Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

ŁÓDZKI OŚRODEK HISTORIOGRAFICZNY. ŚRODOWISKO, BADANIA, DYDAKTYKA*

100%

Kolbuszewska J.

|

nr 3

201-209

EN

The article consists of three parts. It begins with a short characteristics of the lodz historiographic centre; the Author discusses the three generations of researchers who carried out research in the fi eld at the University of Lodz (UŁ). Th e second part is devoted to characterizing the interests and research achievements of the current members of the Department of the History of Historiography and the Auxiliary Sciences of History. Th e doctors promoted in the recent years were also included. Th e fi nal part of the article presents the courses in the history of historiography currently being held at the Institute of History, UŁ.

PL

The article consists of three parts. It begins with a short characteristics of the lodz historiographic centre; the Author discusses the three generations of researchers who carried out research in the fi eld at the University of Lodz (UŁ). Th e second part is devoted to characterizing the interests and research achievements of the current members of the Department of the History of Historiography and the Auxiliary Sciences of History. Th e doctors promoted in the recent years were also included. Th e fi nal part of the article presents the courses in the history of historiography currently being held at the Institute of History, UŁ.

2

Historian as a Social Psychotherapist (Ethical Assumptions of Psychohistorical Writings)

100%

Pawelec T.

Historyka Studia Metodologiczne

|

2012

|

tom 42

3

Entre la traducción y la historia. El enfoque funcionalista en el trabajo del historiador en el ejemplo de la traducción del tratado „Discurso sobre la forma de reducir la disciplina militar a mejor y antiguo estado”

100%

Szadkowski P.

Estudios Hispánicos

|

2016

|

tom 24

125-140

EN

This paper analyses the possibilities of application of some elements of translation studies into historical investigation. When analyzing a historical source, a historian works also as a translator and often, unaware of this, changes the meaning of the original information, that will eventually reshape the results of his final results [?]. History as a science does not use the language separated from the original terms (for example concerning institutions, laws, religions), therefore the risk of mistake in the process of decoding the source is serious, as emphasized by Marc Bloch. The functionalist approach in translation, presented by German scholars Christiane Nord and Hans J. Vermeer and the theory of equivalence by Eugene Nida, prove helpful in the historical analysis of Spanish 16th-century military treatise Discurso sobre la forma de reducir la disciplina militar a mejor y antiguo estado. Using the military charges and early modern military law as examples, we can see how translation studies can improve the fidelity of historical analysis of sources.

4

A FEW REMARKS ON THE METHODOLOGY OF THE HISTORY OF SAFETY RESEARCH

100%

Kazimierski Z.

|

tom 9(1)

301-310

EN

In this article, the author discusses the unanswered subject of the methodology of researching the history of safety. The starting point of his deliberations is the presen-tation of safety issues, the subject of safety history and discussion of the directions and methods of history research indicated in the literature. Next, the author justifies the necessity to start work on the methodology of safety history, then indicates the emer-gence of separate safety subdisciplines such as: safety philosophy, sociology of safety, safety psychology, safety culture. The natural consequence of this development of science, which is safety, should be the introduction of a safety history. An additional argument is the conduct of a subject in this field at Polish universities. In the further part of the article periodical patterns of history are presented. It is intended as a starting point for conducting safety history research. Finally, the author analyses the pos-sibilities of the research.

5

Historiografia dziejów społecznych Polski w XX wieku po 1989 roku: perspektywy i możliwości badawcze, metodologia

100%

Jarosz D.

Rocznik Antropologii Historii

|

2012

|

nr 1(2)

289–297

XX

Repritn: Historiografia dziejów społecznych Polski w XX wieku po 1989 r.: perspektywy i możliwości badawcze, metodologia, [w:] Spojrzenie w przeszłość, t. 2, Wiek XIX, XX, red. zespół, Warszawa 2009, s. 219–227.

6

W poszukiwaniu strategii badawczej antropologii historii

100%

Julkowska V.

