Biokompatybilność w noszeniu i pielęgnacji soczewek kontaktowych: jak ją mierzymy i co oznacza?

Karpecki, P.

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Biokompatybilność w noszeniu i pielęgnacji soczewek kontaktowych: jak ją mierzymy i co oznacza?

Autorzy

Karpecki P.

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

http://gazeta-optyka.pl/

Identyfikatory

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Poniższy artykuł stanowi przegląd trendów w przekonaniach specjalistów ochrony zdrowia oczu w świetle danych z badań naukowych dotyczących barwienia rogówki, przemijającej hiperfluorescencji związanej z obecnością środka konserwującego (PATH) oraz powikłań związanych z noszeniem soczewek kontaktowych. Pierwotnie tezy autora zostały zaprezentowane na łamach czasopisma Optician (czerwiec 2011), a ta wersja stanowi autorskie streszczenie publikowanych tam artykułów.

Słowa kluczowe

biokompatybilność pomiary soczewka kontaktowa pielęgnacja ochrona oczu

Wydawca

MAGMONI Sp. z o.o.

Czasopismo

Optyka

Rocznik

2012

Tom

Nr 1

Strony

56--59

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 169 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Karpecki P.

OD, FAAO

Bibliografia

1. Garofalo R.J., Dassanayake N., et al. Corneal staining and subjective symptoms with multipurpose solutions as a function of time. Eye Contact Lens 2005;31(4):166-174
2. Amos C., Young G., Lakkis C. Biocompatibility of contact lens care systems used with silicone hydrogel lenses. Poster presented at: the 30th Annual Meeting of the British Contact Lens Association; 2006; Birmingham, UK
3. Andrasko G. and Ryen K. Corneal staining and comfort observed with traditional and silicone hydrogel lenses and multipurpose solution combinations. Optometry 2008;79(8):444-454
4. Carnt N., Evans V., et al. IER Matrix Update: Adding Another Silicone Hydrogel. Contact Lens Spectrum 2008;23(3):40-43
5. Carnt N., Jalbert I., et al. Solution toxicity in soft contact lens daily wear is associated with corneal inflammation. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84(4):309-315
6. Bakkar M., Maldonado-Codina C., et al. Development of an in vitro model of solution induced corneal staining (SICS). Presented at the American Association of Optometry. 2010: Abstract 100959
7. Bright F.V., Maziarz P., et al. Poster presented at: The 6th Biennial Scientific Symposium of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists Education & Research Foundation; September 23–25, 2010; Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
8. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Edu Psychol Meas 1960;20(1):37-46
9. Cohen J. Weighed kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968;70(4):213-220
10. Arita R., Itoh K., et al. Contact lens wear is associated with decrease of meibomian glands. Ophthalmology 2009;116(3):379-384
11. Grus F.H., Kramann C., et al. Effects of multipurpose contact lens solutions on the protein composition of the tear film. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2005;28(3):103-112
12. Itoh R., Yokoi N., Kinoshita S. Tear film instability induced by rigid contact lenses. Cornea, 1999;18(4):440-443
13. McNamara N.A., Polse K.A., et al. Tear mixing under a soft contact lens: effects of lens diameter. Am J Ophthalmol, 1999;127(6):659-665
14. Schurmans L.R., Boets E.P., van Best J.A. Corneal epithelial permeability during extended wear of disposable contact lenses versus daily wear of soft contact lenses. Br J Ophthalmol, 1995;79(4):350-353
15. Thai L., Doane M.G., Tomlinson A. Effect of different soft contact lens materials on the tear film. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2002;43:E-abstract 3083
16. Bumgardner J.D., et al. (2007). In G.L. Bowlin & G. Wnek (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering (pp 1-10). New York: Mercel Dekker, Inc.
17. Basu B., Nath S. (2009). Advanced Biomaterials: Fundamentals, Processing, and Applications (pp 4-18). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
