Social Awareness of the Circular Economy as an Integral Part of Sustainable Development. Observations from Poland

Lewandowska, Aleksandra; Rogatka, Krzysztof; Lopata, Ewelina

doi:10.2478/ceer-2022-0023

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Social Awareness of the Circular Economy as an Integral Part of Sustainable Development. Observations from Poland

Autorzy

Lewandowska Aleksandra , Rogatka Krzysztof , Lopata Ewelina

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

ceer2022_2_lewandowska_social_awareness.pdf

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ceer-2022-0023

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Sustained growth in the number of urban dwellers means that matters concerning the development of modern cities are not only a challenge for current residents, but a global test for the entire population. The purpose of this paper is to analyze and assess social awareness regarding sustainable development, with particular emphasis on matters concerning the circular economy. The study was conducted by means of the CAWI (Computer Assisted (Aided) Web Interviews) method on a sample of 389 respondents from Warsaw, the capital city of Poland. The results imply that although the society has a correct understanding of sustainable development and the circular economy, there is still a continuing need to support further education due to the necessity for wider and more intensive implementation of sustainable development in practice.

Słowa kluczowe

sustainable development eco-development closed loop smart city responsibility

zrównoważony rozwój ekorozwój pętla zamknięta inteligentne miasto odpowiedzialność

Wydawca

Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego

Czasopismo

Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports

Rocznik

2022

Tom

Vol. 32, no. 2

Strony

132--153

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 68 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Lewandowska Aleksandra

amal@umk.pl

Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management

autor

Rogatka Krzysztof

Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management

autor

Lopata Ewelina

Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Interdisciplinary Doctoral School of Social Sciences - Academia Rerum Socialium (ARS)

