PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Safety Climate: Do Fairness Perceptions Influence Employee Safety Behaviour?

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This study investigated the relationships between organizational justice, organizational safety climate, job satisfaction, safety compliance and accident frequency. Ghanaian industrial workers participated in the study (N = 320). Safety climate and justice perceptions were assessed with Hayes, Parender, Smecko, et al.’s (1998) and Blader and Tyler’s (2003) scales respectively. A median split was performed to dichotomize participants into 2 categories: workers with positive and workers with negative justice perceptions. Confirmatory factors analysis confirmed the 5-factor structure of the safety scale. Regression analyses and t tests indicated that workers with positive fairness perceptions had constructive perspectives regarding workplace safety, expressed greater job satisfaction, were more compliant with safety policies and registered lower accident rates. These findings provide evidence that the perceived level of fairness in an organization is closely associated with workplace safety perception and other organizational factors which are important for safety. The implications for safety research are discussed.
Rocznik
Strony
199--211
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 49 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Psychology, Buckinghamshire New University, High Wycombe, UK
  • Department of Real Estate, Planning and Geoinformatics, Aalto University Espoo, Aalto, Finland
Bibliografia
  • 1.Schneider B, Bowen DE, Ehrhart MG, Holcombe KM. The climate for service: evolution of a construct. In: Ashkanasy NM, Wilderom CP, Peterson MF, editors. Handbook of organizational culture and climate. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage; 2000. p. 21–36.
  • 2.Zohar D. Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. J Appl Psychol. 1980;65(1):96–102.
  • 3.Neal A, Griffin M. A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(4):946–53.
  • 4.Gyekye SA, Salminen S. Workplace safety perceptions and perceived organizational support: do supportive perceptions influence safety perceptions? International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics (JOSE). 2007;13(2):189–200. Retrieved January 9, 2014, from: http://www.ciop.pl/21990.
  • 5.Gyekye SA, Salminen S. Are “good soldiers” safety conscious? An examination of the relationship between organizational citizenship behaviours and perception of workplace safety. Social Behaviour and Personality: An International Journal. 2005;33(8):805–20.
  • 6.Lee TZ, Wu CH, Hong CW. An empirical investigation of the influence of safety climate on organizational citizenship behaviour in Taiwan’s facilities. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics (JOSE). 2007;13(3):255–69. Retrieved January 9, 2014, from: http:// www.ciop.pl/23206.
  • 7.Hofmann DA, Morgerson FP. Safety-related behaviour as a social exchange: the role of perceived organizational support and leader–member exchange. J Appl Psychol. 1999;84(2):286–96.
  • 8.Clarke S. An integrative model of safety climate: linking psychological climate and work attitudes to individual safety outcomes using meta-analysis. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2010;83(3):553–78.
  • 9.Nahrgang JD, Morgeson F, Hofmann DA. Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. J Appl Psychol. 2011;96(1):71–94.
  • 10.Christian MS, Bradley JC, Wallace JC, Burke MJ. Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(5):1103–27.
  • 11.Gyekye SA, Salminen S, Ojajarvi A. A theoretical model to ascertain determinates of occupational accidents among Ghanaian industrial workers. Int J Ind Ergon. 2012;42(2):233–40.
  • 12.Greenberg J. Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: the hidden cost of pay cuts. J Appl Psychol. 1990;75(5):561–8.
  • 13.Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter CO, Ng KY. Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(3):425-445.
  • 14.Niehoff BP, Moorman RH. Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behaviour. Acad Manage J. 1993;36(6):527–56.
  • 15.Cohen-Charash Y, Spector PE. The role of justice in organizations: a meta-analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2001;86(2):278–321.
  • 16.Simons T, Roberson Q. Why managers should care about fairness: the effects of aggregate justice perceptions on organizational outcomes. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(3):432–43.
  • 17.Chen YJ, Lin CC, Tung YC, Ko YT. Associations of organizational justice and ingratiation with organizational citizenship behaviour: the beneficiary perspective. Social Behaviour and Personality: An International Journal. 2008;36(3):289–302.
  • 18.Beugre CD, Baron RA. Perceptions of systematic justice: the effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2001;31(2):324–39.
  • 19.Brockner J. Making sense of procedural fairness: how high procedural fairness can reduce or heighten the influence of outcome favourability. Academy of Management Review. 2002;27(1):58–76.
