Reconstruction of destroyed architectural monuments in Ukraine: Between historical authenticity and modern needs of the urban environment

Zhukova, Olena; Chagovets, Olesya

doi:10.35784/odk.6122

Powiadomienia systemowe

Sesja wygasła!

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Reconstruction of destroyed architectural monuments in Ukraine: Between historical authenticity and modern needs of the urban environment

Autorzy

Zhukova Olena , Chagovets Olesya

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/odk.6122

Warianty tytułu

Odbudowa zniszczonych zabytków w Ukrainie: Pomiędzy historyczną autentycznością a współczesnymi potrzebami środowiska miejskiego

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

In the context of the 60th anniversary of the Venice Charter, this report focuses on the challenges and opportunities for the reconstruction of destroyed monuments in Ukraine that go beyond traditional methods of restoration and conservation. The circumstances of extensive cultural heritage destruction due to hostilities in Ukraine have presented us with a crucial decision: how to preserve the historical identity and cultural memory of the nation? An example of this can be a city like Kharkiv, where the conservation of ruins or the creation of memorial sites proves to be impossible. This report analyses the challenges associated with the replication of monuments in the urban context of Ukraine, with a particular focus on ensuring the preservation of the urban environment and historical identity. Recognizing the loss of historic buildings as a threat, this report emphasizes the necessity of finding flexible solutions. Special attention is dedicated to preserving the authenticity of the destroyed objects while ensuring their adaptation to new functional needs and the demands of modern usage. Considering the uniqueness of each site, various approaches are explored, ranging from precise reconstruction to more interpretive methods that maintain the historical essence of the place while introducing new functional elements. The report outlines discussions on the moral and practical aspects of reconstructing destroyed objects, addressing the role of the Venice Charter in Ukraine today. It suggests updating doctrinal documents to tackle current urban challenges. The paper highlights the significance of ruined monuments for cities' historical and cultural identities, exemplifying cultural heritage preservation during wartime.

W kontekście 60. rocznicy podpisania Karty Weneckiej, niniejszy raport koncentruje się na, wykraczających poza tradycyjne metody renowacji i konserwacji, wyzwaniach i możliwościach odbudowy zniszczonych zabytków w Ukrainie. Okoliczności rozległego zniszczenia dziedzictwa kulturowego w wyniku działań wojennych w Ukrainie postawiły nas przed kluczową decyzją: jak zachować tożsamość historyczną i pamięć kulturową narodu? Przykładem tego może być miasto Charków, gdzie konserwacja ruin lub tworzenie miejsc pamięci okazuje się niemożliwe. Niniejszy raport analizuje wyzwania związane z replikacją zabytków w kontekście miejskim Ukrainy, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem zapewnienia ochrony środowiska miejskiego i tożsamości historycznej. Uznając utratę historycznych budynków za zagrożenie, raport podkreśla konieczność znalezienia elastycznych rozwiązań. Szczególną uwagę poświęcono zachowaniu autentyczności zniszczonych obiektów przy jednoczesnym zapewnieniu ich adaptacji do nowych funkcjonalności i wymagań nowoczesnego użytkowania. Biorąc pod uwagę wyjątkowość każdego miejsca, zbadano różne podejścia, od precyzyjnej rekonstrukcji po metody bardziej interpretacyjne, które zachowują historyczną istotę miejsca, wprowadzając jednocześnie nowe elementy funkcjonalne. Raport przedstawia dyskusje na temat moralnych i praktycznych aspektów rekonstrukcji zniszczonych obiektów, odnosząc się do współczesnej roli Karty Weneckiej na Ukrainie. Sugeruje się tu aktualizację dokumentów doktrynalnych w celu sprostania obecnym wyzwaniom miejskim. W artykule podkreślono znaczenie zrujnowanych zabytków dla tożsamości historycznej i kulturowej miast, na przykładzie ochrony dziedzictwa kulturowego w czasie wojny.

Słowa kluczowe

destroyed architectural monuments historical authenticity war impact on heritage war destructions reconstruction replication monuments

zniszczone zabytki architektoniczne historyczna autentyczność zniszczenia wojenne wpływ wojny na dziedzictwo rekonstrukcja replikacja zabytki

Wydawca

Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków ICOMOS
Wydawnictwo Politechniki Lubelskiej

Czasopismo

Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego

Rocznik

2024

Tom

Nr 22

Strony

1--32

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 55 poz., fig.

