A model proposal for the analysis of new exterior additions to historic buildings

Şen, Tuğba; Dişli, Gülşen

doi:10.48234/WK70PROPOSAL

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

A model proposal for the analysis of new exterior additions to historic buildings

Autorzy

Şen Tuğba , Dişli Gülşen

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.48234/WK70PROPOSAL

Warianty tytułu

Propozycja modelowa analizy elementów dobudowywanych do budynków zabytkowych

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

New additions in a historical context can take many forms, such as additions to existing buildings and new subsidiary additions like garages, sheds, and outbuildings. There are two main reasons for introducing new additions to historic buildings. These are the loss of original functions, the resultant need for new spaces to serve the given secondary function, and the need to integrate the physically damaged parts of historic buildings with new designs. Therefore, in this study, a model proposal based on a rating system developed with international standards as the main guiding principle is proposed to analyze and evaluate the compatibility of new additions with historic buildings. It was then tested in nine historic baths, where different facilities were added, in Turkey. The study provides an important contribution to determining the suitability of new additions to existing buildings before and during the design phase and can serve as a guiding model for the supervisory authority responsible for the necessary permits.

Dobudowy mogą przybierać różne formy w historycznym kontekście, przykładowo jako rozbudowy istniejących budynków oraz dobudówek, takich jak garaże, szopy czy oficyny. Istnieją dwa główne powody dobudowywania nowych części do obiektów historycznych. Są to utrata funkcji pierwotnej i wynikająca z niej potrzeba nowej przestrzeni do korzystania z nowej funkcji oraz konieczności integrowania fizycznie uszkodzonych części budynków zabytkowych z nowymi. Proponowany model oparty na systemie ocen, stworzony na podstawie międzynarodowych standardów jako głównej zasady, może zostać użyty do analizowania i oceny kompatybilności dobudów do budynków historycznych. Model przetestowano na dziewięciu zabytkowych łaźniach w Turcji, do których dobudowano różne lokale. Badanie to stanowi ważny przyczynek do ustalania poprawności dobudów do budynków istniejących zarówno przed, jak i w trakcie fazy projektowej, i może być wzornikiem dla urzędów.

Słowa kluczowe

new additions historic buildings Turkish bath historic context model proposal historic preservation

nowe dobudowy budynki zabytkowe łaźnie tureckie kontekst historyczny propozycja modelowa konserwacja zabytków

Wydawca

Zarząd Główny Stowarzyszenia Konserwatorów Zabytków

Czasopismo

Wiadomości Konserwatorskie

Rocznik

2022

Tom

Nr 70

Strony

71--88

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 38 poz., tab., il.

