Identify the trends on Maritime Safety Management system studies: a review

• Autorzy: Junaidi Arif , Yudo Hartono , Ab-Samat H. Abdul

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.18.04.03

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Studies to understand the development of the theory and implementation of effective Maritime Safety Management are essential to examine its performance. Therefore, this study aims to identify trends that review Maritime Safety Management using the literature study design model. Data were collected from articles published in Scopus-indexed international journals from 2012 to 2022 and analyzed qualitatively using the Interactive data analysis model. This result showed that the trends responsible include the Effectiveness of the Safety Management System (SMS), developing the model, and identifying sources that raised safety problems. This study discussed these findings in detail, supported by the latest theory and empirical foundation. Furthermore, aspects not examined in preliminary studies were evaluated based on the trend with the evolution of a standard for a SMS, namely the ISM code. Irrespective of implementing this code, ships can still be detained for various reasons. This led to use the AHP-TOPSIS combination method to analyze all findings issued during periodical verification to evaluate the implementation of the SMS on board ship.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

risk assessment; maritime safety; human element; seafarers; shipping operations; International Maritime Organization; IMO; ISM Code; Safety Management System; SMS

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 18 No. 4
• Strony: 775--784
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 93 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Junaidi Arif

• Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal,Penang, Malaysia

autor

Yudo Hartono

• Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6491-3365

autor

Ab-Samat H. Abdul

• Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal,Penang, Malaysia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2992-4015

