Boosting sustainability performance through supply chain quality management in the mining industry

• Autorzy: Basuki , Rajiani Ismi , Widyanti Rahmi

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2021.24.2.03

Warianty tytułu

PL

Zwiększanie wydajności zrównoważonego rozwoju poprzez zarządzanie jakością łańcucha dostaw w górnictwie

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Though much consideration has been dedicated to Supply Chain Management (SCM) conceptions recently, its connection with the quality management philosophy is rare and loose, mainly in developing countries operating under Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). While the significance of quality management is globally acknowledged, academia needs a more comprehensive approach in assessing quality management perspectives in internal and external supply chain contexts. Consequently, the effect of Supply Chain Quality Management (SCQM) practice on the sustainability performance of Indonesian mining industries after joining the EITI was examined. For this purpose, the data was collected from the employees of mining companies working in Indonesia, and the Structural Equation Modelling was employed to examine the relationship among constructs. A positive and significant relationship between internal quality management and sustainability performance was found. In addition, upstream quality management and downstream quality management are positively and significantly associated with sustainability performance. Thus, these findings indicate that Indonesia's mining companies have started applying SCQM to achieve their economic, environmental and social achievement. Practitioners can utilise the proposed model grounded on the relationships between supply chain management practices and the three sustainable development arenas to underline SCQM best practices positively affecting sustainable performance.

PL

Chociaż ostatnio wiele uwagi poświęcono koncepcjom zarządzania łańcuchem dostaw (SCM), jego związek z filozofią zarządzania jakością jest rzadki i luźny, głównie w krajach rozwijających się, działających w ramach Inicjatywy Przejrzystości Przemysłu Wydobywczego (EITI). Chociaż znaczenie zarządzania jakością jest doceniane na całym świecie, środowisko akademickie potrzebuje bardziej kompleksowego podejścia do oceny perspektyw zarządzania jakością w kontekście wewnętrznego i zewnętrznego łańcucha dostaw. W konsekwencji zbadano wpływ praktyki zarządzania jakością łańcucha dostaw (SCQM) na wyniki w zakresie zrównoważonego rozwoju indonezyjskiego przemysłu wydobywczego po wstąpieniu do EITI. W tym celu zebrano dane od pracowników firm wydobywczych pracujących w Indonezji, a do zbadania relacji między konstruktami wykorzystano modelowanie równań strukturalnych. Stwierdzono pozytywny i znaczący związek między wewnętrznym zarządzaniem jakością a wynikami zrównoważonego rozwoju. Ponadto zarządzanie jakością na początku i na końcu są pozytywnie i znacząco powiązane z wynikami zrównoważonego rozwoju. Zatem odkrycia te wskazują, że indonezyjskie przedsiębiorstwa wydobywcze zaczęły stosować SCQM, aby osiągnąć swoje osiągnięcia gospodarcze, środowiskowe i społeczne. Praktycy mogą wykorzystać proponowany model oparty na związkach między praktykami zarządzania łańcuchem dostaw a trzema obszarami zrównoważonego rozwoju, aby podkreślić najlepsze praktyki SCQM pozytywnie wpływające na zrównoważoną wydajność.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

distribution centre; enterprise; SME

PL

centrum dystrybucji; przedsiębiorstwo; MŚP

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 24, No. 2
• Strony: 41--54
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 47 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Basuki

• Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB, Banjarmasin, Indonesia

autor

Rajiani Ismi

• Faculty of Business, Law and Social Science , Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia

