Selection of construction enterprises management strategy based on the SWOT and multi-criteria analysis

• Autorzy: Zavadskas E. K. , Turskis Z. , Tamosaitiene J.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wybór strategii zarządzania przedsiębiorstwem budowlanym na podstawie metody SWOT i analizy wielokryterialnej

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper proposes a methodology for determining management strategies in construction enterprises. For this purpose, the SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) analysis as an instrument for formulating management strategies is recommended. The best practices for this reason are also analysed. The algorithm helps to select the most preferable strategies based on the AHP, expert judgment and permutation method of feasible alternatives. A perspective of construction enterprises management regarding the SWOT is carried out on a basis of selected description of the current state and the feasible future alternatives. Finally, the selected alternatives are ranked according to the permutation method of feasible alternatives. The case study shows the applicability of the proposed model to the real management problems solution.

PL

W pracy zaproponowano metodologie określania strategii zarządzania dla przedsiębiorstw budowlanych. W tym celu wykorzystywana jest analiza SWOT (mocnych stron, słabych stron, szans, zagrożeń) jako narzędzie służące do formułowania odpowiedniej strategii zarządzania. Algorytm pomaga wybrać najbardziej korzystną strategie opartą na AHP, ekspertyzie i metodzie permutacyjnej dla prawdopodobnych scenariuszy. Perspektywa zarządzania przedsiębiorstwem budowlanym w ujęciu SWOT jest przeprowadzana na podstawie wybranych opisów stanu aktualnego oraz przyszłych możliwych scenariuszy. Finalnie wybrane scenariusze są oceniane w oparciu o metodę permutacyjną. Studium przypadku pokazuje możliwości zastosowania proponowanego modelu do rozwiązywania rzeczywisty problemów zarządzania.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

management; strategy; enterprise; SWOT; AHP; expert judgment; permutation method; MCDM

PL

zarządzanie; strategia; przedsiębiorstwo; SWOT; opinia eksperta

• Wydawca: Springer ; Wrocław University of Science and Technology
• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: Vol. 11, no 4
• Strony: 1063--1082
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 78 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Zavadskas E. K.

autor

Turskis Z.

autor

Tamosaitiene J.

• Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Construction Technology and Management, Sauletekioav. 11, Vilnius, LT-10223, Lithuania