Bibliografia

• [1] Papadopoulos G., Georgiadou P., Papazoglou C., Michaliou K. Occupational and public health and safety in a changing work environment: An integrated approach for risk assessment and prevention. Safety Science, Vol. 48, No. 8, 2010, pp.943–949. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.11.002.
• [2] Wang B., Shen Y., Saravanan V., Kr. Luhach A. Workplace safety and risk analysis using Additive Heterogeneous Hybridized Computational Model. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2021, p.101558. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101558.
• [3] Hutchinson D., Luria G., Pindek S., Spector P. The effects of industry risk level on safety training outcomes: A meta-analysis of intervention studies. Safety Science, 2021, p.105594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105594
• [4] Nordlöf H., Wiitavaara B., Winblad U., Wijk K., Westerling R. Safety culture and reasons for risk-taking at a large steel-manufacturing company: Investigating the worker perspective. Safety Science Vol. 73, 2015, pp.126–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.020
• [5] Muflihah Darwis A., Furqaan Nai’em M., Thamrin Y., Noviponiharwani Rahmadani S., Amin F. Safety risk assessment in construction projects at Hasanuddin University. Gaceta Sanitaria Vol. 35, 2021, pp.S385–S387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2021.10.057
• [6] Tulchinsky T.H., Varavikova E.A. Environmental and Occupational Health. In TH Tulchinsky and EABT-TNPH (Third E. Varavikova (Eds.), The New Public Health (3rd ed., 2014, pp. 471–533). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-415766-8.00009-4
• [7] Rodrigues-da-Silva L.H., Crispim J.A. The Project Risk Management Process, a Preliminary Study. Procedia Technology Vol. 16, 2014, pp.943-949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2014.10.047.
• [8] Ferdosi M., Rezayatmand R., Taleghani Y.M. Risk Management in Executive Levels of Healthcare Organizations: Insights from a Scoping Review (2018). Risk Manag Healthc Policy Vol. 13, 2020, pp. 215–243. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S231712.
• [9] Heyerdahl A. Risk assessment without the risk? A controversy about security and risk in Norway. Journal of Risk Research Vol. 25, No. 2, 2022, pp. 252-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2021.1936610.
• [10] Jain A., Leka S., Zwetsloot G.I. Work, Health, Safety and Well-Being: Current State of the Art. Managing Health, Safety and Well-Being, 2018, pp. 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1261-1_1.
• [11] Sorensen G., Dennerlein J.T., Peters S.E., Sabbath E.L., Kelly E.L., Wagner G.R. The future of research on work, safety, health and wellbeing: A guiding conceptual framework. Social Science and Medicine Vol. 269, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113593.
• [12] Sorensen G., Sparer E., Williams J.A., Gundersen D., Boden L.I., Dennerlein J.T., Wagner G.R. Measuring best practices for workplace safety, health and wellbeing: The Workplace Integrated Safety and Health Assessment. J Occup Environ Med Vol. 60, No. 5, 2018, pp. 430-439. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001286.
• [13] Andrei D., Pacheco P.O., Griffin M. Safety and employee health and wellbeing. Wellbeing for Sustainability in the Global Workplace. 2018, pp. 58-75. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429470523-5.
• [14] Hanson G.C., Rameshbabu A., Bodner T.E., Hammer L.B., Rohlman D.S., Olson R., Parish M. A Comparison of Safety, Health, and Well-Being Risk Factors Across Five Occupational Samples. Front Public Health, 2021 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.614725.
• [15] Martyka J., Lebecki K. Safety Culture in High-Risk Industries. International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics: JOSE Vol. 20, No. 4, 2014, pp. 561-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2014.11077076.
• [16] Leso V., Fontana L., Iavicoli I. The occupational health and safety dimension of Industry 4.0. Med Lav Vol. 109, No. 5, 2018, pp. 327-338. DOI: 10.23749/mdl.v110i5.7282.
• [17] Rivera F.M.-L, Mora-Serrano J., Onate E. Factors Influencing Safety on Construction Projects (fSCPs): Types and Categories. Int J Environ Res Public Health Vol. 18, No. 20, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010884.
• [18] Gould K.P., Bieder C. Safety and Security: The Challenges of Bringing Them Together. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology, 2020, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47229-0_1.
• [19] Aven T., Ylonen M. How the risk science can help us establish a good safety culture. Journal of Risk Research Vol. 24, No. 11, 2021, pp. 1349-1367. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1871056.
• [20] Zhang Y., Abdullah M.R., Khan N.H., Javaid M.U., Nazri M., Shah M.U. High Safety Risk Assessment in the Time of Uncertainties (COVID-19): An Industrial Context. Front Psychol, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.834361.
• [21] Mishra A.K., Lama C., Sah D.P., Badagha D.G. Effectiveness of Safety Measures Implemented. Journal of Advanced Research in Civil and Environmental Engineering Vol. 6, No. 2, 2019, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.24321/2393.8307.201903.
• [22] Haas E.J., Yorio P. Exploring the state of health and safety management system performance measurement in mining organizations. Saf Sci Vol. 83, 2016, pp. 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.009.
• [23] Velas A., Halaj M., Hofreiter L., Kampova K., Zvakova Z., Jankura R. Research of security and safety culture within an organization. The case study within the Slovak Republic. Security Journal, Vol. 35, 2022, pp. 571-599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-021-00291-5.
