Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Although SOLAS still requires nautical paper charts on pleasure crafts, more and more sailors prefer navigating digitally. What are the impacts on their spatial abilities? We conducted a field experiment at the Baltic coast and two simulator experiments with altogether 40 sailors. Participants plotted and/or piloted routes either in the classic manner on paper charts or digitally on an ECS. We assessed the situation awareness, the cognitive map, and (for the simulator only) the wayfinding with and without the navigation media. We found that digital navigation significantly impaired the cognitive map. Its impact on situation awareness, however, depended on previous navigation habits: Only sailors who used their paper charts regularly and actively benefitted from the ECS. We concluded that ECS navigation with its high level of automation lastingly alters spatial perception at sea and impairs orienting. With the vulnerable electricity supply on sailboats, this is a safety issue for shipping.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
299--310
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 16 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Bibliografia
- 1. Asyali, E. 2012. The role of ECDIS in improving situation awareness. In: 13th Annual General Assembly of the IAMU. Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada: 123‐136.
- 2. Burnett, G.E.& Lee, K. 2005. The effect of vehicle navigation systems on the formation of cognitive maps. In: G. Underwood (ed.), Traffic and Transport Psychology: Theory and Application: 407–418. Amsterdam: Elsevier
- 3. Endsley, M. 1995a. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37(1): 32‐64.
- 4. Endsley, M. 1995b. Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37(1): 65‐84.
- 5. Grech, M. & Horberry, T. 2002. Human error in maritime operations: Situation awareness and accident reports. Paper presented at the 5th International Workshop on Human Error, Safety and Systems Development, Newcastle, Australia.
- 6. IMO 2014. SOLAS, International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended, Consolidated Edition. IMO: London.
- 7. IMO 2017. ECDIS – Guidance for Good Practice. IMO: London.
- 8. Ishikawaa, T., Fujiwarab, H., Imaic, O., Okabe, A. 2008. Wayfinding with a GPS‐based mobile navigation system: A comparison with maps and direct experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28 (1): 74–82.
- 9. Math, R., Mahr, A., Moniri, M. M., & Müller, C. 2013. OpenDS: A new open‐source driving simulator for research. GMM‐Fachbericht‐AmE 2013.
- 10. Müller‐Plath, G. 2018. Planen besser auf Papier. Nautische Nachrichten der Kreuzerabteilung des Deutschen Seglerverbandes 53(2): 18‐21.
- 11. Münzer, S., Zimmer, H.D. & Baus, J. 2012. Navigation assistance: A trade‐off between wayfinding support and configural learning support. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied 18(1):18‐37.
- 12. Nadel, L. 2013. Cognitive maps. In: D. Waller & L. Nadel (Eds.), Handbook of Spatial Cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association: 155‐171.
- 13. R Core Team 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
- 14. Shao, J. 1997. An asymptotic theory for linear model selection. Statistica Sinica 7: 221‐264.
- 15. Tolman, E.C. 1948. Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review 55: 189‐208.
- 16. Waller, D. & Nadel, L. (Eds.) 2013. Handbook of Spatial Cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-fd2a7656-c223-42d4-a082-25525693689c