PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

What factors will shape the future of sustainable and smart cities in Europe? Evidence from the Delphi study

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Jakie czynniki będą kształtować przyszłość zrównoważonych i inteligentnych miast w Europie? Wyniki badania Delphi
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The article aims to identify and assess the factors shaping the development of sustainable and smart cities in Europe and their interrelationships. With respect to the objective, three research questions were formulated: (I) What are the factors supporting the development of sustainable and smart cities in Europe?, (II) What are the limiting factors (barriers) to the development of sustainable and smart cities in Europe?, (III) What are the main factors influencing the development of sustainable and smart cities in Europe? As part of the research process, the following methods were applied: horizon scanning, STEEPVL analysis, the Delphi method and structural analysis. The study involved 131 experts from 28 countries, whose articles on sustainable and smart cities development are indexed in the Web of Science database. The directions analysed include: smart governance and citizen participation; renewable energy microgrids with decentralised energy trading; delegating decisions to AI-based systems; and urban digital twins. The Delphi results unambiguously indicate three main enabling factors: access to external sources of finance; advanced digital infrastructure together with data integration; and a high level of cybersecurity and data protection. The principal barriers were identified as: a low level of integration across urban systems and a lack of data interoperability; limited fiscal capacity of local authorities; and institutional resistance to change and to the digital climate transition. The results of the structural analysis indicate that institutional governance, the maturity of data infrastructure and interoperability set the trajectory of change. The findings entail practical implications: institutional governance and regulatory transparency should be strengthened; diversified, multi-source funding should be ensured; interoperability should be prioritised; and AI and digital twins should then be scaled in step with capability development and a security-by-design approach.
PL
Artykuł ma na celu identyfikację i ocenę czynników kształtujących rozwój zrównoważonych i inteligentnych miast w Europie oraz ich wzajemnych oddziaływań. W odniesieniu do celu sformułowano trzy pytania badawcze: (I) Jakie czynniki sprzyjają rozwojowi zrównoważonych i inteligentnych miast w Europie? (II) Jakie czynniki ograniczają (utrudniają) rozwój zrównoważonych i inteligentnych miast w Europie? (III) Jakie są główne czynniki wpływające na rozwój zrównoważonych i inteligentnych miast w Europie? W ramach procesu badawczego zastosowano: horizon scanning, analizę STEEPVL, metodę Delphi i analizę strukturalną. W badaniu wzięło udział 131 ekspertów z 28 krajów, publikujących artykuły z zakresu zrównoważonego i inteligentnego rozwoju miast, indeksowane w bazie Web of Science. Analizowane kierunki obejmują: smart governance i partycypację mieszkańców, odnawialne mikrosieci energetyczne ze zdecentralizowanym obrotem energią, delegowanie decyzji na systemy oparte na AI oraz miejskie cyfrowe bliźniaki. Wyniki Delphi jednoznacznie wskazują trzy główne czynniki sprzyjające: dostęp do zewnętrznych źródeł finansowania, rozwiniętą infrastrukturę cyfrową oraz integrację danych, a także wysoki poziom cyberbezpieczeństwa i ochrony danych. Za najważniejsze bariery uznano: niski poziom integracji systemów miejskich i brak interoperacyjności danych, ograniczony potencjał finansowy samorządów oraz opór instytucjonalny wobec zmiany i transformacji cyfrowo-klimatycznej. Wyniki analizy strukturalnej wskazują zaś, że sterowanie instytucjonalne, dojrzałość infrastruktury danych i interoperacyjność wyznaczają trajektorię zmian. Z uzyskanych wyników wynikają implikacje praktyczne: należy wzmocnić sterowanie instytucjonalne i przejrzystość prawa, zapewnić wieloźródłowe finansowanie, nadać priorytet interoperacyjności, a następnie skalować AI i cyfrowe bliźniaki wraz z rozwojem kompetencji i podejściem security-by-design.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
art. no. 1272
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 83 poz., rys., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
  • Bialystok University of Technology, Poland, Wiejska Street 45a, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland
  • Lublin University of Technology, Poland
autor
  • Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania
  • Curtin University, Australia
  • Toronto Metropolitan University, Canada
  • Cardiff Metropolitan University, United Kingdom
autor
  • Curtin University, Australia
Bibliografia
  • Aghazadeh Ardebili, A., Zappatore, M., Ramadan, A. I. H. A., Longo, A., & Ficarella, A. (2024). Digital Twins of smart energy systems: a systematic literature review on enablers, design, management and computational challenges. Energy Informatics, 7, 94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-024-00385-5
  • Almeida, F., Guimarães, C. M., & Amorim, V. (2024). Exploring the Differences and Similarities between Smart Cities and Sustainable Cities through an Integrative Review. Sustainability, 16(20), 8890. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208890
  • Almulhim, A. I., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2025). Understanding Smart Governance of Sustainable Cities: A Review and Multidimensional Framework. Smart Cities, 8(4), 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities8040113
  • Arcade, J., Godet, M., Meunier, F., & Roubelat, F. (1994). Structural analysis with the MICMAC method and actors‘ strategy with Mactor method. Paris: AC/UNU Millennium Project Futures Research Methodology.
