PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!
Tytuł artykułu

Determinants of the use of renewable energy sources in agile organizations

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify and analyze the key determinants that influence the decisions of agile organizations to implement renewable energy sources. The study aims to understand which socio-economic and technological factors have the greatest impact on these decisions. Design/methodology/approach: The research was based on quantitative analysis conducted through a survey among representatives of agile organizations. The collected data was then subjected to statistical analysis, including the calculation of the Gini coefficient to assess the concentration of respondents' preferences. Findings: Research has shown that the development of new technologies and job creation are the most important determinants influencing decisions regarding the implementation of renewable energy sources. The results suggest that agile organizations give equal weight to different factors, which indicates a balanced approach to the energy transition. Research limitations/implications: The limitations of the research are the subjective nature of respondents' answers and the limited representativeness of the sample, which may affect the generalization of the results. In addition, dynamically changing technologies and regulations may affect the validity of the results in the future. Practical implications: The research results suggest that agile organizations should develop strategies that balance multiple determinants when implementing renewable energy sources. Investments in modern technologies and job creation can contribute to improved operational efficiency and market competitiveness. Social implications: The implementation of renewable energy sources supports sustainable development and contributes to environmental protection, which is gaining increasing public support. Organizations that engage in such activities can build a positive image as socially and ecologically responsible. Originality/value: The article adds value through a comprehensive analysis of the determinants influencing the use of renewable energy sources in agile organizations, emphasizing the importance of a sustainable approach. The study provides new conclusions that can support further development of energy strategies in a dynamically changing business environment.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
127--143
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 45 poz.
Twórcy
autor
  • University of Economics in Katowice
autor
  • University of Economics in Katowice
  • Jacob of Paradise University in Gorzow Wielkopolski
autor
  • University of Technology and Economics in Warsaw
Bibliografia
  • 1. Abdmouleh, M., Alammari, R.A., Gastli, A. (2015). Review of policies encouraging renewable energy integration & best practices. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, 249-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.035
  • 2. Adan, H., Fuerst, F. (2016). Do energy efficiency measures really reduce household energy consumption? A difference-in-difference analysis. Energy Efficiency, 9(4), 1207-1219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-015-9423-8
  • 3. Akkaya, B. (2021). Leadership 5.0 in Industry 4.0: Leadership in Perspective of Organizational Agility. IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-8548-1.ch 074
  • 4. Alshehhi, A., Nobanee, H., Khare, N. (2018). The impact of sustainability practices on corporate financial performance: Literature trends and future research potential. Sustainability, 10(2), 494.
  • 5. Attar, R.W., Almusharraf, A., Alfawaz, A., Hajli, N. (2022). New Trends in E-Commerce Research: Linking Social Commerce and Sharing Commerce: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 14 (23), 16024. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316024
  • 6. Borowski, P.F. (2021). Digitization, digital twins, blockchain, and Industry 4.0 as elements of management process in enterprises in the energy sector. Energies, 14(7), 1885. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071885
  • 7. Borowski, P.F. (2021). Digitization, digital twins, blockchain, and Industry 4.0 as elements of management process in enterprises in the energy sector. Energies, 14(7), 1885. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071885
  • 8. Capgemini (2024). Why using only renewable energy is a strategic business imperative. https://www.capgemini.com
  • 9. Chen, X., Siau, K. (2020). Business Analytics/Business Intelligence and IT Infrastructure: Impact on Organizational Agility. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing. DOI: 10.4018/joeuc.2020100107
  • 10. Deloitte (2024). 2024 renewable energy industry outlook. Deloitte Insights. https://www2.deloitte.com
  • 11. Doz, Y., Kosonen, M. (2008). The dynamics of strategic agility: Nokia's rollercoaster experience. California Management Review, 50(3), 95-118. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 41166447
  • 12. Dsilva Winfred Rufuss, K.S., Sonu Ashritha, K., Paramanik, R.C. (2024). Green energy revolution: A unique approach for energy forecasting and optimization towards sustainable energy planning and social development. Environment, Development and Sustainability. link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10668-024-04826-9
  • 13. Eleogu, T., Okonkwo, F., Daraojimba, R.E. (2024). Revolutionizing Renewable Energy Workforce Dynamics: HR's Role in Shaping the Future. Business and Economics Journal, 10, 402-422. Available online: ideas.repec.org, April 24, 2024.
  • 14. Fiddler, E. (2017). Selected aspects of organizational agility. SIGMA-NOT Publishing House, sp. zoo DOI: 10.15199/48.2017.12.2.
  • 15. Gao, P., Zhang, J., Gong, Y., Li, H. (2020). Effects of technical IT capabilities on organizational agility: The moderating role of IT business spanning capability. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(5), 941-961. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2019-0394
  • 16. Gkeka-Serpetsidaki, P. (2024). Sustainable siting of offshore wind farms. www.didaktorika.gr/eadd/handle/10442/56344
  • 17. Harraf, A., Wanasika, I., Tate, K., Talbott, K. (2015). Organizational agility. Journal of Applied Business Research, 31(2), 675-686. Available at: clutejournals.com
  • 18. He, H., Harris, L. (2021). The impact of organizational agility on crisis management and firm performance: A moderation analysis. Journal of Business Research, 122, 698-708. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.026.
