Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 15

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
|
2021
|
nr 2/47/2021
227-244
EN
There can be no doubt that Professor Artur Kozak (1960-2009) was amongst the most original and innovative Central European legal theorists of the tu of the 2t0h and 21st century. His legal theory named 'juriscentrism', based on an unprecedented synthesis of philosophical interpretationism and anti--represent tionism, sociologocial constructivism, as well as pragmatist ethics (inspired b ethnocentrism), allowed to produce a fresh legitimising narrative for lawye power in society. The present paper aims to enquire about the place and role played by legal tradition within Kozak's jurisprudential project. Its main clai will be that legal tradition is a keystone of juriscentrism, as it is the basis for identity and the reproduction of the legal community, the sole guarantor of t reasonableness of judicial decisions.
|
|
nr 1
141-159
EN
The paper argues that the multilingualism of the EU legal order should be viewed from the point of view of the right of individuals to acquaint themselves with the their rights and duties under EU law in the official language of their Member State. In case of discrepancies of equally authentic versions, individuals should have the possibility to rely on an ‘authentic version’ defence, especially in tax, customs and criminal law relationships.
Zeszyty Prawnicze
|
2015
|
tom 15
|
nr 4
147-176
PL
Spółdzielcze własnościowe prawo do lokalu jest przykładem reliktu prawnego epoki socjalizmu realnego, który przetrwał pomimo przemian społeczno-gospodarczych, politycznych i prawnych zapoczątkowanych w 1989 r. Omawiane prawo zostało powołane do życia w latach 50. XX w., a swoją formę ustawową uzyskało w 1961 r. Jego powstanie było uwarunkowane istniejącymi w minionym okresie stosunkami politycznymi i gospodarczymi, a także względami ideologicznymi. Prawo to miało bowiem zastąpić odrębną własność lokali, przy równoczesnym zapewnieniu uprawnionym możliwości władania, za pomocą prawa in rem, lokalem, którego budowę sfinansowali z własnych środków. Ramy prawne omawianej instytucji w okresie PRL nacechowane były elementami „uspołeczniającymi”, m.in. uniemożliwiając nabycie więcej niż jednego prawa przez tę samą rodzinę, uzależniając podnajęcie lokalu od zgody spółdzielni, czy też wtórne nabycie prawa mortis causa i inter vivos od przyjęcia nabywcy w poczet członków spółdzielni. Po roku 1989 spółdzielcze własnościowe prawo do lokalu nie zostało automatyczne przekształcone w odrębną własność lokali, czego można by się spodziewać w kontekście transformacji od gospodarki nakazowo-rozdzielczej do gospodarki rynkowej. Pomimo postępującej konwergencji pomiędzy spółdzielczym własnościowym prawem do lokalu oraz odrębną własnością lokalu, widocznej zarówno w warstwie prawnej, jak też w szczególności w zakresie funkcji społeczno-gospodarczych, prawo to istnieje nadal w obrocie stanowiąc relikt prawny epoki socjalizmu realnego.
EN
The present paper analyses the ideological foundations of the culture of European pri- vate law. The paper groups the possible politico-juridical ideas in opposing pairs, no- ting the domination of neofunctionalism over a systematic approach to law; pragmatism over formalism, instrumentalism over autonomy and technocratism over democratism, as well as liberalism over social justice, consumerism over citizenship and intergration over national sovereignty.
|
|
tom 89
5-14
EN
Critical legal theory emerged in the United States in the 1970s, at a time when Central and Eastern Europe belonged to the Soviet bloc and was subject to the system of actually existing socialism. Therefore, the arrival of critical jurisprudence into the region was delayed. In Poland, the first texts on critical and postmodern legal theory began to appear at the end of the 1990s and the beginning of the 2000s. Lech Morawski’s monograph, characteristically entitled What Legal Scholarship Has to Gain from Postmodernism?, published in 2001, officially inaugurated a broader interest in postmodern legal theory. Adam Sulikowski has been the main representative of critical legal theory in Poland, developing a postmodern theory of constitutionalism. Other sub-fields of postmodern and critical legal theory, gradually developing in Central European jurisprudence, include such areas as law and literature, law and ideology, law and neocolonial theory, as well as feminist jurisprudence. There is a noticeably growing influence of critical sociology and critical discourse analysis which seem to be a promising paradigm for invigorating critical legal theory from an empirical perspective. The concept of “the political”, in the sense used by Chantal Mouffe, has been evoked to propose a “political theory of law” conceived as an analysis of the juridical phenomenon through the lens of the political. Recently, it has found its concrete applications in the political theory of judicial decision-making.
|
|
tom 89
63-80
EN
The aim of the present paper is to contribute to the on-going discussion, both in legal theory and in comparative law, concerning the status of Central Europe and its delimitation from other legal regions in Europe, notably Romano-Germanic Western Europe but also Eastern Europe and Eurasia. The paper adopts the methodological perspective of critical legal geography, understood as a strand of critical jurisprudence laying at the interstices of spatial justice studies, critical geography, comparative law, sociology of law and legal history. The paper proceeds by identifying the notion of Central Europe with reference to a specific list of countries, then proposes a number of objective criteria for delimitng Central Europe and applies them in order to highlight the difference between Central Europe and other adjacent legal regions. Following that, the paper enquires as to whether Central Europe should be deemed to be a ‘legal family’, a ‘legal union’ or simply a ‘legal space’ or ‘space of legal culture’.
|
|
tom 102
185 - 208
EN
The present methodological paper has three aims. First of all, it puts forward the notion of a “legal survival” as a methodological tool at the interstices of comparative legal scholarship, legal history and socio-legal studies. Secondly, on the basis of examples of the legal survivals of real socialism in Polish private law, the paper enquires about the most appropriate methodological approach for analysing legal survivals. Thirdly, it argues that the notion of legal survivals is a particularly useful tool for analysing changes in legal culture following a systemic transformation.
8
Content available Orzekanie w polu polityczności
100%
PL
The purpose of this article is to analyse the relationship between adjudication and the concept of the political. By referring to the understanding of the concept of the political developed inter alia by Carl Schmitt and Chantal Mouffe, the article posits that not all judicial decisions (individual instances of adjudication) should be treated as belonging to the sphere of the political, but only those which fulfil jointly two premises: firstly, they are true decisions, involving at least some degree of discretionality (in the sphere of facts, or in the sphere of law, or in the sphere of the legal classification of facts), and secondly, involving a conflict which is structural for the community or society within which this adjudication is performed. Political adjudication should not be perceived as per se wrong, nonetheless it should be subject to a democratic scrutiny and sustained critique to with greater attention than apolitical adjudication, which merely involves the mechanical application of unambiguous legal rules to undisputed facts.
|
|
tom 16
|
nr 2
5-35
PL
Systemic Transformation and the Continuity of Selected Legal Institutions Summary Despite a systemic transformation a number of legal institutions servive. The existing conceptual framework does not account sufficiently for this phenomenon, hence the need to introduce and refine the concept of ‘legal survival,’ as applicable to a legal institution characterised by normative continuity, though often attended by a political, economic, social or ideological change in its social function.
EN
The paper analyses and evaluates the linguistic policy of the Court of Justice of the European Union against the background of other multilingual courts and in the light of theories of legal interpretation. Multilingualism has a direct impact upon legal interpretation at the Court, displacing traditional approaches (intentionalism, textualism) with a hermeneutic paradigm. It also creates challenges to the acceptance of the Court’s case-law in the Member States, which seem to have been adequately tackled by the Court’s idiosyncratic translation policy.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.