  • 20.Ambrose ML, Hess RL, Ganesan S. The relationship between justice and attitude: an examination of the justice effects on event and system-related attitudes. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2007;103(1):21–36.
  • 21.Fox S, Spector PE, Miles D. Counterproductive work behaviour (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: some mediators and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. J Vocat Behav. 2001;59(3):291–309.
  • 22.Jermier JM, Knights D, Nord WR, editors. Resistance and power in organizations. London, UK: Routledge; 1994.
  • 23.Naumann SE, Bennett N. A case for procedural justice climate: development and test of a multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal. 2000;43(5):881–9.
  • 24.Liao H, Rupp DE. The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: a cross-level multifoci framework. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2005;90(2):242–56.
  • 25.Blau PM. Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY, USA: Wiley; 1964.
  • 26.Gouldner AW. The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. Am Sociol Rev. 1960;25(2):161–78.
  • 27.DeJoy DM, Della LJ, Vandenberg RJ, Wilson MG. Making work safer: testing a model of social exchange and safety management. J Safety Res. 2010;41(2):163–71.
  • 28.Cropanzano R, Mitchell MS. Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. J Manage. 2005;31(6):874 –900.
  • 29.Organ DW. Organizational citizenship behaviour: the good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA, USA: Lexington Books; 1988.
  • 30.Hofmann DA, Morgerson FP, Gerras SJ. Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: safety climate as an exemplar. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(1):170–8.
  • 31.Hayes BE, Parender J, Smecko T, Trask J. Measuring perceptions of workplace safety: development and validation of the Work Safety Scale. J Safety Res. 1998;29(3):145–61
  • 32.Blader SL, Tyler TR. A four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a “fair” process. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003;29(6):747–58.
  • 33.Ambrose ML, Schminke M. The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: a test of mediation. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(2):491–500.
  • 34.Eisenberger R, Fasolo P, Davis-LaMastro V. Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. J Appl Psychol. 1990;75(1):51–9.
  • 35.Locke EA. What is job satisfaction? Organ Behav Hum Perform.1969;4(4):309–36.
  • 36.Porter LW, Lawler EE III. Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL, USA: Irwin-Dorsey; 1968.
  • 37.Dolbier CL, Webster JA, McCalister KT, Mallon MW, Steinhardt MA. Reliability and validity of a single-item measure of job satisfaction. Am J Health Promot. 2005;19(3):194–8.
  • 38.Nagy MS. Using a single-item approach to measure facet of job satisfaction. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2002;75(1):77–86.
  • 39.Masterson SS, Lewis K, Goldman BM, Taylor MS. Integrating justice and social exchange: the differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Acad Manage J. 2000;43(4):738–48.
  • 40.Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson/ Allyn & Bacon; 2007.
  • 41.Hair JF Jr, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate data analysis: with readings. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall; 1995.
  • 42.Carmines EG, McIver JP Analyzing models with unobserved variables: analysis of covariance structures. In: Bohrnstedt GW, Borgatta EF, editors. Social measurement: current issues. Beverly Hills, CA, USA: Sage; 1981. p. 65–115.
  • 43.Gyekye SA. Workers’ perceptions of workplace safety and job satisfaction. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics (JOSE). 2005;11(3):291–302. Retrieved January 9, 2014, from: http://www.ciop.pl/14182.
  • 44.Ang S, Van Dyne L, Bergley MT. The employment relationships of foreign workers versus local employees: a field study of organizational justice, job satisfaction, performance, and OCB. J Organ Behav. 2003;24(5):561–83.
  • 45.Moorman RH. Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviours: do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship behaviours? J Appl Psychol. 1991;76(6):845–55.
  • 46.Heinrich H. Industrial accident prevention. 4th ed. London, UK: McGraw-Hill; 1959.
  • 47.Lui HK, Wong YT. How to improve employees’ commitment to their line manager: A practical study in a Chinese joint venture. Journal of General Management. 2007;32(3):61–77.
  • 48.Crampton SM, Wagner JA. Percept-precept inflation in microorganizational research: an investigation of prevalence and effect. J Appl Psychol 1994;79(1):67–76.
  • 49.Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-4d953b21-0b9d-4953-99f9-1968f742d1ca
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.