Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 2

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  buckling-restrained braces
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The application of high-strength steel (HSS) is a significant trend in the development of steel structures. Two main challenges for HSS structures in seismic design (i.e., low energy dissipation capacity and low lateral stiffness) need to be addressed before HSS structures can be widely constructed in practice. To solve those problems, the seismic performance of structures combined of HSS frames and concentric buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) was investigated in this study. Two half-scale experimental specimens with different stiffness ratios between BRB and HSS frame were fabricated and tested under constant vertical load and cyclic increasing horizontal load. The hysteretic response, horizontal bearing capacity, internal force distribution, energy dissipation capacity, and ductility of the dual system were analyzed. The results showed that the specimens exhibited overall ductile performance with high elastic stiffness, significant ductility, and excellent energy dissipation capacity. The characteristics of both specimens in the pseudo-static test can be divided into three typical phases, which were described as overall elastic phase, BRB hardening phase, and failing phase. The BRB hardening phase was characterized by high energy dissipation capacity, and the plastic deformation was limited to the BRB, so the ductile demand of HSS member in HSSF-BRB was reduced. Moreover, the effect of stiffness ratio between BRB and HSS frame on seismic performance was discussed in this paper.
EN
This paper focused on the seismic performance of buckling-restrained braced concrete frame. Two different systems including the single-level yielding buckling-restrained braced concrete frame (SYBRBCF) and the double-level yielding buckling-restrained braced concrete frame (DYBRBCF) were designed for comparison. Compared with the single-level yielding buckling-restrained braces which are similar to many existing types of buckling-restrained braces, the double-level yielding buckling-restrained braces (DYBRBs) have two different energy absorption mechanisms that are expected to provide energy dissipations under the frequent earthquakes and rare earthquakes. To comparatively investigate the seismic performances of the two systems, cyclic tests were performed on one DYBRBCF specimen and another SYBRBCF specimen. The seismic response including the hysteretic curves, backbone curves, ductility coefficients, equivalent damping ratios, strengths, and stiffness degradations of the two experimental specimens was compared and analyzed. The test results indicate that the properly designed SYBRBCF and DYBRBCF can both exhibit the full hysteretic curves, meet the strong-column–weak-beam design requirement, and achieve the expected seismic performance. However, it was found that the ductility coefficient and energy dissipation capacity of the DYBRBCF were 72.2% and 23.4% higher than those of the SYBRBCF. The present study also provided useful design recommendations, which were beneficial to promote the application of DYBRBs.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.