The optimization model of building construction based on BIM and improved NSGA-III algorithm

• Autorzy: Wang Meng

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/ace.2025.154104

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Currently, there are difficulties in dealing with higher construction requirements and standards in subway construction management. Therefore, a multi-objective optimization model was constructed based on building information management technology, and an improved non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm III was introduced to optimize the model solution. And experimental verification was conducted. These experiments confirmed that the average HV of the improved algorithm was 0.67, which was higher than the original algorithm’s 0.65, indicating that it had higher convergence and reliability. The solution results of the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II showed that the optimized cost was 185.1899 million yuan. The cost of optimizing the original non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm III was 184.6469 million yuan. The total cost of optimizing the research algorithm was 184.1165 million yuan. In addition, the research algorithm had the shortest construction period, ideal cost, and significantly higher quality and safety levels than the comparison algorithms. And its time consumption was only 20 seconds, significantly lower than the comparison algorithms. And its cost was between 183 million to 187.5 million yuan, with higher stability and relatively concentrated distribution of solutions. Overall, the subway construction optimization model based on building information management and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm III has high effectiveness and can be effectively applied in practical construction management.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

building information management; non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm; subway building; multi-objective optimization; pareto solution; construction period; cost

PL

zarządzanie informacją o budynku; algorytm genetyczny sortowania niezdominowanego; budynek metra; optymalizacja wielokryterialna; rozwiązanie Pareto; czas budowy; koszt

• Wydawca: Komitet Inżynierii Lądowej i Wodnej PAN ; Politechnika Warszawska, Wydział Inżynierii Lądowej
• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil Engineering
• Rocznik: 2025
• Tom: Vol. 71, nr 2
• Strony: 5--18
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz., il., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Wang Meng

• School of Construction Management, Chongqing Metropolitan College of Science and Technology, Chongqing, China

• https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0098-9402

Bibliografia

• [1] S. Dixit, A. Stefańsk, and A. Musiuk, “Architectural form finding in arboreal supporting structure optimization”, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 2321-2329, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2020.08.022.
• [2] M. Parsamehr, U.S. Perera, T.C. Dodanwala, P. Perera, and R. Ruparathna,“A review of construction management challenges and BIM-based solutions: perspectives from the schedule, cost, quality, and safety management”, Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 353-389, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s42107-022-00501-4.
• [3] F. Jalaei, M. Zoghi, and A. Khoshand, “Life cycle environmental impact assessment to manage and optimize construction waste using Building Information Modeling (BIM)”, International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 784-801, 2021, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2019.1583850.
• [4] M.G. Meharie, W.J. Mengesha, Z.A. Gariy, and R.N.N. Mutuku, “Application of stacking ensemble machine learning algorithm in predicting the cost of highway construction projects”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 2836-2853, 2022, doi: 10.1108/ECAM-02-2020-0128.
• [5] Q. Xue, Z. Wang, and Q. Chen, “Multi-objective optimization of building design for life cycle cost and CO2 emissions: A case study of a low-energy residential building in a severe cold climate”, Building Simulation, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 83-98, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s12273-021-0796-5.
• [6] M.B. Bouraima, Y. Qiu, C.K. Kiptum, and K.M. Ndiema, “Evaluation of factors affecting road maintenance in Kenyan counties using the ordinal priority approach”, Journal of Computational and Cognitive Engineering, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 260-265, 2023, doi: 10.47852/bonviewJCCE2202272.
• [7] T.Q.D. Pham, T. Le-Hong, and X.V. Tran, “Efficient estimation and optimization of building costs using machine learning”, International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 909-921, 2023, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2021.1943630.
• [8] N. Moretti, J.D. Blanco Cadena, A. Mannino, T. Poli, and F. Re Cecconi, “Maintenance service optimization in smart buildings through ultrasonic sensors network”, Intelligent Buildings International, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 4-16, 2021, doi: 10.1080/17508975.2020.1765723.
• [9] W. He, W. Li, and X. Meng, “Scheduling optimization of prefabricated buildings under resource constraints”, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 4507-4519, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12205-021-0444-8.
• [10] C. Huang, “Discussion on optimization measures of building construction management technology”, Journal of Architectural Research and Development, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 17-24, 2023, doi: 10.26689/jard.v7i1.4695.
• [11] D.L. Luong, D.H. Tran, and P.T. Nguyen, “Optimizing multi-mode time-cost-quality trade-off of construction project using opposition multiple objective difference evolution”, International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 271-283, 2021, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2018.1526630.
• [12] E. Matel, F. Vahdatikhaki, S. Hosseinyalamdary, T. Evers, and H. Voordijk, “An artificial neural network approach for cost estimation of engineering services”, International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1274-1287, 2022, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2019.1692400.
• [13] S. Zhang, R.Y. Sunindijo, M. Loosemore, S. Wang, Y. Gu, and H. Li, “Identifying critical factors influencing the safety of Chinese subway construction projects”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1863-1886, 2021, doi: 10.1108/ECAM-07-2020-0525.
• [14] M. Zhou, Y. Tang, H. Jin, B. Zhang, and X. Sang, “A BIM-based identification and classification method of environmental risks in the design of Beijing subway”, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 500-514, 2021, doi: 10.3846/jcem.2021.15602.
• [15] R. Iftikhar, R. Müller, and T. Ahola, “Crises and coping strategies in megaprojects: The case of the Islamabad-Rawalpindi Metro Bus Project in Pakistan”, Project Management Journal, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 394-409, 2021, doi: 10.1177/87569728211015850.
• [16] Y.H. Li, Z. Sheng, P. Zhi, D. Li, “Multi-objective optimization design of anti-rolling torsion bar based on modified NSGA-III algorithm”, International Journal of Structural Integrity, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 17-30, 2021, doi: 10.1108/IJSI-03-2019-0018.
• [17] F. Gaw, “Algorithmic logics and the construction of cultural taste of the Netflix Recommender System”, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 706-725, 2022, doi: 10.1177/01634437211053767.
• [18] J. Maleki, Z. Masoumi, F. Hakimpour, and C.A. Coello Coello, “Many-objective land use planning using a hypercube-based NSGA-III algorithm”, Transactions in GIS, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 609-644, 2022, doi: 10.1111/tgis.12876.
• [19] A. Juszczyk, “BIM in the construction process-selected problems at the stage of implementation in Polish road engineering”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 623-633, 2022, doi: 10.24425/ace.2022.140190.
• [20] Y. Zhang, T. Wang, and K.V. Yuen, “Construction site information decentralized management using blockchain and smart contracts”, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1450-1467, 2022, doi: 10.1111/mice.12804.
• [21] A. Shehadeh, O. Alshboul, O. Tatari, et al., “Selection of heavy machinery for earthwork activities: A multiobjective optimization approach using a genetic algorithm”, Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 7555-7569, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.01.010.