Risk evaluation of tunneling projects

• Autorzy: Fouladgar M. M. , Yazdani-Chamzini A. , Zavadskas E. K.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Tunneling industry has seen great advancements in underground construction projects. Now, it has significant difference with the last two decades. In many times, tunneling projects find themselves involved in the situation where unexpected conditions threaten the continuation of project. Managers always look for a reliable technique to overcome limitations of finance and time. TOPSIS method is widely used to solve multi criteria decision making (MADM) problems. This technique assigns the best alternative among a pool of feasible alternatives. Furthermore, due to inherent uncertainties in tunneling, using fuzzy logic in order to take into account these uncertainties can be useful. In addition, new factors are introduced to promote the accuracy of risk analysis. Finally, a real world case study is presented to show the effectiveness and the accuracy of the new risk evaluation model. The results demonstrated that collapse is the riskiest parameter in Ghomroud water conveyance tunneling project.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

tunneling; risk evaluation; fuzzy TOPSIS; ghomroud water conveyance tunnel

PL

tunelowanie; ocena ryzyka; metoda TOPSIS; transport wodny

• Wydawca: Springer ; Wrocław University of Science and Technology
• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: Vol. 12, no. 1
• Strony: 1--12
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 107 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Fouladgar M. M.

• Fateh Research Group, Department of Strategic Management, Milad Building, Mini city, Aghdasieh, Tehran, Iran

autor

Yazdani-Chamzini A.

• Fateh Research Group, Department of Strategic Management, Milad Building, Mini city, Aghdasieh, Tehran, Iran

autor

Zavadskas E. K.

• Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Sauletekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania

