The relationship between employee attitudes and innovation types : a managerial perspective

• Autorzy: Bulut Cagri , Gencturk Selin , Aydin Erhan , Nazli Murat , Kahraman Serpil

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2019.19.2.07

Warianty tytułu

PL

Relacja między postawami pracownika a rodzajami innowacji : z perspektywy zarządzania

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This research aims at demonstrating how employee attitudes effect on innovation types that they adopt. Furthermore, this study examines the effects of most frequently used and widely accepted twelve constructs on workplace-related employee attitudes on three types of innovation. Results mainly reveal that based on the data gathered as a self-reported survey over a hundred employees from the manufacturing industry in Turkey, only half-dozen of the attitudes differently connected with the three types of innovation. Concretely, incremental and imitation types of innovation have significant relations with employees’ organizational related attitudes, and radical innovation has significant relations both with the job-related and organizational-related employee attitudes. The study sheds a light for innovation researchers and practitioners to make them consider which of the workplace related attitude of employees has a significant connection with which of the innovation type.

PL

Celem tego badania jest pokazanie, w jaki sposób postawy pracowników wpływają na typy innowacji, które przyjmują. Ponadto w niniejszym badaniu przeanalizowano wpływ najczęściej używanych i powszechnie akceptowanych dwunastu konstrukcji na stosunek pracowników do miejsca pracy w odniesieniu do trzech rodzajów innowacji. Wyniki pokazują przede wszystkim, że na podstawie danych zebranych jako samodzielna ankieta ponad stu pracowników z przemysłu wytwórczego w Turcji, zaledwie pół tuzina postaw różnie związanych z trzema rodzajami innowacji. Konkretnie, przyrostowe i naśladujące typy innowacji mają znaczące powiązania z postawami organizacyjnymi związanymi z pracownikami, a radykalna innowacja ma istotne relacje zarówno z postawami pracowniczymi związanymi z pracą, jak i organizacyjnymi. Badanie rzuca światło badaczom i praktykom zajmującym się innowacjami, aby skłonić ich do zastanowienia się, która z postaw związanych z miejscem pracy ma istotny związek z typem innowacji.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

innovation types; job satisfaction; organizational commitment; job involvement; employee attitudes

PL

typy innowacji; zadowolenie z pracy; zaangażowanie organizacyjne; zaangażowanie w pracę; postawy pracowników

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 19, No. 2
• Strony: 89--100
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 36 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Bulut Cagri

