PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Seismic applicability analysis of high‑speed railway multi‑span simply‑supported bridges based on simplified model

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
CRTS II ballast less track is more commonly used in railway operations since it can meet the railway comfort and smoothness requirements. The effects of track constraint on the seismic response of high-speed railway simply-supported bridges can not be neglected. However, refined track structure modeling can significantly increase the computational time. Therefore, adopting a reasonably simplified model (SM) can improve computational efficiency effectively. Based on the principle of virtual work, the equivalent system is adopted instead of the track structure, and build a simplified model of bridge-track system. And on the basis of considering the randomness of the earthquake, the seismic response of the track-bridge model, the simplified model and the trackless model with different span numbers are compared, the over-capacity ratio and track constraint effect of the high-speed railway bridge-track system under the earthquake are analyzed. The analysis shows that the simplified efficiency of simplified model is up to 85% under longitudinal and transverse ground motions, and the seismic responses are in good agreement with those of the bridge-track system model; The track structure has a greater influence on the safety of the over-capacity probability (SPO) of the bridge structure under the longitudinal ground motion, particularly when the number of spans is high and ignoring the track structure may underestimate the over-capacity probability of some structures.
Rocznik
Strony
art. e220, 1--20
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 33 poz., rys., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
  • School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
autor
  • School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
  • School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
autor
  • School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
autor
  • School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
autor
  • School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
autor
  • School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, China
Bibliografia
  • 1. He XH, Wu T, Zou YF, Chen YF, Guoand ZH, Yu W. Recent developments of high-speed railway bridges in China. Str Infrastruct Eng. 2017;13(12):1584-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732 479.2017.1304429.
  • 2. Zhang N, Zhou S, Xia H, Sun L. Evaluation of vehicle-track bridge interacted system for the continuous CRTS-II non-ballast track slab. Sci China-Technol Sci. 2014;57(10):1895-901. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11431-014-5637-7.
  • 3. Sun L, Chenand HL, Zelelew H. Stress and defection parametric study of high-speed railway CRTS-II Ballast less track slab on elevated bridge foundations. J Transp Eng. 2013;139(12):1224-34. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000577.
  • 4. Guo W. Seismic damage mechanism of CRTS-II slab ballastless track structure on high-speed railway bridges. Int J Str Stab Dyn. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021945542050011X.
  • 5. Yanand GB, Dai L. Seismic pounding and protection measures of simply-supported beams considering interaction between continuously welded rail and bridge. Str Eng Int. 2013;23(1):61-7. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686613X13439149157191.
  • 6. Dai GL, Yan B. Longitudinal forces of continuously welded track on high-speed railway cable-stayed bridge considering impact of adjacent bridges. J Central South University. 2012;19(8):2348-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1281-1.
  • 7. Gou HY, Yang LC, Leng D, Bao Y, Pu QH. Effect of bridge lateral deformation on track geometry of high-speed railway. Steel Comp Str 2018;29(2):219-229. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.29.2. 219.
  • 8. Maragakis E, Douglas BM, Haque S, Sharma V. Full-scale resonance tests of a railway bridge. Sage J. 1996. https://doi.org/10. 3141/1624.
  • 9. Maragakis Emmanuel M, Douglas Bruce M, Chen Qing-bin. Full-scale field failure tests of railway bridge. J Bridge Eng. 2001;5(5):356-62. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084- 0702(2001)6:5(356).
  • 10. Ikeda M, Toyooka A, Iemura H, Iwata S, Ichikawa A. Effects of track structures on seismic behavior of railway bridges supported by isolation rubber bearings. J Japan Soc Civil Eng Ser A1 (Structural Engineering & Earthquake Engineering (SE/EE)) 2014; 70(1):1-16. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejseee.70.1.
  • 11. Yan B, DaiandH GL, Zhang P. Beam-track interaction of high-speed railway bridge with ballast track. J Central South University. 2012;19(5):1447-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1161-8.
  • 12. Chen LK, Jiang LZ, Liu P. Seismic response analyses of high-speed railway bridge round-ended piers using global bridge model. Int J Mater Prod Technol. 2012;44(1–2):35-46. https:// doi.org/10.1504/IJMPT.2012.048190.
  • 13. Connolly DP, Kouroussis G, Laghrouche O, Ho CL, Forde MC. Benchmarking railway vibrations - track, vehicle, ground and building effects. Constr Build Mater. 2015;92:64–81. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.042.