Bibliografia

1. Szymańska, D, Lewandowska, A and Korolko, M 2019. Cyfryzacja w miastach – idea, koncepcje i wdrożenia, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMK, Toruń.
2. United Nations 2019. World Urbanizations Prospects. The 2018 Revision. [online: 07.04.2020]. Available at: https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-Report.pdf.
3. The World Bank 2021. [online: 15.07.2021]. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS
4. Bhagat, RB 2011. Urbanisation and Access to Basic Amenities in India. Urban India, 31(1), 1-13. 5. Mitra, A and Mehta, B 2011. Cities as Engines of Economic Growth; Evidence from India. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 137(2), 171–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000056.
6. Carlowitz, HC Edler Von 1713. Sylvicultura Oeconomica, Meissen.
7. Glavič, P and Lukman, R 2007. Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 1875-1885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.12.006.
8. WCED - World Commission on Environment and Development 1987. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future.
9. Cerin, P 2006. Bringing economic opportunity into line with environmental influence: A Discussion on the Coase theorem and the Porter and van der Linde hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 56(2), 209-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.016.
10. Dernbach, JC 1998. Sustainable development as a framework for national governance. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 49(1), 1-103.
11. Dernbach, JC 2003. Achieving sustainable development: The Centrality and multiple facets of integrated decision making. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies,10(1), 247-285.
12. Stoddart, H 2011. A Pocket guide to sustainable development governance, Stakeholder Forum.
13. Rockström, J et.al. 2009. Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 32.
14. Steffen, W et.al. 2015. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855.
15. Gil, JA Pont, A and Robles, A 2019. e-WASTE: everything an ICT scientist and developer should know. IEEE Access, Volume: 7, 169614 – 169635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2955008.
16. George, DAR Chi-Ang Lin B and Chen, Y 2015. A circular economy model of economic growth. Environmental Modelling & Software, 73, 60-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.06.014.
17. Morseletto, P 2020. Targets for a circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Volume 153, 104553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104553.
18. Ellen Macarthur Foundation (EMAF) 2015. Towards the Circular Economy, EMAF, London, UK.
19. COM (European Commission) 2015. Closing the Loop - An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy. Communication From the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.
20. Santonen, T Creazzo, L Griffon, A Bódi, Z and Aversano, P 2017. Cities as Living Labs: Increasing the impact of investment in the circular economy for sustainable cities. Brussels: European Commission, p. 5.
21. Putra, ZDW and Van Der Knaap, W 2018. Urban Innovation System and the Role of an Open Web-based Platform: The Case of Amsterdam Smart City. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 29(3), 234-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5614/jrcp.2018.29.3.4.
22. Trojan, J Schade, S Lemmens, R and Frantál, B 2019. Citizen science as a new approach in Geography and beyond: Review and reflections. Moravian Geographical Reports, 27(4), 254-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr 2019-0020.
23. Langergraber, G et.al. 2020. Implementing nature-based solutions for creating a resourceful circular city. Blue-Green Systems, 2 (1), 173–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/bgs.2020.933
24. Williams, J 2019. Circular Cities: Challenges to Implementing Looping Actions. Sustainability, 11(2), 423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020423.
25. Camaren, P and Swilling, M 2012. Sustainable Resource Efficient Cities: Making It Happen; UNEP: Nairobi, Kenya.
26. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) 2018. 2018 Global Status Report Towards a Zero-Emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector, p. 9.
27. Savini, F 2019. The economy that runs on waste: accumulation in the circular city. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(6), 675-691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1670048
28. Bastein, AGTM et al. 2016. Circular Amsterdam. A vision and action agenda for the city and metropolitan area. City of Amsterdam: Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
29. Prendeville, S Cherim, E and Bocken, N 2018. Circular Cities: Mapping Six Cities in Transition. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, Volume 26, 171-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.03.002.
30. Padalkina, D 2018. Project - Circular Berlin. Circular Berlin, Germany.
31. CIRCULAR CITIES DECLARATION. [online: 12.04.2020]. Available at: https://circularcitiesdeclaration.eu/cities/malmoe
32. Clark, G, Gille, B and Mcculloch, C 2021. The Circular Economy & Cities. Implications & Imperatives. Glasgow Chamber of Commerce. [online: 30.08.2021]. Available at: https://The-Circular-Economy-and-Cities-Report.pdf (circularglasgow.com).
33. Paiho, S et.al. 2021. Creating a Circular City–An analysis of potential transportation, energy and food solutions in a case district. Sustainable Cities and Society, 64, 102529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102529.
34. United Nations 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 35. Gravagnuolo, A, Angrisano, M and Fusco Girard, L 2019. Circular Economy Strategies in Eight Historic Port Cities: Criteria and Indicators Towards a Circular City Assessment Framework. Sustainability, 11(13), 3512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133512.
36. Malinowski, S 2012. Ku nowoczesności: CAWI jako metoda badawcza w naukach o obronności: wybrane zagadnienia. Studia Bezpieczeństwa Narodowego, Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna im. Jarosława Dąbrowskiego, R. 2, Nr 3, 403-409.
37. Stanisławski R 2017. Triangulacja technik badawczych w naukach o zarządzaniu, Organizacja i Kierowanie, nr 4, 103-120.
38. Arcadis 2021. Ranking of Polish Sustainable Cities.