18. Dracopoulos A., Dixon D.G., et al. In vitro assessment of medical device toxicity: interactions of benzalkonium chloride with silicone-containing and p-hema-containing hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens, 2007;33(1):26-37
19. Hough D.A. Quantifying the surface characteristics of rigid gas permeable lenses. Trans BCLA Conference, Birmingham, 1989:27-28
20. Aakre B.M., Ystenaes A.E., et al. A 6-month follow-up of successful refits from daily disposable soft contact lenses to continuous wear of high-Dk silicone-hydrogel lenses. Ophthal Physiol Optics, 2004;24(2):130-141
21. Barrett R.P., Mowery–McKee M., Hazlett L.D. Punctate fluorescein corneal staining observed using polyhexamethylene biguanide containing disinfecting solution not indicative of corneal surface damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2005;46:E-Abstract 5732
22. Bergmanson J.P. and Barbeito R. Clinical assessment of ocular response to a multipurpose contact lens care solution. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 1995;15(6):535-544
23. Bergmanson J.P. and Ross R.N. A masked quantitative cytologic study of the safety of a multipurpose contact lens solution applied to the in vivo rabbit eye. J Am Optom Assoc, 1993;64(5):308-314
24. Bickel P.W. and Barr J.T. Rigid gas-permeable contact lenses in high and low humidity. J Am Optom Assoc, 1997;68(9):574-578
25. Boets E.P., Kerkmeer M.J., van Best J.A. Contact lens care solutions and corneal epithelial barrier function: a fluorophotometric study. Ophthalmic Res, 1994;26(3):129-136
26. Brennan N.A., Coles M.L., et al. A 12-month prospective clinical trial of comfilcon A silicone-hydrogel contact lenses worn on a 30-day continuous wear basis. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2007;30(2):108-118
27. Cairns G., Bateman K.M., et al. The association of contact lens thickness to the occurrence of SEALs. Presented at: the American Academy of Optometry. 2008
28. Chalmers R.L., Dillehay S., et al. Impact of previous extended and daily wear schedules on signs and symptoms with high Dk lotrafilcon A lenses. Optom Vis Sci, 2005;82(6):549-554
29. Cho P., Lui T., Kee C. Soft contact lens care systems and corneal staining in Hong Kong-Chinese. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 1998;21(2):47-53
30. Dassanayake N.L., Garofalo R., et al. Correlating biocide uptake and release profiles with corneal staining and subjective symptoms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2005;46:E-Abstract 915
31. Davis R., Eiden S.B., Hankin B. Comparing two-week toric contact lenses. Contact Lens Spectrum, 2008;23(2):39-43
32. Dillehay S.M. and Miller M.B. Performance of lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel contact lenses in experienced low-Dk/t daily lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens, 2007;33(6 Pt 1):272-277
33. Doughty M.J., Aakre B.M., et al. Short-term adaptation of the human corneal endothelium to continuous wear of silicone hydrogel (lotrafilcon A) contact lenses after daily hydrogel lens wear. Optom Vis Sci, 2005;82(6):473-480
34. Dumbleton K., Keir N., et al. Objective and subjective responses in patients refitted to daily-wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci, 2006;83(10):758-768
35. Fahmy M., Long B., et al. Comfort-enhanced daily disposable contact lens reduces symptoms among weekly/monthly wear patients. Eye Contact Lens, 2010;36(4):215-219
36. Fisher K., Comstock T. Clinical comparison of opaque tint soft contact lenses. Presented at: the American Academy of Optometry Conference. 1995:143
37. Gleason W., Tanaka H., et al. A 1-year prospective clinical trial of Menicon Z (tisilfocon A) rigid gas-permeable contact lens worn on a 30-day continuous wear schedule. Eye Contact Lens, 2003;29(1):2-9
38. Guillon M. and Maissa C. Clinical acceptance of two multipurpose solutions: MPS containing HPMC versus citrate-based MPS without rubbing. CLAO J, 2002;28(4):186-191
