Analysis of pier contact accident in busan new port of south Korea by System-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP)

• Autorzy: Kim S. R. , Wamugi W. J. , Camliyurt G. , Kim D. W. , Park Y. S.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.17.02.05

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Marine accidents are caused by complex and diverse causes. Therefore, it is necessary to analyse accidents from the perspective of the whole system rather than the existing analysis models that focus on cause-effect. The STAMP analysis is a constraint-based model that focuses on improper management or enforcement of safety-related constraints in system operation. Thus, as a case study of the application of the STAMP technique in marine accident analysis, the Milano Bridge pier contact accident that occurred on April 6, 2020 in Busan New Port of South Korea was analysed by the STAMP technique in this study. Through this study, it was proposed to break away from the domestic accident investigation, which focused only on the punishment of the ship operator, and to suggest improvements that enable organizations related to the marine accidents to take initiative to take efforts for safety.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

maritime accidents; investigation on maritime accidents; accident analysis; System-Theoretic Accident Model and Process; maritime safety; safety at sea; pilotage; lesson

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 17 No. 2
• Strony: 299--304
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 16 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kim S. R.

• Korea Maritime and Ocean University, Busan, South Korea

autor

Wamugi W. J.

• Korea Maritime and Ocean University, Busan, South Korea

autor

Camliyurt G.

• Korea Maritime and Ocean University, Busan, South Korea

autor

Kim D. W.

• Korea Maritime and Ocean University, Busan, South Korea

autor

Park Y. S.

• Korea Maritime and Ocean University, Busan, South Korea

Bibliografia

• [1] Svein Kristiansen, 2005, “Safety Management and Risk Analysis” in Maritime Transportation, Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
• [2] E. K. Lee, and Y. S. Park., 2020, A Study on Cause Analysis of Accidents related to Pilotage in Korean Waterways, Journal of Korean Maritime Police Science, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 109‐129.
• [3] e‐NaraStatistics, 2023, Marine Pollution Accidents (https://www.index.go.kr/), Accessed in 2023.03.30.
• [4] Korean Maritime Safety Tribunal, 2021, Marine Safety Investigation Report on M/V MILANO BRIDGE ‐ Contact with gantry cranes.
• [5] Korea Maritime Pilot’s Association, 2018, Pilot Safety Judgment Casebook (1978‐2017).
• [6] Marine Accident Investigation Branch, 2018, Accident report on the investigation of heavy contact with the quay and two shore cranes by the UK registered container ship CMA CGM Centaurus at Jebel Ali, United Arab Emirates.
• [7] Transportation Safety Board of Canada, 2020, Maritime Transportation Safety Investigation Report M19P0020.
• [8] T. E. Kim, S. Nazir, and K. I Øvergård., 2016, A STAMPbased causal analysis of the Korean Sewol ferry accident, Safety Science, Vol. 83, pp. 93‐101.
• [9] H. Altabbakh, M. A. Alkazimi, S. Murray, and K. Grantham, 2014, STAMP e Holistic system safety approach or just another risk model?, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 32, pp. 104‐ 119.
• [10] Z.H. Qureshi, and A. Campbell., 2009, Systemic Safety and Accident Modelling of Complex Socio‐technical Systems, INCOSE International Symposium, Vol. 1, pp. 21‐35.
• [11] P. Underwood, and P. Waterson., 2013, Systemic accident analysis: Examining the gap between research and practice, Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 55, pp. 154‐164.
• [12] E. Hollnagel, and O. Goteman, 2004., The functional resonance accident model, Proceedings of cognitive system engineering in process plant, pp. 155‐161.
• [13] J. Rasmussen., 1997, Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Safety Science, Vol. 27, pp. 183‐213.
• [14] N. G. Leveson., 2016, Engineering a safer world: Systems thinking applied to safety, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
• [15] N. Leveson., 2004, A new accident model for engineering safer systems, Safety Science, Vol. 42, pp. 237‐270.
• [16] P. M. Salmon, M. Cornelissen, and M. J. Trotter, 2012, Systems‐based accident analysis methods: A comparison of Accimap, HFACS, and STAMP, Safety Science, Vol. 50, pp. 1158‐1170.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).