Benefits of low-intensive grazing : co-occurrence of umbelliferous plant (Hladnikia pastinacifolia Rchb.) and opilionid species (Phalangium opilio. L) in dry, calcareous grassland

• Autorzy: Sajna N. , Kusar P. , Slana Novak L. L. , Novak T.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The impact of grazing has been discussed in many organisms, and it has been shown that it has considerable influence on the structural variation of vegetation, resulting in its tussocky appearance. Such spatial heterogeneity results in plants formations that facilitate other species by providing safe sites against predation and physical stress. On the Trnovski gozd plateau in western Slovenia, a secondary habitat of the rare, monotypic endemic umbelliferous species, Hladnikia pastinacifolia, was colonized by a relatively isolated population of the wide spread opilionid species, Phalangium opilio. We hypothesized that in this stony pasture, the impact of the structurally heterogenous vegetation that results from low-intensity grazing benefits both species on hot summer days. For this purpose, we classified vegetation formation types (VFT) and measured temperature and relative humidity in places settled by Ph. opilio individuals during their daily rest. According to the predominant species, we recognized six VFTs: Carlina acaulis, Ruta divaricata, Koeleria pyramidata, Juniperus communis, understory vegetation and grazed turf. Only the spiny C. acaulis and unpalatable R. divaricata facilitated H. pastinacifolia, while also acting as nurse plants. On the other hand, Ph. opilio preferred the understory, but also settled on the other VFts, except Ruta. During the highest daily temperature of about 38[degrees]C, Ph. opilio avoided the grazed turf. Temperature preferences refer to frequencies of individuals rather than to absolute temperature values. The frequencies were independent of sex and the VFTs. Females were more frequently found in tussocks showing higher temperature profiles (Juniperus, Koeleria). During the hot daytime, Ph. opilio was most sensitive to relative humidity, and less so to temperature, whilst the height of settlement varied in adjusting these two environmental factors. The distribution of males significantly differed between the subsequent morning, midday and evening series, but not between the morning and evening ones, while in females it differed between all the three time series. In habitats, such as stony dry pastures, low grazing intensity can maintain persistent populations of H. pastinacifolia and Ph. opilio even in extremely hot weather. Such grazing is the most convenient measure for protecting both species, especially the highly endangered Hladnikia. The major threat to such habitats is afforestation by Pinus nigra, which deserves additional management. We found that in stony pastures, low grazing intensity assures the structural heterogeneity of vegetation required to maintain persistent populations, of both H. pastinacifolia and Ph. opilio.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

arachnids; calcareous grasslands; facilitation; grazing; habitat heterogeneity; vegetation formation type

PL

heterogeniczność siedlisk; odciążenie; pajęczaki; roślinność; użytki zielone; wypas

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: Vol. 59, nr 4
• Strony: 777--786
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 41 poz.,

Twórcy

autor

Sajna N.

autor

Kusar P.

autor

Slana Novak L. L.

autor

Novak T.

• Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor, Koroska 160, SI-2000, Maribor, Slovenia,

