Railway noise reduction by the application of CHFC material on the rail

• Autorzy: Altenbaher B. , Goltnik D. , Rosi B.

Warianty tytułu

DE

Reduktion des Eisebahnlärms durch die Anwendung von CHFC Material

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Traffic is the most widespread source of environmental noise. Railway noise has become increasingly common in urban areas in the past few decades. Therefore environmental requirements for railway operations regarding noise are becoming very strict and will become even tighter in future. In the present paper we present actual track-based field test performed on Slovenian Railways. The significant noise reduction (up to 30dBA) was achieved by the application of CHFC material on the rail using CL-E1 top anti noise system.

DE

Der Verkehr ist die am weitesten verbreitete Quelle von Umgebungslärm. Eisenbahnlärm nahm in den letzten Jahrzehnten in städtischen Gebieten immer mehr zu. Aus diesem Grund wurden die Umweltanforderungen für den Bahnverkehr bezüglich des Lärms immer strenger und werden in der Zukunft noch höher. In der vorliegenden Arbeit stellen wir den tatsächlichen Track-basierten Feldversuch auf der Slowenischen Bahn dar. Die deutliche Lärmreduzierung (bis 30 dBA)wurde durch die Anwendung von CHFC-Material auf der Schiene mithilfe des Cl-E1 Antirauschsystems erreicht.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

noise reduction; rail; anti noise system; measurements; railway noise; CHFC material

PL

redukcja szumów; szyna; tłumienie hałasu; pomiary; hałas kolejowy; materiał CHFC

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Transport Problems
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: T. 10, z. 2
• Strony: 5--14
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 20 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Altenbaher B.

• ELPA doo., Paka 39/d, SI-3320 Velenje, Slovenia

autor

Goltnik D.

• ELPA doo., Paka 39/d, SI-3320 Velenje, Slovenia

autor

Rosi B.

• University of Maribor, Faculy of logistics Mariborska c. 7, SI-3000 Celje, Slovenia

Bibliografia

• 1. Abbasi, S. & Olofsson, U. & Zhu, Y. & Sellgren, U. Pin-on-disc study of the effects of railway friction modifiers on airborne wear particles from wheel-rail contacts. Tribology International. 2013. Vol. 60. P. 136-139.
• 2. Chan, T. & Lam, K. The effects of information bias and riding frequency on noise annoyance to a new railway extension in Hong Kong. Transportation Research Part D. 2008. Vol. 13. P. 334-339.
• 3. Clayton, P. & Danks, D. Laboratory evaluation of wheel/rail lubricants. Proceedings of Symposium on Rail and Wheel Lubrication. 1993.
• 4. Clayton, P. & Danks, D. & Steel, R. Laboratory assessment of lubricants for wheel/rail applications. Lubrication Engineering. 1989. Vol. 45. P. 501-506.
• 5. Crocket, A. & Pyke, J. Viaduct design for minimization of direct and structure-radiated train noise. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2000. Vol. 231. P. 883-897.
• 6. Dragan, D. & Lipičnik, M. & Kramberger, T. Monte Carlo simulation-based approach to optimal bus stops allocation in the municipality of Laško. Promet - Traffic – Transportation. 2011. Vol. 23(4). P. 265-278.
• 7. European Commission. Commission decision concerning the technical specifications of interoperability relating to the subsystem ‘rolling stock – noise’ of the Trans-European conventional rail system. Official Journal of the European Communities. 4 April 2011.
• 8. European Parliament. Directive 2001/16/ec. Official Journal of the European Communities. 19 March 2001.
• 9. Fang, C. & Ling, D. Investigation of the noise reduction provided by tree belts. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2003. Vol. 63. P. 187-195.
• 10. Gerg, N. & Sharma, O. Noise emissions of transit trains at curvature due to track lubrication. Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics. 2010. Vol. 48. P. 881-885.
• 11. Kalivoda, M. & Danneskiold-Samsoe, U. & Krüger, F. & Barsikow, B. Eurailnoise: a study of European priorities and strategies for railwaynoise abatement. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2003. Vol. 267. P. 387-396.
• 12. Koller, G. & Kalivoda, M. & Jaksch, M. & Muncke, M. & Oguchi, T. & Matsuda, Y. Noise and Vibration Mitigation for Railway Transportation Systems. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design. Springer. 2012. Vol. 118. P. 159-166.
• 13. Kramberger, T. & Dragan, D. & Prah, K. A heuristic approach to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport. 2013. DOI: 10.1680/tran.11.00053.
• 14. Lewis, R. & Olofsson, U. Wheel–Rail Interface Handbook. Wood head Publishing Limited: UK. 2009.
• 15. Oertli, J. The stairrs project, work package 1: a cost-effectiveness analysis of railway noise reduction on a European scale. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2003. Vol. 267. P. 431-437.
• 16. Passchier-Wermeer, W. & Passchier, W. Noise exposure and public health. Environ Health Perspect. 2000. Vol. 108. P. 123-131.
• 17. Reiff, R. Rail/wheel lubrication studies at fast. Lubrication engineering. 1986. Vol. 42(6). P. 340-349.
• 18. Sato, M. & Sugino, K. & Tanikawa, K. & Lida, H. The nature of lubricants and their influence on the wear and fatigue behavior of rail. Proceedings of Symposium on Rail and Wheel Lubrication. 1993.
• 19. Schulte-Werning, B. & Beier, M. & Grütz, H.-P. Jäger, K.J. & Kock, G. & Onnich, J. & Strube, R. Headed for the low-noise railway: The db noise reduction research programme. Tech. rep, Deutsche Bahn AG, Forschungs- und Technologiezentrum. 2002.
• 20. Wang, W. & Zhang, H. & Wang, H. & Liu, Q. & Zhu, M. Study on the adhesion behavior of wheel/rail under oil, water and sanding conditions. Wear. 2011. Vol. 271. P. 2693-2698.