Twórcy

autor

Şen Tuğba

Faculty of Fine Arts and Architecture, Necmettin Er- bakan University, Konya

autor

Dişli Gülşen

Faculty of Fine Arts and Architecture, Necmet- tin Erbakan University, Konya

Bibliografia

Electronic Sources / Źródła elektroniczne
1. Baghasing Kalpa, Sensitive Additions to Historic Buildings: A Primer, Heritage Ohio, https://www.heritageohio.org/2015/05/18/sensitive-additions-to-historic-buildings-a-primer/ (accessed: 11 X 2021).
2. City of New Orleans Historic District Landmarks Commission, Guidelines for New Construction, Additions and Demolition, https://www.nola.gov/nola/media/HDLC/Guidelines/12-New-Construction-Additions-Demolition.pdf (accessed: 12 VII 2021).
3. Creveling Liz, Rooftop Additions on Mid-Size Historic Buildings, “Interpreting The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation” 2007, No. 45, https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/applying-rehabilitation/itsbulletins/ITS47-RooftopAdditions-MidSizeBuildings.pdf (accessed: 12 VII 2021).
4. Grimmer Anne, New Additions to Mid-size Historic Buildings, “Interpreting The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation” 1999, No. 3, https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/applyingrehabilitation/its-bulletins/ITS03-Additions-MidSizeBuildings.pdf (accessed: 12 VII 2021).
5. Grimmer Anne E., Hensley Jo Ellen, Petrella Liz, Tepper Audrey T., The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation & Illustrated Guidelines on Sustainability for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings, Washington D.C. 2011, https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/rehabilitation/sustainability-guidelines.pdf (accessed: 12 VII 2021).
6. Grimmer Anne E., Weeks Kay D., New Exterior Additions to Historic Buildings, Preservation Concerns, https://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/briefs/14-exterior-additions.htm (accessed: 12 VII 2021).
7. ICOMOS, The Burra Charter, The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance, 2013, https://australia.icomos.org/wp-content/uploads/TheBurra-Charter-2013-Adopted-31.10.2013.pdf (accessed: 12 VII 2021).
8. ICOMOS, ICOMOS Charter – Principles for the Analysis, Conservation and Structural Restoration of Architectural Heritage (2003), https://www.icomos.org/charters/structures_e.pdf (accessed: 12 VII 2021).
9. ICOMOS, International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (The Venice Charter 1964), https://www.icomos.org/charters/venice_e.pdf (accessed: 12 VII 2021).
10. ICOMOS, The Declaration of Amsterdam, 1975, https://www.icomos.org/en/and/169-the-declaration-ofamsterdam (accessed: 12 VII 2021).
11. ICOMOS, The ICOMOS New Zealand Charter 2010, https://www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/Charters/ICOMOS_NZ_Charter_2010_FINAL_11_Oct_2 010.pdf (accessed: 12 VII 2021).
12. ICOMOS, Resolutions of the Symposium on the Introduction of Contemporary Architecture into Ancient Groups of Buildings, https://www.icomos.org/publications/93towns7e.pdf (accessed: 12 VII 2021).
13. İlke Kararı- Karar No: 660 / Karar Tarihi: 05.11.1999, https://kvmgm.ktb.gov.tr/TR-44311/ilke-karari-karar-no-660--karar-tarihi-05111999.html (accessed: 12 VII 2021).
14. İlke Kararı- Karar No: 720 / Karar Tarihi: 04.10.2006, https://kvmgm.ktb.gov.tr/TR-44332/ilke-karari-karar-no-720--karar-tarihi-04102006.html (accessed: 12 VII 2021).
15. Köşklük Kaya Nezihat, İtalya’da Tarihi Yapılarda Yeni Ek Uygulamalarında Çağdaş Çatı ve Cephe Sistemleri ile Tasarım İlkeleri, Konu Başlık No: 3 Çatı ve Cephe Sistemlerinde Süreçler, 6. Ulusal Çatı & Cephe Sempozyumu 12–13 Nisan 2012, Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendis-lik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi, Görükle Kampüsü, Bursa, http://catider.org.tr/pdf/sempozyum6/8.pdf (accessed: 10 X 2021).
16. Kültür Ve Tabiat Varliklarini Koruma Yüksek Kurulunun, http://teftis.kulturturizm.gov.tr/yazdir?549C7059D7FF142A3CF3B98AB092CB66 (accessed: 12 VII 2021).
17. Petrella Liz, Designing New Additions to Provide Accessibility, “Interpreting The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation” 2009, No. 53 , https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/applying-rehabilitation/its-bulletins/ITS53-Additions-Accessibility.pdf (accessed: 12 VII 2021).
18. Randl Chad, Rear Additions to Historic Houses, “Interpreting The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation” 2006, No. 37, https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/applyingrehabilitation/its-bulletins/ITS37-Houses-RearAdditions.pdf (accessed: 12 VII 2021).
