Tytuł artykułu
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Objectives. The aim of this work was to develop, validate and test a new questionnaire to assess the biological risk in workers with intentional or unintentional exposure to biological agents. Methods. A questionnaire including 34 questions was developed to study the perception of workers against occupational biohazard. Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validity Ratio (CVR) were calculated for the analysis of content validity. A pilot study was carried out with 60 workers from 17 companies performing analysis of Cronbach's α to assess the internal consistency or reliability. Results. A total of 518 workers from 51 Spanish companies in which there is exposure to biological agents participated in the study yielding a response rate of 90%. The final questionnaire obtained a Cronbach's α > 0.759 with a stable test–retest result. The questionnaire validation demonstrates that it could be used to evaluate the biological risks and help the prevention of occupational accidents and diseases. Discussion. This study has validated the need to evaluate worker's perception against occupational risks, as well as the application of prevention methods and protective equipment. It is a first step towards developing an occupational biohazards assessment method including all the requirements set by the European Health and Safety Strategy 2013–2020.
Wydawca
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
541--549
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 20 poz.
Twórcy
autor
- MC-SPA Sociedad de Prevencion, SLU, Spain
autor
- Council of Salamanca, Spain
autor
- University of Salamanca, Spain
autor
- Public University of Navarra, Spain
Bibliografia
- 1. EU-OSHA. Priorities for occupational safety and health research in Europe: 2013-2020 2013. ISSN: 1831-9351. [Online]. 2013 [cited 2014 Oct 4]. Available from: https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/reports/priorities-for-occupational-safety-and-health-research-in-europe-2013-2020
- 2. Communication from the European Commission. EUROPE 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels [Online]. 2010 [cited 2014 Sept 10]; Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF
- 3. Driscoll T, Takala J, Steenland K, et al. Review of estimates of the global burden of injury and illness due to occupational exposures. Am J Ind Med. 2005;48:491-502. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20194.
- 4. Salma K. Evidence-Based Cancer prevention: strategies for NGOs-A UICC handbook for Europe. [Online]. 2004 [cited 2014 Sept 10]; Available from: http://www.uicc.org/sites/main/files/private/Evidence%20based%20cancer%20prevention_EN_0.pdf
- 5. U-OSHA. Expert forecast on emerging biological risks related to occupational safety and health. Vol. 3. European Communities. [Online]. 2007 [cited 2014 Sept 24]; Available from: http://osha.europa.eu/publications/reports/7606488
- 6. Portell M, Gil RM, Losilla JM, et al.. Characterizing occupational risk perception: the case of biological, ergonomic and organizational hazards in Spanish healthcare workers. Span J Psychol. 2014;17(E51):1–12.
- 7. Rim KT, Cheol-Hong L. Biologically hazardous agents at work and efforts to protect workers’ health: a review of recent reports. Saf Health Work. 2014;5:43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2014.03.006
- 8. Directive 2000/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on the protection of workers from risks related to exposure to biological agents at work. OJ. 2000;L262:21-45. [Online]. 2000 [cited 2014 Sept 10]; Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2000:262:0021:0045:EN:PDF
- 9. Cusick RD, Younggy K, Bruce EL. Energy capture from thermolytic solutions in microbial reverse-electrodialysis cells. Science. 2012;335:1474-1477. doi: 10.1126/science.1219330
- 10. Arribas M. Diseño y validación de cuestionarios. Matronas profesión. 2004;5(17):23–29.
- 11. Directive, E.U. The introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work Sect. Official Journal L 183.29/06. [Online]. 1989 [cited 2014 Sept 10]; Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31989L0391&from=EN
- 12. European Commission. Guidance on risk assessment at work. Brusels. 1996. In: Available from https://osha.europa.eu/en/topics/riskassessment/guidance.pdf
- 13. Caucheteux D, Pierre M. Biological risk assessment: an explanation meant for safety advisors in Belgium. J Am Biol Saf Assoc. 2005;10(1):10-29.
- 14. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol. 1975;28(4):563-575. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
- 15. Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multiv Behav Res. 1966;1:245–276. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
- 16. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334. doi: 10.1007/BF02310555
- 17. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha. BMJ. 1997;314:572. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572
- 18. European Commission Recommendation. Concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, 2003/361/CE. [Online]. 2003 [cited 2014 Sept 10]; Available from: URL:http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/enterprise/business_environment/n26026_en.htm
- 19. Llorca-Rubio JL. Manual práctico para la evaluación del riesgo biológico en actividades laborales diversas (BIOGAVAL). Valencia: Generalitat Valenciana; 2004.
- 20. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-94ee9acb-eb3e-4370-be57-3b842029d75f
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.