Barriers to the implementation of innovations in information systems in SMEs

• Autorzy: Kapler Monika

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.30657/pea.2021.27.20

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Information management and information flow is an important element in the strategy of developing and running a company. The need to supervise information makes it necessary to implement numerous innovations that improve the method of information management correlated with the proper reception, selection and analysis - in both external and internal information flow. This paper presents the results of research that allowed for the assessment of barriers that arise during the implementation of innovative solutions in small and medium-sized enterprises (service MSEs). On the basis of the conducted research, it was found that the mental barrier is not always crucial from the point of view of modern technologies implementation. And the determination to implement information management innovations may be forced by the necessity of the document exchange acceleration . The success of innovative solutions e.g. in the financial services industry (in SMEs) is closely related to the technological capabilities of the enterprise - the technological barrier is crucial in this type of enterprises. Especially, taking into account the assumption that employees are highly motivated to implement new products.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

innovation; information management; service management; MSE

PL

innowacja; zarządzanie informacją; innowacje IT; zarządzanie usługami; MSE

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Stowarzyszenia Menedżerów Jakości i Produkcji
• Czasopismo: Production Engineering Archives
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 27, Iss. 2
• Strony: 156--162
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 34 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kapler Monika

• Czestochowa University of Technology, Armii Krajowej 19b str., 42-217 Częstochowa, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Ahmad, F., Widén, G., Huvila, I., 2020. The impact of workplace information literacy on organizational innovation: An empirical study, International Journal of Information Management, 51(4), 102041, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102041
• 2. Ali Taha, V., Sirkova, M., Ferencova, M., 2016. The impact of organizational culture on creativity and innovation, Polish Journal of Management Studies, 14(1), 7-17, DOI: 10.17512/pjms.2016.14.1.01
• 3. Aspiranti, T., Amaliah, I., Mafruhat, A. Y., Kasim, R. S. R., 2020. Dynamic behaviour model: a sustainable SMEs development, Polish Journal of Management Studies, 22(1), 57-73, DOI: 10.17512/pjms.2020.22.1.04
• 4. Baryshnikova, N., Kiriliuk, O., Klimecka-Tatar, D., 2021. Enterprises’ strategies transformation in the real sector of the economy in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, Production Engineering Archives, 27(1), 8-15, DOI: 10.30657/pea.2021.27.2
• 5. Cheng, L.T.W., Sharma, P., Shen, J., Ng, A.C.C., 2021. Exploring the dark side of third-party certification effect in B2B relationships: A professional financial services perspective, Journal of Business Research, 127(3), 123-136, DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.031
• 6. Ciekanowski, Z., Wyrębek, H., 2020. Impact of micro, small and mediumsized enterprises on economic security, Polish Journal of Management Studies, 22(1), 86-102, DOI: 10.17512/pjms.2020.22.1.06
• 7. Hensen, A.H.R., Dong, J.Q., 2020. Hierarchical business value of information technology: Toward a digital innovation value chain, Information & Management, 57(4), 103209, DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2019.103209
• 8. Iden, J., Eikebrokk, T.R., Marrone, M., 2020. Process reference frameworks as institutional arrangements for digital service innovation, International Journal of Information Management, 54(4), 102150. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102150
• 9. Ingaldi, M., 2018. Overview of the main methods of service quality analysis, Production Engineering Archives, 18(18), 54-59. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2018.18.10
• 10. Ingaldi, M., Klimecka-Tatar, D., 2020. People’s Attitude to Energy from Hydrogen–From the Point of View of Modern Energy Technologies and Social Responsibility, Energies, 13(24), 6495. DOI: 10.3390/en13246495
• 11. Ingaldi, M., Ulewicz, R., 2020. Problems with the Implementation of Industry 4.0 in Enterprises from the SME Sector, Sustainability, 12(1), 217. DOI: 10.3390/su12010217
• 12. Klimecka-Tatar, D., 2018. Context of production engineering in management model of Value Stream Flow according to manufacturing industry, Production Engineering Archives, 21(21), 32-35. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2018.21.07
• 13. Klimecka-Tatar, D., Ingaldi, M., 2020. How to indicate the areas for improvement in service process - the Knowledge Management and Value Stream Mapping as the crucial elements of the business approach, Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 20(2), 52-74, DOI: 10.20397/2177- 6652/2020.v20i2.1878