39. Guillon M. and Maissa C. The effect of optimising silicone hydrogels key physical properties on extended wear clinical performance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006;47:E-abstract 2382
40. Lakkis C. and Vincent S. Clinical investigation of asmofilcon A silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci, 2009;86(4):350-356
41. Lehmann D.M., Cavet M.E., Richardson M.E. Nonclinical safety evaluation of boric acid and a novel borate-buffered contact lens multi-purpose solution, Biotrue™ multi-purpose solution. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010;33(Suppl 1):S24-S32
42. Lemp M.A., Caffery B., et al. Omafilcon A (Proclear) soft contact lenses in a dry eye population. CLAO J, 1999;25(1):40-47
43. Li L., Moody K., et al. Contact lenses in pediatrics study in Singapore. Eye Contact Lens, 2009;35(4):188-195
44. Lipener C.; Contact Lens Advisory in Scientific Studies (CLASS) group. A randomized clinical comparison of OPTI-FREE EXPRESS and ReNu MultiPLUS multipurpose lens care solutions. Adv Ther, 2009;26(4):435-446
45. Long B., Schweizer H., et al. Expanding your use of silicone hydrogel contact lenses: using lotrafilcon A for daily wear. Eye Contact Lens, 2009;35(2):59-64
46. Martin R., Sanchez I., et al. Differences in the daily symptoms associated with the silicone hydrogel contact lens wear. Eye Contact Lens, 2010;36(1):49-53
47. Merchea M.M., Reindel W., et al. Inflammatory mediators associated with transient, contact lens solution-induced corneal staining. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2008;49:E-abstract 4851
48. Miller M.B. and Dillehay S.M. Multipurpose solution use with silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Contact Lens Spectrum, 2007;22(5):33-34,36,38
49. Morgan P., Chamberlain P., et al. A daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lens in neophyte wearers. Presented at: the American Academy of Optometry. 2009:E-abstract 95814
50. Mowrey-McKee M.F., Amos C., et al. AQuifyTM MPS: novel multifunctional contact lens care system. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2004;45:E-abstract 1540
51. Nichols J.J., Mitchell G.L., Zadnik K. Daily disposable vs. disposable extended wear: A contact lens clinical trial. Optom Vis Sci, 2000;77(12):637-647
52. Nichols J.J. Deposition rates and lens care influence on galyfilcon A silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci, 2006;83(10):751-757
53. Pritchard N., Young G., et al. Subjective and objective measures of corneal staining related to multipurpose care systems. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2003;26(1):3-9
54. Riley C., Chalmers R.L., Pence N. The impact of lens choice in the relief of contact lens related symptoms and ocular surface findings. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2005;28(1):13-19
55. Santodomingo-Rubido J., Barrado-Navascués E., et al. Compatibility of two new silicone hydrogel contact lenses with three soft contact lens multipurpose solutions. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2008;28(4):373-381
56. Santodomingo-Rubido J. The comparative clinical performance of a new polyhexamethylene biguanide- vs a polyquad-based contact lens care regime with two silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2007;27(2):168-173
57. Sorbara L., Peterson R., et al. Multipurpose disinfecting solutions and their interactions with a silicone hydrogel lens. Eye Contact Lens, 2009;35(2):92-97
58. Subbaraman L.N., Woods J., et al. Protein deposition on a lathe-cut silicone hydrogel contact lens material. Optom Vis Sci, 2009;86(3):244-250
59. Szczotka-Flynn L.B. and Patel S. Menicon Z rigid gas permeable lenses for keratoconus and irregular corneas: A retrospective case series. Eye Contact Lens, 2008;34(5):254-260
60. Townsend W., Katims S., Rosen J.S. Investigating a new-generation multipurpose solution. Contact Lens Spectrum, 2005;20(12)
61. Walline J.J., Long S., Zadnik K. Daily disposable contact lens wear in myopic children. Optom Vis Sci, 2004;81(4):255-259