• [24] O'Connor P., Madden C., O'Dowd E.B., Lydon S. A meta-review of methods of measuring and monitoring safety in primary care . International Journal for Quality in Health Care Vol. 33, No. 3, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzab117.
• [25] Aven T., Ylonen 2.M. The strong power of standards in the safety and risk fields: A threat to proper developments of these fields? Reliability Engineering and System Safety Vol. 189, 2019, pp.279-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.04.035.
• [26] Guo C., Jiang F., Chen T., Li Y. A Review of Research Topics of Safety Management Systems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series Vol. 1827, 2021, p. 012052.
• [27] Banda O.A., Goerlandt F., Salokannel J., van Gelder P.H. An initial evaluation framework for the design and operational use of maritime STAMP-based safety management systems. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs Vol. 18, 2019, pp. 451-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-019-00180-0.
• [28] Goerlandt F., Li J., Reniers G. The landscape of safety management systems research: A scientometric analysis. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience Vol. 3, No. 3, 2022, pp. 189-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2022.02.003.
• [29] Jiang H., Wang Z. Research on Safety Management and Preventive Measure of Construction Industry. ICIBE 2021: The 2021 7th International Conference on Industrial and Business Engineering, 2021, pp. 379-385. https://doi.org/10.1145/3494583.3494616.
• [30] Lowe C. A Human Factors Perspective on Safety Management Systems. In F Redmill and T Anderson (eds) Improvements in System Safety (pp. 139-153). Springer, London, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-100-8_9.
• [31] Accou B., Reniers G. Introducing the Extended Safety Fractal: Reusing the Concept of Safety Management Systems to Organize Resilient Organizations. Int J Environ Res Public Health Vol. 17, No. 15, 2020, p.5478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155478.
• [32] Cho H.S., Lee J.S., Moon H.C. Maritime Risk in Seaport Operation: A Cross-Country Empirical Analysis with Theoretical Foundations. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics Vol. 34, No. 3, 2018, pp. 240–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2018.09.010
• [33] Haapasaari P., Helle I., Lehikoinen A., Lappalainen J., Kuikka S. A proactive approach for maritime safety policy-making for the Gulf of Finland: Seeking best practices. Marine Policy Vol. 60, 2015, pp. 107–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.06.003
• [34] Størkersen K.V., Thorvaldsen T. Traps and tricks of safety management at sea. Safety Science Vol. 134, No. November 2018, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105081
• [35] Jahangiri M., Hoboubi N., Rostamabadi A., Keshavarzi S., Hosseini A.A. Human Error Analysis in a Permit to Work System: A Case Study in a Chemical Plant. Safety and Health at Work Vol. 7, No. 1, 2016, pp. 6–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2015.06.002
• [36] Wróbel K. Searching for the origins of the myth: 80% human error impact on maritime safety. Reliability Engineering and System Safety Vol. 216, 2021, pp. 107942. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107942
• [37] Albrechtsen E., Solberg I., Svensli E. The application and benefits of job safety analysis. Safety Science Vol. 113, 2019, pp. 425–437. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.007
• [38] Chruzik K. Integration model of management systems in sea transport. TransNav Vol. 14, No. 2, 2020, pp. 393–396. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.14.02.16
• [39] Ajmal M.A., Isha A., Nordin S. Safety Management Practices and Occupational Health and Safety Performance: An Empirical Review. Jinnah Business Review Vol. 9, No. 2, 2021, pp. 15–33. https://doi.org/10.53369/dtoc3606
• [40] Nkrumah E.N., Liu S., Doe Fiergbor D., Akoto L.S. Improving the Safety–Performance Nexus: A Study on the Moderating and Mediating Influence of Work Motivation in the Causal Link between Occupational Health and Safety Management (OHSM) Practices and Work Performance in the Oil and Gas Sector. In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Vol. 18, No. 10, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105064
• [41] Gavalas D., Syriopoulos T., Roumpis E. Digital adoption and efficiency in the maritime industry. Journal of Shipping and Trade, Vol. 7, No. 11, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-022-00111-y.
• [42] Sullivan B.P., Nava E.A., Desai S., Sole J., Rossi M., Ramundo L., Terzi S. Defining Maritime 4.0: Reconciling principles, elements and characteristics to support maritime vessel digitalisation. IET Collaborative Intelligent Manufacturing Vol. 3, No. 1, 2021, pp. 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1049/cim2.12012.
• [43] Storkersen K.V. Safety management in remotely controlled vessel operations. Marine Policy Vol. 130, 2021, p. 104349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104349.
• [44] The International Safety Management (ISM) Code, 2021 https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/HumanElement/Pages/ISMCode.aspx
• [45] Batalden B.M., Sydnes A.K. Maritime safety and the ISM code: A study of investigated casualties and incidents. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs Vol. 13, No. 1, 2014, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-013-0051-8
• [46] Bastug S., Asyali E., Battal T. Beyond the ISM code: a conceptual proposal for an integrated system within the Seven C’s approach. Maritime Policy and Management Vol. 48, No. 3, 2021, pp. 354-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2020.1770884.
• [47] Zaman I., Pazouki K., Norman R., Younessi S., Coleman S. Challenges and Opportunities of Big Data Analytics for Upcoming Regulations and Future Transformation of the Shipping Industry. Procedia Engineering Vol. 194, 2017, pp. 537-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.182.