Bibliografia

• [1] S.D. Eskesen, P. Tengborg, J. Kampmann, T.H. Veicherts, Guidelines for tunnelling risk management: International Tunnelling Association, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 19 (3) (2004) 217–237.
• [2] N.Banaitien, A. Banaitis,A. Norkus, Risk management in projects: peculiarities of Lithuanian construction companies, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 15(1)(2011)60–73.
• [3] M.Schuhmacher, M. Meneses, A. Xifro, J.L. Domingo, The use of Monte-Carlo simulation techniques for risk assessment: study of a municipal waste incinerator, Chemosphere 43 (4–7)(2001)787–799.
• [4] K. Rezaie, M.S. Amalnik, A. Gereie, B. Ostadi, M. Shakhseniae, Using extended Monte Carlo simulation method for the improvement of risk management: Consideration of relationships between uncertainties, Applied Mathematics and Computation 190 (2) (2007) 1492–1501.
• [5] S.K. Au, Z.H. Wang, S.M. Lo, Compartment fire risk analysis by advanced Monte Carlo simulation, Engineering Structures 29 (9) (2007) 2381–2390.
• [6] E.R. Vaidogas, J. Sakenaite, Protecting built property against fire disasters: multi attribute decision making with respect to fire risk, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 14 (4) (2010) 391–407.
• [7] Y.F. Wu, Correlated sampling techniques used in Monte Carlo simulation for risk assessment, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 85 (9) (2008) 662–669.
• [8] Y. Carmel, Sh. Paz, F. Jahashan, M. Shoshan, Assessing fire risk using Monte Carlo simulations of fire spread, Forest Ecology and Management 257 (1) (2009) 370–377.
• [9] S.H. Stroeve, H.A.P. Blom, G.J. Bakker, Systemic accident risk assessment in air traffic by Monte Carlo simulation, Safety Science 47 (2) (2009) 238–249.
• [10] J.H. Smid, D. Verloo, G.C. Barker, A.H. Havelaar, Strengths and weaknesses of Monte Carlo simulation models and Bayesian belief networks in microbial risk assessment, International Journal of Food Microbiology 139 (1) (2010) S57–S63.
• [11] B. Amigun, D. Petrie, J. Gorgens, Economic risk assessment of advanced process technologies for bioethanol production in South Africa: Monte Carlo analysis, Renewable Energy 36 (11) (2011) 3178–3186.
• [12] E. Linder, G.P. Patil, D.S. Vaughan, Application of event tree risk analysis to fisheries management, Ecological Modelling 36 (1–2) (1987) 15–28.
• [13] A.F. Meloy, Arenal-type pyroclastic flows: a probabilistic event tree risk analysis, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 157 (1–3) (2006) 121–134.
• [14] A. Neri, W.P. Aspinall, R. Cioni, A. Bertagnini, P.J. Baxter, G. Zuccaro, D. Andronico, S. Barsotti, P.D. Cole, T. Esposti Ongaro, T.K. Hincks, G. Macedonio, P. Papale, M. Rosi, R. Santacroce, G. Woo, Developing an event tree for probabilistic hazard and risk assessment at Vesuvius, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 178 (3) (2008) 397–415.
• [15] E.S. Hong, I. M. Lee, H. S. Shin, S. W. Nam, J. S. Kong, Quantitative risk evaluation based on event tree analysis technique: application to the design of shield TBM, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 24 (3) (2009) 269–277.
• [16] J. A. Vılchez, V. Espejo, J. Casal, Generic event trees and probabilities for the release of different types of hazardous materials, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 24 (2011) 281–287.
• [17] A. Lindhe, L. Rosen, T. Norberg, O. Bergstedt, Faulttree analysis for integrated and probabilistic risk analysis of drinking water systems, Water Research 43 (6) (2009) 1641–1653.
• [18] R. Ferdous, F. Khan, B. Veitch, P. R. Amyotte, Methodology for computer aided fuzzy fault tree analysis, Process Safety and Environmental Protection 87 (4) (2009) 217–226.
• [19] J. K. Vaurio, Ideas and developments in importance measures and fault-tree techniques for reliability and risk analysis, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 95 (2) (2010) 99–107.
• [20] C. Rodak, S. Silliman, Probabilistic risk analysis and fault trees: Initial discussion of application to identification of risk ata wellhead, Advances in Water Resources 36 (2011) 133–145.
• [21] R. Farret, P. Gombert, F. Lahaie, A. Cherkaoui, S. Lafortune, P. Roux, Design of fault trees as a practical method for risk analysis of CCS: application to the different life stages of deep aquifer storage, combining long-term and short-term issues, Energy Procedia 4 (2011) 4193–4198.
• [22] A. Mentes, I. H. Helvacioglu, An application of fuzzy fault tree analysis for spread mooring systems, Ocean Engineering 38 (2–3) (2011) 285–294.
• [23] B. Carlsson, Chapter 4.2 - initial risk analysis of potential failure modes, Performance and Durability Assessment (2004) 147–157.
• [24] R. Gowland, The accidental risk assessment methodology for industries (ARAMIS)/layer of protection analysis (LOPA) methodology: a step forward towards convergent practices in risk assessment?, Journal of Hazardous Materials 130 (2006) 307–310.
