Collaborative Recovery from Supply Chain Disruptions: Characteristics and Enablers

• Autorzy: Brüning M. , Hartono N. T. P. , Bendul J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Due to their growing global and complex nature, supply chains are increasingly vulnerable to natural and man-made disasters that disrupt the flow of goods. Today, recovering from disruptions represents a major challenge for supply chain professionals. In literature, most recovery methods are based on redundancy and flexibility. Their drawbacks are high inventory and coordination costs. The companies analyzed in this paper took another approach: they recovered by collaborating with their network partners, especially by temporarily sharing resources. Based on the relational view theory, this paper aims to describe whether and how companies can gain competitive advantage by relying on collaboration during the recovery process. A multiple case study with companies from the automotive and electronics industries is conducted. Six cases are analyzed with regard to the recovery characteristics and enabler. Seven propositions are derived that give potential for further research on this promising recovery method.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

recovery; resilience; supply chain risk management; disruptions

• Wydawca: Publishing House of Poznan University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Research in Logistics & Production
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 5, No. 3
• Strony: 225--237
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 48 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Brüning M.

• School of Mathematics and Logistics, Production & Logistics Networks Workgroup, Jacobs University Bremen, 28759 Bremen, Germany

autor

Hartono N. T. P.

• Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA

autor

Bendul J.

• School of Mathematics and Logistics, Production & Logistics Networks Workgroup, Jacobs University Bremen, 28759 Bremen, Germany