• [48] Yan R., Wang S., Zhen L., Laporte G. Emerging approaches applied to maritime transport research: Past and future. Communications in Transportation Research Vol. 1, 2021, p. 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commtr.2021.100011.
• [49] Kilpi V., Solakivi T., Kiiski T. Maritime sector at verge of change: learning and competence needs in Finnish maritime cluster. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs Vol. 20, 2021, pp. 63-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-021-00228-0.
• [50] Lin W.C. Maritime Environment Assessment and Management Using through Balanced Scorecard by Using DEMATEL and ANP Technique. Int J Environ Res Public Health Vol. 19, No. 5, 2022, p. 2873. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19052873.
• [51] Snyder H. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research Vol. 104, No. July, 2019, pp. 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
• [52] Miles M.B., Huberman A.M., Saldaña J. Qualitative Data Analysis (3rd Editio). SAGE Publication, 2014.
• [53] Malomane R., Musonda I., Okoro C.S. The Opportunities and Challenges Associated with the Implementation of Fourth Industrial Revolution Technologies to Manage Health and Safety. In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Vol. 19, No. 2, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020846
• [54] Tuck Kiong M., Yap L.S., Aminudin E., Zakaria R.B. Sensor Modules for Enhancement of Safety Performance in Construction Safety Management. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering Vol. 1200, No. 1, 2021, p. 012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1200/1/012024
• [55] Lee D. The Effect of Safety Management and Sustainable Activities on Sustainable Performance: Focusing on Suppliers. Sustainability Vol. 10, No. 12, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124796
• [56] Nguyen H.D., Macchion L. Risk management in green building: a review of the current state of research and future directions. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02168-y
• [57] Bhardwaj S., Bhattacharya S., Tang L., Howell K.E. Technology introduction on ships: The tension between safety and economic rationality. Safety Science Vol. 115, No. February, 2019, pp. 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.025
• [58] McGuinness E., Utne I.B. A systems engineering approach to implementation of safety management systems in the Norwegian fishing fleet. Reliability Engineering and System Safety Vol. 121, 2014, pp. 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.08.002
• [59] Asyali E., Bastug S. Influence of scientific management principles on ISM Code. Safety Science, Vol. 68, 2014, pp. 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.03.011
• [60] Bye R.J., Aalberg A.L. Maritime navigation accidents and risk indicators: An exploratory statistical analysis using AIS data and accident reports. Reliability Engineering and System Safety Vol. 176, No. October 2017, 2018. 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.03.033
• [61] Chen J., Zhang F., Yang C., Zhang C., Luo L. Factor and trend analysis of total-loss marine casualty using a fuzzy matter element method. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol. 24, No. July, 2017, pp. 383–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.07.001
• [62] Dinis D., Teixeira A.P., Guedes Soares C. Probabilistic approach for characterising the static risk of ships using Bayesian networks. Reliability Engineering and System Safety Vol. 203, No. June, 2020, p. 107073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107073
• [63] Fan S., Zhang J., Blanco-Davis E., Yang Z., Yan X. Maritime accident prevention strategy formulation from a human factor perspective using Bayesian Networks and TOPSIS. Ocean Engineering Vol. 210, No. June, 2020, p. 107544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107544
• [64] Hänninen M., Valdez Banda O.A., Kujala P. Bayesian network model of maritime safety management. Expert Systems with Applications Vol. 41, No. 17, 2014, pp. 7837–7846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.06.029
• [65] Łosiewicz Z., Nikończuk P., Pielka D. Application of artificial intelligence in the process of supporting the ship owner’s decision in the management of ship machinery crew in the aspect of shipping safety. Procedia Computer Science Vol. 159, 2019, pp. 2197–2205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.394
• [66] Uddin M.I., Awal Z.I. Systems-theoretic approach to safety of inland passenger ship operation in Bangladesh. Safety Science Vol. 126, No. August 2019, 2020, p. 104629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104629
• [67] Valdez Banda O.A., Goerlandt F. A STAMP-based approach for designing maritime safety management systems. Safety Science Vol. 109, No. May, 2018, pp. 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.05.003
• [68] Kravchenko P., Plotnikov A., Oleshchenko E. Digital modeling of traffic safety management systems. Transportation Research Procedia Vol. 36, 2018, pp. 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.12.109
• [69] Mohamed Y., Jokonya O. Factors affecting the adoption of technologies to improve fleet safety management. Procedia Computer Science Vol. 181, No. 2019, 2021, pp. 1011–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.278
• [70] Wu B., Tang Y., Yan X., Guedes Soares C. Bayesian Network modelling for safety management of electric vehicles transported in RoPax ships. Reliability Engineering and System Safety Vol. 209, No. June 2020, 2021, p. 107466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107466
