According to the latest edition of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (AERA et al. 2014), validity is still the most fundamental construct in educational measurement. The new edition, like the previous versions of the Testing Standards, contains standards of professional practice in validation. These standards of validity will be presented in the fourth section of this article. The first three sections explore validity standards included in the Testing Standards published before the 2014 edition, in the period of the shift from the trinitarian doctrine validity to the unitarian view of validity. The closing remarks consider the issue of the role of consequences in the most recent validity recommendations.
According to the latest edition of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (AERA et al. 2014), validity is still the most fundamental construct in educational measurement. The new edition, like the previous versions of the Testing Standards, contains standards of professional practice in validation. These standards of validity will be presented in the fourth section of this article. The first three sections explore validity standards included in the Testing Standards published before the 2014 edition, in the period of the shift from the trinitarian doctrine validity to the unitarian view of validity. The closing remarks consider the issue of the role of consequences in the most recent validity recommendations.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.