  • 14. Zhang J, Wu DJ, Li Q. Loading-history-based track-bridge inter action analysis with experimental fastener resistance. Eng Str. 2015;83:62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.11.002. 15. Zhai W, Wang S, Zhang N, Gao M, Zhao C (2013) High-speed train–track–bridge dynamic interactions-Part II: experimental validation and engineering application. Int J Rail Transp 1(1–2):25-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248378.2013.791497.
  • 16. Guo W, Hu Y, Gou H, Du Q, Fang W, Jiangand L, Yu W. Simplified seismic model of CRTS II ballastless track structure on high-speed railway bridges in China. Eng Str. 2020. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.engstruct.2020.110453.
  • 17. Wang JF, Linand CC, Chen L. Vibration suppression for high-speed raitway bridges using tuned mass dampers. Int J Solids Str. 2003;40(2):465-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(02) 00589-9.
  • 18. Jiang LZ, Yu J, Zhou WB, Yan WJ, Lai ZP, Feng YL. Applicability analysis of high-speed railway system under the action of near-fault ground motion. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2020. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106289.
  • 19. Liu. 2008. Probability and Mathematical Statistics: HEP.EDU.CN.
  • 20. Montenegro PA, Calcada R, Carvalho H, Bolkovoy A, Chebykin I. Stability of a train running over the Volga river high-speed railway bridge during crosswinds. Str Infrastr Eng. 2020;16(8):1121-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1684956.
  • 21. Fitzwilliam D. Track structure interactions for the Taiwan High Speed Rail Project. 2003;73-79.
  • 22. Montenegro PA, Calcada R, Poucaand NV, Tanabe M. Running safety assessment of trains moving over bridges subjected to moderate earthquakes. Earthq Eng Str Dyn. 2016;45(3):483-504. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2673.
  • 23. Li Y, Conte JP. Effects of seismic isolation on the seismic response of a California high speed rail prototype bridge with soil structure and track structure interactions. Earthq Eng Str Dyn. 2016. https:// doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2770.
  • 24. LiandJ Y, Conte P. Probabilistic performance-based optimum design of seismic isolation for a California high-speed rail prototype bridge. Earthq Eng Str Dynam. 2018;47(2):497-514. https:// doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2976.
  • 25. Integrity V. Code for seismic design of railway engineering, edited by. Beijing, China: Ministry of Construction of the People’s Republic of China; 2006.
  • 26. Zhou WB, PengandL DH, Liu L. Transverse seismic analysis of high-speed railway bridge in China based on a simplifed calculation model. J Cent South Univ. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11771-023-5226-7.
  • 27. Jiang Lizhong, Zhang Yuntai, Feng Yulin, Zhou Wangbao, Tan Zhihua. Simplifed calculation modeling method of multi-span bridges on high-speed railways under earthquake condition. Bull Earthq Eng. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00779-x.
  • 28. Yu J, Jiang LZ, Zhou WB, Lu JY, Zhong TX, Peng K. Study on the influence of trains on the seismic response of high speed railway structure under lateral uncertain earthquakes.Bull Earthq Eng. 2021;19(7):2971-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01085-1.
  • 29. Zhang YT, Jiang LZ, Zhou WB, Feng YL, Tanand ZH, Chai L. Study of bridge-subgrade longitudinal constraint range for high-speed railway simply-supported beam bridge with CRTSII ballast-less track under earthquake excitation. Constr Build Mater. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118026.
  • 30. Zhang YT, Jiang LZ, Zhou WB, Feng YL, Liuand X, Lai ZP. Critical coupling span number in high-speed railway simply supported beam bridge. Smart Str Syst 2021;28(1):13-28. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2021.28.1.013.
  • 31. Baker JW. Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 2007;97(5):1486-501. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060255.
  • 32. Wei B, Wang P, HeandL XH, Jiang Z. The impact of the convex friction distribution on the seismic response of a spring-friction solation system. KSCE J Civ Eng. 2018;22(4):1203-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-0938-6.
  • 33. Wei B, Yang TH, Jiangand LZ, He H. Effects of friction-based fixed bearings on the seismic vulnerability of a high-speed railway continuous bridge. Adv Str Eng. 2018;21(5):643-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433217726894.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-5f7293a7-e681-4f19-9e64-4639993d3ef7
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.