  • Bao, J., Wu, C., Lin, Y., Zhong, L., Chen, X., & Yin, R. (2023). A scalable approach to optimize traffic signal control with federated reinforcement learning. Scientific Reports, 13, 19184. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46074-3
  • Bowles, N. (1999). The Delphi technique. Nurs Stand, 13(45), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns1999.07.13.45.32.c2650
  • Cape, B., (2004). Gathering opinion and initiating debate: the success of the Delphi Method in purely qualitative research. Library and Information Research, 28(89), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.29173/lirg164
  • Caprari, G., Bellagente, P., Girelli, V. A., Pagliari, D., & Vitti, A. (2022). Digital Twin for Urban Planning in the Green Deal Era: A State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Sustainability, 14(10), 6263. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106263
  • Chen, L., Gao, L., Xing, S., Chen, Z., & Wang, W. (2024). Zero-carbon microgrid: Real-world cases, trends and challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 203, 114720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114720
  • Chen, Z., Xiao, F., Guo, F., & Yan, J. (2023). Interpretable machine learning for building energy management: A state-of-the-art review. Advances in Applied Energy, 9, 100123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2023.100123
  • Cities Coalition for Digital Rights. (2021). Digital Rights Governance Framework (concept draft open for feedback). https://citiesfordigitalrights.org/sites/default/files/DIGITAL%20RIGHTS%20FRAMEWORK_CONCEPT%20FOR%20FEEDBACK.pdf
  • Cities Coalition for Digital Rights. (2024). A milestone for digital rights in cities. https://citiesfordigitalrights.org/milestone-digital-rights-cities?
  • Correia, D., Marques, J. L., & Teixeira, L. (2022). The State-of-the-Art of Smart Cities in the European Union. Smart Cities, 5(4), 1776–1810. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5040089
  • Cugurullo, F., Caprotti, F., Cook, M., Karvonen, A., McGuirk, P., & Marvin, S. (2024). The rise of AI urbanism in post-smart cities: A critical commentary on urban artificial intelligence. Urban Studies, 61(6), 1168–1182. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231203386
  • Directive (EU) 2023/2413 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 October 2023 amending Directive (EU) 2018/2001, Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 and Directive 98/70/EC as regards the promotion of energy from renewable sources, and repealing Council Directive (EU) 2015/652, Pub. L. No. 32023L2413, 2413 OJ L (2023). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2023/2413/oj/eng
  • Directive (EU) 2024/1275 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 April 2024 on the energy performance of buildings (recast) (Text with EEA relevance), Pub. L. No. 1275 OJ L (2024a). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1275/oj/eng
  • Directive (EU) 2024/1711 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 amending Directives (EU) 2018/2001 and (EU) 2019/944 as regards improving the Union’s electricity market design, Pub. L. No. 32024L1711, 1711 OJ L (2024b) https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/markets-and-consumers/electricity-market-design_en?
  • Ejdys, J. (2013). Regional economic foresight. Scenarios of local development of the Mazowieckie Voivodeship [Regionalny foresight gospodarczy. Scenariusze rozwoju lokalnego województwa mazowieckiego]. Warszawa: Związek Pracodawców Warszawy i Mazowsza, https://depot.ceon.pl/handle/123456789/7637 (in Polish).
  • Ejdys, J., & Szpilko, D. (2023). How to ensure the resilience of semiconductor supply chains in the European Union? Polish Journal of Management Studies, 28, 101–122. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2023.28.1.06
  • Ejdys, J., Czerewacz-Filipowicz, K., Halicka, K., Kononiuk, A., Magruk, A., Siderska, J., & Szpilko, D. (2023). A preparedness plan for Europe: Addressing food, energy and technological security. Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service.
