Dual Application of Al-Kheriat of Removal of Arsenic from Aqueous Solution and Acting as Rodenticide

• Autorzy: Al-Jendeel Haider Abdulkareem , Rasheed Hala Abdulkareem , Ahmedzeki Nada Sadoon , Alhassani Maha Hadi

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/159335

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Arsenic is a prevalent and pervasive environmental contaminant with varied amounts in drinking water. Arsenic exposure causes cancer, cardiovascular, liver, nerve, and ophthalmic diseases. The current study aimed to find the best conditions for eliminating arsenic from simulated wastewater and their effect on biomarkers of hepatic in mice. Adsorption tests including pH, contact duration, Al-kheriat dosage, and arsenic concentrations were evaluated. Seventy-two healthy albino mice (male) were accidentally allocated into nine groups (n = 8), the first group was considered as healthy control, the second group (AL-Kheriat), and other groups received AL-Kheriat and arsenic 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150 and 175 mg/kg, respectively. Next 10 days, the following were examined: LD50 level, ALP (alkaline phosphatase), ALT (alanine aminotransferase), and AST (aspartate aminotransferase), besides the histological condition of the liver. The results showed that the best time for arsenic removal was 4 hours, pH 8, Alkheriat dose 1 gram, and 50 ppm of pollutants. The level of alkaline phosphatase ALP, alanine transaminase ALT, and aspartate transaminase AST was increased to 150.96 (U/L), 143.1(U/L), and 32.8(U/L), respectively, in Al-Khriet and arsenic exposed population than the healthy control group, When the appropriate dose of Al-Khriet and arsenic mixture is used, it can aid in the selection of a safe way of disposing of the adsorbed residue. Additionally, it can serve as a low-cost rodent pesticide, increasing the commercial viability of this removal strategy.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

arsenic; biosorbent; rodenticide; green process; Al-Kheriat; liver enzyme

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 24, nr 4
• Strony: 16--26
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 63 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Al-Jendeel Haider Abdulkareem

• Chemical Engineering Department, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8548-9586

autor

Rasheed Hala Abdulkareem

• Biotechnology Department, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq

autor

Ahmedzeki Nada Sadoon

• Chemical Engineering and Petroleum Industry Department, Al-Mustaqbal University College, Babylon, Iraq

autor

Alhassani Maha Hadi

• Chemical Engineering Department, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq

