Yukker : Focus on an Innovative Social Start-Up

• Autorzy: Patrizia Accordino , Raffella Coppolino , Carlo Giannetto , Elvira Tiziana La Rocca
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background: Innovation is a central topic in social entrepreneurial inquiries and is recognised as playing an important role in successful social experiences. However, the relationship between networks and social venture formation is still an open question.
Research objectives: The study aims to analyse the business model of innovative digital start-ups with social goals and to identify and understand the elements influencing their birth, growth, and business performance.
Research design and methods: The paper uses a single case study research design focused on the innovative social start-up "Muoviti in libertà" and its app - Yukker.
Results: Analysing the Yukker business model has allowed to identify and understand crucial elements influencing innovative social start-ups' birth, growth, and business performance.
Conclusions: It is essential to design a network to increase relationships for entrepreneurship and for performing better in strategic and leading change. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Przedsiębiorczość społeczna; Przedsiębiorstwa społeczne; Przedsiębiorstwo typu start-up; Technologie cyfrowe; Innowacyjność przedsiębiorstw; Studium przypadku

EN

Social entrepreneurship; Social enterprises; Startup; Digital technologies; Enterprise innovation; Case study

• Czasopismo: Social Entrepreneurship Review (SER)
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: 1
• Strony: 33-43

Twórcy

autor

Patrizia Accordino

• University of Messina, Italy

autor

Raffella Coppolino

• University of Messina, Italy

autor

Carlo Giannetto

• University of Messina, Italy

autor

Elvira Tiziana La Rocca

• University of Messina, Italy

Bibliografia

• Accordino, P., (2020). Fiscal policy for sustainable development: the Italian way to promote innovative entrepreneurship according to European Union rules. In Mauerhofer, V., Rupo, D., & Tarquinio, L., (Eds.) Sustainability and law - general and specific aspects. (pp. 201-219) Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
• Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value Creation in e-Business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 493-520.
• Austin, J., Stevenson H., & Wei-Skillern J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1-22.
• Boria, P., (2014), European tax law: institutions and principles. Milano, Giuffrè. 177-192.
• Bradley, J., Loucks, J., Macaulay, J., Noronha, A., & Wade M. (2015). Digital Vortex How Digital Disruption Is Redefining Industries. Global Center for Digital Business Transformation. https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/solutions/collateral/industry-solutions/digital-vortex-report.pdf
• Bruni A., Gherardi, S., & Poggio, B. (2004). Entrepreneur-mentality, gender, and the study of women entrepreneurs. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(3), 256-268.
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.
• De Maria, G. (2014). Social entrepreneurship: concept development, networks and open organizational form. A Case study, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, http://hdl.handle.net/10579/5589.
• Dees, J. G. (2001). The meaning of social entrepreneurship (Original draft: 1998, revised 2001) Retrieved June 21, 2010, from http://www.caseatduke.org/
• Galera, G. & Borzaga, C. (2009). Social Enterprise: an International Overview of its conceptual evolution and legal implementation. Social Enterprise Journal, 5(3), 210- 228.
• Gallo, M., Vannoni, V. (2021). Social Impact Assessment: A Focus on Italian Innovative Startups with a Social Goal. In: La Torre, M., Chiappini, H. (eds) Contemporary Issues in Sustainable Finance. Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65133-6_11
• Gault, F. (2018) Defining and measuring innovation in all sectors of the economy. Research Policy, 47, 617-622
• Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. (2010). Mixing interview and questionnaire methods: Practical problems in aligning data. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 15(1), 1.
• Hemingway, CA. (2005). Personal values as a catalyst for corporate social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(3), 233-249.
• Juma, N., & McGee, J. (2006). The relationship between intellectual capital and new venture performance: an empirical investigation of the moderating role of the environment. International Journal of Innovation & Technology Management, 3(4), 379-405.
• Kania, R., Lestari, Y. D., & Dhewanto, W. (2017). Social innovation business model: Case study of start-up enterprise. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 6, 68.
• Kelliher F (2005) Interpretivism and the Pursuit of Research Legitimisation: An Integrated Approach to Single Case Design. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methodology, 3(2), 123-132.
• Kerlin, J. (2006). Social enterprise in the United States and Europe: understanding and learning from the differences. Voluntas, 17(3), 246-62.
• Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61-72.
• Landström, H., Harirchi, G., and Åström, F. (2012). Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41(7), 1154-1181.
• Lundstr, A., & Halvarsson, S. (2006). Entrepreneurship Research: Past Perspectives and Future Prospects. Social Sciences, 2(3), 145-259.
• Mair, J., & Martí, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44.
• Mason C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Growth Oriented Entrepreneurship. OECD, 1-38. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/Entrepreneurial-ecosystems.pdf.
• Mort, G. S., Weerawardena, J., & Carnegie, K. (2003). Social entrepreneurship: Towards conceptualisation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 8(1), 76-88.
• Phills Jr., J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.48558/GBJY-GJ47.
• Poropat, A. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic Performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322-328 .
• Purdue, D. (2001). Neighbourhood governance: leadership, trust, and social capital. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2211- 2224.
• Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2007). Profitable Business Models and Market Creation in the Context of Deep Poverty: A Strategic View. Academy of Management Perspective, 48(3), 49 - 63.
• Sharir, M., & Lerner, M. (2006). Gauging the success of social ventures initiated by individual social entrepreneurs. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 6-20.
• Short J. C., Moss, T. W., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2009). Research in social entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(2), 161-194.
• Smith, Besharov, Wessels, & Chertok (2012). Managing Social - Business Tensions: A Review and research agenda for Social Enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3), 407-442.
• Steyaert, C. (2007). 'Entrepreneuring' as a conceptual attractor? A review of process theories in 20 years of entrepreneurship studies. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19(6), 453-477.
• Tracey, P. & Jarvis, O. (2007). Toward a theory of social venture franchising. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(5), 667-685.
• Waddock, SA, Post, JE. 1991. Social entrepreneurs and catalytic change. Public Administration Review, 51(5), 393 - 401.
• Wong, PK, Ho YP, & Autio E (2005). Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics. 24(3): 335-350.
• Zahra, S., & Wright, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship's next act. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(4): 67-8.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15678/SER.2022.1.03