• [71] Finger J., Ross K., Häring I., Restayn E.-M., Siebold U. Open Chance and Risk Management Process Supported by a Software Tool for Improving Urban Security. European Journal for Security Research Vol. 6, No. 1, 2021, pp. 39–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41125-021- [72] Vulanović S., Žižakov M., Vasić S., Delić M., Sremčev N. The impact of occupational health and safety (Ohands) management systems on risk management practices. Annals of DAAAM and Proceedings of the International DAAAM Symposium Vol. 30, No. 1, 2019, pp. 1188–1195. https://doi.org/10.2507/30th.daaam.proceedings.167
• [73] Wachter JK, Yorio P L (2014) A system of safety management practices and worker engagement for reducing and preventing accidents: An empirical and theoretical investigation. Accident Analysis and Prevention 68: 117–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.07.029
• [74] Alshammari W., Alhussain H., Rizk N.M. Risk management assessments and recommendations among students, staff, and health care workers in educational biomedical laboratories. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Vol. 14, 2021, pp. 185–198. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S278162
• [75] Jazayeri E. Safety Management System and Methods of Safety Measurement. University of Kentucky College of Engineering Vol. February, 2017, pp. 1–30. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26892.10882
• [76] Bhattacharya S. The effectiveness of the ISM Code: A qualitative enquiry. Marine Policy Vol. 36, No. 2, 2012, pp. 528–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2011.09.004
• [77] Akyuz E., Celik M. A hybrid decision-making approach to measure the effectiveness of safety management system implementations onboard ships. Safety Science Vol. 68, 2014, pp.169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.04.003
• [78] Karakasnaki M., Vlachopoulos P., Pantouvakis A., Bouranta N. ISM Code implementation: an investigation of safety issues in the shipping industry. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs Vol. 17, No. 3, 2018, pp. 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-018-0153-4
• [79] Pantouvakis A., Karakasnaki M. An empirical assessment of ISM Code effectiveness on performance: the role of ISO certification. Maritime Policy and Management Vol. 43, No. 7, 2016, pp. 874–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2016.1169451
• [80] Pantouvakis A., Karakasnaki M. The human talent and its role in ISM Code effectiveness and competitiveness in the shipping industry. Maritime Policy and Management Vol. 45, No. 5, 2018, pp. 649–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1454989
• [81] Formela K., Neumann T., Weintrit A.: Overview of Definitions of Maritime Safety, Safety at Sea, Navigational Safety and Safety in General. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2019, pp. 285-290, https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.13.02.03
• [82[ Weintrit A., Neumann T.: Marine navigation and safety of sea transportation: Maritime transport & shipping, 2013, pp. 1 - 320
• [83] Nielsen K.J. Improving safety culture through the health and safety organization: A case study. Journal of Safety Research Vol. 48, 2014, pp. 7–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2013.10.003
• [84] Schenk L., Taher I.A., Öberg M. Identifying the Scope of Safety Issues and Challenges to Safety Management in Swedish Middle School and High School Chemistry Education. Journal of Chemical Education Vol. 95, No. 7, 2018, pp. 1132–1139 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00054
• [85] Usukhbayar R., Choi J. Critical safety factors influencing on the safety performance of construction projects in Mongolia. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering Vol. 19, No. 6, 2020, pp. 600–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2020.1770095
• [86] Baalisampang T., Abbassi R., Garaniya V., Khan F., Dadashzadeh M. Review and analysis of fire and explosion accidents in maritime transportation. Ocean Engineering Vol. 158, No. April, 2018, 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.04.022
• [87] Chen J., Zhang S., Xu L., Wan Z. Identification of key factors of ship detention under Port State Control. Marine Policy Vol. 102, No. 2, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.12.020.
• [88] Akyurek E., Bolat P. Ranking port state control detention remarks: professional Judgement and spatial overview. European Transport Research Review Vol. 13, No. 24, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00480-8.
• [89] He J., Hao Y., Wang X. An Interpretable Aid Decision-Making Model for Flag State Control Ship Detention Based on SMOTE and XGBoost . J Mar Sci Eng Vol. 9, No. 2, 2021, p 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9020156.
• [90] Lindpere H. Prompt Release of Detained Foreign Vessels and Crews in Matters of Marine Environment Protection. International Journal of Legal Information, pp. 33, No. 2, 2005, pp. 240-255. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0731126500004959.
• [91] Chen Y., Lou N., Liu G., Luan Y., Jiang H. Risk analysis of ship detention defects based on association rules. Marine Policy Vol. 142, 2022, p. 105123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105123.
• [92] Fu J., Chen X., Wu S., Shi C., Zhao J., Xian J. Ship Detention Situation Prediction via Optimized Analytic Hierarchy Process and Naïve Bayes Model. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2020, p. 8147310. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8147310.
• [93] Fesntad J., Dahl O., Kongsvik T. Shipboard safety: exploring organizational and regulatory factors. Maritime Policy and Management Vol. 43, No. 5, 2016, pp. 552-568. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2016.1154993.

Uwagi

1. Pełne imiona podano na stronie internetowej czasopisma w "Authors in other databases."

2. Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).