Rocznik Antropologii Historii

|

2015

|

nr 8, Antropologia i historia

313–316

XX

Review article of Jacek Kowalewski's book, "Creations of the past, Sketches on the anthropology of history".

7

Why Would the Skalds Not Have Lied about the Rulers’ Expeditions and Battles? Some Remarks on a Relic of Medieval Attitude toward Sources in Modern Medieval Studies

88%

Rutkowski R.

Acta Poloniae Historica

|

2021

|

tom 122

165-179

PL

The article presents a critique of a research method whereby historical sources could not have possibly lied as they were targeted at the addressees who knew the actual course of the events described or referred to. This attitude toward the sources has its antecedence in Snorri Sturluson’s argument on the reliability of skaldic poetry. To his mind, the poems were biased but still valuable, in a way, as they were declaimed before the rulers who would have perceived an untrue account “as a mockery, rather than a praise”. The question arises, what kind of a situation Snorri tried to preclude: one where a mean warrior would have been shown as a great hero? Or, perhaps, one where a defector would have been portrayed as a warrior bravely marching in the first rank? The story of Giffard from the Morkinskinna saga seems to offer the answer. Giffard fled from the battlefield but had a praise poem dedicated to him, which the (real) character aptly deciphered as derision aimed at him.

8

Antropologia historii

88%

Kowalewski J. , Piasek W.

Rocznik Antropologii Historii

|

2011

|

nr 1-2

11–14

XX

The article is an introduction to the Editors' understanding the relationship between cultural anthropology and history, and thus, the anthropology of history. The "Yearbook of Anthropology of History" is to build a permanent space for the development of cooperation between historiography and cultural anthropology and the corresponding methodologies in the field of multifaceted research on the past and the functioning of its images in human cultures. Magazines will be open to representatives of other disciplines of the humanities, especially literary studies, religiology, philosophy or sociology, which undertake research on the past and its representations in the cultural key.

9

Jerzy Topolski’s History of Historiography

88%

Stobiecki R.

Historyka Studia Metodologiczne

|

2021

|

tom 51

|

nr Spec. iss.

153-166

EN

The place of the history of historiography in Topolski’s comprehensive oeuvre has not been subjected to a holistic analysis yet. I will try to highlight some of the key topics rather than propose an exhaustive interpretation of them The article concentrates on the analysis of both the notion of historiography itself, as well as interpretation the main historiographic work of the Poznan historian.

10

“Methodolosies” of Jerzy Topolski

75%

Historyka Studia Metodologiczne

|

2009

|

tom 39

11

Historian as a Social Psychotherapist (Ethical Assumptions of Psychohistorical Writings)

75%

Pawelec T.

Historyka Studia Metodologiczne

|

2004

|

tom 34

12

PODobni – NiePODobni. Muza dalekich podróży Teodora Parnickiego i „Lód” Jacka Dukaja jako przykład dwóch sposobów alternatywizacji historii

71%

Lemann N.

|

2012

|

tom 10

173-188

EN

The paper is focused to comparative analysis of the novels Muza dalekich podróży by Teodor Parnicki (“A Muse of Distant Journeys”) and Lód (“The Ice”) by Jacek Dukaj. The author compares the artistic techniques as well as the historiosophical consciousness and the awareness of the historical process in the aforementioned novels. The two writers belong to different cultural and literary generations and employed different poetics, still, it is possible to compare the historiosophical and methodological aspects of their works and their ways of thinking about Polishness and cultural myths. The two novels may be treated as realizations of the alternate history genre. Muza dalekich podróży called by the author himself a “historical-fantastical novel”, includes a part entitled “It could have been like that” („Mogło być właśnie tak”) describing the rebirth of Poland after a successful November Uprising. In Jacek Dukaj’s science-fiction novel history “froze” in 1908. Poland still remains divided in the years 1924–1930, never freed after the Partitions. For both Parnicki and Dukaj, creating alternative versions of Polish history was the way to criticizing the model of writing “to uplift hearts” introduced by Henryk Sienkiewicz. Their attitude towards the methodology of history is worth deeper analysis. Parnicki, who lost his enthusiasm towards the 19th century type of history á la Ranke, rejected the idea of historical truth preserved in historical sources. Dukaj, on the contrary, created a postmodernist methodology of history out of the paradigms of the 19th century historiosophy, thus undermining the status of the historical knowledge as “science”.

