Conceptual compression discussion on a multi-linear (FTA) and systematic (FRAM) method in an offshore operation’s accident modeling

• Autorzy: Toroody A. B. , Abaei M. M. , Gholamnia R.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Risk assessment can be classified into two broad categories: traditional and modern. This paper is aimed at contrasting the functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) as a modern approach with the fault tree analysis (FTA) as a traditional method, regarding assessing the risks of a complex system. Applied methodology by which the risk assessment is carried out, is presented in each approach. Also, FRAM network is executed with regard to nonlinear interaction of human and organizational levels to assess the safety of technological systems. The methodology is implemented for lifting structures deep offshore. The main finding of this paper is that the combined application of FTA and FRAM during risk assessment, could provide complementary perspectives and may contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of an incident. Finally, it is shown that coupling a FRAM network with a suitable quantitative method will result in a plausible outcome for a predefined accident scenario.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

risk assessment; human error; risk FRAM network; lifting support

PL

ocena ryzyka; błąd ludzki

• Wydawca: Taylor & Francis
• Czasopismo: International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 22, No. 4
• Strony: 532--540
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 12 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Toroody A. B.

• Kar Higher Education Institute of Qazvin, Iran

autor

Abaei M. M.

• Amirkabir University of Technology Tehran, Iran

autor

Gholamnia R.

• Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Iran

Bibliografia

• 1. Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N. Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2006.
• 2. Hollnagel E. Barriers and accident prevention. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2004.
• 3. Lundblad K, Speziali J, Woltjer R, et al. FRAM as a risk assessment method for nuclear fuel transportation. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference Working on Safety; 2008 September 30-October 3; Crete, Greece.
• 4. Woltjer R, Hollnagel E. The Alaska Airlines flight 261 accident: a systemic analysis of functional resonance. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology; 2007 April 23-26; Dayton, Ohio. p. 763-768.
• 5. Hollnagel E, Pruchnicki S, Woltjer R, et al. A functional resonance accident analysis of Comair flight 5191. Paper presented at the 8th International Symposium of the Australian Aviation Psychology Association; 2008 8-11 April; Sydney, Australia.
• 6. Dougherty EM. Is human failure a stochastic process? Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 1997;55:209–215. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(96)00122-6
• 7. Hollnagel E. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method. Oxford: Elsevier Science; 1998.
• 8. Le Bot P. Human reliability data, human error and accident models - illustration through the Three Mile Island accident analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 2004;83:153-167. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2003.09.007
• 9. Le Bot P. Human reliability data, human error and accident models - illustration through the Three Mile Island accident analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 2004;83:153-167. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2003.09.007
• 10. Hollnagel E, Woods DD. Joint cognitive systems: foundations of cognitive systems engineering. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2005.
• 11. Herrera IA. Modeling process leaks using FRAM [master thesis]. Trondheim: Department of Production and Quality Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU); 2012.
• 12. Woltjer R, Hollnagel E. Functional modeling for risk assessment of automation in a changing air traffic management environment. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference Working on Safety; 2008 September 30-October 3; Crete, Greece.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.