Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

The Level of Dogmatism in Schizophrenia. A Comparative Analysis of Utterance Texts with the Use of the Suitbert Ertel Dogmatism Quotient

100%

Obrębska M. , Nowak S.

|

tom 15

|

nr 1

49-62

EN

The paper describes the results of comparative research on the level of dogmatism in the utterance texts of patients diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia (N=130) and healthy individuals (N=130). The analysis was conducted with the use of the Suitbert Ertel Dogmatism Quotient. The results indicate significant differences between these two groups.

2

Mit i mity w filozofii Paula Feyerabenda

75%

Mączka D.

|

tom 39

97-116

EN

This paper explores the usage of the concept of myth in Paul Feyerabend’s philosophy. First three parts of the paper are devoted to analysis of lectures in which Feyerabend, following Karl Popper, contrasts two philosophical attitudes: mythical dogmatism and criticism of pre-socratics. The next two parts cover Popper’s and Feyerabend’s anti-dogmatic remedies – criticism and humanism. It is shown that, although their critiques of the dogmatic form of life bear many similarities, they differ substantially on the axiological level. While Popper considers rational criticism to be the best way of opposing dangerous myths, Feyerabend uses critical rationalism as a tool that may serve this function but is not effective universally. The final part of the paper shows how Feyerabend’s usage of the concept of myth shifted in his late, more pluralistic and pragmatic works, where he regarded every human practice as a form of nature- and value-dependent myth.

3

Metoda sceptycka w filozofii Kanta i Husserla

63%

Łaciak P.

|

2015

|

tom 27

5-23

EN

The article presents Kant’s and Husserl’s philosophy from the point of view of the skeptical method, understood as an attitude of suspending judgment. Both philosophers make a distinction between skepticism and the skeptical method: skepticism comes down to negative dogmatism, while the skeptical method is characterized as a part of the critical procedure because criticism consists in a suspension of judgments (epoché) which we formulate without previous research of their origins and limits. The aim of the article is to indicate analogy between Kant and Husserl with reference to the suspension of judgments. This analogy opens new interpretational possibilities of the phenomenological epoché from the critical perspective.

4

Popperův flirt s dogmatismem

63%

Parusniková Z.

|

nr 2

179-199

EN

At various occasions Popper states that in order for a theory to show its strength “certain amount” of dogmatism must precede the critical testing phase. He even argues that dogmatism is a necessary precondition of criticism. Th ese are alarming statements, undermining Popper’s methodological imperative of falsifi - cation. Critical rationalism is based on a strict opposition to dogmatism for logical reasons (justifi cation is impossible), for evolutionary reasons (justifi cation blocks the growth of knowledge), and for ideological reasons (dogmatism encourages totalitarianism). Popper cannot provide any objective criterion defi ning the proper dosage of dogmatism and thus opens doors to its uncontrolled expansion. Criticism thus ceases to be the non-negotiable normative principle and the inviolable standard of rationality.

CS

Popper opakovaně tvrdí, že aby teorie mohla rozvinout svůj plný potenciál, musí kritické fázi testování předcházet krátká dogmatická fáze. Někdy zachází Popper ještě dál a uznává dokonce nezbytnost dogmatismu pro rozvinutí kritického myšlení. To jsou znepokojivá tvrzení, která podrývají Popperův metodologický princip falsifi kace. Kritický racionalismus je založen na nesmiřitelném postoji k dogmatismu z logických důvodů (justifi kace je logicky neplatná), z evolučních důvodů (dogmatismus nepřispívá k růstu vědění) i z ideologických důvodů (dogmatismus je typický pro totalitární režimy). Popper není schopen defi novat žádné objektivní měřítko, jak by se měl dogmatismus správně dávkovat, a tak otvírá prostor pro jeho nekontrolovatelné šíření. Kritičnost tak přestává být nekompromisním normativním principem a konstitutivním rysem racionality.

5

Maoizm nad Wisłą? Działalność Komunistycznej Partii Polski Kazimierza Mijala

51%

Gasztold P.

|

nr 32

290-318

PL

Komuniści, którzy krytykowali politykę kierownictwa PZPR z pozycji pryncypialnych, w grudniu 1965 r. założyli nielegalną organizację pod nazwą Komunistyczna Partia Polski. Niekwestionowanym liderem tej grupy został Kazimierz Mijal, który w 1966 r. uciekł do Albanii i stamtąd nadzorował działalność KPP. Organizacja ta nielegalnie drukowała i kolportowała tysiące ulotek oraz broszur, w których potępiano „rewizjonistyczną” politykę Gomułki oraz Gierka, za wzór stawiając albańskie oraz chińskie rozwiązania doktrynalne. Infiltracja środowiska polskich maoistów przez aparat bezpieczeństwa PRL w latach siedemdziesiątych doprowadziła do marginalizacji tej struktury. Artykuł na podstawie dokumentów zgromadzonych m.in. w Archiwum IPN i Archiwum Akt Nowych przybliża kulisy powstania KKP, jej naj ważniejszych liderów, program polityczny i tajną współpracę z albańskimi dyplomatami, podsumowuje także działalność Kazimierza Mijala na tle rozdźwięku w obozie komunistycznym w latach sześćdziesiątych, wśród wielu przyczyn porażek polskich „maoistów” wskazuje na dogmatyczny program polityczny, który nie zyskał szerszej akceptacji w społeczeństwie.

EN

The communists who criticized the policy of the PUWP’s leadership from the principled positions in December 1965 established an illegal organisation called the Communist Party of Poland (CCP). The unquestionable leader of this group was Kazimierz Mijal who in 1966 fled to Albania and supervised the activity of the CPP from there. This organisation illegally printed and distributed thousands of leaflets and brochures in which the “revisionist” policies of Gomułka and Gierek were condemned, holding the Albanian and Chinese doctrinal solutions as a model. The infiltration of the Polish Maoist circles by the security apparatus of the PPR in the seventies led to the marginalisation of this structure. The article, based on documents collected, among others, in the Archives of the Institute of National Remembrance and the Central Archives of Modern Records, presents the inside story of the founding of the CPP, its major leaders, political programme and secret cooperation with Albanian diplomats, and summarises the activity of Kazimierz Mijal in the background of the discord in the communist camp in the 60s, indicating among many reasons for the failures of Polish “Maoists” a dogmatic political programme which did not gained wider acceptance in society.