Tytuł artykułu
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
We present the results of an exploratory analysis of hu‐ man attitudes toward the social robot Vector. The study was conducted on natural language data (2,635 com‐ ments) retrieved from Reddit and YouTube. We describe the tag‐set used and the (manual) annotation procedure. We present and compare attitude structures mined from Reddit and YouTube data. Two main findings are descri‐ bed and discussed: almost 20% of comments from both Reddit and YouTube consist of various manifestations of attitudes toward Vector (mainly attribution of autonomy and declaration of feelings toward Vector); Reddit and YouTube comments differ when it comes to revealed at‐ titude structure – the data source matters for attitudes studies.
Słowa kluczowe
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
3--10
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 16 poz., rys.
Twórcy
autor
- Faculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Szamarzewskiego 89/AB, 60‑568 Poznan, www: https://plupkowski.wordpress.com
autor
- Faculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Szamarzewskiego 89/AB, 60‑568 Poznan
autor
- Faculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Szamarzewskiego 89/AB, 60‑568 Poznan
autor
- Faculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Szamarzewskiego 89/AB, 60‑568 Poznan
Bibliografia
- [1] C. Bartneck, E. Croft, and D. Kulic, “Measuring the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence and perceived safety of robots”. In: Proceedings of the Metrics for Human‑Robot Interaction Workshop in afiliation with the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human‑Robot Interaction (HRI 2008), 2008.
- [2] C. Bartneck and J. Forlizzi, “A design‑centred framework for social human‑robot interaction”. In: RO‑MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No. 04TH8759), 2004, 591–594.
- [3] C. Breazeal, “Toward sociable robots”, Robotics and autonomous systems, vol. 42, no. 3‑4, 2003,167–175.
- [4] T. Fong, I. Nourbakhsh, and K. Dautenhahn, “A survey of socially interactive robots”, Robotics and autonomous systems, vol. 42, 2003, 143–166.
- [5] Q. R. Hover, E. Velner, T. Beelen, M. Boon, and K. P. Truong, “Uncanny, sexy, and threatening robots: The online community’s attitude to and perceptions of robots varying in humanlikeness and gender”. In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human‑Robot Interaction, 2021, 119–128.
- [6] T. Li, L. Lin, M. Choi, K. Fu, S. Gong, and J. Wang, “Youtube av 50k: an annotated corpus for comments in autonomous vehicles”. In: 2018 International Joint Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing (iSAINLP), 2018, 1–5.
- [7] M. Mori, “Bukimi no tani (the uncanny valley)”,Energy, vol. 7, no. 4, 1970, 33–35.
- [8] E. Phillips, X. Zhao, D. Ullman, and B. F. Malle, “What is human‑like?: Decomposing robots’ human‑like appearance using the anthropomorphic robot (abot) database”. In: 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human‑Robot Interaction (HRI), 2018, 105–113.
- [9] N. Piçarra, J.‑C. Giger, G. Pochwatko, and J. Możaryn, “Designing social robots for interaction at work: socio‑cognitive factors underlying intention to work with social robots”, Journal of Automation Mobile Robotics and Intelligent Systems, vol. 10, 2016.
- [10] R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2013.
- [11] D. Ratajczyk, “Shape of the uncanny valley and emotional attitudes toward robots assessed by an analysis of youtube comments”, International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 14, no. 8, 2022, 1787–1803.
- [12] M. Strait, A. S. Ramos, V. Contreras, and N. Garcia, “Robots racialized in the likeness of marginalized social identities are subject to greater dehumanization than those racialized as white”. In: 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN), 2018, 452–457.
- [13] M. K. Strait, C. Aguillon, V. Contreras, and N. Garcia, “The public’s perception of human like robots: Online social commentary reflects an appearance‑based uncanny valley, a general fear of a “technology takeover”, and the unabashed sexualization of female‑gendered robots”. In: 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN), 2017, 1418–1423.
- [14] A. J. Viera and J. M. Garrett, “Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic”, Family Medicine, vol. 37, no. 5, 2005, 360–363.
- [15] E. Vlachos and Z.‑H. Tan, “Public perception of android robots: Indications from an analysis of youtube comments”. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2018, 1255–1260.
- [16] C.‑E. Yu, “Humanlike robots as employees in the hotel industry: Thematic content analysis of online reviews”, Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, vol. 29, no. 1, 2020, 22–38.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-71c494e3-f341-493e-81f8-8bfe77b1080c