  • Ejdys, J., Gudanowska, A., Halicka, K., Kononiuk, A., Magruk, A., Nazarko, J., Nazarko, Ł., Szpilko, D., & Widelska, U. (2019). Foresight in Higher Education Institutions: Evidence from Poland. Foresight and STI Governance, 13, 77-89. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2019.1.77.89
  • ENISA. (2024). Report on the state of cybersecurity in the Union (condensed version). https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/2024-report-on-the-state-of-the-cybersecurity-in-the-union
  • European Commission. (2021). 100 Climate-Neutral and Smart Cities by 2030 – Implementation Plan. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-09/cities_mission_implementation_plan.pdf
  • European Commission. (2025a). EU Mission: Climate-Neutral and Smart Cities. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe/eu-missions-horizon-europe/climate-neutral-and-smart-cities_en
  • European Commission. (2025b). The EU LDT Toolbox empowers European cities with digital twin tools for smarter, data-driven urban planning. https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/collection/ldttoolbox
  • European Commission. (2025c). Annex 8 to Communication to the Commission Approval of the content of the draft Commission Notice providing guidance on new or substantially modified provisions of the recast Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EU) 2024/1275, Solar energy in buildings (Article 10). https://energy.ec.europa.eu/document/download/fd6f89fe-711b-4025-bc37-76b99baaa3fe_en
  • Fontes, C., Al Haddad, C., Antoniou, C., & Lütge, C. (2024). Assessing the collective challenges of AI: An applied framework focused on people centeredness and public participation. Urban Governance, 4(4), 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2024.12.003
  • Frantzeskaki, N., Collier, M., Hölscher, K., Gaziulusoy, I., Ossola, A., Albulescu, P., Bonneau, M., Borgström, S., Connop, S., Dumitru, A., Geneletti, D., Gorissen, L., Levin-Keitel, M., MacIntyre, T., Mascinga, I., McQuaid, S., Tabory, S., von Wirth, T., Vandergert, P., Vos, P., Penha-Lopes, G., Säumel, I., Wachtel, T., & Wittmayer, J. (2025). Premises, practices and politics of co-creation for urban sustainability transitions. Urban Transform 7, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-025-00075-9
  • Ge, C., & Qin, S. (2025). Urban Flooding Digital Twin System Framework. Systems Science & Control Engineering, 13(1), 2460432. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642583.2025.2460432
  • Helbing, D., Mahajan, S., Carpentras, D., Menendez, M., Pournaras, E., Thurner, S., Verma, T., Arcaute, E., Batty, M. & Bettencourt, L. M. A. (2024). Co-creating the future: participatory cities and digital governance. Philosophical Transactions A, 382(2285), 20240113. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0113
  • International Energy Agency. (2024). Empowering Urban Energy Transitions – Executive summary. Paris: IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/empowering-urban-energy-transitions/executive-summary
  • International Organization for Standardization. (2019). Sustainable cities and communities – Indicators for smart cities (ISO Standard No. 37122:2019). https://www.iso.org/standard/69050.html
  • International Telecommunication Union (ITU-T). (2016). Recommendation ITU-T Y.4903/L.1603 – Key performance indicators for smart sustainable cities to assess the achievement of sustainable development goals. https://www.itu.int/rec/dologin_pub.asp?id=T-REC-Y.4903-202203-I%21%21PDF-E&lang=e&type=items
  • Islam, S. N. (2024). A Review of Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Markets: Enabling Models and Technologies. Energies, 17, 1702. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17071702
  • Kim, Y., Oh, J., & Bartos, M. (2025). Stormwater digital twin with online quality control detects urban flood hazards under uncertainty. Sustainable Cities and Society, 118, 105982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105982
  • Lartey, D., & Law, K. M. Y. (2025). Artificial intelligence adoption in urban planning governance: A systematic review of advancements in decision-making and policy-making. Landscape and Urban Planning, 258, 105337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105337
  • Loo, R., (2002). The Delphi method: a powerful tool for strategic management. Policing. An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 25(4), 762-769. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510210450677
  • Loveridge, D. (2002). The STEEPV acronym and process – a clarification. Ideas in Progress. PREST Policy Research in Engineering, Science and Technology, 29. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/12087765/the-steepv-acronym-and-process-a-clarification
  • Luo, J., Liu, P., Kong, X., Shen, J., Wu, Q., & Xu, D. (2025b). Urban digital twins for citizen-centric planning: A systematic review of built environment perception and public participation. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 143, 104746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2025.104746