PL

Artykuł ma na celu analizę porównawczą powieści Teodora Parnickiego Muza dalekich podróży i Lodu Jacka Dukaja, w zakresie technik artystycznych oraz świadomości filozofii i przebiegu procesu historycznego. Mimo iż pisarze ci przynależą do zupełnie innych formacji kulturowych, pokoleniowych i literackich i dzieli ich warsztat pisarski, to obie powieści łączy zainteresowanie historiozofią i metodologią historii oraz literacki namysł nad polskością i jej mitami. Powieści te zaliczyć można do gatunku historii alternatywnych. Powieść Parnickiego zwana przez niego samego powieścią „historyczno-fantastyczną”, zawiera cześć pt. Mogło być właśnie tak, w której to autor testuje możliwość odrodzenia się Polski po zwycięskim powstaniu listopadowym. Jacek Dukaj, pisarz science-fiction, tworzy zaś świat, w którym historia uległa zamrożeniu w postaci z roku 1908. Powieść rozgrywa się w latach 1924–1930, a Polska wciąż jeszcze znajduje się pod zaborami i nie odzyskała niepodległości. Obaj twórcy piszą swe historie alternatywne w trybieveta wobec sienkiewiczowskiej idei „pokrzepienia serc”. Szczególnie interesujący jest stosunek obu twórców wobec metodologii historii. Parnicki zniechęcony do historii w pozytywistycznym sensie (á la Ranke), odrzuca możliwość dotarcia do zdeponowanej w źródłach prawdy historycznej. Dukaj zaś, sięgając właśnie po paradygmaty XIX-wiecznej metodologii historii nicuje je tak, by uzyskać z ich materii postmodernistyczną filozofię historii, podważającą status naukowy historii i jej możliwość wnioskowania o historii.

13

Presupozycje surowe i presupozycje instytucjonalne: próba poszerzenia koncepcji presupozycji tekstu prawnego Marka Smolaka

71%

Zajęcki M.

Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny

|

2013

|

tom 75

|

nr 2

265-279

EN

In the paper, the author comments on some ideas recently presented by Marek Smolak. The aim of the paper is to define the notions of ‘brute presupposition’ and ‘institutional presupposition’ of legal texts. In the first section three main issues of the theory of law where the category of presupposition has been applied are indicated. They are as follows: the notion of obligation, the reflecting of reality in directives, and the reading of legal texts at different levels of meaning. In the second section the notion ‘brute presupposition’ is defined and its potential usefulness in jurisprudence is investigated. The analyses show that the usefulness of the semiotic category of presupposition is, for several reasons, quite limited in the theory of law. Nevertheless, the notions of brute and institutional presupposition may be of some heuristic use when one wishes to define the place of the history of law among other historical studies.

PL

W tekście autor nawiązuje do niedawno przedstawionej idei Marka Smolaka i szkicuję możliwe zastosowania pojęciowego rozróżnienia presupozycji surowych i presupozycji instytucjonalnych tekstu prawnego. W pierwszej części wskazuje się na wybrane problemy prawniczych zastosowań semiotycznej kategorii presupozycji. Są to: konceptualizowanie pojęcia obowiązku, odzwierciedlanie rzeczywistości w wypowiedziach dyrektywalnych oraz odczytywanie tekstu prawnego na różnych poziomach znaczeniowych. W części drugiej wprowadza się pojęcie presupozycji surowej i rozważa możliwe zastosowania tego pojęcia dla charakterystyki nauk prawnych. Na gruncie teorii prawa rozróżnienie to ma ograniczoną użyteczność, może natomiast mieć zalety heurystyczne przy definiowaniu miejsca nauk historycznoprawnych pośród nauk historycznych.

