Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

FROM THE EDITOR

100%

Krajka J.

|

tom 8

|

nr 1

EN

editorial

2

EDITORIAL – TECHNOLOGY-MEDIATED TASK-BASED ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING

100%

Plastina A. F.

|

tom 15

|

nr 2

1-3

XX

editorial

3

Editorial

100%

Pawlak M.

|

nr 4

459-461

EN

The present issue of Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching marks exactly three years of existence of the journal. On the one hand, this has not been a very easy time, mainly because of the fact that, as is the case with any startup publication, it has been extremely difficult to obtain papers that would satisfy the stringent criteria of high-quality academic research, with the effect that the rejection rate has been extremely high, and finding the right reviewers has also often constituted a major challenge. On the other hand, the three years have also witnessed the rise of SSLLT in the field, as we have been privileged to publish papers by prominent scholars in the area of second language acquisition, well-known researchers have consented to act in the capacity of editors of special issues of the journal, and eminent figures have also agreed to review many of the submissions we have received. Equally importantly, there has been increasing interest in the papers we publish, which is evidenced in the growing numbers of downloads and citations, a clear advantage of having both a printed and an online version, the latter of which is accessible to everyone free of charge. I would like to take this opportunity to thank all those who have been involved in the production of the journal over these three years and have spent countless hours to make sure that the final product is each time up to standard. In particular, my sincere thanks go to assistants to the editor Anna Mystkowska-Wiertelak, Jakub Bielak, Mariusz Kruk and Krzysztof Kwiatkowski, our typesetter Piotr Bajak, as well as the authors and anonymous reviewers. Had it not been for their attention to detail, dedication, hard work and support, SSLLT would surely not have gained the position in the field it enjoys today.

4

Editorial

100%

MacIntyre P. D. , Gregerson T.

|

tom 4

|

nr 2

149-152

5

Editorial

100%

Pawlak M.

|

tom 4

|

nr 1

11-12

EN

.

6

Editorial

100%

Singleton D.

|

tom 4

|

nr 3

407-408

EN

.

7

Editorial

100%

Pawlak M.

|

nr 1

11-12

EN

With the present issue, Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching enters the fifth year of its existence, a year that has already started on a very positive note as the journal has just been included in the European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH PLUS). This, as well as the fact that SSLLT has been indexed or abstracted in other prestigious databases, constitutes tangible proof of the growing recognition that it has been gaining in the field. It is also likely to contribute to a considerable increase in the number of citations, something that we need really badly if we want to have the journal listed by the Thomson Reuters Master Journal List. This is certainly a goal that we will be vigorously pursuing and I am confident that we will be able to accomplish it in the near future. Obviously, the number of citations depends in the main on the quality of the papers published because only the best ones stand the chance of being referred to by other specialists, particularly those who routinely publish their work in the most prestigious journals in the field. We are doing our best to ensure the highest possible quality of the papers that appear in SSLLT and one way to do it is to invite renowned scholars as guest editors of thematic issues. This is exactly what is going to happen this year since Sarah Mercer and Stephen Ryan have kindly agreed to put together two issues of the journal which will include papers based on presentations delivered during the first conference on psychology and language learning, which was held in Graz in May, 2014. The line-up of contributors to these two issues is really impressive and they will surely be a real treat for our readers. This is by no means to suggest that the papers included in the regular editions are any less valuable or engaging, as amply demonstrated by the present one.

8

Editorial

100%

Mercer S. , Ryan S.

|

nr 2

199-203

EN

The various papers that make up this special issue of Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching have emerged from the first Psychology in Language Learning (PLL) conference, which took place in May 2014 at the University of Graz, Austria. We would like to open this special issue-the first of a series of two-by discussing that conference’s background, its focus, and its possible future in the hope that such a discussion will clarify our current aims and scope in this special issue. The original impetus for organising the conference came from a book that we, the editors of this special issue, were privileged to edit (Mercer, Ryan, & Williams, 2012). The rationale behind that book was to bring together different areas of language learning psychology within a single volume. The experience of working on the book in conjunction with so many distinguished scholars from around the world convinced us of the potential of an approach that emphasises the commonality between various strands of research that had previously been developing in isolation from each other. Many subareas of our field, such as motivation, autonomy, self, identity, strategy use, and beliefs, have existed as separate communities, with little exploration of the interplay and connections between these closely related areas. Our aim in organising the 2014 conference was to build on the momentum of the book by creating a shared space that would facilitate exchange, and providing opportunities to explore and expand upon how these different areas are interlinked. A secondary aim was to reinterpret the word psychology within the context of foreign language education. For so long, psychology has been closely associated with cognitive processes in second language acquisition and with psycholinguistics, but in our book, the conference, and in this special issue, we are seeking to specifically foreground social and educational psychology themes. Language learning is primarily a social and educational activity and we feel that these dimensions also need to be reflected in how we frame discussions of the psychology of learning a second or foreign language.