Bibliografia

• [1] Andreica M., Dobre I., Nitu B., Andreica R.: A new approach of the risk project from managerial perspective, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2008, pp. 121-129.
• [2] Arslan O., Er I.D.: A SWOT analysis for successful bridge team organization and safer marine operations, Process Safety Progress, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2008, pp. 21-28.
• [3] Auruskeviciene V., Salciuviene L., Vanage J.: Factors determining creation of competitive advantages in the subsidiaries of international enterprises, Transformations in Business & Economics, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2008, pp. 31-46.
• [4] Bartel-Kratochvil R., Leitner H., Axmann P.: Success in local supply chains for organic products - strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and risks for local supply chains for organic cereals and bread, Berichte uber Landwirtschaft, Vol. 87, No. 2, 2009, pp. 323-342.
• [5] Bayraktar M.E., Hastak M.: A decision support system for selecting the optimal contracting strategy in highway work zone projects, Automation in Construction, Vol. 18, No. 6, 2009, pp. 834-843.
• [6] Celik M., Cebi S., Kahraman C., Er I.D.: Application of axiomatic design and TOPSIS methodologies under fuzzy environment for proposing competitive strategies on Turkish container ports in maritime transportation network, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2009, pp. 4541-4557.
• [7] Celik Y., Peker K.: Benefit/cost analysis of mushroom production for diversification of income in developing countries, Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2009, pp. 228-236.
• [8] Cimpoeru S.S.: Neural networks and their application in credit risk assessment. Evidence from the Romanian market, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2011, pp. 519-534.
• [9] Chintoanu M., Naghiu L., Roman C.: National strategy for production and use of biofuels: a SWOT analysis, Agricultura - Revista de Stiinta si Practica Agricola, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2008, pp. 5-10.
• [10] Diskiene D., Galiniene B., Marcinskas A.: A strategic management model for economic development, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2008, pp. 375-387.
• [11] Dwivedi P., Alavalapati J.R.R.: Stakeholders' perceptions on forest biomass-based bioenergy development in the southern US, Energy Policy, Vol. 37, No. 5, 2009, pp. 1999-2007.
• [12] Jackson S.E., Joshi A., Erhardt N.L.: Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications, Journal of Management, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2003, pp. 801-830.
• [13] Ghazinoory S., Kheirkhah A.S.: Transportation of hazardous materials in Iran: A strategic approach for decreasing accidents, Transport, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2008, pp. 104-111.
• [14] Ghazinoory S., Abdi M., Azadegan-Mehr M.: SWOT Methodology: A state-of-the-art review for the past, a framework for the future, Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2010, pp. 24-48.
• [15] Ghazinoory S., Divsalar A., Soofi A.S.: A new definition and framework for the development of a national technology strategy: The case of nanotechnology for Iran, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 76, No. 6, 2009, pp. 835-848.
• [16] Ghazinoory S., Zadeh A.E., Memariani A.: Fuzzy SWOT analysis, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2007, pp. 99-108.
• [17] Ghazinoory S., Aliahmadi A., Namdarzangeneh S., Ghodsypour S.H.: Using AHP and LP for choosing the best alternatives based the gap analysis', Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 184, No. 2, 2007, pp. 316-321.
• [18] Ghosh S., Skibniewski M.J.: Enterprise resource planning systems implementation as a complex project: a conceptual framework, Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2010, pp. 533-549.
• [19] Ginevicius R.: The effectiveness of cooperation of industrial enterprises, Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2010, pp. 283-296.
• [20] Ginevicius R., Podvezko V.: Evaluating the changes in economic and social development of Lithuanian counties by multiple criteria methods, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2009, pp. 418-436.
• [21] Grunig R., Kuhn R.: Successful decision-making: a systematic approach to complex problems, Springer, 2005.
• [22] Gudas S.: Enterprise knowledge modelling: domains and aspects, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2009, pp. 281-293.
• [23] Gudonavicius L., Bartoseviciene V., Saparnis G.: Imperatives for enterprise strategists, Inzinerine Ekonomika - Engineering Economics, Vol. 1, 2009, pp. 75-82.
• [24] Ho W.: Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - a literature review, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 186, 2008, pp. 211-228.
• [25] Houben G., Lenie K., Vanhoof K.: A knowledge-based SWOT-analysis system as an instrument for strategic planning in small and medium sized enterprises, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1999, pp. 125-135.
• [26] Hwang C.L., Yoon K.: Multiple attribute decision making, in lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981.