62. Wang Q., Guerra J., et al. The effect of multipurpose solutions on human cornea cell under in vivo confocal microscope. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2004;45:E-Abstract 1533
63. Young G., Bowers R., et al. Six month clinical evaluation of a biomimetic hydrogel contact lens. CLAO J, 1997;23(4):226-236
64. Emch A.J., Nichols J.J. Proteins Identified From Care Solution Extractions of Silicone Hydrogels. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(2):E123-E131
65. Schachet J., Zigler L.G., et al. Clinical assessment of a new multi-purpose disinfecting solution in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Presented at American Academy of Optometry Conference, Denver, CO. 2006
66. Carnt N.A., Evans V.E., et al. Contact lens-related adverse events and the silicone hydrogel lenses and daily wear care system used. Arch Ophthalmol, 2009;127(12):1616-1623
67. Kislan T.P. and Hom M.M. Corneal infiltrates with multipurpose solutions and contact lens combinations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2010;51:E-abstract 3424
68. Diec J., Carnt N., Naduvilath T.J. Performance of Polyquad, PHMB and peroxide solutions with silicone hydrogel lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2009;50:E-Abstract 5633
69. Kiernan D., Chin E., et al. Multiple drug-resistant Alcaligenes xylosoxidans keratitis in a sanitation worker. Eye Contact Lens, 2009;35(4):212-214
70. Reeder R. Trends associated with corneal infiltrative events in soft lens wearers. Presented at the 2011 Global Specialty Lens Symposium; January 2011; Las Vegas
71. Reindel B., Cairns G., Bateman K. Determining relationships between various safety parameters and lens care solutions using meta-analysis. Poster presented at: the 33rd British Contact Lens Association Clinical Conference and Exhibition; May 29, 2009
72. Sacco A. Silicone hydrogel contact lenses, lens care and sterile infiltrates: is there a connection? Poster presented at: the Annual Global Specialty Lens Symposium; January 27-30, 2011; Las Vegas, NV
73. Dundas M., Walker A., Woods R.L. Clinical grading of corneal staining of non-contact lens wearers. Ophthal Physiol Optics, 2001;21(1):30-35
74. Caffery B.E. and Josephson J.E. Corneal staining after sequential instillations of fluorescein over 30 days. Optom Vis Sci, 1991;68(6):467-469
75. Korb D.R. and Herman J.P. Corneal staining subsequent to sequential fluorescein instillations. J Am Optom Assoc, 1979;50(3):361-367
76. Korb D.R. and Korb J.M. Corneal staining prior to contact lens wearing. J Am Optom Assoc, 1970;41(3):228-232
77. Peral A., Carracedo G., et al. Characterization of ocular surface symptoms and signs of a university population in Spain. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2005;46:E-abstract 4456
78. Schwallie J.D., Mckenney C.D., et al. Corneal staining patterns in normal non-contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci, 1997;74(2):92-98
79. Brautaset R.L., Nilsson M., et al. Corneal and conjunctival epithelial staining in hydrogel contact lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens, 2008;34(6):312-316
80. Begley C.G., Barr J.T., et al. Characteristics of corneal staining in hydrogel contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci, 1996;73(3):193-200
81. Nichols K.K., Mitchell G.L., et al. Corneal staining in hydrogel lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci, 2002;79(1):20-30
82. Davies I.P. and Veys J. The use of fluorescein in contact lens aftercare. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2009;32(4):187-189
83. O'Donnell C., Efron N., Boulton A.J. A prospective study of contact lens wear in diabetes mellitus. Ophthal Physiol Optics, 2001;21(2):127-138
84. Edrington T., Gundel R.E., et al; The CLEK Study Group. Variables affecting rigid contact lens comfort in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. Optom Vis Sci, 2004;81(3):182-188
85. Erdurmus M., Yildiz E.H., et al. Contact lens related quality of life in patients with keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens, 2009;35(3):123-127