Twórcy

autor

Zhukova Olena

28helen82@gmail.com

Scientific Centre of Development of Museum and Monument Studies (Ukraine)

https://orcid.org/000-0002-5932-1461

autor

Chagovets Olesya

chagolesya@gmail.com

O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv (Ukraine)

https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9160-0210

Bibliografia

1. Artishevskyi, A. (2007). Some aspects of the preservation and use of ancient monuments. Modern Problems of Research, Restoration and Preservation of Cultural Heritage, (4), 392–396. [In Ukrainian].
2. Bortnikova, A. (2013). The phenomenon of "Genius loci" in the natural and cultural landscape of a small homeland. Scientific Notes of the National University of Ostroh Academy, Series: Philosophy, (13), 9–13. [In Ukrainian].
3. Bozhenko, A., & Chahovets, O. (2023). Identifying the value of Stalinist architecture in the context of decommunisation processes. Cultural Heritage of Slobozhanshchyn, (52), 98–107.
4. Bulavin, M. (2019, June 18). Only photos remain: Seven lost temples of Kharkiv. Mykharkov.info. https://mykharkov.info/interesno/ratings/ostalis-tolko-fotografii-sem-utrachennyh-hramov-harkova-29426.html (accessed January 5, 2024). [In Russian].
5. Butsenko, O. (2020). Issues of culture and cultural heritage in the projection of sustainable development goals. Art Research of Ukraine, (20), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.31500/2309-8155.20.2020.220912 [In Ukrainian].
6. Cherkasova, E. (2007). Forms of adaptation of architectural monuments to modern use. Scientific Bulletin of Construction; Collection of Scientific Papers*, (41), 22–30. [In Russian].
7. Davidich, T. (2013). Styles in the Architecture of Kharkiv*. Kharkiv: Litera Nova, 164 p. [In Ukrainian].
8. Davydova, Y., & Hovyna, L. (2024, January 14). More than 200 monuments destroyed in Kharkiv region due to the war: What violations do architects see when treating buildings? Suspilne News. https://suspilne.media/653632-na-harkivsini-cerez-vijnu-zrujnovani-ponad-200-pamatok-aki-porusenna-bacat-arhitektori-pid-cas-povodzenna-z-budivlami/ (accessed March 8, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
9. Dezhkina, M. (2021, January 16). Kharkiv is suing the owner of an architectural monument who changed its appearance. Suspilne News. https://suspilne.media/96075-u-harkovi-sudatsa-z-vlasnikom-pamatki-arhitekturi-akij-zminiv-ii-viglad (accessed March 8, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
10. Destruction of monument protection*. (n.d.). http://kyiv-heritage.com/page/znischennya-okhoroni-pamyatok (accessed March 8, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
11. Destroyed history. How the Russians are destroying Kharkiv's monuments. (2022, July 22). KharkivToday. https://2day.kh.ua/ua/kharkow/znyshchena-istoriya-yak-rosiyany-ruynuyut-pamyatky-kharkova (accessed March 8, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
12. Diss, J. (2022, November 2). [Response to the concept of rethinking the building of the Kharkiv Regional State Administration from Dmitry Kuznetsov] [Image attached]. Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/elevinshteyn/posts/pfbid02WU55foHgkN8Kr6zd4vJWaNhbsGWcQBa56VqAn1dWrx6W31r9T6nohsLMdLudMjRdl (accessed March 8, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
13. Goncharova, K. (2014). The place of the Venice Charter principles in the context of national cultural revival in Ukraine after 1991. Change Over Time, 4(2), 286–307. https://doi.org/10.1353/COT.2014.0027
14. E-pamiatka. (n.d.). Ministry of Culture and Information Policy of Ukraine. https://e-pamiatka.gov.ua/ (accessed March 8, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
15. Fitzpatrick, S. (1995). The cultural front: Power and culture in revolutionary Russia. Slavic Review, 54(2), 475–476. https://doi.org/10.2307/2501665
16. Kara-Vasylieva, T. (2022). Cultural heritage of Ukraine: Research, its state in the period of the newest challenges of modernity. Visn. Nac. Acad. Nauk Ukr.*, (7), 42–46. [In Ukrainian].
17. Kharkiv Regional Prosecutor's Office. (n.d.). https://khar.gp.gov.ua/ (accessed January 8, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
18. Kharkiv, which attracts. (n.d.). https://moniacs.kh.ua/ (accessed March 17, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