14

Rozmowa o historii misji średniowiecznych

71%

Strzelczyk J.

Annales Missiologici Posnanienses

|

2014

|

nr 19

7-35

EN

On September 25-26th 2014 the Institute of History, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, has organized a conference „Christianization of Europe. The Church at the turn of the first and second millenium”. It was the first of planned three conferences which preceed the 1050 anniversary of the baptism received by Polish prince Mieszko I in 966 and the official introduction of Christianity to Poland. Prof. Strzelczyk was one of the main organizers of this conference and the discussion reported below touches the subjects related to his professional career as a historian, focusing on the study of the history of Christian missions in Middle Ages.

15

O źródle historycznym. Próba weryfikacji niektórych koncepcji z perspektywy źródłoznawczej

63%

Skibiński E.

|

2020

|

nr 4 (27)

163-179

EN

The article discusses the bases of the contemporary concept of the theory of sources. I have made an attempt at re-interpreting this basic concept of historical methodology based on the semiotic concept of signs and reality.

16

Lviv Multicultural Historical Environment in the 19th and 20th Centuries - a Research Project

63%

Julkowska V.

Historyka Studia Metodologiczne

|

2006

|

tom 36

17

O „Homo metahistoricus” Jana Pomorskiego

63%

Solarska M.

Res Historica

|

2021

|

nr 51

EN

In this paper I present the book of Jan Pomorski Homometahistoricus. Studium sześciu kultur poznających (Lublin 2019). My main goal concerns the reconstruction of basic ideas and presuppositions of the Author and the relations between the concepts which he proposes. I also indicate the questions that are inspired by the thought analyzed, as well as the importance of the fields of problems which them open.

PL

W niniejszym tekście przedstawiam książkę Jana Pomorskiego Homo metahistoricus. Studium sześciu kultur poznających (Lublin 2019). Głównym zamierzeniem jest rekonstrukcja podstawowych idei i założeń autora oraz relacji pomiędzy proponowanymi przez niego pojęciami. Wskazuję również na pytania, do których postawienia inspiruje analizowane myślenie oraz na wagę pól problemowych, które one otwierają.

18

Montesquieu’s Attempt to Establish History as Science

63%

Wewiór P.

|

nr 6(99)

54-65

EN

The essay deals with Montesquieu’s methodology of history. My crucial assumption is that Montesquieu intends to cultivate history as science. In the 18th century this ambition meant that he wanted to use the analytical method in the field of history. His works include many examples of the successful exploitation of analysis. Since the philosopher does not consider his methods, my aim will be to extract from his works the ideas that stand behind his historical investigations. In other words, I am going to answer how history can be practiced as science (in the Enlightenment sense of this term). First of all, I am going to explain why analysis was – and still is – so efficient in a realm of natural phenomena. My point will be that it indicated to early modern scientist how they should conduct their experiments. On the other hand, experiments give advantage to scientists due to the fact that they are able to construct and control their object. To put it differently: analysis and experiments are efficient because truth and action are convertible. Now, my crucial question is: ‘Are historians capable of gaining advantage over their objects as physicists are?’ Giambattista Vico, for example, agrees. According to him, researchers can comprehend historical events because history is man-made. Some parts of Montesquieu’s works indicate that he shares Vico’s assumptions. Hence, historians are able to scrutinize past factors, and they can perform thought experiments. Such experiments are means for validating and abolishing hypotheses by using counterfactuals.

19

Jedna czy wiele metod porównawczych? Komparatystyka w polskich badaniach mediewistycznych

63%

Rutkowski R.

Historyka Studia Metodologiczne

|

2022

|

tom 52

507-529

EN

The article is an attempt to look at the mediaevalist work of Jacek Banaszkiewicz through the prism of statements of other scholars using the comparative method (including M. Handelsman, M. Małowist, M. Tymowski, K. Modzelewski). The aim is to answer the question of whether there is a set of guidelines that every comparatist should follow. The specific issues discussed here include the role of difference and similarity in comparison, the notions of function, analogy and homology, geographical and chronological limitations of comparative studies, and the role of influence and reception.

