Study on safety management in Turkish earthquakes

• Autorzy: Stasiak-Betlejewska Renata , Ömek Gökhan

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/czoto-2023-0024

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Natural disasters affect not only humans but also all living beings and societal elements. The term "disaster “meaning a Great Calamity. Among these calamities, earthquakes stand out as the most significant in terms of the damages they cause. Internationally, all authorities define earthquakes as the disasters that result in the highest loss of life and property. This paper highlights the urgent need for effective debris management measures, drawing on established scientific knowledge and operational experience from scientific studies authored by universities. By highlighting the challenges faced during earthquake debris management and safety management and the associated threats to public health and the environment, this study was undertaken to raise people's awareness against similar negligence in future catastrophic events.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

earthquake; debris management; safety management; risk management

PL

trzęsienie ziemi; gospodarka odpadami; zarządzanie bezpieczeństwem; zarządzanie ryzykiem

• Wydawca: De Gruyter
• Czasopismo: System Safety : Human - Technical Facility - Environment
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 5, iss. 1
• Strony: 224--230
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. poz. 20., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Stasiak-Betlejewska Renata

• Czestochowa University of Technology, Faculty of Management, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8713-237

autor

Ömek Gökhan

• Mersin University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Turkey

• https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7998-9663

Bibliografia

• 1. AFAD, 06 Şubat. 2023. pazarcik (Kahramanmaraş) - AFAD. https://deprem.afad.gov.tr/assets/pdf/Kahramanmaras%20%20Depremleri_%20On%20Degerlendirme%20Raporu.pdf
• 2. Akdağ, M., 2005. Halkla ilişkiler ve kriz yönetimi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14, 1-20. Akdemir, A. B. ve Kılıç, A. (2021). Nitel makalelerin yöntem analizi. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 486-502.
• 3. Asunakutlu, T. ve Dirlik, S., 2009. Kriz yönetimi stratejileri ve kriz sonrası yeniden yapılanma, Kriz Yönetimi. 33-60.
• 4. Ay, Ş., 2023. Kahramanmaraş Pazarcık ve Elbistan depremleri sonrası hasarlı yapıların malzeme kalitesi ve uygulama hatalarının değerlendirilmesi. In International Conference on Engineering, Natural and Social Sciences, 1, 245-251.
• 5. Aydınbaş, G., 2023. Sosyoekonomik boyutuyla Türkiye’de depremler üzerine bir inceleme: Kahramanmaraş depremi örneği. Sosyal Bilimlere Çok Yönlü Yaklaşımlar: Tarih, Turizm, Eğitim, Ekonomi, Siyaset ve İletişim, 177-212.
• 6. Ayyürek, O., 2014. Eğitim örgütlerinde kriz yönetimi: Van depremi örneği, Yüksek lisans tezi/ Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi]. YÖK Tez Merkezi.
• 7. Bommer, J., Spence, R., Erdik, M., Tabuchi, S., Aydinoglu, N., Booth, E. et al., 2022. Development of an earthquake loss model for Turkish catastrophe insurance. J of Seismology, 6 (3) (2002). 431-446.
• 8. Bommer, J., Spence, R., Erdik, M., Tabuchi, S., Aydinoglu, N., Booth, E. et al., 2022. Development of an earthquake loss model for Turkish catastrophe insurance. J of Seismology, 6 (3) (2002). 431-446.
• 9. Comfort, L. K., Siciliano, M. D. ve Okada, A. 2011. Resilience, entropy, and efficiency in Crisis management: the January 12, 2010, Haiti earthquake. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 2(3), 1-25.
• 10. Frost, J., 2023. Worldwide lessons from Turkey earthquakes building safety problems. Insurance Business America.
• 11. Görüm, T.; Tanyaş, H., 2023. Less than expected? Landslides triggered by the 2023 Mw 7.7 and 7.6 Kahramanmaras (Türkiye) earthquake sequence. In Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly 2023, EGU23-17606, Vienna, Austria, 24–28.
• 12. Melgar, D.; Taymaz, T.; Ganas, A.; Crowell, B.; Öcalan, T.; Kahraman, M.; Tsironi, V.; Yolsal-Çevikbilen, S.; Valkaniotis, S.; Irmak, T.S., 2023. Sub- and super-shear ruptures during the 2023 Mw 7.8 and Mw 7.6 earthquake doublet in SE Türkiye. Seismica 2023, 2, 1–10.
• 13. Mercimek, Ö., 2023. Seismic failure modes of masonry structures exposed to Kahramanmaraş earthquakes. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2023, 151, 107422.
• 14. Oakey, J. 2023. Turkey’s earthquakes raise questions over dam safety and its transboundary implications. Azure Strategy.
• 15. Okumus, C., 2022. Turkey safety & Security: Disaster Management. Market Intelligence.
• 16. Taftsoglou, M.; Valkaniotis, S.; Karantanellis, E.; Goula, E.; Papathanassiou, G. 2023. Preliminary Mapping of Liquefaction Phenomena Triggered by the February 6 2023 M7.7 Earthquake, Türkiye/Syria, Based on Remote Sensing Data. Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/record/7668401 (accessed on 25 April 2023).
• 17. Türkiye Recovery and Reconstruction Assessment (TERRA). Türkiye Earthquakes Recovery and Reconstruction Assessment. Report with the Support of the United Nations and the European Union, with Select Inputs from World Bank Staff. https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Turkiye-Recovery-and-Reconstruction-Assessment.pdf (accessed on 20 April 2023).
• 18. Türkiye’de yerel yönetimlerde kriz ve afet yönetim çalışmalarının mevzuat açısından değerlendirilmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Teknik Araştırmalar Dergisi, (12), 195-219.
• 19. United States Geological Survey (USGS). M 7.5—Elbistan Earthquake, Kahramanmaras Earthquake Sequence. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000jlqa/executive (accessed on 15 April 2023).
• 20. Veri, Kaynagi, 2023. Year of construction of buildings in earthquake-affacted provinces.https://www.verikaynagi.com/genel/6-subat-kahramanmaras-depreminin-ardindan/

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).