Management science versus business practice - analysis of selected aspects of the problem

• Autorzy: Dźwigoł Henryk , Dźwigoł Dariusz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2020.148.11

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The aim of the paper was to determine whether the purpose of the discipline, i.e. management science, is to support the practical aspects of economic life. Design/methodology/approach: In order to find answers to the said research questions, 401 theoreticians of management science were surveyed by means of an anonymous survey questionnaire. Findings: Conclusions resulting from the conducted research and the analysis of the literature clearly indicate the need to carry out research work embedded in both theoretical and practical terms. Originality/value: It is indicated that the main disadvantage associated with the management science is the impermanence of the claims made. It should be remembered that it also cover theoretical research within its scope, as no science can develop without theoretical background. It is also worth noting that the relationship between the management science and business practice is bilateral and additionally complex.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

management science; methodology; research techniques; research methods

PL

nauki o zarządzaniu; metodologia; metody badawcze; techniki badawcze

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: z. 148
• Strony: 151--160
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 20 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Dźwigoł Henryk

• Silesian University of Technology. Faculty of Organisation and Management, Zabrze

autor

Dźwigoł Dariusz

• Bumech SA

Bibliografia

• 1. Almalki, S. (2016). Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Data in Mixed Methods Research—Challenges and Benefits. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(3), doi: 10.5539/jel.v5n3p288.
• 2. Apuke, O.D. (2017). Quantitative Research Methods: A Synopsis Approach. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 6(10), DOI: 10.12816/0040336.
• 3. Boddy, C. (2016). Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research, 19(4), 426-432. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2016-0053.
• 4. Bryman, A. (2006) Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 3-37, https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877.
• 5. Coghlan, D., and Shani, A.B. (Eds.). (2016). Action Research in Business and Management (Fundamentals of Applied Research). London: Sage.
• 6. Collins, H. (2010). Creative research. The theory and practice of research for the creative industries. Switzerland: AVA Publishing SA.
• 7. Dźwigoł, H. (2018). Współczesne procesy badawcze w naukach o zarządzaniu. Uwarunkowania metodyczne i metodologiczne. Warszawa: PWN.
• 8. Dzwigol, H., Aleinikova, O., Umanska, Y., Shmygol, N., & Pushak, Y. (2019). An Entrepreneurship Model for Assessing the Investment Attractiveness of Regions. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 22(SI1), 1-7.
• 9. Dźwigoł, H., Dźwigoł-Barosz, M., Zhyvko, Z., Miśkiewicz, R., Pushak, H. (2019). Evaluation of the energy security as a component of national security of the country. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 8(3), 307-317. http://doi.org/10.9770/ jssi.2019.8.3(2).
• 10. Gerring, J. (2017). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices (Strategies for Social Inquiry). New York: Cambridge University Press.
• 11. Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W., and Wicki, B. (2008). What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal, 29(13), 1465-1474. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.722.
• 12. Hair, J.F., Page, M., and Brunsveld, N. (2019). Essentials of Business Research Methods. New York: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429203374.
• 13. Harrington, H.J., and Voehl, F. (Eds.). (2016). The Innovation Tools Handbook, Vol 1: Organizational and Operational Tools, Methods, and Techniques that Every Innovator Must Know. USA: CRC Press, Boca Raton FL.
• 14. Hessen, R., Bright, L.K., and Zucker A. (2019). Vindicating methodological triangulation. Synthese, 196(8), 3067-3081, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1294-7.
• 15. Jokiel, G. (2006). O celach nauki organizacji i zarządzania. In: H. Jagoda, and J. Lichtarski (Eds.), Nowe kierunki w zarządzaniu przedsiębiorstwem – celowość, skuteczność, efektywność. Prace naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu, 1104.
• 16. Joslin, R., and Müller, R. (2016). Identifying interesting project phenomena using philosophical and methodological triangulation. International Journal of Project Management, 34(6), 1043-1056, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.005.
• 17. O’Leary, Z., and Hunt, J.S. (2016). Workplace Research: Conducting small-scale research in organizations. London: Sage.
• 18. Roe, B.D., and Just, D.R. (2009). Internal and External Validity in Economics Research: Tradeoffs between Experiments, Field Experiments, Natural Experiments, and Field Data. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(5), 1266-1271, https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-8276.2009.01295.x.
• 19. Tonidandel, S., King, E.B., and Cortina, J. (2016). Big Data Methods: Leveraging Modern Data Analytic Techniques to Build Organizational Science. Organizational Research Methods, 21(3), 525-547, DOI: 10.1177/1094428116677299.
• 20. Vaivio, J., & Sirén, A. (2010) Insights into method triangulation and “paradigms” in interpretive management accounting research. Management Accounting Research, 21(2), 130-141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2010.03.001.