Maintenance and management of wastewater system components using the condition index system, prediction process and costs estimation

• Autorzy: Amani N. , Ali N. M. , Mohammed A. H. , Samat R. A.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Konserwacja i zarządzanie systemem kanalizacji ściekowej za pomocą systemu wskaźnika stanu, procesu przewidywania i szacowania kosztów

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Component maintenance management of public building is complex and dynamic as the execution of the engineering management system is subjected to sensitive staff and users' requirements and high expectation of the top management for supporting the business. This paper presents the practices and survey need for maintaining the facilities systems in the building. The purpose of this study is maintenance time optimization of building component using the USACERL condition index (CI) system. To achieve this objective, cast iron pipe within wastewater plumbing system is surveyed using the financial analysis for implementation of optimal maintenance time based on limited cost. The findings show how a best time approach to plumbing system maintenance can assist the owner for decision making in component maintenance time based on existing cost.

PL

Zarządzanie konserwacją instalacji budynku publicznego jest złożone i dynamiczne z uwagi na fakt, iż realizacja systemu zarządzania technicznego poddana jest zarówno wymaganiom personelu i użytkowników końcowych jak i oczekiwaniom kierownictwa w zakresie wsparcia rozwoju przedsiębiorstwa. W niniejszym artykule przedstawiono praktykę oraz badania dotyczące potrzeb wiążących się z konserwacją instalacji w budynkach. Celem tego opracowania jest optymalizacja czasu konserwacji tej części budynku za pomocą systemu wskaźnika stanu (condition index - CI) USACERL. Aby osiągnąć ten cel, przeanalizowano za pomocą analizy finansowej system kanalizacji ściekowej oparty na rurach żeliwnych pod kątem przyjęcia optymalnego czasu obsługi w oparciu o ograniczone koszty. Wyniki pokazują jak optymalne podejście czasowe do konserwacji systemu hydraulicznego może pomóc właścicielowi w procesie podejmowania decyzji w aspekcie czasu konserwacji na podstawie rzeczywistych kosztów.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

maintenance management process; component; optimization; cost analysis; case study

PL

proces zarządzania konserwacją; instalacja; optymalizacja; analiza kosztów; studium przypadku

• Wydawca: Polskie Naukowo-Techniczne Towarzystwo Eksploatacyjne
• Czasopismo: Eksploatacja i Niezawodność
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: Vol. 15, no. 2
• Strony: 161--168
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Amani N.

autor

Ali N. M.

autor

Mohammed A. H.

autor

Samat R. A.

• Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Skudai., 81310 UTM, Malaysia,

Bibliografia

• 1. Ali AS. Cost decision making in building maintenance practice in Malaysia. Journal of Facilities Management 2009; 7(4): 298–306.
• 2. Ali AS, Rahmat I, Hassan H. Involvement of key design participants in refurbishment design process. Facilities 2008; 26(9-10): 389–400.
• 3. Amani N, Nasly MA, Mohamed AH, Samat, R A. A survey on the implementation of facilities maintenance management system of buildings in Iran. Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering 2012; 24(1): 85–95.
• 4. Amani N, Nasly MA, Samat RA. Infrastructure component assessment using the condition index system:literature review and discussion. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management 2012; 2(1): 27–34.
• 5. ASTM. Standard Practice for Measuring Benefit-to-Cost and Savings to Investment Ratios for Building and Building Systems, American Society for Testing and Materials, USA, 2002.
• 6. Boyle G. Design Project Management. NC Press, Burlington, 2003.
• 7. El-Haram MA, Horner MW. Factors affecting housing maintenance cost. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 2002; 8(2): 115–123.
• 8. Esteghlal Hotel. Persian Esteghlal International Co. http://esteghlalhotel.ir/, Iran, 2011.
• 9. Fahiminia M. Wastewater engineering in the earthquake-prone regions. Proceeding of 1the International Conference on Earthquake 2004; Kerman, Iran (in Persian).
• 10. Grussing MN. Building envelope life cycle condition evaluation using a distress-based methodology. Proceedings of the ASCE Specialty Conference Applications of Advanced Technology in Trans 2009: 2482–2490.
• 11. Index Mundi. Equivalent Data from the International Monetary Fund. http://www.indexmundi.com/iran/inflation_rate_(consumer_prices). html, Iran, 2011.
• 12. Khodabakhshi M. Plumbing system inspection based on API-570. Proceeding of the 1th International Conference on Technical Inspection and Non Distractive Test 2007; Tehran, Iran (in Persian).
• 13. Lazarus WF. Machinery Cost Estimates. University of Minnesota, 2012.
• 14. Lazarus WF. Estimating Farm Machinery Repair Costs. Extension Economist, University of Minnesota, 2008.
• 15. Lee HHY, Scott D. Overview of maintenance strategy, acceptable maintenance standard and resources from a building maintenance operation perspective. Journal of Building Appraisal 2009; 4(4): 269–78.
• 16. Lose Angeles HOA Management. Estimating Useful Life for Capital Assets. http://www.homeownersassociationmanagementla.com/ Estimating-Useful-Lives-of-Building-Components.html, Lose Angeles, 1993.
• 17. Means RS. Square Foot Costs. 29th Annual Edition, RS Means Company Inc, 2008.
• 18. Mjema EAM. An analysis of personnel capacity requirement in the maintenance department by using simulation method. Journal of Qualityin Maintenance 2002; 8(3): 253–73.
• 19. Mohd-Noor N, Hamid Y, Ghani AA, Haron SN. Building maintenance budget determination: an exploration study in the Malaysia government practice. Procedia Engineering 2011; 20: 435–444.
• 20. Narayan V. Effective Maintenance Management: Risk and Reliability Strategies for Optimizing Performance. Industrial Press, New York, 2003.
• 21. Pilch R, Szybka J, Broniec Z. Determining of hot water-pipe exploitation time on the basis of limiting states. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability 2012; 14 (3): 203–207.
• 22. Price Index. President Deputy Strategic Planning and Control. http://www.spac.ir/Portal/Home/, Tehran, 2011.
• 23. Rahmat I. Managing Refurbishment Projects. UPENA, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, 2008.
• 24. Rashidi H. Interview, Department of Engineering, National Iranian Oil Company, Iran, 2011.
• 25. Ruegg TR, Marshall HE. Building Economic: Theory and Practice. Van Nostrand Reinhold- VNR Press, New York, 2003.
• 26. Sajadi SJ, Moghadam B. Cost assessment of maintenance and repair in industrial. Proceedings of the 3th Conference in Maintenance and Repair 2005; Tehran, Iran (in Persian).
• 27. Thacker BH, Doebling S W, Hemez F M, Anderson M C, Pepin J E, Rodriguez E A. Concepts of Model Verification and Validation. Los Alamos National Laboratory, California, USA, 2004.
• 28. Tilley PA, McFallen S L. Design and documentation quality survey designer’s perspectives. CSIRO Press, Melbourne, 2000.
• 29. Uzarski DR. Development of Condition Indexes for Low Volume Railroad Track. U.S Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories Press, Champaign, Illinois 1993.
• 30. Uzarski DR. Development of a track structure condition index (TSCI). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois, Champaign, 1991.
• 31. Vafai MR, Mighani H, Borghai A M. Identification of mathematical model of maintenance and repair from Newholand machinery, TMISS Model. Journal of the Agriculture Modern Findings 2007; 2(2): 190–199.