19. KhODA building: demolish or leave? (2023, March 16). Art-Oborona. https://art-oborona.weblium.site/khoada-discussion (accessed March 13, 2024).
20. Kot, S. (Ed.). (2015). Cultural heritage in the context of the "Syllabus of historical and cultural monuments of Ukraine". Kyiv: Institute of History of Ukraine, 486 p. [In Ukrainian].
21. Kupriychuk, V. (2018). The role of national cultural heritage in the formation of Ukrainian identity. In V. Troshchynskyi (Ed.), Formation of Ukrainian identity in the context of modern challenges: Theoretical and political aspects (pp. 78–106). Kyiv. [In Ukrainian].
22. Leshchenko, N. (2022). The principle of "integrity" in the complex process of restoration and reconstruction transformations of historical city centres. Modern Problems of Architecture and Urban Planning, (62), 50–60. [In Ukrainian].
23. Ligostaeva, S. (2020, October 28). Architectural catastrophe in the centre of Kharkiv. UKRINFORM. https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-regions/3124268-arhitekturna-katastrofa-v-centri-harkova.html (accessed March 17, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
24. López Morales, F. J. (2016). La Carta de Venecia en el siglo XXI. Gremium, 3(5), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.56039/rgn05a04
25. Main Directorate of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine in Kharkiv Region. (n.d.). https://kh.dsns.gov.ua/ (accessed March 17, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
26. Map of destroyed architectural monuments in Kharkiv. (n.d.). https://hero.kharkiv.ua/ (accessed March 17, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
27. Map of destruction and recovery. (n.d.). https://reukraine.shtab.net/ (accessed March 17, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
28. Meshcheryakov, V. (2016). Mechanisms of state regulation in the field of protection of historical and cultural heritage and architectural monuments in the regions. [PhD thesis in public administration]. [In Ukrainian].
29. MCIP: 872 monuments of cultural heritage were damaged due to Russian aggression in Ukraine. (2024, January 9). Unified Web Portal of the Executive Authorities of Ukraine. https://www.kmu.gov.ua/news/mkip-cherez-rosiisku-ahresiiu-v-ukraini-postrazhdaly-872-pamiatky-kulturnoi-spadshchyny (accessed March 8, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
30. Ministry of Culture and Information Policy of Ukraine. (n.d.). https://mcip.gov.ua/ (accessed March 17, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
31. Movchan, O. (2007). Campaign to confiscate church values in the Ukrainian SSR in 1922. In: Encyclopedia of the History of Ukraine (Vol. 4, p. 50). Kyiv: Naukova Dumka. [In Ukrainian].
32. Nakypilo LIVE. (2024, February 2). Discussion of the problems of restoring architectural monuments damaged by Russian aggression [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prxJ5gtRhC0 (accessed March 8, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
33. NeMo: Ukrainian Heritage Monitoring Lab. (n.d.). Monitoring heritage for restoration. https://www.heritage.in.ua/ (accessed March 10, 2024).
34. Oleynik, A. (2020). Kharkiv may lose the Mussouri Circus. https://kharkiv.znaj.ua/327754-u-harkovi-legendarniy-cirk-mussuri-peretvoryuyetsya-na-rujinu-yogo-obozhnyuvali-shalyapin-visockiy-i-charivna-dunkan (accessed March 10, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
35. Orlenko, M. (2016a). Legislative policy in the field of protection and restoration of architectural monuments. Regional Policy: Historical Origins, Legislative Regulation, Practical Implementation, 2(II), 7–11. [In Ukrainian].
36. Osychenko, H. (2022). Modern trends in the restoration of architectural monuments. Urban Planning and Territorial Planning, (79), 283–295. [In Ukrainian].
37. Panasiuk, S. (2022, November 4). The new building of the Kharkiv Regional State Administration: What did the author of the concept want to say and how did social media react? Luke – Online Media about Kharkiv. https://lyuk.media/city/kharkivoda-new-concept/ (accessed March 10, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
38. Plamenytska, O. (1997). Ukrainian restoration: Problems and prospects of development. Monuments of Ukraine: History and Culture, (1), 15–18. [In Ukrainian].