Bibliografia

• 1. Androutsopoulos, V.P., et al. 2013. A mechanistic overview of health associated effects of low levels of organochlorine and organophosphorous pesticides. Toxicology, 307, 89–94.
• 2. Humans, I.W.G.O.T.E.O.C.R.T. 2012. Arsenic, metals, fibres, and dusts. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, 100(Pt C), 11–465.
• 3. Lara, F., et al. 2006. Solar-light assisted removal of arsenic from natural waters: Effect of iron and citrate concentrations. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 81, 1282–1287.
• 4. Na, P., et al. 2010. Arsenic adsorption on Ti‐pillared montmorillonite. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 85(5), 708–714.
• 5. Hartwig, A., et al. 2003. Modulation of DNA repair processes by arsenic and selenium compounds. Toxicology, 193(1), 161–169.
• 6. Vahter, M. 2002. Mechanisms of arsenic biotransformation. Toxicology, 181–182, 211–217.
• 7. Jiang, J.Q., et al. 2015. Removal of Arsenic (III) from groundwater applying a reusable Mg‐Fe‐Cl layered double hydroxide. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 90(6), 1160–1166.
• 8. Silva, B., et al. 2020. Waste-based biosorbents as cost-effective alternatives to commercial adsorbents for the retention of fluoxetine from water. Separation and Purification Technology, 235, 116139.
• 9. Hossain, I., Anjum N., Tasnim T. 2016. Removal of arsenic from contaminated water utilizing tea waste. International journal of environmental science and technology, 13(3), 843–848.
• 10. Hussain, S., et al. 2018. Waste tea as a novel adsorbent: a review. Applied Water Science, 8(6), 1–16.
• 11. Ghimire, K.N., et al. 2003. Adsorptive separation of arsenate and arsenite anions from aqueous medium by using orange waste. Water Research, 37(20), 4945–4953.
• 12. Kim, Y., et al. 2018. Use of Powdered Cockle Shell as a Bio‐Sorbent Material for Phosphate Removal from Water. Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, 39(12), 1362–1367.
• 13. Babu, A.N., et al. 2018. Removal of lead and fluoride from contaminated water using exhausted coffee grounds based bio-sorbent. Journal of Environmental Management, 218, 602–612.
• 14. El-Sheikh, A.H., Hilal, M.M.A., Sweileh J.A. 2011. Bio-separation, speciation and determination of chromium in water using partially pyrolyzed olive pomace sorbent. Bioresource technology, 102(10), 5749–5756.
• 15. Singh, K., Singh A., Hasan S. 2006. Low cost biosorbent ‘wheat bran’for the removal of cadmium from wastewater: kinetic and equilibrium studies. Bioresource technology, 97(8), 994–1001.
• 16. Mohamed, C., et al. 2012. Application of low-cost adsorbents for arsenic removal: A review. Journal of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, 4(5), 91–102.
• 17. Najim, A.A., Mohammed A.A. 2018. Biosorption of methylene blue from aqueous solution using mixed algae. Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 19(4), 1–11.
• 18. Crini, G., et al. 2019. Conventional and non-conventional adsorbents for wastewater treatment. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 17(1), 195–213.
• 19. Al-Hassani, M.H. 2013. Al-Khriet Agricultural Waste Adsorbent, for Removal Lead and Cadmium Ion from Aqueous Solutions. AL-Khwarizmi Engineering Journal, 9(2), 69–76.
• 20. Yaro, A.S., Al-Hassani M.H., Rasheed H.A. 2015. Copper biosorption using local Iraqi natural agents. Desalination and Water Treatment, 54(2), 533–539.
• 21. Mondal, M.K., Garg, R. 2017. A comprehensive review on removal of arsenic using activated carbon prepared from easily available waste materials. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(15), 13295–13306.
• 22. Carneiro, M.A., et al. 2021. Current trends of arsenic adsorption in continuous mode: Literature review and future perspectives. Sustainability, 13(3), 1186.
• 23. Patel, D., Kellici, S., Saha, B. 2014. Green process engineering as the key to future processes. Processes, 2(1), 311–332.
• 24. Tobiszewski, M., et al. 2015. Green chemistry metrics with special reference to green analytical chemistry. Molecules, 20(6), 10928–10946.
• 25. Pérez Mora, B.E., et al. 2019. Optimization of continuous arsenic biosorption present in natural contaminated groundwater. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 94(2), 547–555.
• 26. Ahuja, S. 2013. Green chemistry and other novel solutions to water pollution: overview. Novel Solutions to Water Pollution, 1–14.
• 27. Sheldon, R.A. 2017. The E factor 25 years on: the rise of green chemistry and sustainability. Green Chemistry, 19(1), 18–43.
• 28. He, W., et al. 2007. Arsenic exposure in pregnant mice disrupts placental vasculogenesis and causes spontaneous abortion. Toxicological sciences, 99(1), 244–253.
• 29. Hill, D.S., Wlodarczyk B.J., Finnell R.H. 2008. Reproductive consequences of oral arsenate exposure during pregnancy in a mouse model. Birth Defects Research Part B: Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology, 83(1), 40–47.
• 30. Sanghamitra, S., et al. 2008. Arsenic induced toxicity on testicular tissue of mice. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol, 52(1), 84–90.
• 31. Santra, A., et al. 2000. Hepatic damage caused by chronic arsenic toxicity in experimental animals. Journal of Toxicology: Clinical Toxicology, 38(4), 395–405.
• 32. Gora, R.H., et al. 2014. Hepatoprotective activity of Tephrosia purpurea against arsenic induced toxicity in rats. Indian Journal of Pharmacology, 46(2), 197.
• 33. Pershagen, G. 1983. The epidemiology of human arsenic exposure. Biological and environmental effects of arsenic, 1.
