Zarządzania bezpieczeństwem drogowym : idea - koncept - model ogólny

• Autorzy: Szymanek A. , Borowicz S.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Road safety management : idea - concept - general model

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Skuteczne zarządzanie bezpieczeństwem drogowym jest trudne z praktycznego punktu widzenia, a od strony metodologicznej stanowi duże wyzwanie dla teoretyków i badaczy. Wynika to stąd, że istnieją różne poglądy i rozbieżności dotyczące samej idei zarządzania, jak też jego koncepcji i modelu ogólnego. Rozbieżności te wynikają z różnych możliwych uwarunkowań lokalnych i administracyjnych jakie istnieją w różnych systemach transportu drogowego. Zarządzanie bezpieczeństwem drogowym powinno być uniwersalne na wyższych poziomach zarządzania, a jednocześnie otwarte na ewentualne korekty związane ze specyfiką niższych poziomów zarządzania. W artykule pokazano syntetyczne ujęcie podstawowych problemów zarządzania bezpieczeństwem drogowym – od idei do modelu ogólnego.

EN

Effective management of road safety is difficult from a practical point of view, and from the methodological poses a major challenge for theorist and researches. This is due to the fact that there are different views and divergences on the idea of management, as well as its general concept and model. These discrepancies result from the different possible local conditions and administrative that exist in the various systems of road transport. Management of road safety should be universal at higher levels of management, while open to any adjustments related to the specificity of the lower levels of management. The article shows the synthetic approach tom the basic problems of road safety management – from the idea to the general model.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

transport drogowy; bezpieczeństwo drogowe; zarządzanie bezpieczeństwem

EN

road transport; road safety; security management

• Wydawca: Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz - Poznański Instytut Technologiczny
• Czasopismo: Logistyka
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: nr 3
• Strony: 6192--6200
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 30 poz., rys., CD1

Twórcy

autor

Szymanek A.

• Uniwersytet Technologiczno-Humanistyczny im. K. Pułaskiego w Radomiu. Wydział Transportu i Elektrotechniki; 26-600 Radom, ul. Malczewskiego 29

autor

Borowicz S.

• Uniwersytet Technologiczno-Humanistyczny im. K. Pułaskiego w Radomiu. Wydział Transportu i Elektrotechniki; 26-600 Radom, ul. Malczewskiego 29