Bibliografia

• 1. Aisin Seiki Co., L. 2014. Aisin Seiki Global Website [Online]. [Accessed 12.08.2014 2014].
• 2. Barratt, M. 2004. Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9, 30-42.
• 3. Bello, D. & Bovell, L. 2012. Collaboration analysis: Joint resolution of problems in global supply networks. Information Knowledge Systems Management, 11, 77-99.
• 4. Blackhurst, J., Craighead, C. W., Elkins, D. & Handfield, R. B. 2005. An empirically derived agenda of critical research issues for managing supply-chain disruptions. International Journal of Production Research, 43, 4067-4081.
• 5. Bovell, L. J. 2012. Joint Resolution of Supply Chain Risks: The Role of Risk Characteristics and Problem Solving Approach. Georgia State University.
• 6. Cao, M., Vonderembse, M. A., Zhang, Q. & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. 2010. Supply chain collaboration: conceptualisation and instrument development. International Journal of Production Research, 48, 6613-6635.
• 7. Chen, I. J., Paulraj, A. & Lado, A. A. 2004. Strategic purchasing, supply management, and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 505-523.
• 8. Christopher, M. & Peck, H. 2004. Building the Resilient Supply Chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 15, 1-14.
• 9. Commission, S. S. 2008. Niigata Chuetsu-oki, Japan Earthquake and Disaster Preparedness in Shizuoka Prefecture: Lessons for California.
• 10. Craighead, C. W., Blackhurst, J., Rungtusanatham, M. J. & Handfield, R. B. 2007. The Severity of Supply Chain Disruptions: Design Characteristics and Mitigation Capabilities. Decision Sciences, 38, 131-156.
• 11. Dyer, J. H. & Singh, H. 1998. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 660-679.
• 12. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
• 13. Fuller, T. 2011. Thailand Flooding Cripples Hard-Drive Suppliers. NYTimes.com.
• 14. Greenway, T. 2014. How Safe is your Supply Chain? Delivered DHL.
• 15. Hendricks, K. & Singhal, V. 2005. An Empirical Analysis of the Effect of Supply Chain Disruptions on Long-Run Stock Price Performance and Equity Risk of the Firm. Production & Operations Management, 14, 35-52.
• 16. Honda 2007. Update on Earthquake Impact to Honda’s July 26 Production Activity.
• 17. Lavie, D. 2006. The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31, 638-658.
• 18. Mandal, S. 2013. Towards a relational framework for supply chain resilience. International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, 4, 227-245.
• 19. Milbourn, M. A. 2011. Western Digital restarts flooded Thai plant. The Orange County Register.
• 20. Miyamoto, G. R. 2007. 2007 Niigata Chuetsu-Oki Japan Earthquake Reconnaissance Report. In: Miyamoto, G. R. (ed.).
• 21. Mukherjee, A. 2008. The Fire That Changed an Industry: A Case Study on Thriving in a Networked World. FT Press.
• 22. Nishiguchi, T. & Beaudet, A. 1998. The Toyota Group and the Aisin Fire. MIT Sloan Management Review, 40, 49-59.
• 23. Nissan 2012. Disaster Response at Nissan. Sustainability Report.
• 24. Nissan. 2015. http://www.nissan-global.com/EN/COMPANY/PROFILE/ [Online]. Accessed April 21st.
• 25. Olcott, G. & Oliver, N. 2014. Social Capital, Sense-Making and Recovery from Disaster: apanese Companies and the March 2011 Earthquake. California Management Review, 56, 5-22.
• 26. Philips. 2014. Philips - Company profile [Online]. [Accessed 12.08.2014 2014].
• 27. Reitman, V. 1997. Toyota Manages Quick Recovery from Fire. Wall Street Journal.
• 28. Renesas 2011. CSR and Environmental Report. Renesas Electronics Corporation.
• 29. Renesas. 2014. http://www.renesas.com/ [Online]. [Accessed August 12th 2014].
• 30. Rice, J. B. & Caniato, F. 2003. Buildung a secure and resilient supply network. Supply Chain Management Review, 7, 22-30.
• 31. Riken 2007a. Notice of the Resumption of Production at Riken Kashiwazaki Plant after the Niigata-Chuetsuoki Earthquake. Tokyo.
• 32. Riken 2007b. The Status of Recovery from the Damage of Niigata-Chuetsuoki Earthquake on Riken’s Kashiwazaki Plant (as of July 19). Tokyo.
• 33. Riken. 2015. http://www.riken.co.jp/e/ [Online]. [Accessed April 17th 2015].
• 34. Sasaki, T. 2013. Disaster Management and JIT of Automobile Supply Chain. 新潟国際情報大学情報文化学部紀要,16, 81-95.
• 35. Schmidt, W. & Simchi-Levi, D. 2013. Nissan Motor Company Ltd.: Building Operational Resiliency. Https://Mitsloan.Mit.Edu/Learningedge/Casedocs/13-149%20nissan.Si- mchi-Levi.Pdf, R. F. (ed.).
• 36. Sheffi, Y. 2005. The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.
• 37. Sheffi, Y. & Rice, J. B. 2005. A Supply Chain View of the Resilient Enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47, 41-48.
• 38. Simchi-Levi, D., Schmidt, W. & Wei, Y. 2014. From Superstorms to Factory Fires. Harvard Business Review, 92, 97-101.
• 39. Sodhi, M., Son, B.-G. & Tang, C. S. 2012. Researchers' perspectives on supply chain risk management. Production and Operations Management, 21.
• 40. Swissre 2012. Natural catastrophes and man-made disasters in 2011: historic losses surface from record earthquakes and floods. In: RE, S. (ed.) Sigma.
• 41. Tang, C. S. 2006. Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Logistics: Research & Applications, 9, 33-45.
• 42. Thun, J. H. & Hoenig, D. 2011. An empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in the German automotive industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 31, 242-249.
• 43. Wai, L. C. & Wongsurawat, W. 2013. Crisis management: Western Digital’s 46-day recovery from the 2011 flood disaster in Thailand. Strategy & Leadership, 41, 34-38.
• 44. Westerndigital 2014. Western Digital Announces Q3 Revenue of $3.7 Billion and non- GAAP Net Income of $470 Million, or $1.94 Per Share.
• 45. Whitney, D. E., Luo, J. & Heller, D. A. 2014. The benefits and constraints of temporary sourcing diversification in supply chain disruption and recovery. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 20, 238-250.
• 46. Wieland, A. & Wallenburg, C. M. 2013. The influence of relational competencies on supply chain resilience: a relational view. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43, 300-320.
• 47. Yin, R. K. 2014. Case Study Research: design and methods, USA, Sage Publications, Inc.
• 48. Zdnet. 2011. Thai floods: Expect months of hard drive shortages. CBS News.