9

Editorial

100%

Mercer S. , Ryan S.

|

nr 3

367-369

EN

Editorial

10

Editorial (special issue section on contemporary approach to production processes management)

63%

Matuszek J. , Masłowski A.

|

tom Vol. 3, No. 3

43-45

11

Editorial

63%

Cynarski W. J.

|

nr 4

1-2

EN

The 75th anniversary of the start of the 2nd world World War in 1939 is being commemorated this year. We recall the fact that Poland was invaded by Nazi Germany on 1 September 1939 and by her ally, the Soviet Union ( the USSR) on 17 September. It is also the anniversary of Poland being betrayed by its contemporary allies i.e. France and Great Britain (in 1939 and after the war). Then, and even now very few people cared about the meaning of such concepts as honour, betrayal and shame. In Poland, then, an unequal struggle was launched against these two totalitarian aggressors...

PL

W bieżącym roku mamy oto 75 rocznicę wybuchu II wojny światowej. Przypomnijmy, że pierwszego września napadły na Polskę hitlerowskie Niemcy, a 17 września – ich sojusznik – sowiecka Rosja (ZSRR). Jest to jednocześnie rocznica zdrady Polski przez jej ówczesnych sojuszników, tzn. Francję i Wielką Brytanię (w 1939 i po zakończeniu wojny). I wówczas, i tym bardziej dziś niewielu ludzi przejmuje się znaczeniem takich pojęć, jak honor, zdrada i hańba. W Polsce jednak podjęto wówczas nierówną walkę z obydwoma totalitarnymi agresorami.

12

Uvodnik (4.2)

63%

Narančić Kovač S.

|

nr 4.2

203-209

HR

Uvodnik za novi broj časopisa Libri et Liberi (4.2).

EN

This is the editorial for the new issue of Libri et Liberi (4.2).

13

Uvodnik 2 (1)

63%

Narančić Kovač S.

|

nr No. 1

5-6

HR

Uvodnik u novi broj časopisa Libri et Liberi.

EN

Editorial to the new issue of Libri et Liberi.

14

FROM THE EDITOR

63%

Krajka J.

|

nr 2

1-2

EN

editorial

15

FROM THE EDITOR

63%

Krajka J.

|

nr 3

1-2

EN

editorial

16

Er(r)go...

54%

Kalaga W. w.

|

2019

|

nr 38

EN

Er(r)go..., time for a leftist salad. Above all, an animal matter, a serious matter: animalcide, animal harm and our moral cowardice, institutionalized butchering, vertical farming, intensive farming, live non-life of animals, a bird hecatomb, chickens burned at stake in Asia, festivals of dog meat in China, de-animalization of animals and ontological degradation of animal beings, animal lumpenproletariat. In the background, a historical march of everyday people for animal protein, and animals marching to slaughter, all in even step. Still, meat absorbs all suffering. Animals ask questions of us: What do we eat when we eat – Körper or Leib? And are nonhuman animals “non-personal subjects of law” or “movable goods”? Somebody hesitates: scrambled tofu instead of scrambled eggs? And different attempts at an answer: vegetarianism, semi-vegeterianism, flexitarianism, abolitionism, reductionism, ingredientism, reductarianism, pro-topian model of moral progress, vistopia, carnism and neo-carnism, veganism, cheating vegetarianism, lazy veganism, identity veganism, revisionary political veganism, boycott veganism, ethical veganism, Ko sisters’ black veganism, naïve veganism and, finally, how else: post-veganism. All of this in the heat of battle: against species chauvinism, speciesim, food slavery, sexism, racism, homophobia and classism. Somebody states: a philosophy which feels the world is needed, not hermetic mumbo-jumbo. And that is the new question: to beat or not to beat? Between texts and within them, various things happen. Aesthetes aestheticize life, white middle class appropriates ethical space, ethnocentric epistemologies of ignorance become apparentin vegan practices, vege-forums multiply, vegans demonstrate moral superiority over non-vegans, the Real becomes that which always returns to the same place, “but” gains a voice, the subject struggles with literalness, a poem battles against the infection of task-oriented thought, women who live without a partner eat less meat, somatic imagination turns to that which is hot and dry, animals, taking pity upon man’s ineptitude, sacrifice their flesh for food, the rich folks’ cows eat the bread of the poor, the number of people eating meat increases but chimpanzees prefer fruit with worms, and post-racial approach dominatesin vegan rhetoric. Meanwhile, Lacan forbids that which is impossible anyway, Freud divides the fellow neighbor into two parts, Henry Ford is inspired by the functioning of a slaughterhouse, Deleuze suggests the idea of universal meat, Marvin Harris battles for protein, the Central Market, a parody of a village marketplace, makes a mythological promise, one poet observes the world galled by linguistic clichés and pierces through the prosaic nature of plastic which does not give way to syntax. Coetzee in Texas rides a bike without his sandals, does not practice socialism or free love, does not take cold showers, does not eat meat, not even ribs or chicken. But he asks: four paws of one bear: what of the rest of the animal? And: what does an ox think of being taxonomized, without being consulted, as species of order lower than a bear. And how can the Meat Hall follow the spirit of times? Art does not stay behind. Vienna Actionists return again to eat excrements, to copulate with animals, to slaughter, to gut and to rip apart. Huan, dressed in a meat suit, strolls through the city streets, in paintings women and men wriggle on the floor amidst pieces of meat and bite raw pieces of chicken, Jana Sterbak sews a dress out of steaks, Jannis Kounellis hangs pieces of beef on hooks along the wall. Heide Hatry says “Heide, you pig!,” and Lucien Freud simply is meat. Meat is the fabric of art! – and the homeless have nothing to eat. Fortunately, a new form of life emerges from the poems of Bartczyk – szczeźnik [perisher] – already not a human and not an animal. We are accompanied in all this by various beings and nonbeings: an inferior being, cursed being, though not a cursed soldier, colonialism of beings, sacrifice-less meat, puremeat, meatless meat, 101.4 kg of meat per capita, capitalism with an animal face, secret vegan wars, grandma’s attitude towards meat, meaty connotations of masculinity, omnivore (omni?), 100 famous black vegans, cotton – an unethical vegan produce, “philosophical fragments on cats,” carnivorous character of subjectivity, an ethnoclass man, epistemological and ontological disobedience, ovo-lacto-fleshy excess, women – agents of change, technologically printed meat, our potential non non-humanity, inner life of animals, active ignorance, realistic utopias, celebritization of veganism, methodological tangles. Maybe these are all dubious beings-nonbeings; one fact, however, remains incontestable: the carnivorous fact. The carnivorous fact! The carnivorous fact! The carnivorous fact! Wojciech Kalagahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4874-9734 P.S.: We wish to inform our Readers and Authors that – beginning with issue No. 40 (1/2020) – Er(r)go will become bilingual: we will be publishing articles in both Polish and English. The cover of this issue heralds these forthcoming changes.

