Nowe granice w jednodniowych soczewkach kontaktowych

• Autorzy: Giles T. , Pérez-Gómez I. , Hudson C.
• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Dr Tim Giles, dr Inma Pérez-Gómez oraz dr Cameron Hudson wyjaśniają, w jaki sposób zrównoważony rozwój takich cech jednodniowych soczewek kontaktowych, jak komfort użytkowania, zdrowie oka oraz biokompatybilność, wpływają na wzrost ich atrakcyjności dla użytkowników.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

soczewki kontaktowe; komfort użytkowania; biokompatybilność

• Wydawca: MAGMONI Sp. z o.o.
• Czasopismo: Optyka
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Nr 2
• Strony: 60--62
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz., fot.

Twórcy

autor

Giles T.

• Alcon Vision Care

autor

Pérez-Gómez I.

• Alcon Vision Care

autor

Hudson C.

• Alcon Vision Care

Bibliografia

• 1. www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/jfkl960dnc.htm
• 2. Davis R. Customize your patients’ lens wearing schedule. Review of Cornea and Contact Lenses June 2008; 14-18
• 3. Bergenske P., et al. Long-term clinical results: 3 Years of up to 30-night continuous wear of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel and daily wear of low--Dk/t hydrogel lenses. Eye & Contact Lens 2007; 33(2): 74-80
• 4. Stapleton F., et al. Silicone hydrogel contact lenses and the ocular surface. Ocul Surf 2006; 4(1): 24-43
• 5. Fonn D., et al. Can overnight lens induced corneal swelling be minimised to equal no lens wear regardless of oxygen transmissibility? AAO Abstract, November 2010
• 6. Moezzi A., et al. Distribution of overnight central corneal swelling across subjects with 4 different silicone hydrogel lenses. Eye & Contact Lens 2011; 37(2): 61-65
• 7. Mueller N., et al. A comparison of overnight swelling response with two high Dk silicone hydrogels. Optom Vis Sci 2001; 78(125): 199-214
• 8. Fonn D., et al. Elemental need: achieving normoxia; measuring oxygen uptake; sustaining limbal health; oxygen measurements and needs. CL Spectrum August 2005; (S) 1-15
• 9. Reeder R. Daily disposable lenses: a look back and ahead. CL SpectrumApril 2010
• 10. Young G., Veys J., et al. A multi-centre study of lapsed contact lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002; 22(6): 516-527
• 11. Rumpakis J. New Data on Contact Lens Dropouts: An International Perspective. Review of Optometry 2010; 147(1): 37-42
• 12. Barr J.T. 2004 Contact Lens Spectrum Annual Report. Cont Lens Spectrum 2005; Jan; 20(1): 26-31
• 13. Chalmers R.L., McNally J.J., McKenney C.D., Robirds S.R. The role of dryness symptoms in discontinuation of wear and unscheduled lens removals in extended wear of silicone hydrogel lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43s (2002)
• 14. Nichols J.J., Ziegler C., et al. Self-reported dry eye disease across refractive modalities. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46(6): 1911-1914
• 15. Jones L., May C., et al. In vitro evaluation of the dehydration charac-teristics of silicone hydrogel and conventional hydrogel contact lens materials. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2002; 25(3): 147-156
• 16. Chalmers R., et al. How much are symptoms of dryness in daily wear hydrogel contact lens wearers alleviated by silicone hydrogel lenses? 2007 ARV0 Abstract; 48: 5396/B642
• 17. Chalmers R.L., Hunt C., et al. Struggle with hydrogel CL wear increases with age in young adults. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009; 32(3): 113-119
• 18. Helton D.O., Watson L.S. Hydrogel contact lens dehydration rates determined by thermogravimetricanalysis. CLAO J 1991; 17(1): 59-61
• 19. Larsen D., Huff J., et al. Proton N.M.R. relaxation in hydrogel contact lenses: Correlation with in vivo lens dehydration data. Curr Eye Res l990; 9: 697-706
• 20. Jones R., Jones L.L.. In Vitro Bulk Dehydration Rates of Hydrogel and Silicone Hydrogel Daily Disposable and Frequent Replacement Contact Lens Materials. www.siliconehydrogels.org/posters/dec_10.asp accessed 04/11/11
• 21. Morris C. high technology contact lens materials and their biomimetic properties. Optician 2008; April 4
• 22. Nichols B., Dawson C.R., Togni B. Surface features of the conjunctiva and cornea. Invest Ophthal and Vis Sci May 1983; 24: 570-576
• 23. Murube J. Tear osmolarity. Ocul Surf 2006; 1: 62-73
• 24. Thai L.C., Tomlinson A., Doane M. The effect of contact lens materials on tear physiology. Optom Vis Sci March 2004; 81: 194-204
• 25. Glasson M.J., Stapleton F., Keay L., et al. Differences in clinical parame-ters and tear film of tolerant and intolerant contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 5116-5124
• 26. Epstein A.B., Stone R. Surface and Polymer Chemistry: The Quest for Comfort. Review of Cornea and Contact Lenses April 5, 2010; 147(1): 15-19
• 27. Holden B. Minimizing discomfort. Contact Lens Spectrum April 2005; Supplement: 3-4