Bibliografia

• 1. Abouraad,; S., Elsenaar P. (2006). Road Safety Management in ESCWA Countries Critical Issues in Implementation, In: ESCWA-WHO Regional Conference Global Road Safety Partnership, Cairo, 20-21 December 2006, <http://www.grsproadsafety.org>
• 2. (Auckland, 2009/12) = Regional Road Safety Plan 2009/12. Creating a Safer Transport System for Aucklanders. The Auckland Regional Transport Authority (ARTA), <http://www.roadsafeauckland.org.nz>
• 3. Bliss, T. (2004). Implementing the Recommendations of The World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention. Transport Note No. TN-1, The World Bank,Washington DC
• 4. Bliss,T. & Breen, J. (2008). Implementing the Recommendations of The World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention Country guidelines for the conduct of road safety management capacity reviews and the related specification of lead agency reforms, investment strategies and safety programs and projects, Global Road Safety Facility, World Bank, Washington
• 5. CADaS. (2011). Common Accident Data Set , Version 3.1, European Commission, January 2011; <http://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/pdf/statistics/cadas_glossary.pdf>
• 6. CARE Glossary.(2006). European Commission/Directorate General Energy and Transport, July 2006; <(http://ec.europa.eu/transport/roadsafety_library/care/doc/care_glossary.pdf>
• 7. Ghazwan Al-Haji, Road Safety Development Index (RSDI). Theory, Philosophy and Practice. Linköping Studies in Science and Technology. Dissertation No. 1100. Department of Science and Technology. Linköping University, SE-601 74, Norrköping, Sweden, 2007
• 8. Haddon, W., Jr. (1968). The changing approach to the epidemiology, prevention, and amelioration of trauma: The transition to approaches etiologically rather than descriptively based. American Journal of Public Health, 58, pp. 1431-1438
• 9. Haight, F.A. (1986). Risk, especially risk of traffic accident. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Volume 18, Issue 5, October 1986, pp. 359-366
• 10. Hakkert, A. S. & Braimaister, L. (2002). The uses of exposure and risk in road safety studies. Number: R-2002-12, SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, The Netherlands. Leidschendam
• 11. Hauer, E. (1982). Traffic conflicts and exposure. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Volume 14, Issue 5, October 1982, pp. 359-364
• 12. ISO 73 (2001). Risk Management—Vocabulary—Guidelines for Use in Standards, Draft ISO Guide 73, 2001
• 13. Koornstra, M. J. et al. (2002). SUNflower: a comparative study of the development of road safety in Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands. SWOV, Leidschendam, <http://ec.europa.eu/transport/roadsafety_library/publications/sunflower_report.pdf>
• 14. LTS (2000). Land Transport Safety Authority. Road Safety Strategy 2010: A Consultation Document. National Road Safety Committee, Land Transport Safety Authority, Wellington
• 15. Lederer, J. (1990). Safety Science in Aviation. Proceedings of 1st World Congress on Safety Science. Köln, 1990
• 16. Nilsson, G. (2004). Traffic safety dimensions and the power model to describe the effect of speed on safety. Lund Bulletin 221, Lund Institute of Technology, ISSN 1404-272X
• 17. PIARC (2005). Study on Risk Management for Roads. World Road Association. PIARC Technical Committee on Risk Management for Roads (C18)
• 18. PIARC (2006). PIARC Lexicon on Road and Traffic Engineering, validated by the members of the Technical and Terminology Committees of PIARC. December 2006; <http://termino.piarc.org>
• 19. PRMH (2003). Project Risk Management Handbook. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA
• 20. PROMISING (2001). PROMISING. Promotion of mobility and safety of vulnerable road users. Leidschendam, Institute for Road Safety Research
• 21. RESPONSE (2004). RESPONSE 2 – Final Report: ADAS – from Market Introduction Scenarios towards a Code of Practice for Development and Evaluation. Deliverable D4 (Final Version 2.0), 18 October 2004
• 22. Rumar, K. (1999). Transport Safety Visions, Targets and Strategies: beyond 2000. European Transport Safety Council, Brussels, <http://www.etsc.eu/oldsite/etsl1.pdf>
• 23. SafetyNet (2007). First classification of the EU member states on Risk and Exposure Data. Deliverable 2.2.2 of the EU Integrated Project No. 506723, SafetyNet
• 24. Szymanek, A. (2008). Risk acceptation principles in transport. Journal of KONBiN: Safety and Reliability Systems, vol. II, No 2(5), 2008, pp. 271-281, ISSN 1895-8281
• 25. Tingvall, C. (1995). The Zero Vision, In: Transportation, traffic safety and health: the new mobility,van Holst, H.; Nygren, A. & Thord, R. (eds.). Proceedings of the 1st International Conference, Gothenburg, Springer-Verlag, pp. 35–57
• 26. Wegman, F. & Elsenaar, P. (1997). Sustainable solutions to improve road safety in the Netherlands. Leidschendam, Institute for Road Safety Research, SWOV Report D–97–8
• 27. Wegman, F. (2008). Advancing Sustainable Safety in the Netherlands. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research The Netherlands, September 2008, Available from <http://www.swov.nl>
• 28. WHO (2004). Road safety is No accident; brochure for World health day 2004, quoted as: Harry M. Derriks H. M & Mak, P.M., IRTAD Special Report Underreporting of Road Traffic Casualties. The Netherlands, June 2007, < http://www.oecd.org/document/>
• 29. (WHO, 2006), Helmets: a road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2006; Glossary of terms, p. 141; <http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2006/>
• 30. ZEUS 1-3 (2009-2010). Zintegrowany system bezpieczeństwa transportu, Krystek, R. (Ed.), vol. 1-3, WKŁ, Warszawa