The author of the study claims that in the discussion held in the previous century by the jurists of religious law concerning understanding of the salvation of souls as the purpose of the canon law there were not very clear references to the assumptions which led Ivo of Chartres to such a statement. Therefore he expresses them in the following points: the education and knowledge of Ivo gained in the Le Bec school in his pastoral activity, sacrament as the source of the canon norm, the biblical foundation of the canon norm (ratio auctoritatis), mercy and justice as the principle of legal hermeneutics of Ivo, salvation of souls as a conciliation element of norms. In author’s opinion, Ivo is a precursor of a contemporary orientation in the approach to canon law as a dimension of the salvation order.
PL
Autor opracowania twierdzi, że w dyskusji podejmowanej w kanonistyce w ubiegłym stuleciu, dotyczącej rozumienia zbawienia dusz (salus animarum) jako celu prawa kanonicznego, nie było zbyt wyraźnych odniesień do założeń, które doprowadziły Iwona z Chartres do takiego stwierdzenia. Ujmuje je zatem w następujących punktach: wykształcenie i wiedza Iwona wyniesiona ze szkoły Le Bec w jego działalności duszpasterskiej; sakrament jako źródło normy kanonicznej; biblijny fundament normy kanonicznej (ratio auctoritatis); miłosierdzie i sprawiedliwość jako zasada hermeneutyki prawnej Iwona; zbawienie dusz jako element koncyliacyjny norm. Uważa, że Iwon jest prekursorem historiozbawczej orientacji w podejściu do prawa kanonicznego jako wymiaru porządku zbawienia.
On account of differences in translation of canon 223 §2 into Polish and associated interpretation controversies, the article presents an interpretation of the canon based on its sources and an explanatory note issued by the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts. The Author demonstrates ambiguities which, in his opinion, are related to the narrowing of the meaning of the Latin word moderari and presentation of bonum commune as a general clause. Moreover, the postulate expressed in canon studies to include the last sentence of Dignitatis humanae 7 into the canon is upheld.
The subject of the study is the analysis of the content of specific answers which were given by the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts with regard to doubts which arose after the promulgation of the Apostolic Letter„Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus”. Some of them were published on the website of the Council, others on the websites of Italian Bishops` Conference and other sites dedicated to canon law. Some answers were placed there as explanatory notes. Therefore, it was necessary to explain the difference between declarations, explanatory notes and specific answers to next comment on answers.
L’autore analizza la corelazione tra diritto e dovere nell’aspetto logico e ontico come pure presenta nella storia e oggi il modo di vedere sia il dovere sia il diritto nella loro funzione nella vita degli uomini. Oggi l’attenzione umana si concentra intorno ai diritti in modo assai opposto a quello che fu in precedenza dove i diversi codici deontici ponevano 1’accento sulle leggi, che dicevano quello che bisogna fare oppure omettere. In seguito presenta alcuni motivi di questo stato di cose.
The reference point for deliberations is constituted by two documents: the Apostolic Constitution of Francis Episcopalis communio and the final document of XV General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops dedicated to the problems of young people Young People, the Faith, and Vocational Discernment. The synodal document presented the issues which were not discussed during the synodal sessions and concern the synodal path of the Church. The author reflects on common elements of both documents and interprets each of them in the light of the other one. He highlights the element of discernment of gifts, charisms, and conscience, which determine the position of the faithful in the ecclesial community and influence the bonds between them and the pastors of the Church. Extending the area of implementation of the synodal character of the Church allows the author to ask the question about the model of the presence of the Church in the world. The author points out similarities between the synodal way and the methodology of ecumenical dialogue, which may affect summoning of the Synod dedicated to ecumenical issues.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.