Differentiation of labor productivity level and wages as a basis for changes in labor market

• Autorzy: Kuznetsova Alfiya , Askarov Almir , Gusmanov Rasul , Askarova Aigul , Pypłacz Paula

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2019.20.2.29

Warianty tytułu

PL

Różnicowanie poziomu wydajności pracy i płac jako podstawa zmian na rynku pracy

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Differentiation of the level of labor productivity has a direct impact not only on the level of wages, but also on the formation of labor market. The growth of labor productivity, mechanization, automation and digitalization of economy contribute to the release of part of labor resources. On the other hand, motivation of workers in various sectors of economy contributes to the outflow of people to more paid and prestigious industries. The study of trends in motivation of workers, the redistribution of labor resources between sectors of economy in connection with a significant differentiation of productivity and wages is of high importance. The purpose of this research is to study the trends and structure of the labor market in Russian Federation in conjunction with productivity and wages, as well as to identify factors affecting the growth of labor productivity. The research methodology includes the analysis of secondary data of official statistics for the period from 1995 to 2017, institutional analysis, binary regression models, as well as the results of own research. It was established that labor market has changed. The number of employed labor resources increased in financial activity, public administration, wholesale and retail trade, hotels and restaurants, health care, education, construction and mining. At the same time, the number of people employed fell in research and development, real estate operations, manufacturing industries, agriculture, the provision of other services (municipal, social and personal), transport and communications.

PL

Zróżnicowanie poziomu wydajności pracy ma bezpośredni wpływ nie tylko na poziom płac, ale także na kształtowanie rynku pracy. Wzrost wydajności pracy, mechanizacja, automatyzacja i cyfryzacja gospodarki przyczyniają się do uwolnienia części zasobów pracy. Z drugiej strony motywacja pracowników z różnych sektorów gospodarki przyczynia się do odpływu ludzi do bardziej płatnych i prestiżowych branż. Bardzo ważne jest badanie trendów w motywowaniu pracowników, redystrybucji zasobów pracy między sektorami gospodarki w związku ze znacznym zróżnicowaniem wydajności i płac. Celem tych badań jest badanie trendów i struktury rynku pracy w Federacji Rosyjskiej w połączeniu z produktywnością i płacami, a także identyfikacja czynników wpływających na wzrost wydajności pracy. Metodologia badań obejmuje analizę wtórnych danych z oficjalnych statystyk za okres 1995-2017, analiza instytucjonalna, modele regresji binarnej, a także wyniki własnych badań. Ustalono, że rynek pracy się zmienił. Wzrosła liczba zatrudnionych zasobów pracy w działalności finansowej, administracji publicznej, handlu hurtowym i detalicznym, hotelach i restauracjach, służbie zdrowia, edukacji, budownictwie i górnictwie. Jednocześnie zmniejszyła się liczba zatrudnionych osób w pracach badawczo-rozwojowych, nieruchomościach, przemyśle wytwórczym, rolnictwie, świadczeniu innych usług (komunalnych, społecznych i osobowych), transporcie i łączności.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

labor productivity; labor market; wages; motivation

PL

wydajność pracy; rynek pracy; płace; motywacja

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 20, No. 2
• Strony: 345--357
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 33 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kuznetsova Alfiya

• Faculty of Economics and management, Federal State Budgetary Educational Establishment of Higher Education «Bashkir State Agrarian University»

autor

Askarov Almir

• Faculty of Economics and management, Federal State Budgetary Educational Establishment of Higher Education «Bashkir State Agrarian University»

autor

Gusmanov Rasul

• Faculty of Economics and management, Federal State Budgetary Educational Establishment of Higher Education «Bashkir State Agrarian University»

autor

Askarova Aigul

• Faculty of Economics and management, Federal State Budgetary Educational Establishment of Higher Education «Bashkir State Agrarian University»