• [25] Y. M. Wang, K. S. Chin, G. K. K. Poon, J. B. Yang, Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean, Expert Systems with Applications 36 (2) (2009) 1195–1207.
• [26] J. F. Leeuwen, M. J. Nauta, D. Kaste, Y. M. C. F. Odekerken-Rombouts, M. T. Oldenhof, M. J. Vredenbregt, D. M. Barends, Risk analysis by FMEA as an element of analytical validation, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 50 (5) (2009) 1085–1087.
• [27] A. H. Hu, C. W. Hsu, T. C. Kou, W.C. Wu, Risk evaluation of green components to hazardous substance using FMEA and FAHP, Expert Systems with Applications 36 (2009) 7142–7147.
• [28] N. Xiao, H.Z. Huang, Y. Li, L. He, T. Jin, Multiple failure modes analysis and weighted risk priority number evaluation in FMEA, Engineering Failure Analysis 18 (4) (2011) 1162–1170.
• [29] Z. Zhang, X. Chu, Risk prioritization in failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty, Expert Systems with Applications 38 (1) (2011) 206–214.
• [30] K. B. Misra, G. G. Weber, Use of fuzzy set theory for level-I studies in probabilistic risk assessment, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 37 (2) (1990) 139–160.
• [31] H. M. Lee, Group decision making using fuzzy sets theory for evaluating the rate of aggregative risk in software development, Fuzzy Set sand Systems 80 (3) (1996) 261–271.
• [32] Sh. J. Chen, Sh. M. Chen, Fuzzy risk analysis based on measures of similarity between interval-valued fuzzy numbers, Computers & Mathematics with Applications 55 (8) (2008) 1670–1685.
• [33] A. S. Markowski, M. S. Mannan, Fuzzy risk matrix, Journal of Hazardous Materials 159 (1) (2008) 152–157.
• [34] L. W. Lee, Sh. M. Chen, Fuzzy risk analysis based on fuzzy numbers with different shapes and different deviations, Expert Systems with Applications 34 (4) (2008) 2763–2771.
• [35] Sh. H. Wei, Sh. M. Chen, A new approach for fuzzy risk analysis based on similarity measures of generalized fuzzy numbers, Expert Systems with Applications 36 (1) (2009) 589–598.
• [36] Sh. H. Wei, Sh. M. Chen, Fuzzy risk analysis based on interval-valued fuzzy numbers, Expert Systems with Applications 36 (2) (2009) 2285–2299.
• [37] Sh. M. Chen, Ch. H. Wang, Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking fuzzy numbers using a-cuts, belief features and signal/noise ratios, Expert Systems with Applications 36 (3) (2009) 5576–5581.
• [38] A. S. Markowski, M. S. Mannan, Fuzzy logic for piping risk assessment (pfLOPA), Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 22 (6) (2009) 921–927.
• [39] Sh. M. Chen, J.H. Chen, Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking generalized fuzzy numbers with different heights and different spreads, Expert Systems with Applications 36 (3) (2009) 6833–6842.
• [40] Sh. M. Chen, J.H. Chen, Fuzzy risk analysis based on similarity measures between interval-valued fuzzy numbers and interval-valued fuzzy number arithmetic operators, Expert Systems with Applications 36 (3) (2009) 6309–6317.
• [41] L.H. Feng, G.Y. Luo, Analysis on fuzzy risk of landfall typhoon in Zhejiang province of China, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 79 (11) (2009) 3258–3266.
• [42] J.F. Balmat, F. Lafont, R. Maifret, N. Pessel, MAritime RISk Assessment (MARISA), a fuzzy approach to define an individual ship risk factor, Ocean Engineering 36 (15–16) (2009) 1278–1286.
• [43] T. Elsayed, Fuzzy inference system for the risk assessment of liquefied natural gas carriers during loading/offloading at terminals, Applied Ocean Research 31 (3) (2009) 179–185.
• [44] Zh. Xu, Sh. Shang, W. Qian, W. Shu, A method for fuzzy risk analysis based on the new similarity of trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, Expert Systems with Applications 37 (3) (2010) 1920–1927.
• [45] Nieto-Morote, F. Ruz-Vila, A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment, International Journal of Project Management 29 (2) (2011) 220–231.
• [46] S.R. Hejazi, A. Doostparast, S.M. Hosseini, An improved fuzzy risk analysis based on a new similarity measures of generalized fuzzy numbers, Expert Systems with Applications 38 (8) (2011) 9179–9185.
• [47] Sh. M. Chen, K. Sanguansat, Analyzing fuzzy risk based on similarity measures between interval-valued fuzzy numbers, Expert Systems with Applications 38 (7) (2011) 8612–8621.
• [48] Sh. M. Chen, K. Sanguansat, Analyzing fuzzy risk based on a new fuzzy ranking method between generalized fuzzy numbers, Expert Systems with Applications 38 (3) (2011) 2163–2171.
• [49] A. Idrus, M.F. Nuruddin, M.A. Rohman, Development of project cost contingency estimation model using risk analysis and fuzzy expert system, Expert Systems with Applications 38 (3) (2011) 1501–1508.
• [50] C. Kahraman, I. Kaya, Investment analyses using fuzzy probability concept, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16 (1) (2010) 43–57.
• [51] E. C. M. Hui, O.M.F. Lau, K. K. Lo, A fuzzy decision making approach for portfolio management with direct real estate investment, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 13 (2) (2009) 191–204.