autor

Widyanti Rahmi

• Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB, Banjarmasin, Indonesia

Bibliografia

• 1.Aguirre-Villegas, H. A., Benson, C. H., (2017). Case history of environmental impacts of an Indonesian coal supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 157, 47-56.
• 2.Alsawafi, A., Lemke, F. and Yang, Y., (2021). The impacts of internal quality management relations on the triple bottom line: A dynamic capability perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 232, 107927.
• 3.Arisanty, D., Jędrasiak, K., Rajiani, I. and Grabara, J., (2020). The Destructive Impact of Burned Peatl&s to Physical & Chemical Properties of Soil. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 25(2) 213-223.
• 4.Baskoro, F. R., Takahashi, K., Morikawa, K. and Nagasawa, K., (2021). System dynamics approach in determining coal utilisation scenario in Indonesia. Resources Policy, 73, 102209.
• 5.Bastas, A., Liyanage, K., (2018). Sustainable supply chain quality management: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 726-744.
• 6.Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S. and Walker, K., (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652-661.
• 7.Chau, K. Y., Tang, Y. M., Liu, X., Ip, Y. K. and Tao, Y., (2021). Investigation of critical success factors for improving supply chain quality management in manufacturing. Enterprise Information Systems, 1-20.
• 8.Chin, W. W., (2010). Bootstrap cross-validation indices for PLS path model assessment. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares (pp. 83-97). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
• 9.Dash, G., Paul, J., (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121092.
• 10.Grabara, J., Dabylova, M. and Alibekova, G., (2020). Impact of legal standards on logistics management in the context of sustainable development. Acta Logistica, 7(1), 31-37.
• 11.Gutierrez-Gutierrez, L. J., Barrales-Molina, V. and Kaynak, H., (2018). The Role of Human Resource-Related Quality Management Practices in New Product Development: A Dynamic Capability Perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(1), 43.
• 12.Gupta, A. K., (2021). Innovation dimensions and firm performance synergy in the emerging market: A perspective from Dynamic Capability Theory & Signaling Theory. Technology in Society, 64, 101512.
• 13.Hair Jr, J. F., Howard, M. C. and Nitzl, C., (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101-110.
• 14.Haiyun, C., Zhixiong, H., Yüksel, S. and Dinçer, H., (2021). Analysis of the innovation strategies for green supply chain management in the energy industry using the QFD-based hybrid interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143, 110844.
• 15.Harland, C., (2021). Discontinuous wefts: Weaving a more interconnected supply chain management tapestry. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 57(1), 27-40.
• 16.Hong, J., Liao, Y., Zhang, Y. and Yu, Z., (2019). The effect of supply chain quality management practices and capabilities on operational and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturers. International Journal of Production Economics, 212, 227-235.
• 17.Jabbour, C. J. C., Seuring, S., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Jugend, D., Fiorini, P. D. C., Latan, H. and Izeppi, W. C., (2020). Stakeholders, innovative business models for the circular economy and sustainable performance of firms in an emerging economy facing institutional voids. Journal of Environmental Management, 264, 110416.
• 18.Kähkönen, A. K., Lintukangas, K. and Hallikas, J., (2018). Sustainable supply management practices: making a difference in a firm’s sustainability performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 23(6), 518-530.
• 19.Kurniawan, R., Trencher, G. P., Edianto, A. S., Setiawan, I. E. and Matsubae, K., (2020). Understanding the multi-faceted drivers of increasing coal consumption in Indonesia. Energies, 13(14), 3660.
• 20.Lin, X., Zhou, Y. W. and Hou, R., (2021). Impact of a “buy-online-and-pickup-in-store” channel on price and quality decisions in a supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 294(3), 922-935.
• 21.Madhani, P. M., (2020). Enhancing Supply Chain Efficiency and Effectiveness With Lean Six Sigma Approach. International Journal of Project Management and Productivity Assessment 8(1), 40-65.
• 22.Mena, C., Schoenherr, T., (2020). The green contagion effect: an investigation into the propagation of environmental practices across multiple supply chains tiers. International Journal of Production Research, 1-18.
• 23.Muhamed, A. A., Salim, N., Ab Rahman, M. N., Hamzah, F. M. and Ali, M. H., (2020). Effects of supply chain orientation on firm performance: insights from a Malaysian case study of halal-certified small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 1-17.
• 24.Oppong, N., Andrews, N., (2020). Extractive industries transparency initiative and the politics of institutional innovation in Ghana's oil industry. The Extractive Industries and Society, 7(4), 1238-1245.