19. Sullivan Aleca, Exterior Stair/Elevator Tower Additions, “Interpreting The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation” 1999, No. 10, https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/applyingrehabilitation/its-bulletins/ITS10-StairTowers.pdf (accessed: 12 VII 2021).
20. Sandor John, New Additions to Mid-size Historic Buildings, “Interpreting The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation” 2011, No. 18, https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/applyingrehabilitation/its-bulletins/ITS18-Additions-MidSizeBuildings.pdf (accessed: 12 VII 2021).
21. https://forum.savingplaces.org/viewdocument/differentiated-andcompatible (accessed: 17 X 2021).
22. Tanaç Kiray Mine, Yilmaz Karaman Özgül, Tarihi Yapılara Çağdaş Ekler, “Çativecephe” 2006, No. 5, http://www.cativecephe.com/yayin/631/tarihi-yapilara-cagdas-ekler_18599.html (accessed: 15 X 2021).
23. Technical Preservation Services, The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation: Introduction to the Standards, https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/rehabilitation/rehab/stand.htm (accessed: 12 VII 2021).
24. Technical Preservation Services, Rooftop Additions, “Interpreting The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation” 2006, No. 36, https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/applying-rehabilitation/itsbulletins/ITS36-Rooftop-Additions.pdf (accessed: 12 VII 2021).
25. Tepper Audrey, Adding or Modifying Fly Lofts on Historic Theaters, “Interpreting The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation” 2007, No. 45, https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/applying-rehabilitation/its-bulletins/ITS45-Theaters-Lofts.pdf (accessed: 12 VII 2021).
26. UNESCO, Vienna Memorandum on World Heritage and Contemporary Architecture – Managing the Historic Urban Landscape, whc.unesco.org/document/6814.f (accessed: 12 VII 2021). https://yapidergisi.com/tarihi-yapive-ek-yapi-il-iskisinde-cagdas-yaklasimlar-alman-tarih-muzesi-ve-cagdas-ek-yapisi/ (accessed: 11 X 2021).
Secondary sources / Opracowania
27. Al-Jameel H. Ali, Saffo Bayda, Patterns of Additions to Old Buildings, “The Second International Conference on Conservation of Architecture, Urban Areas, Nature, and Landscape: Towards a Sustainable Survival of Cultural Landscape” Heritage 2011, Amman, Jordan 2011.
28. Dibner R. David, Dibner-Dunlap Amy, Building Additions Design, New York 1985.
29. Dişli Gülşen, New Additions to Existing Built Heritage and Their Contributions to Sustainable Development: Cases from Ankara, Turkey, [in:] Urban and Architectural Heritage Conservation within Sustainability, ed. Farisi Hmood Kabila, London 2018.
30. Guzmán-Torres Zasha Natiana, “Historic Buildings, and Contemporary Additions: The Elements of a Cohesive Design Relationship,” Master’s project prepared at the University of Maryland School of Architecture Planning Preservation, 2009.
31. Kozień Adam, Efficient Management of Cultural Heritage by Local Government Bodies, “Wiadomości Konserwatorskie – Journal of Heritage Conservation” 2020, No. 64, p. 7–16.
32. Mikulski Daniel, New Seats of Landed Gentry – Remodeling or A New Construction? Studies on the Identification and Dating of Manors and Palaces in Greater Poland, “Wiadomości Konserwatorskie – Journal of Heritage Conservation” 2019, No. 59, p. 49–60. Tanaç-Zeren Mine, Tarihi Çevrede Yeni Ek ve Yeni Yapı Olgusu, Çağdaş Yaklaşım Örnekleri, İstanbul 2010.
33. Węcławowicz-Gyurkovich Ewa, To Demolish or Preserve for Posterity, “Wiadomości Konserwatorskie – Journal of Heritage Conservation” 2020, No. 62, p. 85–96.
34. White M. Armon, “Defining Appropriateness: An Analysis of the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards on Additions to Historic Structures and Its Impact on the Practice of Architecture, Development, and Preservation,” Master's thesis project prepared at Columbia University, Graduate School of Architecture Planning and Preservation, 2018.
35. Yalaz Elif Tuğba, Dişli Gülşen, Şen Tuğba, New Additions to Historic Buildings: A Contemporary Roof Addition Proposal for Gaziantep Tutun Han, “Social Sciences Studies Journal” 2018, vol. 80, No. 81, p. 1635–1648.
36. Yavuz Zeynep, Yıldırım Tayfun, Analyses of Contemporary Architectural Designs Attached to Historical Buildings, “Gazi University Journal of Science, Part B, Arts Humanities Design and Planning” 2020, vol. 8, No. 4, p.747–760.
37. Yüceer Hülya, “An Evaluation of Interventions in Architectural Conservation: New Exterior Additions to Historic Buildings,” doctoral project prepared at the İzmir Institute of Technology, 2005.
38. Yüceer Hülya, İpekoğlu Başak, An Architectural Assessment Method for New Exterior Additions to Historic Buildings, “Journal of Cultural Heritage” 2012, vol. 13, No. 4, p. 419–425.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-ca6bdd3f-2c43-429c-a756-b7191eeab894