Identyfikatory
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Purpose: reasons for writing the paper is to present, the optimal procedure to manage of risk and Risk Assessment procedures on board sea-going vessels. Design/methodology/approach: an analysis of implemented Risk Assessment procedures on board sea-going vessels various shipping companies. Findings: found that approach to risk management and requirements to perform Risk Assessment are varied between shipping companies and sometime varied between vessels in the same shipping company. Research limitations/implications: management of risk based on Risk Assessment to be simplify and unified. Practical implications: suggestion is given to unify procedures for Risk Assessment. Social implications: reduction of risk to happen undesired events and mitigations of hazards associated with day to day operation of sea-going vessels. Originality/value: recommendation to shipping companies for modification of Risk Assessments procedures where is necessary to improve safety on board.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
207--221
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 22 poz.
Twórcy
autor
- Maritime University of Szczecin
Bibliografia
- 1. Balmat, J.F., Lafont, F., Maifret, R., Pessel, N. (2009). Maritime Risk Assessment (MARISA), a fuzzy approach to define an individual ship risk factor Ocean. Reliab. Eng.Syst. Saf., 36(15-16). Elsevier, pp. 1278-1286.
- 2. British Standards No. 4778. BS.
- 3. Code of Safe Working Practices for Merchant Seamen (2000). MCA.
- 4. Culp, S. (2020). Why Risk management is more important then ever. Forbs.
- 5. Dominguez-Péry, C., Narasimha Raju Vuddaraju, C.L., Corbett-Etchevers, I. & Tassabehji, R. (2021). Reducing maritime accidents in ships by tackling human error: a bibliometric review and research agenda. Journal of Shipping and Trade, vol. 6, Art. no. 20. Springer.
- 6. Embrechts, P., Frey, R., McNeil, A. (2005). Quantitative Risk management. Princeton University Press.
- 7. Goerlandt, F., Montewka, J. (2015). Maritime transportation risk analysis: review and analysis in light of some foundational issues. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 138, Elsevier, pp. 115-134.
- 8. Haugen, S., Ventikos, N., Teixeira, A., Montewka, J. (2016). Trends and needs for research in maritime risk. International Congress of the International Maritime Association of the Mediterranean. Taylor & Francis, pp. 313-321.
- 9. ISM Code (1998). IMO.
- 10. Montewka, J., Goerlandt, F., Kujala, P. (2014). On a systematic perspective on risk for formal safety assessment (FSA). Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 127. Elsevier, pp. 77-85.
- 11. Kaplan, R.S., Mikes, A. (2012). Managing Risk: New Framework. Harvard Business Review.
- 12. Puisa, R., McNay, J., Montewka, J. (2021). Maritime safety: prevention versus mitigation? Saf. Sci., 136. Elsevier, p. 105151.
- 13. Risk Assessment Training Manual (2006). Lloyds Register of Shipping.
- 14. Safety Management System, (2015). Shipping Company C (Europe).
- 15. Safety Management System, (2017). Shipping Company D (Asia).
- 16. Safety Management System, (2018). Shipping Company A (Europe).
- 17. Safety Management System, (2020). Shipping Company B (Europe).
- 18. Safety Management System, (2021). Shipping Company E (Asia).
- 19. SOLAS Convention (1998). Gdańsk: PRS.
- 20. Standard OHSAS 18001:2007.
- 21. Tchankova, L. (2002). Risk identification – basic stage in risk management. Environmental Management and Health. Emerald.
- 22. Zhang, S., Pedersen, P.T., Villavicencio, R. (2019). Probability and Mechanics of Ship Collision and Grounding. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-12046cff-614d-4d83-a1b1-e21535df5f9c