PL

Er(r)go..., czas na lewacką sałatę. Przede wszystkim sprawa zwierzęca, sprawa poważna: zwierzobójstwo, krzywda zwierząt i nasze moralne tchórzostwo, zinstytucjonalizowane zarzynanie, chów wertykalny, hodowla intensywna, żywe nie-życie zwierząt, hekatomba ptaków, w Azji kury palone na stosie, festiwale psiego mięsa w Chinach, deanimalizacja zwierząt i ontologiczna degradacja bytów zwierzęcych, zwierzęcy lumpenproletariat. W tle historyczny marsz zwykłych ludzi po zwierzęce białko i zwierzęta idące na rzeź, wszyscy równym krokiem. A przecież mięso zachowuje całe cierpienie. Zwierzęta zadają nam pytania: Co jemy, gdy je jemy – Körper czy Leib? A zwierzęta pozaludzkie to „nieosobowe podmioty prawne” czy „rzeczy ruchome”? Ktoś się waha: może tofucznica zamiast jajecznicy? I różne próby odpowiedzi: wegetarianizm, semiwegetarianizm, fleksitarianizm, abolicjonizm, redukcjonizm, ingredientyzm, reduktarianizm, protopijny model postępu moralnego, wystopia, karnizm i neokarnizm, weganizm, cheating vegetarianism, lazy veganism, weganizm tożsamościowy, rewizyjny weganizm polityczny, weganizm bojkotowy, weganizm etyczny, czarny weganizm sióstr Ko, weganizm naiwny i w końcu, a jakże by inaczej, post-weganizm. Wszystko to w ogniu walki: z szowinizmem gatunkowym, z gatunkizmem, z niewolnictwem żywnościowym, z seksizmem, rasizmem, homofobią i klasizmem. Ktoś stwierdza: potrzebna filozofia czująca świat zamiast hermetycznej gadaniny. I oto nowe jest pytanie: bić albo nie bić? Między tekstami i w nich dzieją się przeróżne rzeczy. Pięknoduchy estetyzują życie, biała klasa średnia zawłaszcza przestrzeń etycznego, w praktykach wegańskich uwidaczniają się etnocentryczne epistemologie ignorancji, mnożą się wege fora, weganie demonstrują moralną wyższość wobec nie-wegan, Realne staje się tym, co zawsze wraca do tego samego miejsca, „ale” dochodzi do głosu, podmiot zmaga się z dosłownością, wiersz walczy z infekcją myślenia zadaniowego, kobiety mieszkające bez partnera jedzą mniej mięsa, wyobraźnia somatyczna zwraca się ku temu, co gorące i suche, zwierzęta, litując się nad nieporadnością człowieka, oddają mu swoje ciało na pokarm, krowy bogatych zjadają chleb biednych, liczba osób niejedzących mięsa wzrasta, ale szympansy wolą owoce z robakiem, zaś w retoryce wegańskiej dominuje podejście postrasowe. Tymczasem Lacan zakazuje czegoś, co i tak jest niemożliwe, Freud dzieli bliźniego na dwie części, Henry Ford inspiruje się sposobem funkcjonowania rzeźni, Deleuze proponuje ideę mięsa uniwersalnego, Marvin Harris walczy o białko, Central Market, parodia wiejskiego targowiska, składa mitologiczną obietnicę, a jeden poeta przygląda się światu toczonemu przez klisze językowe i przebija się przez prozaiczność plastiku, ale ten nie daje się składni. Cotzee w Texasie jeździ na rowerze bez sandałów, nie uprawia socjalizmu ani wolnej miłości, nie bierze zimnych pryszniców i nie je mięsa, nawet żeberek i kurczaka. Ale