Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

Ten serwis zostanie wyłączony 2025-02-11.

Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Ograniczanie wyników

4 Gomułka Ł.

Znaleziono wyników: 4

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

Filozofia w nauce i nauka w filozofii. Kilka uwag w świetle myśli Stanisława Lema

100%

Gomułka Ł.

2016

nr 2

Dlaczego trudno zdefiniować pojęcie „logosu”?

100%

Gomułka Ł.

Społeczeństwo i Edukacja. Międzynarodowe Studia Humanistyczne

2017

nr 1(24)

45-52

In the text: Why is it difficult to define the notion of „logos”? I propose and defend the following thesis: the notion of logos weighed in the context of scientific discoveries (in physics and mathematics) is difficult to explicate and thus difficult to understand. I introduce two perspectives of the logos: the objective one connected with the structure of the world itself and the subjective one connected with a language, which allows us to to speak about the world itself (to learn). The analysis of this cogni- tive situation reveals a few interesting observations in epistemology and philosophical anthropology, which I present in the final part of the article.

Goethe a Lem

100%

Gomułka Ł.

nr 4(21)

40-49

In this article ‘Lem and Goethe’, the author compares the figure of Stanislaw Lem to J.W. Goethe, whereas Lem’s oeuvre to ‘Faust’. There are two reasons for such a comparison. First, the scope of subjects raised by the Polish writer is perhaps even wider than the German one’s. The second thing is their great insight into these subjects. When Lem and Goethe are compared, it should be noticed that both their personalities (certain openness to the world and environment, participation in discussions, vast correspondence) and artistic and scientific interests (distinct exceeding limits by both of them) are similar. The author of the article takes notice of the fact that there is a tremendous difference between Lem’s works and ‘Faust’, because Lem’s are structurally and formally scattered. While there is no doubt that ‘Lem is also a philosopher writing great novels, not a novelist that possesses his own philosophy, like many others’ and that such output is ‘cognitively homogenous’, such state of affairs significantly hinders reception and interpretation of his oeuvre. The author of the text observes that by contrast with ‘Faust’, the character of Lem’s works is scattered not only in terms of content but also formally. That is because the author of ‘Summa Technologiae’ continually adopted new means of expression for his thoughts.

Polimorfizm języka naturalnego a twierdzenia Kurta Gödla

100%

Gomułka Ł.

2015

nr 3(12)

25-33

The aim of this paper is to outline Stanisław Lem’s (1921-2006) original views on Kurt Gödl’s theorems. The project consists of five concise paragraphs in which such issues are discussed: the introduction with an explanation of selected terms: a natural language, polymorphism. The author of the article presents a short outline of certain mathematical problems, that is the problems of arithmetics and the history of trying to prove its absolute non-contradiction. The author also includes Gödl’s theorems into the greatest achievements of the scientific thought of 20th century (limitation theorems). After that, epistemological questions of Kurt Gödl’s theorems are introduced together with their original interpretation according to Stanisław Lem. The author of the paper emphasizes that this prominent philosopher and writer introduces cultural-linguistic interpretation of Gödl’s discoveries, thus suggesting that a natural language overcomes ‘Gödl-made abyss’ thanks to its characteristic polymorphism.