86. Weed K.H., Macewen C.J., McGhee C.N. The Dundee University Scottish Keratoconus Study II: a prospective study of optical and surgical correction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2007;27(6):561-567
87. Ramos-Remus C., Suarez-Almazor M., Russell A.S. Low tear production in patients with diabetes mellitus is not due to Sjögren’s syndrome. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 1994;12(4):375-380
88. Dogru M., Katakami C., Inoue M. Tear function and ocular surface changes in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Ophthalmology, 2001;108(3):586-592
89. Dogru M., Karakaya H., et al. Tear function and ocular surface changes in keratoconus. Ophthalmology, 2003;110(6):1110-1118
90. Chalmers R.L., Keay L., et al. Risk factors for contact lens complications in US clinical practices. Optom Vis Sci, 2010;87(10):725-735
91. Lakkis C., Goldenberg S.A., Woods C.A. Investigation of the performance of the Menifocal Z gas-permeable bifocal contact lens during continuous wear. Optom Vis Sci, 2005;82(12):1022-1029
92. Szczotka-Flynn L., Lass J.H., et al. Risk factors for corneal infiltrative events during continuous wear of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2010;51(11):5421-5430
93. Fonn D., Gauthier C.A., Pritchard N. Patient preferences and comparative ocular responses to rigid and soft contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci, 1995;72(12):857-863
94. Kuo J., Albright M., Szczotka-Flynn L. Is there an association between corneal staining and other clinical slit lamp variables during 30 day soft lens continuous wear? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2008;49:E-Abstract 4832
95. Efron N., Dumbleton K., et al. Clinical evaluation of microfenestrated contact lenses. Presented at: the American Academy of Optometry Conference. 1993:43
96. Fletcher E.L. and Brennan N.A. The effect of solution tonicity on the eye. Clin Exp Optom, 1993;76:17-21
97. Michaud L., Beaulieu M., Gravel K. Clinical performance of senofilcon A lenses compared with omafilcon A to reduce induced ocular dryness. Presented at: the American Academy of Optometry. 2009:E-Abstract 95570
98. Paugh J.R., Brennan N.A., Efron N. Ocular response to hydrogen peroxide. Am J Optom Physiol Optics, 1988;65(2):91-98
99. Du Toit R., Papas E., et al. Ocular surface physiology and ocular symptoms in younger versus older, continuous, silicone hydrogel lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2002;43:E-abstract 3091
100. Maldonado-Codina C. and Efron N. Impact of manufacturing technology and material composition on the clinical performance of hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci, 2004;81(6):442-454
101. Du Toit R., Situ P., et al. The effects of six months of contact lens wear on the tear film, ocular surfaces, and symptoms of presbyopes. Optom Vis Sci, 2001;78(6):455-462
102. Lipson M.J., Musch D.C. Synergeyes versus soft toric lenses: vision-related quality of life. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(7):593-597
103. Maldonado-Codina C., Morgan P.B., et al. Comparative clinical performance of rigid versus soft hyper Dk contact lenses used for continuous wear. Optom Vis Sci, 2005;82(6):536-548
104. Orsborn G.N. and Zantos S.G. Corneal desiccation staining with thin high water content contact lenses. CLAO J, 1988;14(2):81-85
105. Stahl U., Willcox M.D., et al. Influence of tear film and contact lens osmolality on ocular comfort in contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci, 2009;86(7):857-867
106. van der Worp E., de Brabander J., Swarbrick H.A., Hendrikse F. Evaluation of signs and symptoms in 3- and 9-o'clock staining. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(3):260-265
107. Pult H., Murphy P.J., Purslow C. A novel method to predict the dry eye symptoms in new contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(9):E1042-E1050
108. Pult H., Purslow C., Berry M., Murphy P.J. Clinical tests for successful contact lens wear: relationship and predictive potential. Optom Vis Sci, 2008;85(10):E924-E929
