Post occupancy evaluation of adaptively reused buildings: case study of an office building in Saudi Arabia

• Autorzy: Hamida Mohammad B. , Hassanain Mohammad A.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.21307/ACEE-2020-003

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Adaptive reuse of buildings is the practice of converting the use of an originally designed built-environment to suit a new use. This conversion process has a direct bearing on the performance of the building, and the satisfaction of the users with the conditions of the converted built-environment. This paper presents the findings of a post occupancy evaluation (POE) of an adaptively reused student housing facility to an office building, as a case study. The POE was conducted to investigate the consequences of the conversion process on the technical and functional elements of performance of the adapted building. A review of literature was performed to identify the technical and functional elements of performance pertaining to the new use of the building, along with their recommended performance criteria in codes and standards. The study employed multiple data collection methods, including a walkthrough tour to develop insights about the performance of the building elements; interviews to confirm the validity of the identified technical and functional performance elements, and initiate discussion with the users based on the findings of the walkthrough tour; and a user satisfaction survey to obtain the users’ feedback on the performance of the building. The findings of the study resulted in developing a series of recommendations to improve the performance of the case study building. The paper serves to guide design professionals involved in the planning and design of adaptive reuse projects, and facilities managers in charge of the daily operations of adaptively reused buildings.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

post-occupancy evaluation; adaptive reuse; performance elements; performance criteria

PL

ocena po okresie użytkowania; adaptacyjne ponowne użycie; elementy wydajności; kryteria wydajności

• Wydawca: Silesian University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Architecture Civil Engineering Environment
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 13, no. 1
• Strony: 29--40
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 41 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Hamida Mohammad B.

• Graduate Student; King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Architectural Engineering Department, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia

autor

Hassanain Mohammad A.

• Professor; King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Architectural Engineering Department, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia

Bibliografia

• [1] Bullen, P. A., (2007). Adaptive reuse and sustainability of commercial buildings, Facilities, 25(1), 20-31.
• [2] Bullen, P. A., and Love, P. (2011). Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings, Structural Survey, 29(5), 411-421.
• [3] Máte, K., (2011). Chapter 22: Resource efficiency, Workplace Strategies and Facilities Management: Building in Value, 352-377, Spon Press, London, UK.
• [4] Zivkovic, M., Oliynyk, O., and Murgul, V. A., (2016). Reconstruction of urban areas: Sustainable strategy of obsolete building conversion to residential uses, Construction of Unique Buildings and Structures, 1, 102-111.
• [5] Riggs,W., and Chamberlain, F., (2018). The TOD and smart growth implications of the LA adaptive reuse ordinance, Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 594-606.
• [6] Glew, D., Smith, M. B., Miles-Shenton, D., and Gorse, C., (2017). Assessing the quality of retrofits in solid wall dwellings. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 35(5), 501-518.
• [7] Ali, Z. M., Zawawi, R., Myeda, N. E., and Mohamad, N., (2018). Adaptive reuse of historical buildings: Service quality measurement of Kuala Lumpur museums. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 37(1), 54-68.
• [8] Aigwi, I. E., Egbelakin, T., Ingham, J., (2018). Efficacy of adaptive reuse for the redevelopment of underutilised historical buildings: Towards the regeneration of New Zealand’s provincial town centres, International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 36(4), 385-407.
• [9] Mehr, S. Y., and Wilkinson, S., (2018). Technical issues and energy efficient adaptive reuse of heritage listed city halls in Queensland Australia, International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 36(5), 529-542.
• [10] Preiser, W. F. E., Rabinowitz, H., and White, E., (1988). Post Occupancy Evaluation, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, USA.
• [11] Bordass, B., and Leaman, A., (2005). Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 1: A portfolio of feedback techniques, Building Research and Information, 33(4), 347-352.
• [12] Preiser, W. F. E., (1995). Post-occupancy evaluation: how to make buildings work better, Facilities, 13(11), 19-28.
• [13] Nelson, P. B., Rodrigues R. C., and Rocha, P. F., (2016). Post-occupancy evaluation data support for planning and management of building maintenance plans, Buildings, 6(4), 45.
• [14] Voordt, T. J. V., Been, I. D., and Maarleveld, M., (2012). Chapter 10: Post-Occupancy Evaluation of Facilities Change, Facilities Change Management, 137-154, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex, UK.
• [15] Mundo-Hernández, J., Valerdi-Nochebuena, M. C., and Sosa-Oliver, J., (2015). Post-occupancy evaluation of a restored industrial building: A contemporary art and design gallery in Mexico, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 4(4), 330-340.
• [16] Dikmen, N., and Elias-Ozkan, S.T., (2016). Housing after disaster : A post occupancy evaluation of a reconstruction project, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 19, 167-178.
• [17] Al-Obaidi, K.M.,Wei, S. L., IsmailM. A., Kam, K. J., (2017). Sustainable building assessment of colonial shophouses after adaptive reuse in Kuala Lumpur, Buildings, 7(4), 87.
• [18] Keul, A. G., (2012). Passive housing - a sustainable answer to mainstream user needs. Architecture Civil Engineering Environment, 5(2), 13-20.
• [19] Bielak, M., (2012). Research methods aiding the creation of the built environment for senior care housing facilities. Architecture Civil Engineering Environment, 5(3), 5-18.
• [20] Hassanain, M. A., and Iftikhar, A., (2015). Framework model for post-occupancy evaluation of school facilities, Structural Survey, 33(4/5), 322-336.
• [21] Khalil, N., and Husin, H. N., (2009). Post occupancy evaluation towards indoor environment improvement in Malaysia’s office buildings, Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(1), 186-191.
• [22] Emuze, F., Mashili, H., and Botha, B., (2013). Postoccupancy evaluation of office buildings in a Johannesburg country club estate. Acta Structilia, 20(1), 89-110.
• [23] Choi, J., Loftness, V., and Aziz, A., (2012). Post-occupancy evaluation of 20 office buildings as basis for future IEQ standards and guidelines, Energy and Buildings, 46, 167-175.
• [24] Nicol, F., and Roaf, S., (2005). Post-occupancy evaluation and field studies of thermal comfort, Building Research & Information, 33(4), 338-346.
• [25] Hassanain, M. A., (2008). On the performance evaluation of sustainable student housing facilities, Journal of Facilities Management, 6(3), 212-225.
• [26] ASHRAE, (2017). Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy (ASHRAE-55), American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air- Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), Northeast Atlanta, USA.
• [27] Hassanain, M. A., and Mudhei, A. A., (2006). Postoccupancy evaluation of academic and research library facilities, Structural Survey, 24(3), 230-239.
• [28] Popiolek, Z., and Kateusz, P., (2017). Comprehensive on site thermal diagnostics of buildings - Polish practical experience. Architecture Civil Engineering Environment, 10(2), 125-132.
• [29] IES, (2011). The Lighting Handbook, 10th Edit., Illuminating Engineering Society (IES), New York, USA.
• [30] Conejos, S., Langston, C., Chan, E. H. W., Chew M. Y. L., (2016). Governance of heritage buildings: Australian regulatory barriers to adaptive reuse, Building Research & Information, 44(5-6), 507-519.
• [31] ASHRAE, (2014). Standard for the Design of High- Performance Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings (ASHRAE - 189.1), American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), Northeast Atlanta, USA.
• [32] Cheong, K. W., and Chong, K. Y., (2001). Development and application of an indoor air quality audit to an air-conditioned building in Singapore, Building and Environment, 36(2), 181-188.
• [33] ASHRAE, (2016). Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality (ASHRAE 62.1), American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), Northeast Atlanta, USA.
• [34] Sanni-Anibire, M. O., and Hassanain, M. A., (2016). Post-occupancy evaluation of housing facilities: overview and summary of methods, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 30(5), 04016009-1-04016009-9.
• [35] ICC, (2018). International Fire Code (IFC), International Code Council (ICC), New Jersey, USA.
• [36] Behdad, H., (2006). City of Los Angeles Adaptive Reuse Program, 2nd edn., Mayor’s Office of Housing and Economic Development, Los Angeles, USA.
• [37] Bullen, P.A., and Love, P. E. D., (2009). Residential regeneration and adaptive reuse: Learning from the experiences of Los Angeles, Structural Survey, 27(5), 351-360.
• [38] ICC, (2015). International Plumbing Code (IPC), International Code Council (ICC), Country Club Hills, USA.
• [39] Halvitigala, D. and Reed, R. G., (2015). Identifying adaptive strategies employed by office building investors, Property Management, 33(5), 478-493.
• [40] Hassanain, M. A., (2010). Analysis of factors influencing office workplace planning and design in corporate facilities, Journal of Building Appraisal, 6(2), 183-197.
• [41] Bullen, P., and Love, P., (2011). Factors influencing the adaptive re-use of buildings. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 9(1), 32-46.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).