• 14. Kock, A., Schulz, B., Kopmann, J., Gemünden, H. G., 2020. Project portfolio management information systems’ positive influence on performance – the importance of process maturity, International Journal of Project Management, 38(4), 229-241, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.05.001
• 15. Korpysa, J., 2021. Process Ambidexterity in Startups Innovation, Management Systems in Production Engineering, 29(1), 27-32, DOI: 10.2478/mspe-2021-0004
• 16. Lazar, S., Klimecka-Tatar, D., Obrecht, M., 2021. Sustainability Orientation and Focus in Logistics and Supply Chains, Sustainability, 13(6), 3280, DOI: 10.3390/su13063280
• 17. Lei, Y., Guo, Y., Zhang, Y., Cheung, W., 2021. Information technology and service diversification: A cross-level study in different innovation environments, Information & Management, 34(4), 103432, DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2021.103432
• 18. Liu, J., Duan, Y., Wu, Y., Chen, R., Chen, L., Chen, G., 2021. Information flow perception modeling and optimization of Internet of Things for cloud services, Future Generation Computer Systems, 115(8), 671-679, DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2020.10.012
• 19. Ma, H.-L., Wang, Z. X., Chan, F. T.S., 2020. How important are supply chain collaborative factors in supply chain finance? A view of financial service providers in China, International Journal of Production Economics, 219(3), 341–346, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.002
• 20. Matuszny, M., 2020. Building decision trees based on production knowledge as support in decision-making process, Production Engineering Archives, 26(2), 36-40, DOI: 10.30657/pea.2020.26.08
• 21. Meyer, N., Molefe, K., De Jongh, J.J., 2018. Managerial challenges within SMEs: The case of a developing region, Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(2), 185-196, DOI: 10.17512/pjms.2018.18.2.15
• 22. McDonough, I.M., Bui, D.C., Friedman, M. C., Castel, A.D., 2015. Retrieval monitoring is influenced by information value: The interplay between importance and confidence on false memory, Acta Psychologica, 161, 7-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.07.017
• 23. Muangmee, C, Kot, S, Meekaewkunchorn, N, Kassakorn, N, Khalid, B., 2021. Factors Determining the Behavioral Intention of Using Food Delivery Apps during COVID-19 Pandemics, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(5), 1297-1310. DOI: 10.3390/jtaer16050073
• 24. Mueller‐Using, S., Urban, W., Wedemeier, J., 2020. Internationalization of SMEs in the Baltic Sea Region: Barriers of cross‐national collaboration considering regional innovation strategies for smart specialization, Growth and Change, 51(4), 1471-1490. DOI: 10.1111/grow.12439
• 25. Niciejewska, M., Idzikowski, A., Lestyánszka Škurková, K.L., 2021. Impact of technical, organizational and human factors on accident rate of smallsized enterprises, Management Systems in Production Engineering, 29(2), 139-144, DOI: 10.2478/mspe-2021-0018
• 26. Okur, Ö., Heijnen, P., Lukszo, Z., 2021. Aggregator’s business models in residential and service sectors: A review of operational and financial aspects, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 139(6), 110702, DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110702
• 27. Peltier, J.W., Dahl, A.J., Swan, E.L., 2020. Digital information flows across a B2C/C2C continuum and technological innovations in service ecosystems: A service-dominant logic perspective, Journal of Business Research, 121(3), 724-734, DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.020
• 28. Pietraszek, J., Radek, N., Goroshko, A.V., 2020. Challenges for the DOE methodology related to the introduction of Industry 4.0, Production Engineering Archives, 26(4), 190-194. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2020.26.33
• 29. Tkachenko, V., Klymchuk, M., & Tkachenko, I., 2021. Recursive and Convergence Methodology of the Investment Management of the Enterprise Digitalization Processes, Management Systems in Production Engineering, 29(1), 14-19, DOI: 10.2478/mspe-2021-0002
• 30. Ulewicz, R., Mazur, M., 2019. Economic aspects of robotization of production processes by example of a car semi-trailers manufacturer, Manufacturing Technology 19(6), 1054-1059, DOI: 10.21062/ujep/417.2019/a/1213-2489/MT/19/6/1054
• 31. Urban, W., Łukaszewicz, K., 2021. Technologies Supporting Pandemic Restrictions in the Hospitality Industry, Hitherto Experiences and Outlook, Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 12(1), 196, DOI: 10.14505/jemt.12.1(49).17
• 32. Urban, W., Łukaszewicz, K., Krawczyk-Dembicka, E., 2020. Application of Industry 4.0 to the Product Development Process in Project-Type Production, Energies, 13(21), 5553DOI: 10.3390/en13215553
• 33. Vendrell-Herrero, F., Bustinza, O.F., Opazo-Basaez, M., 2021. Information technologies and product-service innovation: The moderating role of service R&D team structure, Journal of Business Research, 128(1), 673-687, DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.047
• 34. Żywiołek, J., Rosak-Szyrocka, J., Jereb, B., 2021. Barriers to knowledge sharing in the field of information security, Management Systems in Production Engineering, 29(2), 114-119, DOI:10.2478/mspe-2021-0015

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).