Mean residual lifetime assessment approach for a multi-state standby system

• Autorzy: Karadayi Ebru , Funda Iscioglu

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17531/ein/166328

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In this paper, a new MRL assessment approach for a multi-state standby system is considered. The three-state system is backed up with a binary cold standby unit. Given that the system is at a specific state at time t, obtaining the MRL is worth considering in conducting the maintenance and repair plans of the system. For different degradation rates and time points, MRL results are examined. An HCTMP is considered for the degradation. Therefore, when the system is observed to be at its perfect state, the MRL decrease with an increase in all the failure rates of the system. However, when the system is observed to be at its partial state, the MRL is not affected by the increase in the failure rate pertained to the perfect state. The MRL when the system has known to be failed before time t and backed up with the standby unit increases with the time increase whereas the MRL when the system is at its perfect(or partial) state is constant when time increases. Moreover, cost evaluation of the system is analyzed. The results are supported with numerical examples and graphical representations.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

reliability analysis; standby system; multi-state system; mean time to failure; mean residual lifetime

• Wydawca: Polskie Naukowo-Techniczne Towarzystwo Eksploatacyjne
• Czasopismo: Eksploatacja i Niezawodność
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 25, no. 2
• Strony: art. no. 166328
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 38 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Karadayi Ebru

• The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ege University, Turkey

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9355-6926

autor

Funda Iscioglu

• Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Ege University, Turkey

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2037-3889

Bibliografia

• 1. Ahmad R, Kamaruddin S. An overview of time-based and condition-based maintenance in industrial application. Computers&Industrial Engineering 2012; 63: 135-149, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2012.02.002.
• 2. Boedigheimer R A, Kapur K C. Customer-driven reliability models for multi-state coherent systems. IEE Transactions on Reliability 1994; 43 (19): 46-50, https://doi.org/10.1109/24.285107.
• 3. Brunelle R D, Kapur K C. Review and classification of reliability measures for multistate and continuum models. IIE Transactions 1999; 31: 1171-1180,https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007600314061.
• 4. Chen Y, Meng X, Chen S. Reliability analysis of a cold standby system with imperfect repair and under poisson shocks. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2014; 3: 1-11, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/507846.
• 5. Chen Y, Wang Z, Li Y, Kang R, Mosleh A. Reliability analysis of a cold standby system considering the development stages and accumulations of failure mechanisms. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2018; 180: 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.06.022.
• 6. Ebrahimi N. Multistate reliability models. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 1984; 31: 671-680, https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800310415.
• 7. El-Neweihi E, Proschan F, Sethuraman J. Multi-state coherent system. Journal of Applied Probability 1978; 15: 675-688, https://doi.org/10.2307/3213425.
• 8. Eryilmaz S. Mean residual and mean past lifetime of multi-states systems. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 2010; 59: 644--649, https://doi.org/10.11009/TR.2010.2054173.
• 9. Eryilmaz S. Dynamic reliability and performance evaluation of multi-state systems with two components. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 2011; 40 (1): 125-133.
• 10. Eryilmaz S. Computing optimal replacement time and mean residual life in reliability shock models. Computers&Industrial Engineering 2017;103: 40-45,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.11.017.
• 11. Eryilmaz S. Reliability analysis of multi-state system with three-state components and its application to wind energy. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2018;172: 58-63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.12.008.
• 12. Fathizadeh M, Khorshidian K. An alternative approach to reliability analysis of cold standby systems. Communication in Statistics -- Theory and Methods 2016; 45 (21): 6471-6480, https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2014.944660.
• 13. Hudson J C, Kapur K C. Reliability analysis for multistate systems with multistate components. IEE Transactions 1983;15 (2):127-135, https://doi.org/10.1080/05695558308974623.
• 14. Iscioglu F. Dynamic performance evaluation of multi-state systems under non-homogeneous continuous time Markov-process degradation using life-times in terms of order statistics. Proc ImechE Part O:Journal of Risk and Reliability 2017; 231: 255-264, https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X17695710.
• 15. Iscioglu F. Dynamic Performance Evaluation of General Three-State k-out-of-n:G Systems with a NHCTM Degradation Process Istatistik: Journal of Turkish Statistical Associations 2017; 10: 52-62.
