PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Methodological aspects of risk mapping in multimode transport systems

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Efficient transport solutions are based on multimodal systems, with the dominant role of rail and road transport in land versions of the systems and the connecting and directing part of intermodal terminals, transhipment terminals or warehouse centres. The implementation of transport processes is always associated with the risk of lack of timeliness (quality) or threats to people, equipment and cargo (safety) resulting from human, technical, organizational and global factors like pandemics or war. The article contains a risk mapping method in multimodal transport systems configured to estimate the risk of lowering the quality of logistics services (on-time deliveries, etc.). The method combines factors usually considered separately in studies on individual modes of transport. A formal notation of risk factors as a mathematical model was proposed, and a case study was provided to picture the implementation.
Rocznik
Strony
art. no. 19
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 61 poz., tab.
Twórcy
  • Faculty of Transport, Warsaw University of Technology, Koszykowa, 75, 00-662, Warsaw, Poland
  • Faculty of Transport, Warsaw University of Technology, Koszykowa, 75, 00-662, Warsaw, Poland
autor
  • The Office of Rail Transport, Poland
  • Faculty of Transport, Warsaw University of Technology, Koszykowa, 75, 00-662, Warsaw, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. Adjetey-Bahun K., Birregah B., Châtelet E., Planchet J.-L., A model to quantify the resilience of mass railway transportation systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 153(2016) 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.03.015.
  • 2. Aqlan F., Lam S. S., A fuzzy-based integrated framework for supply chain risk assessment. Int. J. Production Economics 161(2015) 54–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.11.013.
  • 3. Ashby S., Diacon S., Risk Appetite in Theory and Practice, Uniwersity of Plymounth, Nottingham University Business School, 2010
  • 4. Auad R., Dalmeijer K., Riley C., Santanam T., Trasatti A., Van Hentenryck P., Zhang H., Resiliency of on-demand multimodal transit systems during a pandemic. Transportation Research Part C 133 (2021) 103418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103418
  • 5. Aven T., 2015. Risk assessment and risk management: review of recent advances on their foundation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 253, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023
  • 6. Bandyopadhyay A., Bhatnagar S., Impact of COVID-19 on ports, multimodal logistics and transport sector in India: Responses and policy imperatives. Transport Policy 130 (2023) 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.10.014
  • 7. Basallo-Triana M. J., Vidal-Holguín C. J., Bravo-Bastidas J. J., Planning and design of intermodal hub networks: A literature review. Computers & Operations Research 136 (2021) 105469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2021.105469
  • 8. Bernstein P.L., Against the Gods. The Remarkable Story of Risk, Joh Wiley & sons, Inc., 1996
  • 9. Bohus L., A General Model for Railway Systems Risk Assessment with the. Use of Railway Accident Scenarios Analysis. Procedia Engineering nr 187 (2017) pp. 150 – 159 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.361
  • 10. Cedergren A., Hassel H., Tehler H., Tracking the implementation of a risk management process in a public sector organisation – A longitudinal study. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol. 81, 2022, 103257, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103257
  • 11. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 402/2013 of 30 April 2013 on the common safety method for risk evaluation and assessment and repealing Regulation (EC) No. 352/2009, Journal of Laws OJ L 121, 3.5.2013, pp. 8-25
  • 12. Conca A., Ridella C., Sapori E. (2016). A Risk Assessment for Road Transportation of Dangerous Goods: A Routing Solution. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 2890-2899. DOI:10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.407
  • 13. El-Koursi E., Subhabrata Mitra S., Bearfield G., Harmonising Safety Management Systems in the European Railway Sector, Safety Science Monitor, Issue 2, Vol 11 Monash
  • 14. Ergonomic Association; http://www.iea.cc/ergonomics/, www.ergono miapolska.com/07_03_ergonomia.htm – 15.02.2012; Zink, 2006, s. 437
  • 15. Fan H., Li G., Sun H., Cheng T. C. E., An information processing perspective on supply chain risk management: Antecedents, mechanism, and consequences. International Journal of Production Economics 185 (2017) 63–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.11.015.
  • 16. Fan S., Yang Z., Safety and security co-analysis in transport systems: Current state and regulatory development. Transportation Research Part A 166 (2022) 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.11.005.
