Assessment of ship manoeuvring safety in waterway systems by relative navigational risk

• Autorzy: Gucma Stanisław , Ślączka Wojciech , Bąk Andrzej

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0016.1230

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The safety of vessels navigating in the sea waterway system is ensured by fulfilling the acceptable restrictions called safe ship operation conditions in that system. The assessment of navigation safety is particularly important when the conditions for safe operation of ships in the waterway system are changed concerns increasing the maximum parameters of vessels, increasing the allowable hydrometeorological conditions or changing the minimum tug assistance. The article presents a method for assessing navigation safety when the conditions for the safe operation of vessels in the waterway system get changed. The method uses two indicators, which are difference in navigation risks and relative navigation risk. To determine the navigational risk, algorithms were developed for calculating the probability of accidents caused by the deterioration of navigation conditions and technical failure of ship equipment and tugs. Another algorithm was developed for calculating the consequences of the accidents that involve blocking a waterway by a ship anchoring in an emergency, grounding, impact of the ship against a port structure or moored ship and a collision with another ship in motion. The method developed for assessing navigation safety by means of relative navigation risk can be used in practice when changing the conditions for safe operation of vessels in the waterway system and when the system is modernized. Navigational safety management is a decision process that is implemented in the loop presented in the article. The acceptable risk is determined on the basis of vessel traffic intensity and ship parameters defined by safe operation conditions for a given waterway system. Relative navigational risk may be used in assessment and comparison of various conditions of safe ship operation. The probability of an accident caused by ship's moving outside the available navigable area due to technical failures of ship equipment or tugs is determined, depending on the type of port waterway and the manoeuvres performed.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

sea waterway system; navigational risk; maritime safety; waterways

PL

system morskich dróg wodnych; ryzyko nawigacyjne; bezpieczeństwo żeglugi morskiej; drogi wodne

• Wydawca: Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Transport
• Czasopismo: Archives of Transport
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 64, iss. 4
• Strony: 119--134
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 51 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Gucma Stanisław

• Maritime University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2286-8815

autor

Ślączka Wojciech

• Maritime University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3265-9726

autor

Bąk Andrzej

• Maritime University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4977-6304

