Risk assessment of tunnel portals in the construction stage based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process

• Autorzy: Deng Xianghui , Wang Rui , Xu Tian

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ace-2018-0045

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This study presents a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) by integrating analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy cognition to evaluate the construction risks of tunnel portals. Wuguanyi Tunnel is taken as the research objective to validate the performance of the proposed method. The result shows that the proposed decision making method can effectively identify risk factors and determine the risk level during the construction of tunnel portals. Finally, the corresponding control measures during the construction of the Wuguanyi Tunnel portal are proposed according to the risk assessment results.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

tunnel portal; construction stage; fuzzy analytic hierarchy process; FAHP; risk assessment

PL

portal tunelu; etap budowy; proces rozmytej hierarchii analitycznej; FAHP; ocena ryzyka

• Wydawca: Komitet Inżynierii Lądowej i Wodnej PAN ; Politechnika Warszawska, Wydział Inżynierii Lądowej
• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil Engineering
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: Vol. 64, nr 4/I
• Strony: 69--87
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz., il., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Deng Xianghui

• School of Civil and Architecture Engineering, Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an, China

autor

Wang Rui

• School of Civil and Architecture Engineering, Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an, China

autor

Xu Tian

• School of Civil and Architecture Engineering, Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an, China

Bibliografia

• 1. F. Ye, C.He, S. M.Wang, J. L. Zhang. “Landscape design of mountain highway tunnel portals in China”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 29, 52-68, 2012.
• 2. D. Peila, S. Pelizza. “Criteria for technical and environmental design of tunnel portals”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 17, 335-340, 2002.
• 3. M. Li, “Research of Landscape Design on the Entrance of Highway Tunnel”, Master Dissertation, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 2008 (in Chinese).
• 4. Özgür Satıcıa, Bahtiyar Ünverba. “Assessment of tunnel portal stability at jointed rock mass: A comparative case study”, Computers and Geotechnics, 64, 72-82, 2014.
• 5. Nezarat Hamidreza, Sereshki Farhang Ataei Mohammad. “Ranking of Geological risks in Mechanized Tunneling by Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarcy Process (FAHP).” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 50, 358-364, 2015.
• 6. M. Ersoy. “The role of occupational safety measures on reducing accidents in marble quarries of Iscehisar region.” Safety Science, 57, 293-302, 2013.
• 7. A. Badri, S. Nadeau, A. Gbodossou. “A new practical approach to risk management for underground mining project in Quebec.” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 26, 1145-1158, 2013
• 8. K A S Al-Harbi. “Application of the AHP in project management.” International Journal of Project Management, 19, 19–27, 2001.
• 9. C M Tam, T K L Tong, G W C Chiu. “Comparing non-structural fuzzy decision support system and analytical hierarchy process in decision making for construction problems”. European Journal of Operational Research, 174, 1317-1324, 2006
• 10. Q. X. Wang, H. Wang, Z. Q. Qi. “An application of nonlinear fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in safety evaluation of coal mine.” Safety Science, 86, 78-87, 2016.
• 11. K Meng Tay, C Peng Lim. “Fuzzy FMEA with a guided rules reduction system for prioritization of failures.” International Journal Quality & Reliability Management, 23, 1047- 1066, 2006.
• 12. E. Triantaphyllou, S. Mann, “An evaluation of the eigenvalue approach for determining the membership values in fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 35, 295-301, 1990.
• 13. G. Lakoff, Hedges. “A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts.” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2, 234-281, 1977.
• 14. Laarhoven, Van, P J M Pedrycz. “A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory.” Fuzzy Set and Systems, 11, 229-241, 1983.
• 15. D Y Chang. “Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP.” European Journal of Operational Research, 95, 649-655, 1996.
• 16. B Asady. “The revised method of ranking LR fuzzy number based on deviation degree.” Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 5056-5060, 2010.
• 17. Y K Zhu. “Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: Fallacy of the popular methods.” European Journal of Operational Research, 239, 209-217, 2014.
• 18. Li F, Phoon K, Du X, et al. “Improved AHP method and its application in risk identification.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(3), 312-320, 2013.
• 19. B. S. Liang, D. L. Cao. “Fuzzy mathematics and application.” Beijing: Science Press, 2007. (in Chinese)
• 20. Y. X. Zhao, W. Y. Xu. “Risk assessment of TBM construction for tunnels based on AHP and fuzzy synthetic evaluation.” Rock and Soil Mechanics, 30(30), 793-798, 2009. (in Chinese)
• 21. T.L. Saaty, L.G. “Vargas, Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process.” Springer, 2012.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).