  • 17. Gradowski P., Karasiewicz I., Is the common technical solution always an insignificant change?, Journal of KONBiN, 2020, Vol. 50, iss. 2 s. 399-422 https://doi.org/10.2478/jok-2020-0046
  • 18. Guo J., Du Q., He Z., A method to improve the resilience of multimodal transport network: Location selection strategy of emergency rescue facilities. Computers & Industrial Engineering 161 (2021) 107678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107678
  • 19. Helak M., Smoczyński P., Kadziński A., Implementation of the common safety method in the European Union railway transportation, Zeszyty Naukowe. Transport / Politechnika Śląska, 2019/102, pp.: 65-72. https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2019.102.5
  • 20. Hosseini S. D., Verma M., Conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) methodology to optimal train configuration and routing of rail hazmat shipments. Transportation Research Part B 110 (2018) 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.02.004
  • 21. https://sjp.pwn.pl (access 22.01.2023).
  • 22. ISO 31010 Risk management - Risk assessment techniques. 2.0. Geneva: IEC. (2020).
  • 23. Izdebski, M., Jacyna-Gołda, I., Gołda, P. (2022). Minimisation of the probability of serious road accidents in the transport of dangerous goods. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 217, 108093. DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2021.108093.
  • 24. Jacyna M, Pyza D., Jachimowski R., Transport Intermodalny - Projektowanie Terminali Przeładunkowych, PWN, Warszawa, 2018 (in polish).
  • 25. Jacyna M, Semenov I. Models of vehicle service system supply under information uncertainty. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability 2020; 22 (4): 694–704, http://dx.doi.org/10.17531/ein.2020.4.13
  • 26. Jacyna-Gołda, I., Kłodawski, M., Lewczuk, K., Łajszczak, M., Chojnacki, T., Siedlecka-Wójcikowska, T., 2019. Elements of perfect order rate research in logistics chains. Archives of Transport, 49(1), 25-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.2771
  • 27. Jamroz K., Kadziński A., Chruzik K., Szymanek A., Gucma L., Skorupski J., Trans-risk – an integrated method for risk management in transport, Journal of KONBiN 1 (13) 2010 s. 209-220 https://doi.org/10.2478/v10040-008-0149-9
  • 28. Jingni G., Junxiang X., Zhenggang H., Wei L., Research on risk propagation method of multimodal transport network under uncertainty. Physica A 563 (2021) 125494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.125494
  • 29. Karasiewicz I., Bezpieczna integracja w procesie zarządzania ryzykiem z punktu widzenia jednostki inspekcyjnej, Zeszyty Naukowo-Techniczne SITK RP, Oddział w Krakowie, Nr 2(123)/2021 (in polish).
  • 30. Karasiewicz I., Metoda wielokryterialnej oceny ryzyka zagrożeń wywoływanych czynnikiem ludzkim w systemie transportu kolejowego. Rozprawa doktorska, Politechnika Warszawska 2022 (in polish).
  • 31. Ke G. Y., Verma M., A framework to managing disruption risk in rail-truck intermodal transportation networks. Transportation Research Part E 153 (2021) 102340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102340
  • 32. Kłodawski Michał, Jacyna Marianna, Lewczuk Konrad, Wasiak Mariusz: The Issues of Selection Warehouse Process Strategies, Procedia Engineering, 2017, vol. 187, s.451-457. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.399
  • 33. Koohathongsumrit N., Meethom W., An integrated approach of fuzzy risk assessment model and data envelopment analysis for route selection in multimodal transportation networks. Expert Systems With Applications 171 (2021) 114342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114342.
  • 34. Kukulski J., Experimental and simulation study of the superstructure and its componets, In: Railway research Selected topics on development, safety and technology / Zboiński Krzysztof (ed.), 2015, Rijeka, Chorwacja, InTech, s.115-143, ISBN 978-953-51-2235-7
  • 35. Lahuta, P., Kardoš, P., Hudáková, M. (2021). Integrated Risk Management System in Transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 55, 1530-1537. DOI:10.1016/j.trpro.2021.07.142
  • 36. Leleń P., Wasiak M., The model of selecting multimodal technologies for the transport of perishable products. Archives of Transport. Vol. 50, Iss. 2, 2019, 17-33. 10.5604/01.3001.0013.5573
  • 37. Liu J., Xiong Q., Shi X., Wang K., Shi W., Robustness of complex networks with an improved breakdown probability against cascading failures. Physica A 456 (2016) 302–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.03.040
  • 38. Luo Ch. Xu L., Railway disruption management: Designing bus bridging services under uncertainty. Computers and Operations Research 131 (2021) 105284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2021.105284
  • 39. Ma B., Zhang J., Tie strength, organizational resilience and enterprise crisis management: An empirical study in pandemic time. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. Vol 81, 2022, 103240, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103240
  • 40. Marufuzzaman, M., Eksioglu, S., Li, X., Wang, J., 2014. Analyzing the impact of intermodal-related risk to the design and management of biofuel supply chain. Transp. Res. Part E 69, 122–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2014.06.008.