• [52] X. Miao, B. Yu, B. Xi, Y.-H. Tang, Modeling of bilevel games and incentives for sustainable critical infrastructure system, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16 (3) (2010) 365–379.
• [53] Z. Turskis, E. K. Zavadskas, F. Peldschus, Multi-criteria optimization system for decision making in construction design and management, Inzinerine Ekonomika Engineering Economics 1 (61) (2009) 7–17.
• [54] L. Ustinovichius, A. Barvidas, A. Vishnevskaja, I. V. Ashikhmin, Multicriteria verbal analysis for the decision of construction problems, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 15 (2) (2009) 326–340.
• [55] E. K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, J. Tamosaitiene, Riskassessment of construction projects, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 16 (1) (2010) 33–46.
• [56] E. K. Zavadskas, T. Vilutiene, Z. Turskis, J. Tamosaitiene, Contractor selection for construction works by applying SAW-Gand TOPSIS grey techniques, Journal of Business Economics and Management 11(1) (2010) 34–55.
• [57] J. Reilly, J. Brown, Management and control of cost and risk for tunneling and infrastructure projects, in: Proceedings of International Tunneling Conference, Singapore, 2004, pp.1–8.
• [58] M. Sari, A. S. Selcuk, C. Karpuz, H.S.B. Duzgun, Stochastic modeling of accident risks as sociated with an underground coal minein Turkey, Safety Science 47 (1) (2009) 78–87.
• [59] R.J. Durrheim, S.M. Spottiswoode, M.K.C. Roberts, A.Z.Brink, Comparative seismology of the wit watersrand Basin and Bushveld Complex and emerging technologies to manage the risk of rockbursting, The Journal of The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 105 (2005) 409–416.
• [60] Ch. Yoo, Y. W. Jeon, B.S. Choi, IT-basedtunnellingrisk management system (IT-TURISK) – development and implementation, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 21 (2) (2006) 190–202.
• [61] J.J. Reilly, Cost estimating and risk – management for under- ground projects, in: Proceedings of International Tunneling Association Conference, Istanbul, 2005, pp.1-9.
• [62] Y.G. Kim, Application of risk analysis and assessment in tunnel design, nternational Journal of the Japanese Committee for Rock Mechanics 5 (1) (2009) 11–18.
• [63] S. Jian, W. Lian-guo, Zh.Hua-lei, Sh.Yi-feng, Application of fuzzy neural network in predicting the risk of rockburst, Procedia Earth and Planetary Science 1 (1) (2009) 536–543.
• [64] R.L. Grayson, H. Kinilakodi, V. Kecojevic, Pilotsamplerisk analysis for underground coal mine fires and explosions using MSHA citation data, Safety Science 47 (10) (2009) 1371–1378.
• [65] Q. Meng, X. Qu, X.Wang, V. Yuanit, S.Ch.Wong, Quantitative risk assessment modeling for nonhomogeneous urban road tunnels, Risk Analysis 31 (3) (2011) 382–403.
• [66] H.S.B. Duzgun, H.H. Einstein, Assessment and management of roof fall risks in underground coal mines, Safety Science 42 (2004) 23–41.
• [67] H.S.B. Duzgun, Analysis of roof fall hazards and risk assessment for Zonguldak coal basin underground mines, International Journal of Coal Geology 64 (1–2) (2005) 104–115.
• [68] O. Nyvlt, S. Privara, L. Ferkl, Probabilistic risk assessment of highway tunnels, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 26 (2011) 71–82.
• [69] V. Podvezko, S. Mitkus, E. Trinkuniene, Complex evaluation of contracts for construction, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 16 (2) (2010) 287–297.
• [70] E.K. Zavadskas, A. Zakarevicius, J. Antucheviciene, Evaluation of ranking accuracy in multiple-criteria decision, Informatica 17 (4) (2006) 601–618.
• [71] L.Tupenaite, E.K.Zavadskas, A.Kaklauskas, Z.Turskis, M. Seniut, Multiple criteria assessment of alternatives for built and human environment renovation, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management16(2)(2010)257–266.
• [72] Z. Han, P. Liu, A fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method under risk with unknown attribute weights, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17 (2) (2011) 246–258.
• [73] J. Antuchevicien, E. K. Zavadskas, A. Zakarevicius, Multiple criteria construction management decisions considering relations between criteria, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16 (1) (2010) 109–125.
• [74] P. Liu, Multi attribute decision making method research based on interval vague set and TOPSIS method, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 15 (3) (2009) 453–463.
• [75] D. Kalibatas, E. K. Zavadskas, D. Kalibatiene, The concept of the ideal in door environment in multi-attribute assessment of dwelling-houses, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 11 (1) (2011) 89–101.
• [76] T.Ch. Wang, T.H. Chang, Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment, Expert Systems with Applications 33 (2007) 870–880.
• [77] X. Yu, Sh. Guo, J. Guo, X. Huang, Rank B2C e-commerce websites in e-alliance based on AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS, Expert Systems with Applications 38 (4) (2011) 3550–3557.