• [27] Jaskowski P., Biruk S., Bucon R.: Assessing contractor selection criteria weights with fuzzy AHP method application in group decision environment, Automation in Construction, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2010, pp. 120-126.
• [28] Kaya T., Kahraman C.: A fuzzy approach to e-banking website quality assessment based on an integrated AHP-ELECTRE method, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2011, pp. 313-334.
• [29] Kalibatas D., Zavadskas E.K., Kalibatiene D.: The concept of the ideal indoor environment in Multi-attribute assessment of dwelling-houses, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2011, pp. 89-101.
• [30] Kendall M.G.: Rank correlation methods (4th ed.), London Griffin, 1970.
• [31] Kheirkhah A.S., Esmailzadeh A., Ghazinoory S.: Materials transportation in Iran using the method of fuzzy SWOT analysis, Transport, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2009, pp. 325-332.
• [32] Kong E.: The development of strategic management in the non-profit context: Intellectual capital in social service non-profit organizations, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2008, pp. 281-299.
• [33] Lee C.T.: Selecting technologies for constantly changing applications markets, Research-Technology Management, Vol. 53, No. 1, 2010, pp. 44-54.
• [34] Lee K.-L., Lin S.-C.: A fuzzy quantified SWOT procedure for environmental evaluation of an international distribution centre, Information Sciences, Vol. 178, No. 2, 2008, pp. 531-549.
• [35] Lee S.-H., Jeon R.-K., Kim J.-H., Kim J.-J.: Strategies for developing countries to expand their shares in the global construction market: phase-based SWOT and AAA analyses of Korea, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 137, No. 6, 2011, pp. 460-471.
• [36] Li S., Li J.Z.: Hybridising human judgment, AHP, simulation and a fuzzy expert system for strategy formulation under uncertainty, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2009, pp. 5557-5564.
• [37] Ling F.Y.Y., Gui Y.: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats: case study of consulting firms in shenzhen, China, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE, Vol. 135, No. 7, 2009, pp. 628-636.
• [38] Ling F.Y.Y., Pham V.M.C., Hoang T.P.: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for architectural, engineering, and construction firms: case study of Vietnam, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,-ASCE, Vol. 135, No. 10, 2009, pp. 1105-1113.
• [39] Markovska N., Taseska V., Pop-Jordanov J.: SWOT analyses of the national energy sector for sustainable energy development, Energy, Vol. 34, No. 6, 2009, pp. 752-756.
• [40] Maskeliunaite L., Sivilevicius H., Podvezko V.: Research on the quality of passenger transportation by railway, Transport, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2009, pp. 100-112.
• [41] Maydl P., Passer A., Cresnik G.: Stahl im Hochbau - ein nachhaltiger Werkstoff (in German), Stahlbau, Vol. 76, No. 4, 2007, pp. 241-249.
• [42] Paelnick J.H.P.: Qualitative multiple criteria analysis, environmental protection and multiregional development, Papers of the Regional Science Association, Vol. 36, 1976, pp. 59-74.
• [43] Pankratova N.D., Beznosik A.Y., Pankratov V.A.: Definition of indicators of sustainable development of the coastal zone of the crimea autonomous republic with the context of regional priorities, Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 9, 2009, pp. 63-73.
• [44] Peldschus F., Zavadskas E.K., Turskis Z., Tamosaitiene J.: Sustainable assessment of construction site by applying game theory, Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2010, pp. 223-237.
• [45] Peng Y., Kou G., Wang G., Wang H., Ko F.I.S.: Empirical evaluation of classifiers for software risk management, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2009, pp. 749-767.
• [46] Plebankiewicz E.: Construction contractor prequalification from Polish clients' perspective, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2010, pp. 57-64.
• [47] Podvezko V., Mitkus S., Trinkuniene E.: Complex evaluation of contracts for construction, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2010, pp. 287-297.
• [48] Raharjo H., Xie M., Brombacher A.C.: On modeling dynamic priorities in the analytic hierarchy process using compositional data analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 194, No. 3, 2009, pp. 834-846.
• [49] Saaty T.L.: The Analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation, McGraw-Hill, USA. 1980.
• [50] Saaty T.L.: Decision - making for leaders, Pittsburg University Edition, 1990.
• [51] Shi Y., Peng Y., Kou G., Chen Z.X.: Classifying credit card accounts for business intelligence and decision making: A multiple-criteria quadratic programming approach, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2009, pp. 581-699.
• [52] Shinno H., Yoshioka S., Marpaung S., Hachiga S.: Qualitative SWOT analysis on the global competitiveness of machine tool industry, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2006, pp. 251-258.
• [53] Sinuany-Stern Z., Mehrez A., Hadad Y.: An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units, International Transactions in Operational Research, Vol. 7, 2000, pp. 109-124.
• [54] Sivilevicius H.: Modelling the interaction of transport system elements, Transport, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2011, pp. 20-34.