• 25.Peng, X., Prybutok, V. and Xie, H., (2020). Integration of supply chain management and quality management within a quality focused organisational framework. International Journal of Production Research, 58(2), 448-466.
• 26.Pettit, T. J., Croxton, K. L. and Fiksel, J., (2019). The evolution of resilience in supply chain management: a retrospective on ensuring supply chain resilience. Journal of Business Logistics, 40(1), 56-65.
• 27.Pham, T. S. H., Darabi, F. and Wilmot, N. V., (2020). International supply chain case study. In Supply Chain and Logistics Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1183-1204). IGI Global.
• 28.Phan, A. C., Nguyen, H. A., Trieu, P. D., Nguyen, H. T. and Matsui, Y., (2019). Impact of supply chain quality management practices on operational performance: empirical evidence from manufacturing companies in Vietnam. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 24(6), 855-871.
• 29.Phung, H. T. X., Phan, A. C., Nguyen, H. T. and Matsui, Y., (2021). Mediation effects of information technology links with suppliers and information sharing with suppliers in the relationship of supply chain process integration and supply chain performance. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 33(4), 542-567.
• 30.Rada E. C., Cioca L. I. and Ionescu, G., (2017). Energy recovery from Municipal Solid Waste in EU: Proposals to assess the management performance under a circular economy perspective. MATEC Web of Conferences, 121. Sibiu.
• 31.Rada E. C., Ragazzi M., Torretta V., Castagna G., Adami, L. and Cioca L. I., (2018). Circular Economy and Waste to Energy. Technologies and materials for renewable energy, environment and sustainability. 1968. AIP Conference Proceedings.
• 32.Reyseliani, N., Purwanto, W. W., (2021). Pathway towards 100% renewable energy in Indonesia power system by 2050. Renewable Energy, 176(C), 305-321.
• 33.Rosser, A., Kartika, W., (2020). Conflict, contestation, and corruption reform: the political dynamics of the EITI in Indonesia. Contemporary Politics, 26(2), 147-164.
• 34.Sadeghi Moghadam, M. R., Safari, H. and Yousefi, N., (2021). Clustering quality management models and methods: systematic literature review and text-mining analysis approach. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 32(3-4), 241-264.
• 35.Sahoo, S., (2019). Quality management, innovation capability and firm performance: Empirical insights from Indian manufacturing SMEs. The TQM Journal, 31(6), 1003-1027.
• 36.Salimian, H., Rashidirad, M. and Soltani, E., (2021). Supplier quality management and performance: the effect of supply chain oriented culture. Production Planning & Control, 32(11), 942-958.
• 37.Samad, S., Nilashi, M., Almulihi, A., Alrizq, M., Alghamdi, A., Mohd, S. and Azhar, S. N. F. S., (2021). Green Supply Chain Management practices and impact on firm performance: The moderating effect of collaborative capability. Technology in Society, 67, 101766.
• 38.Shaharudin, M. S., Fernando, Y., Jabbour, C. J. C., Sroufe, R. and Jasmi, M. F. A., (2019). Past, present, and future low carbon supply chain management: A content review using social network analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, 629-643.
• 39.Shkoukani, M., Alnagi, E. and Abulail, R., (2013). Comparison between Upstream and Downstream Supply Chain Management and How they are affected by E-business. Oriental Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 6(2), 1-8.
• 40.Straková, J., Rajiani, I., Pártlová, P., Váchal, J. and Dobrovič, J., (2020). Use of the Value Chain in the Process of Generating a Sustainable Business Strategy on the Example of Manufacturing and Industrial Enterprises in the Czech Republic. Sustainability, 12(4), 1-15.
• 41.Szentesi, S., Illés, B., Cservenák, Á., Skapinyecz, R. and Tamás, P., (2021). Description of a novel supplier selection method for companies manufacturing food supplements. Acta Logistica, 8(3), 297-308.
• 42.Usop, S. R., Rajiani, I., (2021). Indigenous Indonesian Dayak Traditional Wisdom in Reducing Deforestation. Indonesian Journal of Geography, 53 (3).
• 43.Vijge, M. J., Metcalfe, R., Wallbott, L. and Oberlack, C., (2019). Transforming institutional quality in resource curse contexts: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Myanmar. Resources Policy, 61, 200-209.
• 44.Wawak, S., Rogala, P. and Dahlgaard-Park, S. M., (2020). Research trends in quality management in years 2000-2019. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 12(4), 417-433.
• 45.Widyanti, R., Rajiani, I. and Basuki, (2021). Managing during crisis: Do workplace spirituality and spiritual leadership matter? Polish Journal of Management Studies, 23 (1), 453- 469.
• 46.Xu, L., Peng, X., Pavur, R. and Prybutok, V., (2020). Quality management theory development via meta-analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 229, 107759.
• 47.Yanuardi, Y., Vijge, M. J. and Biermann, F., (2021). Improving governance quality through global standard setting? Experiences from the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Indonesia. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8 (3), 100905.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).