• Yasar University, Turkey

autor

Gencturk Selin

• Yasar University, Turkey

autor

Aydin Erhan

• Usak University, Turkey
• IPAG Business School Paris, France

autor

Nazli Murat

• Yasar University, Turkey

autor

Kahraman Serpil

• Yasar University, Turkey

Bibliografia

• 1. Bakker A.B., Schaufeli W.B., Leiter M.P., Taris T.W., 2008, Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology, Work and Stress, 22(3).
• 2. Barney J., 1991, Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, “Journal of Management”, 17(1).
• 3. Bateman T.S., Organ D.W., 1983, Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee citizenship, “Academy of Management Journal”, 26(4).
• 4. Bowling N.A., Khazon S., Meyer R.D., Burrus C.J., 2015, Situational strength as a moderator of the relationship between job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analytic examination, “Journal of Business and Psychology”, 30(1).
• 5. Currivan D.B., 1999, The causal order of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in models of employee turnover, Human Resource Management Review, 9(4).
• 6. Damanpour F., Wischnevsky J.D., 2006, Research on innovation in organizations: Distinguishing innovation-generating from innovation-adopting organizations, “Journal of Engineering and Technology Management”, 23(4).
• 7. Davis G.F., Cobb J.A., 2010, Chapter 2 Resource dependence theory: Past and future. In Stanford's organization theory renaissance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• 8. Forés B., Camisón C., 2016, Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend on different types of knowledge accumulation capabilities and organizational size? “Journal of Business Research”, 69(2).
• 9. Garcia R., Calantone R., 2002, A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review, “Journal of Product Innovation Management”, 19(2).
• 10. Gatignon H., Xuereb J.M., 1997, Strategic Orientation of The Firm and New Product Performance, “Journal of Marketing Research”, 34(1).
• 11. Gracia E., Marisa S., Rosa G., Eva C., 2013, How to enhance service quality through organizational facilitators, collective work engagement, and relational service competence, “European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology”, 22(1).
• 12. Griffin R., 1983, Objective and social sources of information in task redesign: a field experiment, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2).
• 13. Hitt M.A., Bierman L., Shimizu K., Kochhar R., 2001, Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective, “The Academy of Management Journal”, 44(1).
• 14. Huang L.C., Ahlstrom D., Lee A.Y.P., Chen S.Y., Hsieh M.J., 2016, HPWS, employee well-being, and job involvement: An empirical study, Personnel Review, 45(2).
• 15. Huselid M.A., 1995, The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance, “Academy of Management Journal”, 38(3).
• 16. Jabeen F., Friesen H.L., Ghoudi K., 2018, Quality of work life of Emirati women and its influence on job satisfaction and turnover intention: Evidence from the UAE, “Journal of Organizational Change Management”, 31(2).
• 17. Kanungo R.N., 1982, Measurement of Job and Work Involvement, “Journal of Applied Psychology”, 67(3).
• 18. Kim K.Y., Eisenberger R., Baik K., 2016, Perceived organizational support and affective organizational commitment: Moderating influence of perceived organizational competence, “Journal of Organizational Behavior”, 37(4).
• 19. López-Pueyo C., Barcenilla S., Giménez G., 2018, The two faces of human capital and their effect on technological progress, Panoeconomicus, 65(2).
• 20. Meneghel I., Borgogni L., Miraglia M., Salanova M., Martínez I.M., 2016, From social context and resilience to performance through job satisfaction: A multilevel study over time, Human Relations, 69(11).
• 21. Meyer A.M., Bartels L.K., 2017, The Impact of Onboarding Levels on Perceived Utility, Organizational Commitment, Organizational Support, and Job Satisfaction, “Journal of Organizational Psychology”, 17(5).
• 22. Meyer J.P., Allen N.J., Smith C.A., 1993, Commitment to Organizations and Occupations: Extension and Test of Three-Component Conceptualization, “Journal of Applied Psychology”, 78(4).
• 23. Nieves J., Quintana A., 2018, Human resource practices and innovation in the hotel industry: The mediating role of human capital, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 18(1).
• 24. OECD-EUROSTAT, 2005, Oslo manual. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data.
• 25. Pachura A., 2012, Innovation theory: an epistemological aspects, “Polish Journal of Management Studies”, 5.
• 26. Pfeffer J., Salancik G.R., 1978, The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective, New York: Harper & Row.
• 27. Pfeffer J., Salancik G.R., 2003, The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• 28. Priesemuth M., Schminke M., Ambrose M., Folger R., 2014, Abusive supervision climate: a multiple-mediation model of its impact on group outcomes, “Academy of Management Journal”, 57(5).
• 29. Singh A., Gupta B., 2015, Job involvement, organizational commitment, professional commitment, and team commitment, “Benchmarking: An International Journal”, 22(6).
• 30. Spector P.E., 1997, Job Satisfaction: Application, Causes, and Consequences, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• 31. Taha A.V., Sirkova M., Ferencova M., 2016, The impact of organizational culture on creativity and innovation, “Polish Journal of Management Studies”, 14.
• 32. Tushman M.L., O’Reilly C.A., 2002, Winning through innovations, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
• 33. van den Broek J., Boselie P., Paauwe J., 2018, Cooperative innovation through a talent management pool: A qualitative study on coopetition in healthcare, “European Management Journal”, 36(1).
• 34. Williams L.J., Anderson S.E., 1991, Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors, “Journal of Management”, 17(3).
• 35. Yu M., Lee H., 2018, Impact of resilience and job involvement on turnover intention of new graduate nurses using structural equation modeling, “Japan Journal of Nursing Science”, 15(4).
• 36. Zhou K.Z., 2006, Innovation, imitation, and new product performance: The case of China, Industrial Marketing Management, 35(3).

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).