Bibliografia

• [1] Aalberg, A. L., Bye, R. J., & Ellevseth, P. R. (2022). Risk factors and navigation accidents: A historical analysis comparing accident-free and accident-prone vessels using indicators from AIS data and vessel databases. Maritime Transport Research, 3, 100062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2022.100062.
• [2] Bąk, A., & Zalewski, P. (2021). Determination of the Waterway Parameters as a Component of Safety Management System. Applied Sciences, 11(10), 4456. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11104456.
• [3] Bray, D., Daniels, J., Fiander, G., Foster, D. (2020). DP operator’s handbook. Third edition. Nautical Institute, London.
• [4] Car, M., Tominca-Coslovich, S., Brčić, D., & Žuškin, S. (2021). Cross-section of ECDIS education and training worldwide and in the Republic of Croatia: Relations Between Programs and User Perceptions. TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 15(2), 267-275. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.15.02.01.
• [5] Car, M., Vujičić, S., Žuškin, S., & Brčić, D. (2019). Human machine interface: Interaction of OOWs with the ECDIS system. NAŠE MORE, 74-86.
• [6] Chen, P., Huang, Y., Mou, J., & Van Gelder, P. H. A. J. M. (2019). Probabilistic risk analysis for ship-ship collision: State-of-the-art. Safety science, 117, 108-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.014.
• [7] Dhillon, B. S. (2022). Applied Reliability, Usability, and Quality for Engineers. CRC Press.
• [8] Gil, M., Montewka, J., Krata, P., Hinz, T., & Hirdaris, S. (2020). Determination of the dynamic critical maneuvering area in an encounter between two vessels: Operation with negligible environmental disruption. Ocean Engineering, 213, 107709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107709.
• [9] Montewka, J., Krata, P., Goerland, F., & Kujala, P. (2010). A model for risk analysis of oil tankers. Archives of Transport, 22(4), 423-445.
• [10] Gucma, L. (2009). Guidelines for maritime risk management (in Polish). Maritime University of Szczecin Press (Chapter 2).
• [11] Gucma, L., & Gralak, R. (2008). Construction of the ship’s technical failure model to assess its navigational safety. TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 2(2), 173-176.
• [12] Gucma, S., Gralak, R., & Muczyński, B. (2020). Areas of emergency maneuvers and the navigational risk of accidents in fairways due to ship technical failures determined by the ship movement simulation method. Scientific Journals of the Maritime University of Szczecin, 61(133), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.17402/39.8.
• [13] Gucma, S., & Gucma, M. (2019). Optimization of LNG terminal parameters for a wide range of gas tanker sizes: the case of the port of Świnoujście. Archives of Transport, 50(2), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.5696.
• [14] Gucma, S., Gucma, M., Gralak, R., Bilewski, M., & Muczyński, B. (2019a). A simulation method for the determining the minimum pull of tugs assisting in port manoeuvres. Scientific Journals of the Maritime University of Szczecin, 57(129), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.17402/325.
• [15] Gucma, S., Gucma, M., Gralak, R., Przywarty, M., & Muczyński, B. (2019b). Conditions for the location of a universal LNG tanker berth designed for the port of Świnoujście. Scientific Journals of the Maritime University of Szczecin, 57(129), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.17402/326.
• [16] Gucma, S. at al. (2015). Sea waterways – designing and exploitation in terms of maritime traffic engineering. Foundation of shipyard and marine promotion. Gdańsk (Chapter 8).
• [17] Gucma, S. (2016). Parameter optimization of sea waterway system dredged to the specified depth case of the modernized Świnoujście-Szczecin fairway. Archives of Transport, 40(4), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.5604/08669546.1225461.
• [18] Gucma, S. et al. (2017). Marine Traffic Engineering (in Polish). Foundation of shipyard and marine promotion. Gdańsk (Chapter 9).
• [19] Gucma, S., & Ślączka, W. (2018). Comprehensive method of formal safety assessment of ship manoeuvring in waterways. Scientific Journals of the Maritime University of Szczecin, 54(126), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.17402/292
• [20] Gucma, S., & Ślączka, W. (2019). Navigational risk as a criterion for the assessment of the safe ship operation conditions in seaports. In International Scientific Conference "Transport XXI wieku”, Ryn (pp. 9-11).
• [21] Gucma, S., & Zalewski, P. (2020). Optimization of fairway design parameters: Systematic approach to manoeuvring safety. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 12, 129-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2019.08.002.
• [22] European Commission. Statistical Pocketbook (2019). Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publica-tion/f0f3e1b7-ee2b-11e9-a32c-01aa75ed71a1 (accessed on 17 August 2022).
• [23] Della, R. H., Lirn, T. C., & Shang, K. C. (2020). The study of safety behavior in ferry transport. Safety science, 131, 104912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104912.