pyta: cztery łapy z jednego niedźwiedzia: a co z resztą zwierza? I jeszcze: co myśli wół zaliczony bez żadnej konsultacji z nim do gatunku niższego niż niedźwiedź? Jak Hala Mięsna ma iść z duchem czasu? Sztuka nie pozostaje w tyle. Akcjoniści Wiedeńscy powracają znów, by zjadać ekskrementy, kopulować ze zwierzętami, zarzynać, patroszyć i rozszarpywać. Huan ubrany w mięsny kombinezon przechadza się ulicami miasta, na obrazach kobiety i mężczyźni wiją się na podłodze wśród kawałków mięsa i gryzą surowe kawałki kurczaka, Jana Sterbak szyje sukienkę ze steków, Jannis Kounellis rozwiesza wzdłuż ścian na hakach kawały wołowiny, papież pojawia się na tle przepołowionego wołu, Heide Hatry powiada „Heide, ty świnio!”, a Lucien Freud po prostu jest mięsem. Mięso materiałem sztuki! – a bezdomni nie mają co jeść. Na szczęście w wierszach Bartczaka wyłania się nowa forma życia – szczeźnik – już nie człowiek ani nie zwierzę. Różne inne byty i nie-byty nam w tym wszystkim towarzyszą: byt pośledni, byt wyklęty, choć nie żołnierz, kolonialność bytów, mięso bezofiarne, mięso czyste, mięso bezmięsne, 101,4 kg mięsa na osobę, kapitalizm ze zwierzęcą twarzą, tajne wojny wegańskie, stosunek babci do jedzenia, mięsne konotacje męskości, wszystkożerca (wszystko?), 100 słynnych czarnych wegan, bawełna – nieetyczny produkt wegański, „okruchy filozoficzne o kotach”, mięsożerność podmiotowości, człowiek etnoklasowy, nieposłuszeństwo epistemologiczne i ontologiczne, owo-lakto-mięsny nadmiar, kobiety – agentki zmiany, technicznie drukowanie mięsa, nasza potencjalna nie nieludzkość, wewnętrzne życie zwierząt, aktywna ignorancja, realistyczne utopie, celebrytyzacja weganizmu, sploty metodologiczne. Może to byty nie-byty wątpliwe, ale jeden fakt nadal pozostaje bezsporny: fakt mięsożerny. Fakt mięsożerny! Fakt mięsożerny! Fakt mięsożerny! Wojciech Kalagahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4874-9734 P.S. Pragniemy poinformować naszych Czytelników i Autorów, iż począwszy od numeru 40 (1/2020) „Er(r)go” stanie się pismem dwujęzycznym: będziemy publikować materiały w języku polskim i angielskim. Zwiastunem tych nadchodzących zmian jest okładka tego numeru.

17

Wstęp

51%

Ćwiek-Rogalska K. , Daszuta A. , Mętrak M.

|

nr 12

EN

IntroductionIntroduction to the 12th issue of “Adeptus” written by the Editorial Team. WstępWstęp do 12 numeru „Adeptusa” napisany przez zespół redakcyjny.

18

Wstęp

51%

Šatava L. , Mętrak M. J.

|

nr 14

EN

IntroductionIntroduction to the 14th issue of “Adeptus” written by members of the Editorial Team/Editorial Board. WstępWstęp do 14 numeru „Adeptusa” przygotowany przez członków Redakcji i Rady Naukowej.

19

Central European Journal of Communication - 10 years on

51%

Dobek-Ostrowska B. , Głowacki M. , Trzcińska J. , Norström R. , Barczyszyn-Madziarz P.

|

nr 2(21)

122-128

20

Od redakcji / Editorial

51%

Schab S. , Skrzypek D. , Zborowski P.

|

tom 12

5-6