  • Luo, J., Liu, P., Xu, W., Zhao, T., & Biljecki, F. (2025a). A perception-powered urban digital twin to support human-centred urban planning and sustainable city development. Cities, 156, 105473. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264275124006875
  • Mazzetto, S. (2024). A Review of Urban Digital Twins Integration, Challenges, and Future Directions in Smart City Development. Sustainability, 16(19), 8337. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198337
  • Meijer, A. J., & Rodríguez-Bolívar, M. P. (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308
  • Michailidis, P., Michailidis, I., Lazaridis, C. R., & Kosmatopoulos, E. (2025). Traffic Signal Control via Reinforcement Learning: A Review on Applications and Innovations. Infrastructures, 10(5), 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures10050114
  • Nazarko, J., Ejdys, J., Kononiuk, A., & Olszewska, A.M. (2013). Structural analysis as a method of data classification in foresight studies [Analiza strukturalna jako metoda klasyfikacji danych w badaniach foresight]. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 78, 44-53. https://www.dbc.wroc.pl/dlibra/publication/27220/edition/24612#description
  • Nazarko, J., Wnorowski, H., Ejdys, J., Kononiuk, A., Olszewska, A., & Gudanowska, A. (2011). Structural analysis of factors influencing the development of nanotechnology in the Podlaskie Province [Analiza strukturalna czynników rozwoju nanotechnologii w województwie podlaskim]. Białystok: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Białostockiej.
  • NetZeroCities. (2023a). Climate-neutral City Contract – Concept (D1.3). https://netzerocities.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/D1.3-Climate-neutral-city-contract-concept.pdf
  • NetZeroCities. (2023b). Citizen Engagement Model and Template Action Plan (D8.3). https://netzerocities.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/D8.3_Citizen-Engagement-Model-and-Template-Action-Plan.pdf
  • NetZeroCities. (2025a). 112 Mission Cities striving for climate neutrality by 2030. Brussels: NZC Mission Platform. https://netzerocities.eu/mission-cities/
  • NetZeroCities. (2025b). Climate City Contracts: A Roadmap to Climate Neutrality. https://netzerocities.eu/climate-city-contract/
  • Nguyen, A. (2024, May 23). How AI is arming cities in the battle for climate resilience. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/how-ai-is-arming-cities-battle-climate-resilience-2024-05-23
  • OECD Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs, Regions and Cities. (2024). Activity Report 2024. Paris: OECD. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/directorates/cfe/CFE-2024-Annual-Activity-Report.pdf/_jcr_content/renditions/original./CFE-2024-Annual-Activity-Report.pdf
  • OECD. (2020). Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2020/06/innovative-citizen-participation-and-new-democratic-institutions_11aa2baf/339306da-en.pdf
  • OECD. (2023). Smart City Data Governance: Challenges and the Way Forward. https://doi.org/10.1787/e57ce301-en
  • Palacin, V., McDonald, S., Aragón, P., & Nelimarkka, M. (2024). Configurations of Digital Participatory Budgeting. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 31(2), 28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3635144
  • Popper, R. (2018). Foresight Process and Fundamentals. https://prospectivaalc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/p3_4_t3_foresight-process.pdf
  • Regulation (EU) 2024/903 laying down measures for a high level of public sector interoperability across the Union (Interoperable Europe Act), Pub. L. No. 32024R0903, 903 Oj L (2024). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/903/oj
  • Ruijer, E., Van Twist, A., Haaker, T., Tartarin, T., Schuurman, N., Melenhorst, M., & Meijer, A. (2023). Smart Governance Toolbox: A Systematic Literature Review. Smart Cities, 6(2), 878–896. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6020042
  • Sharifi, A., Allam, Z., Bibri, S. E., & Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R. (2024). Smart cities and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A systematic literature review of co-benefits and trade-offs. Cities, 146, 104659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104659
  • Shin, B., Floch, J., Rask, M., Bæck, P., Edgar, C., Berditchevskaia, A., Mesure, P., & Branlat, M. (2024). A systematic analysis of digital tools for citizen participation. Government Information Quarterly, 41(3), 101954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101954
  • Skulmoski, G.J., Hartman, F.T., & Krahn, J., (2007). The Delphi Method for Graduate Research. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.28945/199
  • Smith, A., & Prieto Martín, P. (2021). Going Beyond the Smart City? Implementing Technopolitical Platforms for Urban Democracy in Madrid and Barcelona. Journal of Urban Technology, 28(1–2), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2020.1786337
  • Sun, C., Wu, Z., & Zhu, Z. (2024). Microgrid optimisation: blockchain-enabled peer-to-peer energy trading. Cyber-Physical Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/23335777.2024.2394786