39. Central Statistical Office (CSO) 2021. Municipal waste management in the Mazowieckie voivodeship in 2020.
40. Map „Donate Waste”. [online: 10.02.2022]. Mapa punktów zbiórek odpadów (oddamodpady.pl).
41. Institute of Environmental Protection - National Research Institute 2020. Research findings from the PROM project. [online: 03.12.2020]. Available at:
42. Eurostat 2021. Circular material use rate. [online: 25.11.2021].
43. DFID 2002. Tools for development: a handbook for those engaged in development activity. Version 15.
44. Kulczycka, J et.al. 2017. Gospodarka o obiegu zamkniętym – znajomość i akceptacja założeń wśród mieszkańców Małopolski. Aura, 10, 17-19.
45. Smol, M et. al. 2018. Public awareness of circular economy in southern Poland: Case of the Malopolska region. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1035-1045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.100.
46. Granier, B and Kudo, H 2016. How are citizens involved in smart cities? Analysing citizen participation in Japanese - Smart Communities. Information Polity 21(1), 61-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-150367.
47. Spil, T, Effing, R and Kwast, J 2017. Smart City Participation: Dream or Reality? A Comparison of Participatory Strategies from Hamburg, Berlin & Enschede. Conference: Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68557-1_12.
48. Rogatka, K, Starczewski, T and Kowalski, M 2021. Urban resilience in spatial planning of polish cities - True or false? Transformational perspective. Land Use Policy. 101, 105172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105172.
49. Bruzzone, M Dameri, RP and Demartini, P 2021. Resilience Reporting for Sustainable Development in Cities. Sustainability, 13(14), 7824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147824.
50. Słupik, S 2016. Rola partycypacji społecznej w kreowaniu lokalnego zrównoważonego rozwoju. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, Ekonomika ochrony środowiska i ekoinnowacje, nr 454, 252-264, ISSN 1899-3192.
51. Amado, MP, Santos, CV, Moura, EB and Silva, VG 2010. Public Participation in Sustainable Urban Planning. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 5:2, 102-108.
52. Olawumi, TO and Chan, DW 2018. A scientometric review of global research on sustainability and sustainable development. Journal of cleaner production, 183, 231-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.162.
53. Berglund, T Gericke, N Boeve-De Pauw, J Olsson, D and Chang, TC 2020. A cross-cultural comparative study of sustainability consciousness between students in Taiwan and Sweden. Environment, development and sustainability, 22(7), 6287-6313. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019- 00478-2.
54. Nikolic, V Vukic, T Maletaski, T and Andevski, M 2020. Students‘ attitudes towards sustainable development in Serbia. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(4), 733-755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-11-2019-0336.
55. Lewandowska, A and Szymańska, D 2019. Municipal waste recycling in big cities in Poland in the context of ecologisation. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 43(43), 131-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/18103.
56. Lewandowska, A and Szymańska, D 2021. Ecologisation of Polish cities in the light of selected parameters of sustainable development. Sustainable Cities and Society, 64, 102538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102538.
57. Căutișanu, C, Asandului, L, Borza, M and Turturean, CL 2018. Quantitative Approach to Circular Economy in the OECD Countries. Amfiteatru Economic, 20, 262-277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2018/48/262.
58. Whalen, KA, Berlin, C, Ekberg, J, Barletta, I and Hammersbergd, P 2018. “All they do is win”: Lessons learned from use of a serious game for Circular Economy education. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 335-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.06.021.
59. Whalen, KA and Peck, D 2014. In the loop-sustainable, circular product design and critical materials. Int. J. Automation Technol., 8(5), 664-676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2014.p0664.
60. Secondi, L, Principato, L, Laureti, T 2015. Household food waste behaviour in EU-27 countries: A multilevel analysis, Food policy, 56, 25-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.07.007.
61. Calvo-Porral, C, Medín, AF and Losada-López, C 2017. Can marketing help in tackling food waste?: proposals in developed countrie. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 23(1), 42-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2017.1244792.
62. Kowalska, A 2017. The issue of food losses and waste and its determinants. LogForum, 13(1), 7-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2017.1.1.
63. Gamburzew, A et.al. 2016. In-store marketing of inexpensive foods with good nutritional quality in disadvantaged neighborhoods: increased awareness, understanding, and purchasing. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 13(1), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016- 0427-1.
64. Xu, L, Prybutok, V and Blankson, C 2019. An environmental awareness purchasing intention model. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(2), 367-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-12-2017-0591.
65. Kuncoro, W and Windyasari, HA 2021. Consumer Purchasing Decision Improvement Model through Brand Image, Religiosity, Brand Ambassador and Brand Awareness. International Business Research, 14(8), 1-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v14n8p42.
66. Hossain, M 2020. Sharing economy: A comprehensive literature review. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 87, 102470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102470.
67. Choi, Tsan-Ming Taleizadeh, Ata Allah and Yue, Xiaohang 2019. Game theory applications in production research in the sharing and circular economy era. International Journal of Production Research, 58(1), 118-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1681137.
68. Tran, KC 2006. Public perception of development issues: Public awareness can contribute to sustainable development of a small island. Ocean & Coastal Management, 49(5–6), 367-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2006.02.005.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-6e564506-dc93-4557-b69a-a2261840b09c