  • 41. Nooraie S. V., Parast M. M., A multi-objective approach to supply chain risk management: Integrating visibility with supply and demand risk. Int. J. Production Economics 161(2015) 192–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.024.
  • 42. Nowakowska M., Road traffic accident patterns: a conceptual grouping approach to evaluate crash clusters, Archives of Transport, 2012, Vol. 24, iss. 1, 73-98. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10174-012-0006-4
  • 43. Pineda-Jaramillo J., Viti F. Identifying the rail operating features associated to intermodal freight rail operation delays. Transportation Research Part C 147 (2023) 103993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103993
  • 44. Pirogova O., Plotnikov V., Uvarov S., Risk-based approach in the assessment of infrastructure transport projects. Transportation Research Procedia. Vol. 63, 2022, 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.05.015
  • 45. PN-ISO 31000:2018-08. (2018). Risk management - Guidelines.
  • 46. Qazi A., Dickson A., Quigley J., Gaudenzi B. Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks. International Journal of Production Economics 196 (2018) 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.11.008
  • 47. Rangel D. A., de Oliveira T. K., Leite M. S. A., 2015. Supply chain risk classification: discussion and proposal. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53, 6868–6887. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.910620
  • 48. Semenov I, Jacyna M. The synthesis model as a planning tool for effective supply chains resistant to adverse events. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability 2022; 24 (1): 140–152, http://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2022.1.16.
  • 49. Sowa A., Analiza poprawności użycia wybranych pojęć w rozporządzeniu wykonawczym UE nr 402 /2013 dotyczącym transport u kolejowego, w Proceedings of XXII Scientific Conference „Pojazdy szynowe 2016”, Bydgoszcz – Gniew 2016, electronic version (in polish).
  • 50. Staniec I., Zawiła-Niedźwiecki J., Ryzyko operacyjne w naukach o zarządzaniu, 2015, C.H. Beck (in polish).
  • 51. Szaciłło L, Jacyna M, Szczepański E, Izdebski M. Risk assessment for rail freight transport operations. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability 2021; 23 (3): 476–488, http://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2021.3.8.
  • 52. Szaciłło L., Krześniak M., Jasiński D., Valis D., The use of the risk matrix method for assessing the risk of implementing rail freight services. Archives of Transport. Vol. 64, Iss. 4, 2022, 89-106. 10.5604/01.3001.0016.1185.
  • 53. Szczepański E., Jacyna M., Jachimowski R., Vašek R., Nehring K., Decision support for the intermodal terminal layout designing, Archives of Civil Engineering, 2021, vol. 67, nr 2, s.611-630.
  • 54. Tang L., Jing K., Hea J., Stanley H. E., Robustness of assembly supply chain networks by considering risk propagation and cascading failure. Physica A 459 (2016) 129–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.04.030.
  • 55. The Committe of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission Zarządzanie ryzykiem korporacyjnym - zintegrowana struktura ramowa, Warszawa, Polski Instytut Kontroli Wewnętrznej 2004 (in polish).
  • 56. Tubis, A., Werbińska-Wojciechowska, S. (2017). Risk assessment issues in the process of freight transport performance. Journal of KONBiN, 42(1), 235-253. DOI:10.1515/jok-2017-0027
  • 57. Vilko J. P. P., Hallikas J. M., Risk assessment in multimodal supply chains. Int. J. Production Economics 140(2012) 586–595. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.09.010
  • 58. Vilko J., Ritala P., Hallikas J. Risk management abilities in multimodal maritime supply chains: Visibility and control perspectives. Accident Analysis and Prevention 123 (2019) 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.010
  • 59. Wang L., Zheng S., Yonggang Wang Y., Wang L. Identification of critical nodes in multimodal transportation network. Physica A 580 (2021) 126170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2021.126170
  • 60. Wasiak M, Jacyna-Gołda I, Markowska K, Jachimowski R, Kłodawski M, Izdebski M. The use of a supply chain configuration model to assess the reliability of logistics processes. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability 2019; 21 (3): 367–374, http://dx.doi.org/10.17531/ein.2019.3.2.
  • 61. Wasiak M., Jacyna M., Lewczuk K., Szczepański E., The method for evaluation of efficiency of the concept of centrally managed distribution in cities, Transport, 2017, vol. 32, nr 4, s.348-357. DOI:10.3846/16484142.2017.1345005
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-ac9d8fec-e09d-401a-881e-2ae41b381329
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.