• 16. Iscioglu F. A new approach in the mean residual lifetime evaluation of a Multi-state System. Proc ImechE Part O:Journal of Risk and Reliability 2021; 235 (4): 700-710, https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X20969573.
• 17. Jia H, Levitin G, Ding Y, Song Y. Reliability analysis of standby systems with multi-state elements subject to constant transition rates. Quality and Reliability Engineering 2018; 35(3): 1-11, https://doi.org/10.11002/qre.2401.
• 18. Jia H, Liu D, Li Y, Ding Y, Liu M, Peng R. Reliability evaluation of power systems with multi-state warm standby and multi-state performance sharing mechanism. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2020; 204, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107.107139.
• 19. Kim D-H, Lee S-H, Lim J-H. Reliability analysis of multi-state parallel system with a multi-functional standby component. Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research 2015; 20(4): 75-87, https://doi.org/10.9723/jksiis.2015.20.4.075.
• 20. Leung K N F, Zhang Y L, Lai K K. Analysis for a two-dissimilar-component cold standby repairable system with repair priority. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2011; 96: 1542 - 1551, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2011.06.004.
• 21. Levitin G, Amari S V. Multi-state systems with multi-fault coverage. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2008; 93: 1730-1739, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.12.004.
• 22. Levitin G, Jia H, Ding Y, Song Y, Dai Y. Reliability of multi-state systems with free access to repairable standby elements. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2017; 167:192-197, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.003.
• 23. Li M, Ma X, Zhang X, Peng R, Yang J. Reliability analysis of nonrepairable cold-standby system based on the Wiener process. 2nd International Conference on System Reliability and Safety (ICSRS), 2017: pp. 151-155, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSRS.2017.8272812.
• 24. Lisnianski A, Levitin G. Multi-state system reliability:Assessment, Optimization, Applications. 2003, World Scientific Pub. Co. Inc., Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1142/5221
• 25. Liu Y W, Kapur K C. Reliability measures for dynamic multistate non-repairable systems and their applications to system performance evaluation. IEE Transactions 2006; 38: 511-520, https://doi.org/10.1080/07408170500341288.
• 26. Liu Y W, Kapur K C. New Models and Measures for Reliability of Multi-state Systems. In: Misra, K.B. (eds) Handbook of Performability Engineering. 2008; Springer, London, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-131-2_28.
• 27. Peng D, Zichun N, Bin H. A new analytic method of cold standby system reliability model with priority. MATEC Web of Conferences 2018; 175: 5p. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201817503060
• 28. Shu M-H, Hsu B-M, Kapur K C. Dynamic Performance measures for tools with multi-state wear processes and their applications for tool design and selection. International Journal of Production Research 2010; 48: 4725-4744, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540903071385.
• 29. Su B. Reliability analysis of 2 - unit cold standby redundant systems with repairable and non -- repairable failures. The Proceedings of the Multiconference on "Computational Engineering in Systems Applications". 2006: 1223-1227, https://doi.org/10.1109/CESA.2006.4281827.
• 30. Tuncel A. Residual Lifetime of a System with a Cold Standby Unit. İSTATİSTİK:Journal of Turkish Statistical Association 2017; 10 (1): 24-32.
• 31. Wang Y, Guo L, Wen M, Yang Y. Availability analysis for a multi-comonent system with different k-out-of-n:G warm standby subsystems subject to suspended animation. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability 2019; 21(2): 289–300, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2019.2.14.
• 32. Xue J, Yang K. Dynamic reliability analysis of coherent multi-state systems, IEEE Transactions on Reliability 1995; 44(4): 683-688, https://doi.org/10.1109/24.476002.
• 33. Yaghoubi A, Akhavan S T. Reliability Analysis of a two-unit standby system under Marshall-Olkin dependency. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 2022, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-11-2020-0366.
• 34. Yang K, Xue J. Dynamic reliability measures and life distribution models for multistate systems. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering 1995; 2: 79-102, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218539395000083.
• 35. Yuan L, Meng X-Y. Reliability analysis of a warm standby repairable system with priority in use. Applied Mathematical Modeling 2011; 35 (9): 4295-4303, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.03.002.
• 36. Zaliskyi M, Petrova Y, Asanov M, Bekirov E. Statistical Data Processing during Wind Generators Operation. International Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering&Telecommunications 2019; 8 (1): 33-38, https://doi.org/10.18178/ijeetc.8.1.33-38.
• 37. Zhai Q, Xing L, Peng R, Yang J. Reliability analysis of cold standby system with scheduled backups. IEEE 2015: 6p, https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2015.7105121.
• 38. Zhao X, Chai X, Sun J, Qiu Q. Joint optimization of mission abort and component switching policies for multistate warm standby systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2021; 212, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107641.