Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Zabawa narracyjna jako strategia sprzyjająca autentycznemu uczeniu się dzieci

100%

Szymczak J.

Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji

|

2020

|

tom 48

|

nr 1

40-50

EN

A narrative play is a strategy which was used while creating educational situations for children aged 6 to 9, in the Narrative Environments for Play and Learning research project. The process of build-ing the strategy and implementing it in practice was monitored in order to answer the question of the strategy’s meaning for creating a teaching environment. The observation of children and teachers, the interviews with teachers and the analysis of the collected empirical material in the form of audio and video recordings lead to a conclusion that a narrative play supports developing self-regulation in students (see: Arends 1994: 488–499; Filipiak 2012: 70–79). Some specific properties and the role of a teacher who is a facilitator genuinely engaged in its construction are characteristic qualities of a narrative play. It supports developing reflectiveness and reflection regarding such aspects as: educational problems, motives of one’s behavior, one’s own beliefs.

2

Model rozwijania refl eksyjności u (przyszłych) nauczycieli edukacji wczesnoszkolnej – założenia, istota, motywy konstruowania i nadawania mu wymiaru praktycznego

100%

Szymczak J.

Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji

|

2015

|

tom 28

|

nr 1

140-153

EN

The aim of the article is to present an original model of developing refl exivity in reference to educational events. The Department of Didactics and Studies in the Culture of Education lends the model a practical dimension in working with early school education teachers-to-be during the Refl exive Teacher Workshops course. The inspiration for creating (and sustaining) the model is a carried out under the direction of prof. Ewa Filipiak, Ph.D and is a research project concerning refl ection in reference to educational events taken up by early school education teachers. The article indicates three concepts: (1) critical events in teaching by D. Tripp, (2) the refl exive practitioner by D.A. Schön and (3) mindfulness and mindlessness by E.J. Langer, all of which constitute a theoretical background for the model. The paper also presents an adopted understanding of refl exivity and refl ection. Moreover, the paper considers the motives for using the model while working with teachers-to-be. Therefore, it discusses the value of being and becoming a refl exive teacher, as well as characteristic features of a refl exive practitioner and their signifi cance for working with students.

3

Co się dzieje w umysłach nauczycieli, kiedy myślą o pracy z uczniami?

100%

Szymczak J.

|

tom 20

|

nr 3(79)

117-130

EN

The article is an attempt to present the reflection models concerning working with students, which were constructed based on the analysis of the data gathered in a research project. I focused on providing the answer to the question of how doing reflection on working with students is documented in the narration of the research participants, i.e. early education teachers. I also tried to reconstruct a specific reflection way, which was created and followed by the interviewees. I tried to consider such aspects as: what triggers reflection?; how does reflection proceed?; what does it lead to?; when does doing reflection end? Moreover, I presented a strategy which was documented in the empirical data, and which the research participants used in order to stimulate their own thinking process, and named it talking for thinking. I emphasised the methodological solutions which were used in the research, i.e. an episodic interview and the grounded theory from the perspective of K. Charmaz. I took account of the following theories which allowed me to build a theoretical framework for thinking about reflection and methodological proceeding: constructivism from the perspective of H. Berner, N. Goodman and K. J. Gergen; the constructivist model of cognition and the non-classical sociology of knowledge from the perspective of A. Zybertowicz, A. Gidden’s structuration theory, H. Blumer and E. Goffman’s symbolic interactionism, phenomenology from the perspective of E. Husserl, P. L. Berger and T. Luckmann, and A. Schütz, J. Burner’s sociocultural approach, J. Dewey’s concept of reflective thinking, J. Kozielecki’s concept of human cognition and E. J. Langer’s notions of mindfulness and mindlessness. In the paper, I made an attempt to create a cultural space for considerations about early education teachers’ reflection concerning working with students.

PL

W niniejszym artykule przedstawiłam modele refleksji dotyczącej pracy z uczniami, które stworzyłam na podstawie danych uzyskanych w ramach zrealizowanego projektu badawczego. Skoncentrowałam się na udzieleniu odpowiedzi na pytanie, jak przejawia się namysł w odniesieniu do pracy z uczniami w narracjach nauczycieli wczesnej edukacji. Zrekonstruowałam swoistą drogę zastanawiania się, którą kreowali rozmówcy. Starałam się uwzględnić takie aspekty, jak: czym inicjowany jest namysł?; w jaki sposób on przebiega?; do czego prowadzi?; w którym momencie refleksja się kończy? Przedstawiłam także ujawniającą się w materiale empirycznym strategię, za pośrednictwem której uczestnicy projektu stymulowali własny proces myślenia, nazwaną „mówieniem dla myślenia”. Zaakcentowałam zastosowane rozwiązania metodologiczne, tj. wywiad epizodyczny i metodologię teorii ugruntowanej w danych w ujęciu K. Charmaz. Uwzględniłam także wybrane stanowiska przedstawicieli fenomenologii i konstruktywistycznego nurtu w naukach społecznych. Zależało mi, aby tekst stworzył przestrzeń kulturową dla rozważań o namyśle nauczycieli wczesnej edukacji dotyczącym pracy z uczniami.

4

AnAlySE jako narzędzie stymulujące rozwój refleksyjności i refleksji nauczyciela dotyczącej codzienności szkolnej

100%

Szymczak J.

|

nr 3

103-112

EN

Educational situation analysis sheet (AnAlySE) was used as a tool while working with university students of early education. The work with AnAlySe was monitored in order to answer the question of its meaning in developing the ability to reflect on the everyday educational reality. The observation of students’ proceedings, the interviews with them and the analysis of their work lead to the conclusion that the sheet constitutes a specific space for obtaining knowledge and developing certain skills in teacher’s both individual and group work. It fosters developing the ability to learn “with” others and “from” others “in” and “from” the everyday educational reality.