  • Szpilko, D. (2014). The use of Delphi method in the process of building a tourism development strategy in the region. Ekonomia i Zarządzanie, 6, 329–346. https://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-4a8da916-296f-434e-b086-247589dbfffe
  • Szpilko, D., & Ejdys, J. (2022). European Green Deal – research directions. a systematic literature review. Ekonomia i Środowisko - Economics and Environment, 81(2), 8–38. https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2022.81.2.455
  • Szpilko, D., Fernando, X., Nica, E., Budna, K., Rzepka, A., & Lăzăroiu, G. (2024). Energy in Smart Cities: Technological Trends and Prospects. Energies, 17(24), 6439. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17246439
  • Szpilko, D., Glinska, E., & Szydło, J. (2020a). STEEPVL and structural analysis as a tools supporting identification of the driving forces of city development. European Research Studies Journal, 23(3), 340–363. https://doi.org/1 0.35808/ersj/1642
  • Szpilko, D., Jimenez Naharro, F., Lăzăroiu, G., Nica, E., & de la Torre Gallegos, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence in the smart city – a literature review, Engineering Management in Production and Services, 15(4), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2023-0028
  • Szpilko, D., Szydło, J., & Winkowska, J. (2020b). Social Participation of City Inhabitants Versus Their Future Orientation. Evidence From Poland. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 17, 692–702. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2020.17.67
  • Szum, K. (2021). IoT-based smart cities: A bibliometric analysis and literature review. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 13(2), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2021-0017
  • Tarashandeh, N., & Karimi, A. (2024). Peer-to-peer energy trading under distribution network constraints with preserving independent nature of agents. Applied Energy, 355, 122240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122240
  • Tedeschi, M. (2024). Datafication and urban (in)justice: Towards a digital spatial justice. Geography Compass, 18(6), e12763. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12763
  • Tomor, Z., Meijer, A., Michels, A., & Geertman, S. (2019). Smart Governance For Sustainable Cities: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Urban Technology, 26(4), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2019.1651178
  • UNECE. (2021). People-Smart Sustainable Cities. https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/SSC%20nexus_web_opt_ENG_0.pdf
  • UN-Habitat. (2024). World Cities Report 2024: Cities and Climate Action. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2024/11/wcr2024_-_full_report.pdf
  • UN-Habitat. (2025). International Guidelines on People-Centred Smart Cities. “Smart Cities for People: empowering lives, protecting the planet, advancing prosperity. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2025/02/international_guidelines_on_people_centred_smart_cities_10.02.25_shared.pdf
  • van Twist, A., Ruijer, E., & Meijer, A. (2023). Smart cities & citizen discontent: A systematic review of the literature. Government Information Quarterly, 40(2), 101799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101799
  • Van Woensel, L.D., & Vrščaj, D. (2015). Towards Scientific Foresight in the European Parliament In-depth Analysis. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2015/527415/EPRS_IDA%282015%29527415_REV1_EN.pdf
  • Veerasamy, V., Hu, Z., Qiu, H., Murshid, S., Gooi, H. B., & Nguyen, H. D. (2024). Blockchain-enabled peer-to-peer energy trading and resilient control of microgrids. Applied Energy, 353(A), 122107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122107
  • Wang, T., & Yorke-Smith, N. (2025). Introduction: AI for and in Urban Planning. Urban Planning, 10, 9417. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.9417
  • Weil, C., Bibri, S. E., Longchamp, R., Golay, F., & Alahi, A. (2023). Urban Digital Twin Challenges: A Systematic Review and Perspectives for Sustainable Smart Cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 99, 104862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104862
  • Winkowska, J., Szpilko, D., & Pejić, S. (2019). Smart city concept in the light of the literature review. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 11(2), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2019-0012
  • World Economic Forum. (2022). Digital Twin Cities: Framework and Global Practices. https://www.weforum.org/publications/digital-twin-cities-framework-and-global-practices/
  • Xiao, F., Lu, J., Li, L., Tu, W., & Li, C. (2025). Advances in reinforcement learning for traffic signal control: a review of recent progress. Intelligent Transportation Infrastructure, 4, liaf009. https://doi.org/10.1093/iti/liaf009
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-55b8fb30-1c56-4d0c-9d60-849c974cf039
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.