20

Wojciech Kętrzyński jako historyk prawa

63%

Białuński G.

|

2018

|

tom 83

|

nr 3

117-141

EN

The article concerns Wojciech Kętrzyński (1838–1918), the long-term director of the Ossoliński National Institute in Lviv. He was above all an outstanding historian, a passionate researcher with great methodological background. For the contemporaries, he was undoubtedly a scientific authority, an expert in the Polish Middle Ages, Prussian lands, genealogy and diplomacy, and a publisher of historical sources. Less known are his other merits in the field of research, such as interest in the history of law. There is no doubt that they remained beyond his main scientific interests; nevertheless one may say that Kętrzyński was also a researcher in the history of law. It should also be noted that he received a good education in this respect during his studies in Königsberg, especially in the field of Roman law and German law. Mostly, his research concerned the history of law in the Prussian lands and the original socio-legal system of Polish lands. It should be emphasized, however, that in these disciplines Kętrzyński usually limited himself to searching for sources of law and the system, their analysis and explanation. He rarely made detailed analytical or wider synthetic conclusions. He kept up to date with the historical and legal literature; he also maintained intense contacts with the entourage of Polish and foreign (German-speaking) scholars dealing with the history of law. Kętrzyński’s findings were scarcely maintained, but they undoubtedly constituted a step forward in the development of historical and legal sciences. The source publications and possibly their translations remain valid, as do numerous extracts from archival sources, which are nowadays partly missing.

DE

Der Artikel behandelt Wojciech Kętrzyński (1838–1918), den langjährigen Direktor des Nationalen Ossoliński-Instituts in Lemberg. Er war vor allem ein bedeutender Historiker, ein Forscher mit Leidenschaft und ausgezeichneter handwerklicher Vorbereitung. Für sein Zeitgenossen war er ein unanfechtbare wissenschaftliche Autorität, ein Kenner des polnischen Mittelalters, der preußischen Gebiete, der Genealogie und Diplomatik sowie ein Herausgeber von historischen Quellen. Weniger bekannt sind seine anderern Verdienste auf dem Feld der Froschung wie zum Beispiel das Interesse für Rechtsgeschichte. Ohne Zweifel nahmen sie gegenüber seinen wissenschaftlichen Hauptinteressen nur eine Nebenrolle ein, dennoch kann man die Aussage wagen, dass Kętrzyński auch ein Erforscher der Rechtsgeschichte war. Es sollte auch gesagt werden, dass er in diesem Bereich bereits während seiner Studien in Königsberg eine solide Ausbildung erhalten hatte, vor allem im römischen und deutschen Recht. Seine Forschungen betrafen hauptsächlich die Geschichte des Rechts in preußischen Landen und die ursprüngliche sozial-rechtliche Ordnung in den polnischen Gebieten. Es ist jedoch zu betonen, dass Kętrzyński sich in diesen Disziplinen normalerweise mit der Suche nach den Quellen des Rechts und der Ordnung, ihrer Besprechung und Übersetzung begnügte. Seltener bemühte er sich um besondere analytische oder um breitere synthetische Schlussfolgerungen. Er verfolgte ständig die historisch-juristische Literatur und unterhielt auch intensive Kontakte mit den Kreisen polnischer und ausländischer (deutschsprachiger) Gelehrter, die sich mit Rechtsgeschichte befassten. Von den Befunden Kętrzyńskis hat sich nicht viel gehalten, doch ohne Zweifel stellten sie einen Schritt nach vorn in der Entwicklung der historisch-juristischen Wissenschaften dar. Aktuell bleiben die Quellenausgaben und eventuell ihre Übersetzungen sowie die zahlreichen Exzerpte aus archivalischen Quellen, die heute zu Teil verloren sind.