109. Szczotka-Flynn L., Debanne S.M., et al. Predictive factors for corneal infiltrates with continuous wear of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Arch Ophthalmol, 2007;125(4):488-492
110. Young G. and Port M. Rigid gas-permeable extended wear: A comparative clinical study. Optom Vis Sci, 1992;69(3):213-226
111. Schnider C.M., Terry R.L., Holden B.A. Effect of patient and lens performance characteristics on peripheral corneal desiccation. J Am Optom Assoc, 1996;67(3):144-150
112. Walker J., Young G., et al. Multi-centre evaluation of two daily disposable contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2007;30(2):125-133
113. Truong T.N., Graham A.D., et al. Subjective ratings of comfort and dryness vs. clinical evaluation of lens performance and ocular response to silicone hydrogel lenses: evidence from a multi-study database. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2008;49:E-abstract 4833
114. Lundgrin E.L., Truong T.N., et al. Clinical assessment vs. subjective experience of dry eye in soft contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2008;49:E-abstract 4831
115. Carnt N.A., Sweeney D.F., et al. Factors associated with unusual cases of acute infiltrative keratitis in silicone hydrogel extended wear. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2002;43:E-abstract 3111
116. Carnt N.A., Keay L., et al. Risk factors associated with corneal inflammation in soft contact lens daily wear. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2007;48:E-Abstract 4326
117. Willcox M. FDA Ophthalmic Devices Panel Meeting. 2008. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/AC/08/slides/2008-4363oph1-08-WILLCOX.pdf. Accessed March 18, 2011
118. Zigler L., Cedrone R., et al. Clinical evaluation of silicone hydrogel lens wear with a new multipurpose disinfection care product. Eye Contact Lens, 2007;33(5):236-243
119. Duench S., Simpson T., et al. Corneal staining is not correlated with limbal or bulbar redness in subjects using daily wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006;47:E-Abstract 87
120. Maldonado-Codina C., Morgan P.B., et al. Short-term physiologic response in neophyte subjects fitted with hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci, 2004;81(12):911-921
121. Michaud L. and Giasson C.J. Overwear of contact lenses: increased severity of clinical signs as a function of protein adsorption. Optom Vis Sci, 2002;79(3):184-192
122. Young G., Keir N., et al. Clinical evaluation of long-term users of two contact lens care preservative systems. Eye Contact Lens, 2009;35(2):50-58
123. Sweeney D.F. Are inflammatory events a marker for increased risk of MK? Presented at: The 32nd Annual Meeting of the British Contact Lens Association; May 29-June 1, 2008; Birmingham, UK
124. Jones L., MacDougall N., Sorbara L.G. Asymptomatic corneal staining associated with the use of balafilcon silicone-hydrogel contact lenses disinfected with a polyaminopropyl biguanide-preserved care regimen. Optom Vis Sci, 2002;79(12):753-761
125. Keir N.J., Situ P., et al. Clinical performance of alexidine-based and polyquad-based multipurpose solutions when used with daily wear etafilcon lenses. Presented at: the 84th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Optometry; December 7-10, 2006; Denver, CO
126. Paugh J.R., Marsden H.J., et al. A pre-application drop containing carboxymethylcellulose can reduce multipurpose solution-induced corneal staining. Optom Vis Sci, 2007;84(1):65-71
127. Riley C., Young G., Chalmers R. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon a). Eye Contact Lens, 2006;32(6):281-286
128. Situ P., Simpson T.L., Fonn D. Clinical measures do not discriminate symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1999;40:E-Abstract 4795
129. Willcox M.D., Phillips B., et al. Interactions of lens care with silicone hydrogel lenses and effect on comfort. Optom Vis Sci, 2010;87(11):839-846
130. Jones L.W., Keir N., et al. The impact of post-insertion time on corneal staining and comfort with group II hydrogel materials disinfected with various lens care regimens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2005;46: E-Abstract 917