• [55] Sivilevičius H.: Application of expert evaluation method to determine the importance of operating asphalt mixing plant quality criteria and rank correlation, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, Vol. VI, No. 1, 2011, pp. 48-58.
• [56] Skibniewski M.J., Chao L.-C.: Evaluation of advanced construction technology with AHP method, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE, Vol. 118, No. 3, 1992, pp. 577-593.
• [57] Stein E.W., Ahmad N.: Using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to construct a measure of the magnitude of consequences component of moral intensity, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 89, No. 3, 2009, pp. 391-407.
• [58] Tamosaitiene J., Turskis Z., Zavadskas E.K.: Modeling of contractor selection taking into account different risk level, The 25th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Technika, Vilnius, 2008, pp. 676-681.
• [59] Tiryaki F., Ahlatcioglua B.: Fuzzy portfolio selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy Process, Information Sciences, Vol. 179, No. 1-2, 2009, pp. 53-69.
• [60] Tserng H.P., Yin S.Y.L., Dzeng R.J., Wou B., Tsai M.D., Chen W.Y.: A study of ontology-based risk management framework of construction projects through project life cycle, Automation in Construction, Vol. 18, No. 7, 2009, pp. 994-1008.
• [61] Turskis Z.: Multi-attribute contractors ranking method by applying ordering of feasible alternatives of solutions in terms of preferability technique, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2008, pp. 224-239.
• [62] Vainiunas P., Zavadskas E.K., Peldschus F., Turskis Z., Tamosaitiene J.: Model of construction design projects' managers qualifying by applying analytic hierarchy process and Bayes rule, in the 5th International Conference EURO Mini Conference "Knowledge-Based Technologies and OR Methodologies for Strategic Decisions of Sustainable Development", Technika, Vilnius, 2009, pp. 154-158,
• [63] Zaerpour N., Rabbani M., Gharehgozli A.H., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R.: Make-to-order or make-to-stock decision by a novel hybrid approach, Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2008, pp. 186-201.
• [64] Zavadskas E.K.: Automation and robotics in construction: International research and achievements, Automation in Construction, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2010, pp. 286-290.
• [65] Zavadskas E. K., Turskis Z., Vilutiene T.: Multiple criteria analysis of foundation installment alternatives by applying Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 10, 2010, pp. 123-141.
• [66] Zavadskas E.K., Turskis Z., Tamosaitiene J.: Multi-criteria decision making of management effectiveness of construction enterprises based on the SWOT and MCDM in: The 6th International Scientific Conference Business and Management, Technika, Vilnius, 2010, pp. 1127-1132.
• [67] Zavadskas E.K., Turskis Z., Tamosaitiene J.: Risk assessment of construction projects, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2010, pp. 33-46.
• [68] Zavadskas E.K., Vilutiene T., Turskis Z., Tamosaitiene J.: Contractor selection for construction works by applying SAW-G and TOPSIS grey techniques, Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2010, pp. 34-55.
• [69] Zavadskas E.K., Kaklauskas A., Turskis Z., Tamosaitiene J.: Multi-attribute decisionmaking model by applying grey numbers, Informatica, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2009, pp. 305-320.
• [70] Zavadskas E.K., Andruskevicius A., Podvezko V.: Quantitative evaluation of the organization of manufacturing and technological processes, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 48, No. 4, 2009, pp. 544-55.
• [71] Zavadskas E.K., Turskis Z., Tamošaitiene J.: Contractor selection of construction in a competitive environment, Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2008, pp. 181-187.
• [72] Zavadskas E.K., Peldschus F., Kaklauskas A.: Multiple criteria evaluation of projects in construction, Technika Vilnius, 1994.
• [73] Zavadskas E.K.: Systems of estimation of technological solutions in building construction (in Russian), St. Petersburg 1991.
• [74] Zhao Z.Y., Shen L.Y., Zuo J.: Performance and strategy of Chinese contractors in the international market, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE, Vol. 135, No. 2, 2009, pp. 108-118.
• [75] Weihrich H.: The TOWS matrix - a tool for situational analysis', Journal of Long Range Planning, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1982, pp. 54-66.
• [76] Weihrich H.: Analyzing the competitive advantages and disadvantages of Germany with the TOWS matrix - an alternative to Porter's model', European Business Review, Vol. 99, No. 1, 1999, pp. 9-22.
• [77] Wu J., Tian X.G., Tang Y., Zhao Y.J., Hu Y.D., Fang Z.L.: Application of analytic hierarchy process-grey target theory systematic model in comprehensive evaluation of water environmental quality, Water Environment Research, Vol. 82, No. 7, 2010, pp. 633-641.
• [78] Xu T.J., Smith N.J., Bower D.A.: Forms of collaboration and project delivery in Chinese construction markets: Probable emergence of strategic alliances and design-build, Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2005, pp. 100-109.