Creating safe and competitive conditions for the provision of rail transport services

• Autorzy: Stasiak-Betlejewska Renata , Török Ádám

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/czoto-2019-0083

• Konferencja: 7th International Conference System Safety: Human - Technical Facility - Environment, CzOTO 2018 (7 ; 12-14.12.2018 ; Zakopane, Poland)
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Safety is a key and necessary condition for the sustainable development of the railway industry. Every entity operating in the railway area should maintain and increase the level of security as part of its operations. The subject of the analysis of data on the rail transport safety in European countries and content of the safety culture program implemented in Poland, whose main objective is to implement safety culture principles in the railway transport and to encourage all companies operating in the railway industry to improve the rail transport safety as the key condition for the sustainable development of railway industry. Paper contains results of the analysis of the European rail transport safety level in the context of the objectives set for Poland indicated by the European Union (CSI value) as improvement areas.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

railway; transport; safety; improvement

PL

kolej; transport; bezpieczeństwo; doskonalenie

• Wydawca: De Gruyter
• Czasopismo: System Safety : Human - Technical Facility - Environment
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 1, nr 1
• Strony: 653--660
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Stasiak-Betlejewska Renata

• Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland

autor

Török Ádám

• Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary

Bibliografia

• [1] Clewlowa, R.R., Sussman, J.M., Balakrishnan, H., 2014. The impact of high-speed rail and low-cost carriers on European air passenger traffic. Transport Policy, 33 (5), 136-143, DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.01.015
• [2] Crozet, P.Y., 2016. Introducing competition in the European rail sector. Insights for a holistic regulatory assessment. Draft Discussion Paper prepared for the Roundtable on Assessing regulatory changes in the transport sector, Stockholm, 2.
• [3] Čičmancová, S., 2013. Safety of railway system, Perner’s Contacts, 8, 2.
• [4] Gaal, G., Horváth, E., Török, Ádám and Csete, M., 2015. Analysis of Public Transport Performance in Budapest, Hungary. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 23, 1, 68–72, DOI: 10.3311/PPso.7724.
• [5] Gouvernal, E., Daydou, J., 2005. Container Railfreight Services in North‐west Europe: Diversity of Organizational Forms in a Liberalizing Environment. Transport Reviews, 25(5), 557-571, DOI: 10.1080/01441640500072127.
• [6] Grabara, J., Kot, S., 2009. Theoretical frames for designing reverse logistics processes. Review of General Management, 1, 55–61.
• [7] Jupe, R., Funnell, W., 2015. Neoliberalism, consultants and the privatisation of public policy formulation: The case of Britain’s rail industry. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 29, 65–85, DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2015.02.001.
• [8] Kadłubek, M., 2015. Examples of Sustainable Development in the Area of Transport. Procedia Economics and Finance, 27, 494–500, DOI: 10.1016/S2212- 5671(15)01026-6.
• [9] Kurosaki, F., Singh, M., 2016. Comparison of three models for introducing competition in rail freight transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 2820–2829, DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.348.
• [10] Mononen, P., Leviäkangas, P., 2016. Transport safety agency's success indicators – How well does a performance management system perform? Transport Policy, Elsevier, 45 (C), 230–239, DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.03.015.
• [11] Nedeliakova, E., Panák, M., 2015. New Trends in Process-oriented Quality Management. Procedia Economics and Finance, 34, 172–179, DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01616-0.
• [12] Ozkan, T., Yanginlar, G., Kalayci, S., 2016. Railway Transport Liberalization: A Case Study of Various Countries in the World. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 6, 4, 140–148, DOI: 10.5539/jms.v6n4p140.
• [13] Panák, M., Nedeliaková, E., Abramović, B., Šipuš, D. 2017. Synergies of the Liberalization of the Railway Transport Market. MATEC Web of Conferences 134:00045, DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201713400045.
• [14] Robinson, M., Kapoor, A., 2009. Fatigue in railway infrastructure. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Abington Hall, Granta Park, Great Abington, Cambridge CB21 6AH, UK, 97.
• [15] The European Commission, 2013. Commission implementing regulation (EU) No 402/2013 of 30 April 2013 on the common safety method for risk evaluation and assessment and repealing Regulation (EC) No 352/2009. Official Journal of the European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu.
• [16] The European Commission, 2012. Commission regulation (EU) No 1078/2012 of 16 November 2012 on a common safety method for monitoring to be applied by railway undertakings, infrastructure managers after receiving a safety certificate or safety authorization and by entities in charge of maintenance. Official Journal of the European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu.
• [17] The European Commission, 2004. Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on safety on the Community’s railways and amending Council Directive 95/18/EC on the licensing of railway undertakings and Directive 2001/14/EC on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification (Railway Safety Directive), Official Journal of the European Union, https://eurlex.europa.eu.
• [18] The European Union Agency for Railways, 2016. Railway Safety Performance in the European Union. Belgium, DOI: 10.2821/171211.
• [19] The Office of Rail Transport in Poland, 2017. Report on the railway traffic safety status in 2017, Warsaw 2018, 115–117.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).