Prioritizing and Scheduling of Production Orders in Non-homogenous Production Systems

• Autorzy: Skołud Bożena , Szopa Agnieszka , Kalinowski Krzysztof

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/mper.2022.140877

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the work was to develop a prioritizing and scheduling method to be followed in small and medium-sized companies operating under conditions of non-rhythmic and nonrepeatable production. A system in which make to stock, make to order and engineer to order (MTS, MTO and ETO) tasks are carried out concurrently, referred to as a non-homogenous system, has been considered. Particular types of tasks have different priority indicators. Processes involved in the implementation of these tasks are dependent processes, which compete for access to resources. The work is based on the assumption that the developed procedure should be a universal tool that can be easily used by planners. It should also eliminate the intuitive manner of prioritizing tasks while providing a fast and easy to calculate way of obtaining an answer, i.e. a ready plan or schedule. As orders enter the system on an ongoing basis, the created plan and schedule should enable fast analysis of the result and make it possible to implement subsequent orders appearing in the system. The investigations were based on data from the non-homogenous production system functioning at the Experimental Plant of the Łukasiewicz Research Network – Institute of Ceramics and Building Materials, Refractory Materials Division – ICIMB. The developed procedure includes the following steps: 1 – Initial estimation of resource availability, 2 – MTS tasks planning, 3 – Production system capacity analysis, 4 – ETO tasks planning, 5 – MTO orders planning, 6 – Evaluation of the obtained schedule. The scheduling procedure is supported by KbRS (Knowledge-based Rescheduling System), which has been modified in functional terms for the needs of this work assumption.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

procedures; process planning; production planning and control; job; activity scheduling; production planning; scheduling; non-homogenous systems

• Wydawca: Production Engineering Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences ; Polish Association for Production Management
• Czasopismo: Management and Production Engineering Review
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 13, No. 1
• Strony: 62--75
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 23 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Skołud Bożena

• Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poland

autor

Szopa Agnieszka

• The Institute of Ceramics and Building Materials, Refractory Materials Division in Gliwice, Poland

autor

Kalinowski Krzysztof

• Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Engineering Processes Automation and Integrated Manufacturing Systems Konarskiego 18A, 44- 100 Gliwice, Poland

Bibliografia

• Adan I.J.B.F. and van der Wal J. (1998). Combining make to order and make to stock. Operations-Research-Spektrum, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 73–81. DOI: 10.10 07/BF01539854
• Alemany M.M.E., Ortiz A., and Fuertes-Miquel V.S. (2018). A decision support tool for the order promising process with product homogeneity requirements in hybrid Make-To-Stock and Make-To-Order environments. Application to a ceramic tile company. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 122, pp. 219–234.
• Ashayeri J. and Selen W.J. (2001). Order selection optimization in hybrid make-to-order and make-to-stock markets. Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 52, No. 10, pp. 1098–1106.
• Beemsterboer B., Land M., and Teunter R. (2016). Hybrid MTO-MTS production planning: An explorative study. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 248, No. 1, pp. 453–461.
• Beemsterboer B., Land M., Teunter R., and Bokhorst J. (2017). Integrating make-to-order and make-to-stock in job shop control. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 185, pp. 1–10.
• Egri P., Kovács A., Markus A., and Vŕnzca J. (2004). Project-oriented approach to production planning and scheduling in make-to-order manufacturing. Production Systems and Information Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 22–36.
• Herroelen, W., Demeulemeester, E., and De Reyck, B. (2001). A note on the paper “Resource-constrained project scheduling: Notation, classification, models and methods” by Brucker et al. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 128, No. 3, pp. 679–688.
• Kalantari M., Rabbani M., and Ebadian M. (2011). A decision support system for order acceptance/rejection in hybrid MTS/MTO production systems. Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 1363-1377.
• Kalinowski K. (n.d.). KBRS software. Retrieved 21 February 2022, from http://cim.polsl.pl/dla-studenta/oprogramowanie-kbrs
• Kalinowski K. (2013). Scheduling of discreet production processes (in Polish). Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej.
• Kingsman B., Hendry L., Mercer A., and de Souza A. (1996). Responding to customer enquiries in maketo-order companies Problems and solutions. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 46–47, No. 1, pp. 219–231.
• Knosala R. (2017). Production Engineering. Knowledge compendium (in Polish) Inżynieria produkcji. Kompendium wiedzy. Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa.
• Kovács A. (2003). A novel approach to aggregate scheduling in project-oriented manufacturing. Proc. of the 13th Int. Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, Doctoral Consortium, pp. 63–67.
• Martínez E.C., Duje D., and Pérez G.A. (1997). On performance modeling of project-oriented production. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 509–527. DOI: 10.1016/S0360-8352(97)00005-3
• Martínez E.C., and Pérez G.A. (1998). A project-oriented production model of batch plants. Computers & Chemical Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 391–414. DOI: 10.1016/S0098-1354(97)00225-1
• Mula J., Poler R., Garcia-Sabater J.P., and Lario F.C. (2006). Models for production planning under uncertainty: A review. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 103, No. 1, pp. 271–285.
• Rafiei H., Rabbani M., and Alimardani M. (2013). Novel bi-level hierarchical production planning in hybrid MTS/MTO production contexts. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 51, No. 5, pp. 1331-1346. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2012.661089
• Rajagopalan S. (2002). Make to Order or Make to Stock: Model and Application. Management Science, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 241–256.
• Rezaie K., Eivazy H., and Nazari-Shirkouhi S. (2009). A novel release policy for hybrid make-to-stock/maketo-order semiconductor manufacturing systems. 2009 Second International Conference on Developments in Esystems Engineering, pp. 443–447.
• Skolud B. and Zolghadri M. (2004). Capacity planning and scheduling in project oriented production. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 317–322.
• Wang Z., Qi Y., Cui H., and Zhang J. (2019). A hybrid algorithm for order acceptance and scheduling problem in make-to-stock/make-to-order industries. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 127, pp. 841–852.
• Weng J., Mizoguchi S., Akasaka, S., and Onari H. (2020). Smart manufacturing operating systems considering parts utilization for engineer-to-order production with make-to-stock parts. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 220, pp. 107459.
• Zaerpour N., Rabbani M., Gharehgozli A.H., and Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R. (2008). Make-to-order or maketo-stock decision by a novel hybrid approach. Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 186–201.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023)