131 Tilia D., Weng R., et al. Evaluation of solution induced corneal staining impact on comfort during short term contact lens wear. Presented at: the 87th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Optometry; November 11-14, 2009; Orlando, FL
132. Varikooty J., Situ P., et al. Clinical performance of alexidine-based and polyquad-based multipurpose solutions when used with daily wear balafilcon lenses. Presented at: the 83rd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Optometry; December 8–11, 2005; San Diego, CA
133. Lebow K.A. and Schachet J.L. Differences in clinical performance of multi-purpose solutions with a silicone hydrogel lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006;47:E-abstract 99
134. Diec J., Carnt N., et al. Patient and lens characteristics associated with solution induced corneal staining. Presented at: the 88th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Optometry; November 17-20, 2010; San Francisco, CA
135. Young G., Canavan K., et al. Pre-disposing factors for solution induced corneal staining (SICS). Presented at: the 88th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Optometry; November 17-20, 2010; San Francisco, CA
136. Situ P., Simpson T.L., et al. Effects of silicone hydrogel contact lens wear on ocular surface sensitivity to tactile, pneumatic mechanical and chemical stimulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2010;51(12):6111-6117
137. Corbin G.S., Bennett L., et al. A multicenter investigation of OPTI-FREE RepleniSH multi-purpose disinfecting solution impact on soft contact lens patient comfort. Clin Ophthalmol, 2010;4:47-57
138. Epstein A.B. Contact lens care products effect on corneal sensitivity and patient comfort. Eye Contact Lens, 2006;32(3):128-132
139. Lebow K.A. and Schachet J.L. Evaluation of corneal staining and patient preference with use of three multi-purpose solutions and two brands of soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens, 2003;29(4):213-220
140. Sindt C.W., Chu D., et al. A multi-site comparison of acute corneal staining associated with a silicone hydrogel lens and two marketed multi-purpose solutions. Presented at: the American Academy of Optometry Conference; Tampa, FL; 2007
141. Stiegemeier M.J., Friederichs G.J., et al. Clinical evaluation of a new multi-purpose disinfecting solution in symptomatic contact lens wearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2006;29(3):143-151
142. Santodomingo-Rubido J., Barrado-Navascués E., Rubido-Crespo M.J. Ocular surface comfort during the day assessed by instant reporting in different types of contact and non-contact lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens, 2010;36(2):96-100
143. Choy C.K., Cho .P, et al. Do multipurpose solutions damage porcine corneal epithelial cells? Optom Vis Sci, 2009;86(5):E447-E453
144. Cavet M.E., VanDerMeid K.R., et al. Effect of a novel multipurpose contact lens solution on human corneal epithelial barrier function. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2010;33(Suppl 1):S18-S23
145. McCanna D.J., Harrington K.L., et al. Use of a human corneal epithelial cell line for screening the safety of contact lens care solutions in vitro. Eye Contact Lens, 2008;34(1):6-12
146. Tchao R., McCanna D.J., Miller M.J. Comparison of contact lens multipurpose solutions by in vitro sodium fluorescein permeability assay. CLAO J, 2002;28(3):151-156
147. Pham X.T. and Huff J.W. Cytotoxicity evaluation of multipurpose contact lens solutions using an in vitro test battery. CLAO J, 1999;25(1):28-35
148. Hall J.Q., Paugh J.R., et al. A pilot study of the effect of silicone-hydrogel lenses and marketed multipurpose solutions on human epithelial barrier function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2007;48:E-Abstract 5400
149. Paugh J.R., Krall D., et al. The Physiological Consequence of Lens Material and Care Solution Bio-Incompatibilities in Humans. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2009;50:E-abstract 6358