• [24] Huang, J. C., Nieh, C. Y., & Kuo, H. C. (2019). Risk assessment of ships maneuvering in an approaching channel based on AIS data. Ocean Engineering, 173, 399-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.12.058.
• [25] Khan, B., Khan, F., Veitch, B., & Yang, M. (2018). An operational risk analysis tool to analyze marine transportation in Arctic waters. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 169, 485-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.014.
• [26] Kite-Powell, H., Patrikalakis, N. M. (1998). Formulation of a Model for Ship Transit Risk: Final Project Report. MIT Sea Grant College Program Report, No. 98-7, Massachusetts.
• [27] Kristiansen, S. (2005). Maritime Transportation. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
• [28] Kristić, M., Žuškin, S., Brčić, D., & Car, M. (2021). Overreliance on ECDIS technology: A challenge for safe navigation. TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 15(2), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.15.02.02.
• [29] Kulińska, E. (2012). Selected tools for risk analysis in logistics processes. Archives of Transport, 24(1), 27-42.
• [30] Lau, Y. Y., Lu, C. S., & Weng, H. K. (2021). The effects of safety delivery and safety awareness on passenger behaviour in the ferry context. Maritime Policy & Management, 48(1), 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2020.1750720.
• [31] Liu, C., Liu, J., Zhou, X., Zhao, Z., Wan, C., & Liu, Z. (2020). AIS data-driven approach to estimate navigable capacity of busy waterways focusing on ships entering and leaving port. Ocean Engineering, 218, 108215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108215.
• [32] Matuszak, Z. (2012). Research of damage distribution of engine room system (in Polish). ADVSEO. Szczecin (Chapter 3).
• [33] Ozturk, U., & Cicek, K. (2019). Individual collision risk assessment in ship navigation: A sys-tematic literature review. Ocean Engineering, 180, 130-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.03.042.
• [34] Ozturk, U., Birbil, S. I., & Cicek, K. (2019). Evaluating navigational risk of port approach manoeuvrings with expert assessments and machine learning. Ocean Engineering, 192, 106558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106558.
• [35] Pedersen, P. T., Chen, J., & Zhu, L. (2020). Design of bridges against ship collisions. Marine Structures, 74, 102810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2020.102810.
• [36] PIANC (1997). Approach Channels. A Guide for Design. Final report of the joint Working Group PIANC and IAPH 1997. Supplement to Bulletin no 95.
• [37] PIANC (2002). Guidelines for the Design of Fenders System:2002. Report of Working Group 33. PIANC. General Secretariat. Brussels.
• [38] PIANC (2014). Harbour Approach Channels Design Guidelines. PIANC Report PIANC. General Secretariat. Brussels.
• [39] Pillay, A., Wang, J. (2003). Technology and safety of marine systems. Elsevier Science LTD, Oxford.
• [40] Rausand, M. (2011). Risk Assessment. Theory, Methods, and Applications. Wiley, New Jersey.
• [41] Report Maritime University of Szczecin (2015). Formal risk analysis of Q-Flex LNG gas carriers at the terminal in the Świnoujście outer port.
• [42] Rudyk, T., Szczepański, E., & Jacyna, M. (2019). Safety factor in the sustainable fleet management model. Archives of Transport, 49(1), 103-114. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.2780.
• [43] Szubrycht, T. (2020). Marine accidents as potential crisis situations on the Baltic sea. Archives of Transport, 54(2), 125-135. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.2972.
• [44] Szymanek, A. (2010). Conception of "4 goals and 3 levels" in risk management in road transport systems. Archives of Transport, 22(3), 359-375. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10174-010-0022-1.
• [45] Ślączka, W. (1999). Determination of ship’s damage arising during going aground – physical aspect. Materials for the National Safety and Reliability Conference KONBiN’99. Zakopane - Kościelisko.
• [46] Ung, S. T. (2021). Navigation Risk estimation using a modified Bayesian Network modeling a case study in Taiwan. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 213, 107777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107777.
• [47] Vinnem, J. E. (2014). Offshore Risk Assessment vol. 1, Springer, London.
• [48] Woodward, J., Pitblado R. (2010). LNG Risk Based Safety, Modeling and consequence analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Hoboken. New Jersey.
• [49] Zhang, S. (1999). The Mechanics of Ship Collisions. Department of Naval Architecture and Offshore Engineering, Technical University of Denmark.
• [50] Zhang, M., Zhang, D., Yao, H., & Zhang, K. (2020). A probabilistic model of human error assessment for autonomous cargo ships focusing on human – autonomy collaboration. Safety science, 130, 104838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104838.
• [51] Zhang, W., Feng, X., Goerlandt, F., & Liu, Q. (2020). Towards a Convolutional Neural Network model for classifying regional ship collision risk levels for waterway risk analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 204, 107127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107127.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023)