Bibliografia

• 1. Allard C.M., Yeargan K.V. 2005 – Dial activity patterns and microspatial distribution of the harvestman Phalangium opilio (Opiliones, Phalangiidae) in soybeans – J. Arachnol. 33: 745–752.
• 2. Angelstam P., Roberge J.-M., Lõhmus A., Bergmanis M., Brazaitis G, Dönz-Breuss M., Edenius L., Kosinski Z., Kurlavicius P., Lārmanis V., Lūkins M., Mikusinski G., Račinskis E., Strazds M., Tryjanowski P. 2004 – Habitat modelling as a tool for landscape-scale conservation - a review of parameters for focal forest birds – Ecol. Bull. 51: 427–453.
• 3. Ausden M. 2007 – Habitat management for conservation - a handbook of techniques – Oxford University Press, New York, 424 pp.
• 4. Balmer O., Erhardt A. 2000 – Consequences of succession on extensively grazed grasslands for central European butterfly communities: Rethinking conservation practices – Conserv. Biol. 14: 746–757.
• 5. Bonte D., Maelfait J.-P., Hoffmann M. 2000 – The impact of grazing on spider communities in a mesophytic calcareous dune grassland – J. Coast. Conserv. 6: 135–144.
• 6. Brooker R.W., Maestre F.T., Callaway R.M., Lortie C.L., Cavieres L.A., Kunstler G., Liancourt P., Tielbörger K., Travis J.M.J., Anthelme F., Armas C., Coll L., Corcket E., Delzon S., Forey E., Kikvidze Z., Olofsson J., Pugnaire F., Quiroz C.L., Saccone P., Schiffers K., Seifan M., Touzard B., Michalet R. 2008 – Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future – J. Ecol. 96: 18–34.
• 7. Callaway R.M. 1994 – Facilitative and interfering effects of Anthrocnemum subterminale on winter annuals – Ecology, 75: 681–686.
• 8. Callaway R.M., Kikvidze Z., Kikvidze D. 2000 – Facilitation by unpalatable weeds may conserve plant diversity in overgrazed meadows in the Caucasus Mountains – Oikos, 89: 275–282.
• 9. Clingenpeel L.W., Edgar A.L. 1966 – Certain ecological aspects of Phalangium opilio (Arthropoda: Opiliones) – Pap. Mich. Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. Arts, 51: 119–26.
• 10. Čušin B. 2004 – Hladnikia pastinacifolia Rchb. – rebrinčevolistna hladnikija, hladnikovka [In: Natura 2000 v Sloveniji, Eds: Čušin B., Babij V., Bačič T., Dakskobler I., Frajman B., Jogan N., Kaligarič M., Praprotnik N., Seliškar A., Skoberne P., Surina B., Škornik S., Vreš B.] – Rastline. Ljubljana, ZRC SAZU, Ljubljana: 107– 113.
• 11. Dennis P., Young M.R., Gordon I.J. 1998 – Distribution and abundance of small insects and arachnids in relation to structural heterogeneity of grazed, indigenous grasslands – Ecol. Entomol. 23: 253–264.
• 12. Devillers P., Devillers-Terschuren J. 1996 – A Classification of Palaearctic Habitats – Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 194 pp.
• 13. Dover J.W., Rescia A., Fungariño S., Fairburn J., Carey P., Lunt P., Arnot C., Dennis R.L.H., Dover C.J. 2010 – Land-use, environment, and their impact on butterfly populations in a mountainous pastoral landscape: individual species distribution and abundance – J. Insect Conserv. 15: 207–220.
• 14. Edgar A.L. 1980 – Physiological and ecological aspects of the cosmopolitan opilionid, Phalangium opilio [In: Soil biology as related to land use practices. – Proc. VIIth Int. Coll. Soil Zool. Int. Soc. Soil Sc.] – Washington, DC, p.p. 170–181.
• 15. Edgar A.L., Yunan H.A. 1965 – Daily locomotory activity in two phalangid genera, Leiobunum and Phalangium – Am. Zool. 5: 647.
• 16. Edgar A.L., Yunan H.A. 1968 – Daily locomotory activity in Phalangium opilio and seven species of Leiobunum (Arthropoda: Phalangida) – Bios, 39: 167–176.
• 17. Grant S.E., Torvell L., Sim E.M., Small J.L., Armstrong R.H. 1997 – Controlled grazing studies on Nardus grassland: effects of between-tussock sward height and species of grazer on Nardus utilization and floristic composition in two fields in Scotland – J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 1053– 1064.
• 18. Hillyard P.D. 2005 – Harvestmen – London. Linn. Soc. London, 167 pp.