• [78] G.T. Friedlob, L.L.F. Schleifer, Fuzzy logic: application for audit risk and uncertainty, Managerial Auditing Journal 14 (3) (1999) 127–137.
• [79] A. Pillay, J. Wang, Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 79 (1) (2003) 69–85.
• [80] A. Gegov, Complexity Management in Fuzzy Systems: A Rule Base Compression Approach, Heidelberg, Berlin, 2007.
• [81] L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Information Control 8 (1965) 338–353.
• [82] B. Chang, Ch. W. Chang, Ch. H. Wu, Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria, Expert Systems with Applications 38 (2011) 1850–1858.
• [83] F. Torfi, R.Z. Farahani, Sh. Rezapour, A.H.P. Fuzzy, to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and Fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives, Applied Soft Com- puting 10 (2010) 520–528.
• [84] C.L. Hwang, K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981.
• [85] T.Y. Chen, Ch.Y. Tsao, The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 159 (11) (2008) 1410–1428.
• [86] B. Ashtiani, A. Haghighirad, G. Makui, A. Montazer, Extension of fuzzy TOPSIS method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets, Applied Soft Computing 9 (2) (2009) 457–461.
• [87] K. Zavadskas, J. Antucheviciene, Evaluation of buildings’ redevelopment alternatives with an emphasis on the multi- partite sustainability, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 8 (2) (2004) 121–128.
• [88] E.K. Zavadskas, J. Antucheviciene, Development of an indicator model and ranking of sustainable revitalization alternatives of derelict property: a Lithuanian case study, Sustainable Development 14 (5) (2006) 287–299.
• [89] T.Ch. Wang, H.D. Lee, Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights, Expert Systems with Applications 36 (2009) 8980–8985.
• [90] V.F. Yu, K.J. Hu, An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria approach for the performance evaluation of multiple manufacturing plants, Computers and Industrial Engineering 58 (2010) 269–277.
• [91] Ch.Ch. Sun, A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods, Expert Systems with Applications 37 (2010) 7745–7754.
• [92] S. Sadi-Nezhad, K. Kh. Damghani, Application of a fuzzy TOPSIS method base on modified preference ratio and fuzzy distance measurement in assessment of traffic police centers performance, Applied Soft Computing 10 (2010) 1028–1039.
• [93] R.A. Krohling, V.C. Campanharo, Fuzzy TOPSIS for group decision making: a case study for accidents with oil spill in the sea, Expert Systems with Applications 38 (4) (2011) 4190–4197.
• [94] B. Vahdani, S.M. Mousavi, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Group decision making based on novel fuzzy modified TOPSIS method, Applied Mathematical Modelling 35 (9) (2011) 4257–4269.
• [95] A. Kelemenis, K. Ergazakis, D. Askounis, Support managers selection using an extension of fuzzy TOPSIS, Expert Systems with Applications 8 (3) (2011) 2774–2782.
• [96] A. Awasthi, S.S. Chauhan, H. Omrani, A. Panahi, A hybrid approach based on SERVQUAL and fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluating transportation service quality, Computers & Industrial Engineering 61 (2011) 637–646.
• [97] G. Torlak, M. Sevkli, M. Sanal, S. Zaim, Analyzing business competition by using fuzzy TOPSIS method: an example of Turkish domestic airline industry, Expert Systems with Applications 38 (4) (2011) 3396–3406.
• [98] M.M. Fouladgar, A. Yazdani-Chamzini, E.K. Zavadskas, An integrated model for prioritizing strategies of the Iranian mining sector, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17 (3) (2011) 459–484.
• [99] K. Heldman, C. Baca, P. Jansen, PMP: Project Management Professional Exam Study Guide, 2nd ed., Wiley Publishing, 2007.
• [100] T. Merna, F.F. Al-Thani, Corporate Risk Management: An Organisational Perspective, John Wiley and Sons Ltd, London, 2005.
• [101] M. Wood, Tunnelling: Management by Design, London, 2000.
• [102] S. Ebrahimnejad, S. M. Mousavi, S.M.H. Mojtahedi, A fuzzy decision-making model for risk ranking with an application to an onshore gas refinery, International Journal Business Continuity and Risk Management 1 (1) (2009) 38–66.
• [103] E. Farrokh, J. Rostami, Correlation of tunnel convergence with TBM operational parameters and chip size in the Ghomroud tunnel, Iran, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 23 (2008) 700–710.
• [104] E. Farrokh, J. Rostami, Effect of adverse geological condition on TBM operation in Ghomroud tunnel conveyance Project, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 24 (2009) 436–446.
• [105] O. N. Aneziris, I. A. Papazoglou, D. Kallianiotis, Occupational risk of tunneling construction, Safety Science 48 (2010) 964–972.
• [106] S. Tesfamariam, R. Sadiq, Risk-based environmental deci- sion-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP), Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 21 (2006) 35–50.
• [107] T. Yang, C.C. Hung, Multiple attribute decision making methods for plant layout design problem, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 23 (1) (2007) 126–137.