150. Webb J.R., Paugh J.R., et al. Clinical and epithelial barrier function evidence of lens material and care solution bio-incompatibilities. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2008;49:E-abstract 2019
151. Leung T., Tierney W.S., et al. Corneal epithelium as a diffusion barrier in human subjects: evidence of changes during overnight sleep. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2009;50:E-abstract 4615
152. Peterson R., Gorbet M., et al. The transient nature of solution induced corneal staining. Presented at: the American Academy of Optometry Conference; Orlando, FL; 2009
153. Chuang E.Y., Li D.Q., et al. Effects of contact lens multipurpose solutions on human corneal epithelial survival and barrier function. Eye Contact Lens, 2008;34(5):281-286
154. Li S.L., Ladage P.M., et al. Effects of contact lens care solutions on surface exfoliation and bacterial binding to corneal epithelial cells. Eye Contact Lens, 2003;29(1):27-30
155. Lin M., Truong T., et al. Two-week clinical performance evaluation of soft lenses with channels. Presented at: the American Academy of Optometry Conference; San Diego, CA; 2005
156. Bantseev V., McCanna D.J., et al. Biocompatibility of contact lens solutions using confocal laser scanning microscopy and the in vitro bovine cornea. Eye Contact Lens, 2007;33(6, Part 1 of 2):308-316
157. Chang J.H., Ren H.W., et al. The application of in vivo confocal microscopy and tear LDH measurement in assessing corneal response to contact lens and contact lens solutions. Curr Eye Res, 1999;19(2):171-181
158. Crawford L., Tran D., et al. Direct cell-contact and agar-overlay in vitro MPS cytotoxicity scores do not correlate to an in vivo sign of MPS cytotoxicity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2009;50:E-abstract 6354
159. Dutot M., Paillet H., et al. Severe ocular infections with contact lens: role of multipurpose solutions. Eye (Lond), 2009;23(2):470-476
160. Dutot M., Reveneau E., et al. Multipurpose solutions and contact lens: modulation of cytotoxicity and apoptosis on the ocular surface. Cornea, 2010;29(5):541-549
161. Gorbet M., Tanti N., et al. Impact of lens material on in vitro cytotoxicity potential of multipurpose solutions on human corneal epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2010;51:E-abstract 3415
162. Huang L.C., Datta K., Lally J.M. Effects of contact lens multipurpose solutions on inflammatory cytokine production in human corneal epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2009;50:E-abstract 5627
163. Lim M.J., Hurst R.K., et al. Cytotoxicity testing of multipurpose contact lens solutions using monolayer and stratified cultures of human corneal epithelial cells. Eye Contact Lens, 2009;35(6):287-296
164. Mowrey-McKee M., Sills A., Wright A. Comparative cytotoxicity potential of soft contact lense care regimens. CLAO J, 2002;28(3):160-164
165. Oriowo M.O. A fluorometric study of relative ocular lens cytosensitivity to multipurpose contact lens solutions using the resazurin assay method. Toxicol In Vitro, 2006;20(8):1548-1554
166. Siwale R.C., Sills A.M., et al. Biocompatability of silicone hydrogel contact lens materials and contact lens care products using in vitro cytotoxicty assays. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2008;49:E-abstract 4863
167. Imayasu M., Hori Y., Cavanagh H.D. Effects of multipurpose contact lens care solutions and their ingredients on membrane-associated mucins of human corneal epithelial cells. Eye Contact Lens, 2010;36(6):361-366
168. Imayasu M., Shiraishi A., Ohashi Y., Shimada S., Cavanagh H.D. Effects of multipurpose solutions on corneal epithelial tight junctions. Eye Contact Lens, 2008;34(1):50-55
169. Nichols J.J. and Sinnott L.T. Tear film, contact lens, and patient factors associated with corneal staining. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2011;52(2):1127-1137

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-b3bff26b-6565-4853-b0f4-98ab5f9dde23