  • 19. Joiner, B. (2019). Leadership Agility for organizational agility. Journal of Creating Value, 5(2), 194-208. Available at: journals.sagepub.com
  • 20. Kemp, R., Foxon, T.J. (2023). Green Innovation and the Dynamics of Sustainable Energy Transition. In: Shifting Paradigms in Sustainable Development. Springer, pp. 98-115. Available online: SpringerLink, 24 April 2024.
  • 21. Kocot, M., Kwasek, A. (2022). Organizational agility as a determinant of the effective use of ICT. Scientific Journals of the Humanitas University of Management, No. 23(4).
  • 22. Kt, M.A., Sivasubramanian, C. (2023). Workforce Agility: A Review on Agility Drivers and Organizational Practices. Karyavattom: Researchers' Forum, Department of Commerce. University of Kerala. DOI: 10.59640/cbr.v14i2.1-8
  • 23. Kurnia, S., Chien, S.W. (2020). Building organizational agility through strategic management accounting: A case study of an Indonesian manufacturing company. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 14(4), 591-612. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-09-2019-0253
  • 24. Lambri, M., Sironi, E., Teti, E. (2024). The Role of Digitization in Cross-Border E-Commerce Performance of Italian SMEs. Sustainability, 16(2), 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020508
  • 25. Liu, Z. (2024). Transforming waste to catalyst: utilizing incineration ash for environmental solutions. dr.ntu.edu.sg/handle/10356/175414
  • 26. Luo, B.N., Ren, X., Cao, Z., Hong, Y. (2020). Corporate sustainability paradox management: A systematic review and future agenda. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 579272. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579272
  • 27. Luthra, S., Kumar, S., Kharb, R., Ansari, M.F., Shimmi, S.L. (2015). Adoption of smart grid technologies: An analysis of interactions among barriers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 33, 554-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.023
  • 28. Luthra, S., Kumar, S., Kharb, R., Ansari, M.F., Shimmi, S.L. (2015). Adoption of smart grid technologies: An analysis of interactions among barriers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 33, 554-565. https ://doi . org /10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.023
  • 29. Masoud, R., Basahel, S. (2023). The Effects of Digital Transformation on Firm Performance: The Role of Customer Experience and IT Innovation. Digital, 3(2), 109-126.
  • 30. McNamee, R.C., Schoch, N., Oelschlaeger, P., Huskey, L. (2012). Collaboration Continuum Cultural and Technological Enablers of Knowledge Exchange. Research Technology Management, 53(6), 54-57.
  • 31. Mrugalska, B., Ahmed, J. (2021). Organizational agility in industry 4.0: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 13(15), 8272. Available at: mdpi.com
  • 32. Munodawafa, R.T., Johl, S.K. (2019). A systematic review of eco-innovation and performance from the resource-based and stake-holder perspectives. Sustainability, 11, 60-67. DOI: 10.3390/su11030607.
  • 33. Nath, V., Agrawal, R. (2020). Agility and lean practices as antecedents of supply chain social sustainability. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40(10), 1589-1611. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-10-2019-0676
  • 34. Prieto, L., Talukder, M.F. (2023). Resilient Agility: A Necessary Condition for Employee and Organizational Sustainability. Sustainability. DOI: 10.3390/su15021552.
  • 35. Rahimi, G., Mansouri, A.M. (2019). The relationship between the organizational intelligence and organizational agility (Case study: employees of municipality of Tabriz). IAJOBHRM. DOI: 10.9756/iajobhrm/v5i1/1810010
  • 36. Ramadhana, R. (2021). Employee Agility. Center for Open Science. DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/vrwnq
  • 37. Reyes-Mercado, P. (2023). A Narrative Review of Research on the Sustainable Development Goals in the Business Discipline. In: Paradigm Shift in Business: Critical Appraisal of Agile... Springer, pp. 154-196.
  • 38. Rosário, A., Raimundo, R. (2021). Consumer Marketing Strategy and E-Commerce in the Last Decade: A Literature Review. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(7), 3003-3024. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16070164
  • 39. Schneider Electric (2024). Sustainable energy for industries: Benefits of renewable energy. Schneider Electric. https://www.se.com
  • 40. Sedej, T., Justinek, G. (2020). Effective Tools for Improving Employee Feedback during Organizational Change. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-7297-9.ch022.
  • 41. Skyrius, R., Valentukevič, J. (2020). Business Intelligence Agility, Informing Agility and Organizational Agility: Research Agenda. Informatics, 90, 47. DOI: 10.15388/im.2020.90.47
  • 42. Torres, E.F. (2023). Implementation of indicators in the sectors of operations of an e-commerce creation company. Retrieved from: https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/ 123456789/56103
  • 43. Van der Nat, A., Nagy, E., De Ruiter, E., Osusky, J., Boot, T. (2024). A Solarpunk Energy Landscape: Decentralizing the Energy Transition Towards Sustainable Energy Communities. repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:74954595-4224-4126-8f7b-d66e2287f3e9
  • 44. Varshney, D. (2020). Digital Transformation and Creation of an Agile Workforce: Exploring Company Initiatives and Employee Attitudes. In: M.A. Turkmenoglu, B. Cicek (Eds.), Contemporary Global Issues in Human Resource Management. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 154-196. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-392-220201009
  • 45. Wells, P., Lin, X. (2024). Transitioning to Green Energy: Agile Approaches in Global Companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31, pp. 442-457.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-437f7c60-0751-4e5c-bae5-ff6085a8e498
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.