• 34. Mazumder, D.G. 2005. Effect of chronic intake of arsenic-contaminated water on liver. Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 206(2), 169–175.
• 35. Majumdar, K.K. 2017. Chronic arsenic poisoning and Hepatotoxicity. Journal of Comprehensive Health, 5(1), 24–33.
• 36. Zhang, A., et al. 2000. The progress of endemic arsenism due to burning coal contain arsenic. Metal Ions Biol Med, 6, 53–55.
• 37. Lu, T., et al. 2001. Application of cDNA microarray to the study of arsenic-induced liver diseases in the population of Guizhou, China. Toxicological sciences, 59(1), 185–192.
• 38. Arteel, G.E., et al. 2008. Subhepatotoxic exposure to arsenic enhances lipopolysaccharide-induced liver injury in mice. Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 226(2), 128–139.
• 39. Straub, A.C., et al. 2007. Arsenic stimulates sinusoidal endothelial cell capillarization and vessel remodeling in mouse liver. Hepatology, 45(1), 205–212.
• 40. Styblo, M., Hughes M.F., Thomas D.J. 1996. Liberation and analysis of protein-bound arsenicals. Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications, 677(1), 161–166.
• 41. Noman, A.S.M., et al. 2015. Arsenic-induced histological alterations in various organs of mice. Journal of cytology & histology, 6(3).
• 42. Al-Jubouri, S.M., et al. 2022. Antibiotics adsorption from contaminated water by composites of ZSM-5 zeolite nanocrystals coated carbon. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 47, 102745.
• 43. Hussein, A.A., R.M. Al-Ezzy, Abdallah M.T. 2019. Biochemical, enzymatic, and immunological study on antimutagenic Achillea millefolium Methanolic Extract in vivo. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 7, 69–74.
• 44. Das, N., et al. 2012. Arsenic exposure through drinking water increases the risk of liver and cardiovascular diseases in the population of West Bengal, India. BMC public health, 12(1), 1–9.
• 45. Arfat, Y., et al. 2014. Effect of imidacloprid on hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity in male albino mice. Toxicology reports, 1, 554–561.
• 46. Soares da Silva, F.A., et al. 2019. Optimization of bacterial nanocellulose fermentation using recycled paper sludge and development of novel composites. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 103(21), 9143–9154.
• 47. Luo, M.-T., et al. 2019. Bacterial cellulose based superabsorbent production: A promising example for high value-added utilization of clay and biology resources. Carbohydrate polymers, 208, 421–430.
• 48. Leonarski, E., et al. 2021. Production of kombucha-like beverage and bacterial cellulose by acerola by-product as raw material. Lwt, 135, 110075.
• 49. Wu, Y., et al. 2021. In-situ fermentation with gellan gum adding to produce bacterial cellulose from traditional Chinese medicinal herb residues hydrolysate. Carbohydrate Polymers, 270, 118350.
• 50. Nandiyanto, A.B.D., Oktiani R., Ragadhita R. 2019. How to read and interpret FTIR spectroscope of organic material. Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 4(1), 97–118.
• 51. Cazón, P., Velázquez G., Vázquez M. 2019. Characterization of bacterial cellulose films combined with chitosan and polyvinyl alcohol: Evaluation of mechanical and barrier properties. Carbohydrate polymers, 216, 72–85.
• 52. Célino, A., et al. 2014. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of water sorption in natural fibres using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Carbohydrate polymers, 101, 163–170.
• 53. Roddick-Lanzilotta, A.J., McQuillan A.J., Craw D. 2002. Infrared spectroscopic characterisation of arsenate (V) ion adsorption from mine waters, Macraes mine, New Zealand. Applied Geochemistry, 17(4), 445–454.
• 54. Cowen, S., et al. 2008. Vibrational spectroscopic characterization of some environmentally important organoarsenicals—A guide for understanding the nature of their surface complexes. Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 86(10), 942–950.
• 55. Polowczyk, I., et al. 2016. Influence of pH on arsenic (III) removal by fly ash. Separation Science and Technology, 51(15–16), 2612–2619.
• 56. Khamkure, S., et al. 2020. Prediction of the pH effect on arsenic (V) removal by varying catalyst of magnetic xerogel monoliths based on FREN model. Water Supply, 20(7), 2747–2761.
• 57. Rahdar, S., et al. 2019. Adsorption of arsenic (V) from aqueous solution using modified saxaul ash: isotherm and thermodynamic study. Applied Water Science, 9(4), 1–9.
• 58. Alhassani, M.H., Al-Jubouri S.M., Al-Jendeel H.A. 2020. Stabilization of phenol trapped by agricultural waste: a study of the influence of ambient temperature on the adsorbed phenol. Desalin Water Treat, 187, 266–276.
• 59. Mondal, P., Majumder, C., Mohanty, B. 2008. Effects of adsorbent dose, its particle size and initial arsenic concentration on the removal of arsenic, iron and manganese from simulated ground water by Fe3+ impregnated activated carbon. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 150(3), 695–702.
• 60. Kord Mostafapour, F., et al. 2013. Arsenic removal from aqueous solutions by Salvadora persica stem ash. Journal of Chemistry, 2013.
• 61. Al-jandeel, H.A. 2013. Removal of Phenolic Compounds from Aqueous Solution by Using Agricultural Waste (Al-Khriet). Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 14(3), 55–62.
• 62. Hughes, M.F., et al. 2011. Arsenic exposure and toxicology: a historical perspective. Toxicological sciences, 123(2), 305–332.
• 63. Zhu, H., et al. 2014. Biochemical and histopathological effects of subchronic oral exposure of rats to a mixture of five toxic elements. Food and chemical toxicology, 71, 166–175.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).