39. Plamenytska, O. (2004). The Venice Charter: A view from the distance of 40 years. Monuments of Ukraine: History and Culture, (4), 60–63. [In Ukrainian].
40. Plamenytska, O. (2013). The case of the "subject of protection" of an architectural monument as a methodological problem. Ukrainian Academy of Arts, (21), 133–146. [In Ukrainian].
41. Potapenko, V., Tyshchenko, Y., Kaplan, Y., Bakalchuk, V., Lytvynenko, O., & Mykhailova, O. (2023). Cultural heritage and national security. National Institute for Strategic Studies. https://doi.org/10.53679/niss-analytrep.2023.08 [In Ukrainian].
42. Project "Visual Identification of Heritage: Virtual Presentation of Public Spaces in Historic Cities of Ukraine". (2023). https://heritage-research.com.ua/golovna-storinka-proekt (accessed March 10, 2024).
43. Prybega, L. (2022). The concept of authenticity in architectural monument studies and restoration. Ukrainian Academy of Arts, (31), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.33838/naoma.31.2022.7-14 [In Ukrainian].
44. Riazantseva, A., & Hrebinnyk, D. (2022, November 10). A century-old building in Kharkiv damaged by shelling: An architect explains how to preserve it. Suspilne News. https://suspilne.media/313724-poskodzena-obstrilami-storicna-budivla-u-harkovi-arhitektor-rozpoviv-ak-ii-vberegti/ (accessed January 17, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
45. Rishniak, O. (2022). Cultural heritage in a military conflict: International experience of the second half of the twentieth – the beginning of the twenty-first centuries and the Ukrainian present time. Ukrainskyi Istorychnyi Zhurnal, (4), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2022.04.159 [In Ukrainian].
46. Rybchynskyi, O. (2015). Analysis of programmes for the preservation of cultural heritage of Ukraine. The CHOICE project: Cultural Heritage and Modernity. [In Ukrainian].
47. Salimonovich, L. (2022, June 16). Recognition by the facade: How Kharkiv's architectural monuments destroyed by rashists will be reconstructed. Ukraine Moloda. https://umoloda.kyiv.ua/number/3808/2006/167129/ (accessed March 10, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
48. Salimonovych, L. (2022, June 9). To restore or not: A confrontation is brewing in Kharkiv over the fate of the historic building of the Kharkiv Regional State Administration. Ukraine Moloda. https://umoloda.kyiv.ua/number/3807/196/166965/ (accessed March 10, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
49. Semyakin, G. (2017). On the definition of the concept of the subject of protection in modern normative sources on the preservation of architectural heritage. Naukovy Visnyk Budivnytstva, 89(3), 58–62. [In Russian].
50. Smolenska, S. (2015). Preserving the monuments of constructivism in Ukraine (based on unpublished archival materials). Modern Problems of Architecture and Urban Planning, 41, 190–198. [In Ukrainian].
51. Solodovnyk, M., & Dezhkina, M. (2023, April 21). In Kharkiv, a request to conserve a 19th-century monument damaged by a Russian missile. Suspilne News. https://suspilne.media/653632-na-harkivsini-cerez-vijnu-zrujnovani-ponad-200-pamatok-aki-porusenna-bacat-arhitektori-pid-cas-povodzenna-z-budivlami/ (accessed January 17, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
52. State Register of Immovable Monuments of Ukraine. (n.d.). Ministry of Culture and Information Policy of Ukraine. https://mcip.gov.ua/kulturna-spadshchyna/derzhavnyy-reiestr-nerukhomykh-pam-iatok-ukrainy/ (accessed March 10, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
53. Vecherskyi, V. (2002). Lost objects of the architectural heritage of Ukraine. Research Institute of the Theory and History of Architecture and Urban Planning; Main Department of Urban Planning. [In Ukrainian].
54. What is happening around the "official" reconstruction of Kharkiv. (2023, August 16). Kharkiv Anti-Corruption Centre. https://anticor-kharkiv.org/our-work/pro-te-shcho-foster-u-pryntsypi-ne-mozhe-rozrobyty-henplan-my-znaly-vid-pochatku-shcho-vidbuvaietsia-navkolo-ofitsiynoi-vidbudovy-kharkova-ta-khto-shche-pratsiuie-nad-kontseptsiieiu-vidnovlennia-mis/ (accessed March 10, 2024). [In Ukrainian].
55. Yacyna, O., & Mykhailov, H. (2021). The First Kharkiv Fortress. Kharkiv: The House of Advertising, 95 p. [In Ukrainian].

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-e88ddf8c-104c-4fd5-b6c8-1494d35e56f3