• 19. Hillyard P.D., Sankey J.H.P. 1989 – Harvestmen – Synopses of the British Fauna 4. Academic Press, London, 120 pp.
• 20. Kahmen S., Poschlod P. 2004 – Plant functional traits responses to grassland succession over 25 years – J. Veg. Sci. 15: 21– 32.
• 21. Kaligarič M., Culiberg M., Kramberger B. 2006 – Recent vegetation history of the North Adriatic grasslands: Expansion and decay of an anthropogenic habitat – Folia Geobot. 41: 241– 258.
• 22. Komposch C. 1993 – Neue synanthrope Arachniden für Kärnten und die Steiermark – Carinthia II 183/103: 803–814.
• 23. Littlewood N.A. 2008 – Grazing impacts on moth diversity and abundance on a Scottish upland estate – Insect Conserv. Div. 1: 151–160.
• 24. Martens J. 1978 – Weberknechte, Opiliones [In: Die Tierwelt Deutschlands 64] – Fischer Verlag, 464 pp.
• 25. Newton B.L., Yeargan K.V. 2002 – Population characteristics of Phalangium opilio (Opiliones: Phalangiidae) in Kentucky agroecosystems – Environ. Entomol. 31: 92– 98.
• 26. Novak T., Klokočovnik V., Lipovšek Delakorda S., Devetak D., Janžekovič F. 2009 – Preferences for different substrates in Phalangium opilio (Opiliones: Phalangiidae) in natural environment – Acta Biol. Slov. 52: 29– 35.
• 27. Novak T., Slana L., Červek N., Mlakar M., Žmaher N., Gruber J. 2002 – Harvestmen (Opiliones) in human settlements of Slovenia – Acta Entomol. Slov. 10: 133–156.
• 28. Padilla F.M., Pugnaire F.I. 2006 – The role of nurse plants in the restoration of degraded environments – Front. Ecol. Environ. 4: 196–202.
• 29. Povolný D. 1963 – Einige Erwägungen über die Beziehungen zwischen den Begriffen ‘Synanthrop’ und ‚Kulturfolger’ – Beitr. Entomol. 13: 439– 444.
• 30. Pugnaire F.I., Haase P., Puigdefabregas J. 1996 – Facilitation between Higher Plant Species in a Semiarid Environment – Ecology, 77: 1420–1426.
• 31. Pykala J., Luoto M., Heikkinen R.K., Kontula T. 2005 – Plant species richness and persistence of rare plants in abandoned semi-natural grasslands in northern Europe – Basic Appl. Ecol. 6: 25–33.
• 32. Rohf l F.J., Sokal R.R. 1981 – Statistical tables – San Francisco, W.H. Freeman and Company, 219 pp.
• 33. Šajna N., Kušar P., Slana Novak L., Novak T. 2009 – Notes on thermo- and hygropreference in Leiobunum roseum C. L. Koch, 1839 (Opiliones: Sclerosomatidae) in a habitat of Hladnikia pastinacifolia Reichenbach, 1831 (Spermatophyta: Apiaceae) – Contrib. Nat. Hist. (Bern), 12: 1111–1123.
• 34. Smit C., Den Ouden J., Müller-Schärer H. 2006 – Unpalatable plants facilitate tree sapling survival in wooded pastures – J. Appl. Ecol. 4: 305–312.
• 35. Smith R.K., Jennings N.V., Robinson A., Harris S. 2004 – Conservation of European hares Lepus europaeus in Britain: is increasing habitat heterogeneity in farmland the answer? – J. Appl. Ecol. 41: 1092–1102.
• 36. Sokal R.R., Rohf l F.J. 1995 – Biometry. The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research – San Francisco, W.H. Freeman and Company, 887 pp.
• 37. Stašiov S., Tajovsky K., Resl K. 2006 – Restored meadow harvestman communities (Opiliones) in the Bílé Karpaty Protected Landscape Area, Czech Republic – Biologia, 61: 165–169.
• 38. Todd V. 1949 – The habits and ecology of the British harvestmen (Arachnida, Opiliones), with special reference to those of the Oxford District – J. Anim. Ecol. 18: 209–29.
• 39. Wallis De Vries M.F., Poschlod P., Willems J.H. 2002 – Challenges for the conservation of calcareous grasslands in north- western Europe: integrating the requirements of flora and fauna – Biol. Conserv. 104: 265–273.
• 40. Ward L.K. 1977 – The conservation of juniper: the associated fauna with special reference to southern England – J. Appl. Ecol. 14: 81–120.
• 41. Willemart R.H., Farine J.-P., Peretti A.V., Gnaspini P. 2006 – Behavioral roles of the sexually dimorphic structures in the male harvestman, Phalangium opilio (Opiliones, Phalangiidae) – Can. J. Zool. 84: 1763–1774.