autor

Pypłacz Paula

• The Management Faculty, Czestochowa University of Technology

Bibliografia

• 1. Adiguzel Z., Kiloglu E., (2019). Examination of the Effects of Emotional Intelligence and Authentic Leadership on the Employees in the Organizations. International journal of organizational leadership, 8(1), 13-30.
• 2. Albouy D., Chernoff A., Lutz C., Warman C., (2019). Local Labor Markets in Canada and the United States. Journal Of Labor Economics, 37, 533-S594.
• 3. Afonasova, M. A., Panfilova, E. E., Galichkina, M. A., & Ślusarczyk, B. (2019). Digitalization in Economy and Innovation: the Effect on Social and Economic Processes. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(2), 22-32.
• 4. Balsmeier B., Woerter M., (2019) Is this time different? How digitalization influences job creation and destruction. Research policy, 48(8), 103765.
• 5. Carlier S.I., Costamagna R., Mendi P., Parra J.M., (2019). Low-skilled labor markets as a constraint on business strategy choices: A theoretical approach. Journal of business research, 102, 228-234.
• 6. Cochrane R., McKeown T., (2015). Vulnerability and agency work: from the workers’ perspectives. International journal of manpower, 36(6), 947-965.
• 7. Croce G., Ricci A., Tesauro G., (2019). Pensions reforms, workforce ageing and firm-provided welfare. Applied Economics, 51(32), 3480-3497.
• 8. Danvila-del-Valle I., Estevez-Mendoza C., Lara F.J., (2019). Human resources training: A bibliometric analysis. Journal Of Business Research, 101, 627-636.
• 9. Ferguson R.S., Lovell S.T., (2019). Diversification and labor productivity on US permaculture farms. Renewable Agriculture And Food Systems, 34(4), 326-337.
• 10. Ferraresi T., Roventini A., Semmler W., 2019. Macroeconomic Regimes, Technological Shocks and Employment Dynamics. Jahrbucher Fur Nationalokonomie Und Statistik, 239(4), 599-625.
• 11. Frank M.R., Autor D., Bessen J.E., Brynjolfsson E., Cerbian M., Demind D.J., Feldman M., Groh M., Lobo J., Moro E., (2019). Toward understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on labor. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the united states of America, 116(14), 6531-6539.
• 12. Gilbert S.L., Stephanie L., (2018). Leadership, Recognition and Well-Being: A Moderated Mediational Model. Canadian journal of Administrative Sciences-revue Canadienne des Sciences de l administration, 35(4), 523-534.
• 13. Grosse S.D., Krueger, K.V., Pike J., (2019). Estimated annual and lifetime labor productivity in the United States, 2016: implications for economic evaluations. Journal Of Medical Economics, 22(6), 501-508.
• 14. Islam A., Lopez A.P., Amin M., (2019). Decomposing the Labour Productivity Gap between Migrant-Owned and Native-Owned Firms in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of development studies, 55(9), 2065-2082.
• 15. Jaksic S., Erjavec N., Cota B., (2019). The role of foreign direct investment and labor productivity in explaining Croatian regional export dynamics. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 27(3), 835-849.
• 16. Kalleberg A.L., (2000). Nonstandard employment relations: Part-time, temporary and contract work. Annual review of sociology, 26, 341-365.
• 17. Klapper H., Reitzig M., (2018). On the effects of authority on peer motivation: Learning from Wikipedia. Strategic management journal, 39(8), 2178-2203.
• 18. Kopycinska, D., & Krynska, E. (2016). Wage Inequalities between Men and Women in Poland-a Justified Differentiation or Accepted Wage Discrimination of Women?. Economics & Sociology, 9(4), 222-242.
• 19. Kuznetsova A.R., Zagirova Z., Omarhanova Zh., (2018). Problems of poverty and motivation of workers to labor in the field of agriculture as effects of stagnant econom Hradec Economic Days. PT I, 8, 523-538.
• 20. Kuznetsova A., Dvorakova Z., Lankasova R., Kostyaev A., Nikoniva G., Omarkhanova Zh., (2018)b. Influence of migration displacements on the formation of the labour market in the countries of the European Union. In: 12th International Days of Statistics and Economics, Praha, 1007-1020.
• 21. Kuznetsova A., Kolevid G., Kostyev A., Nikonova G., Akhmetyanova A., (2019)b. Reproduction of the qualified personnel of working professions in agriculture. Hradec Economic Days. Part II. of the international scientific conference Hradec Economic Days, 9(1), 11-22.
• 22. Libanova, E. (2019). Labour Migration from Ukraine: Key Features, Drivers and Impact. Economics & Sociology, 12(1), 313-368.
• 23. Lysenko, D., (2019). The long-run effects of the real exchange rate on employment and wages in Canadian manufacturing. International Review Of Applied Economics, 33(4), 477-504.
• 24. Ma S.Z., Liang F., Zhang H.S., (2018). The Employment Effects of Global Value Chains. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(10), 2230-2253.
• 25. Matsumoto K., (2019). Climate change impacts on socioeconomic activities through labor productivity changes considering interactions between socioeconomics and climate systems. Journal of clear production, 216, 528-541.
• 26. McKenzie J., Olson R.E., Patulny R., Bellocchi A., Mills K.A., (2019). Emotion management and solidarity in the workplace: A call for a new research agenda. Sociological review, 67(3), 672-688.
• 27. Mehta C.R., Chandel N.S., Jena P.C., Jha A., (2019). Indian Agriculture Counting on Farm Mechanization. Ama-agricultural mechanization in Asia Africa and Latin America, 50(1), 84-89.
• 28. Mertzanis C., Said M., (2019). Access to skilled labor, institutions and firm performance in developing countries. International journal of manpower, 40(2), 328-355.
• 29. Moriconi S., Peri G., (2019). Country-specific preferences and employment rates in Europe. European Economic Review, 116, 1-27.
• 30. Policardo L., Punzo, L.F., Carrera E.J.S., (2019). On the wage-productivity causal relationship. Empirical Economics, 57(1), 329-343.
• 31. Seadon J., Tookey J.E., John E., (2019). Drivers for construction productivit Engineering Construction And Architectural Management, 26(6), 945-961.
• 32. Statistical measurement of qualifications of employed population to the work performed, (2018). Federal State Statistics Service. http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/population/trud/stat-izm.pdf
• 33. Van Stel A., Loshkin B., de Vries N., (2019). The effect of SME productivity increase on large firm productivity in the EU. Kyklos, 72(2), 332-353.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).