Review of risk assessment tools and techniques for selected aspects of functioning aerodrome operator

• Autorzy: Marzec Dominika , Fellner Radosław

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0016.3201

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The safety risk management is crucial for aviation industry companies. Each of aviation organizations (i.e. airlines, aerodrome operators, General Aviation entities, etc.) has different specificity and deals with different factors. Numerous studies on safety risk management have been conducted, however authors of presented paper have seen a need to review one of the its’ numerous aspect - the risk assessment from the perspective of aerodrome operator. The variety of risk assessment tools and techniques gives many possibilities, but can also cause disarray if rules or selection criteria for their use have not been developed. The aim of the article is to present the risk assessment tools and techniques, that may be the most beneficial and useful for selected safety aspects of aerodrome functioning. For this purpose, existing risk assessment techniques and tools were collected and briefly reviewed, as well as their usefulness for the aerodrome operator was verified according to the proposed issues related to the safety of aerodrome operations. Analysis have shown that a manual summarizing and reviewing risk assessment tools and techniques could be useful for aerodrome operators.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

safety risk analysis; risk assessment; aerodrome safety management system; airport; aviation safety

PL

analiza ryzyka bezpieczeństwa; ocena ryzyka; zarządzanie bezpieczeństwem lotniska; lotnisko; bezpieczeństwo lotnicze

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej
• Czasopismo: Prace Naukowe Politechniki Warszawskiej. Transport
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: z. 136
• Strony: 5--22
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 40 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Marzec Dominika

• Warsaw University of Technology, Doctoral School no. 5, Warsaw, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8744-7662

autor

Fellner Radosław

• Main School of Fire Service, Institute of Internal Security, Warsaw, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9095-4996

Bibliografia

• 1. Allan, J. (2006). A heuristic risk assessment technique for birdstrike management at airports. Risk analysis, 26(3), 723-729.
• 2. Annual Safety Review 2021, EASA, DOI: 10.2822/071257, pp. 154.
• 3. Bow tie diagrams, Available at: https://www.ulc.gov.pl/pl/zarzadzanie-bezpieczenstwem/analizy-bezpieczenstwa/4429-diagramy-bow-tie.
• 4. Chang YH, Yang HH, Hsiao YJ. Human risk factors associated with pilots in runway excursions. Accid Anal Prev. 2016;94, pp. 227–37.
• 5. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/2034 of 6 October 2020 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 376/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the common European risk classification scheme, Annex, pp. 4.
• 6. De Vivo, C., Ellena, M., Capozzi, V., Budillon, G., & Mercogliano, P. (2021). Risk assessment framework for Mediterranean airports: a focus on extreme temperatures and precipitations and sea level rise. Natural Hazards, 1-20.
• 7. Annex to Decision 2014/012/R Of The Executive Director Of The Agency of 27 February 2014 adopting Acceptable Means of Compliance and Guidance Material to Regulation (EU) No 139/2014, Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) and Guidance Material (GM) to Authority, Organisation and Operations Requirements.
• 8. Decision 2014/012/R Of The Executive Director Of The Agency of 27 February 2014 adopting Acceptable Means of Compliance and Guidance Material to Regulation (EU) No 139/2014 https://www.easa.europa.eu/downloads/16802/en
• 9. Dollard, P., Griffin, I., Berro, A., Cohen, N. J., Singler, K., Haber, Y., ... & COVID, C. (2020). Risk assessment and management of COVID-19 among travelers arriving at designated US airports, January 17–September 13, 2020. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(45), 1681.
• 10. Easy Access Rules for Aerodromes (Regulation (EU) No 139/2014, revision from April 2022, EASA, pp. 130-132.
• 11. Falavigna, G. P., Iescheck, A. L., & Souza, S. F. D. (2021). Obstacles risk classification model in aerodromes protection zones using the multi-criteria decision analysis ahp. Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas, 27.
• 12. Gordon, R., Kirwan, B., & Perrin, E. (2007). Measuring safety culture in a research and development centre: A comparison of two methods in the Air Traffic Management domain. Safety Science, 45(6), pp. 669-670.
• 13. GUIDANCE ON HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION, ECAST Safety Management System and Safety Culture Working Group (SMS WG), 2009, pp. 2.
• 14. Hales, B.M. and Pronovost, P.J. (2006) The Checklist—A Tool for Error Management and Performance Improvement. Journal of Critical Care, 21, pp. 231-235.
• 15. How does bow tie work, Available at: https://www.caa.co.uk/safety-initiatives-and-resources/working-with-industry/bowtie/about-bowtie/how-does-bowtie-work/The Mind Map Book: How to Use Radiant Thinking to Maximize Your Brain's Untapped Potential, Penguin Publishing Group, 1996.
• 16. ICAO Doc 10152 Manual on Testing and Cross-border Risk Management Measures, Second Edition, 2021, pp. 4-2.
• 17. ICAO: Safety Management Manual - Doc 9859-AN/474. 4th ed. International Civil Aviation Organisation. (2018).
• 18. IEC 31010:2019. Risk management — Risk assessment techniques. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, pp. 32-39.
• 19. IEC 61882, Hazard and operability studies (HAZOP studies) – Application Guide
• 20. Inan, T. T. (2020). Application of High Reliability Organizations (HRO) in Civil Aviation Related With Civil Aviation Business Models as an Overview. J Aeronaut Aerospace Eng, 9, 222.
• 21. Ishikawa K. Guide to Quality Control. Revised, Subsequent edition. Tokyo: Asian Productivity Organisation; 1986. Pp. 225.
• 22. Janik, P., Zawistowski, M., Fellner, R., & Zawistowski, G. (2021). Unmanned Aircraft Systems Risk Assessment Based on SORA for First Responders and Disaster Management. Applied Sciences, 11(12), 5364, pp. 2.
• 23. Kirkland, I. D. L., Caves, R. E., Humphreys, I. M., & Pitfield, D. E. (2004). An improved methodology for assessing risk in aircraft operations at airports, applied to runway overruns. Safety Science, 42(10), 891-905.
• 24. Kirwan, B. (1998). Human error identification techniques for risk assessment of high risk systems—Part 1: review and evaluation of techniques. Applied ergonomics, 29(3), pp. 157-177.
• 25. Lewis, P. (2013, April). Comparison of High Reliability Organizations (HROs). In 2013 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS). IEEE. pp. 1.
• 26. Martinez, C., Sanchez-Cuevas, P. J., Gerasimou, S., Bera, A., & Olivares-Mendez, M. A. (2021). SORA Methodology for Multi-UAS Airframe Inspections in an Airport. Drones, 5(4), 141.
• 27. Martínez-Córcoles, M., & Vogus, T. J. (2020). Mindful organizing for safety. Safety science, 124(January), pp. 1.
• 28. Marzec, D. (2021). Safety First or Safety Sometimes? In: Kwasiborska, A., Skorupski, J., Yatskiv, I. (eds) Advances in Air Traffic Engineering. ATE 2020. Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70924-2_7
• 29. Marzec, D.: The management of change as part of the safety management system of selected civil aviation organisations. War Studies University Scientific Quarterly 2(115), 60-76 (2019).
• 30. O'Neil, P. D., & Kriz, K. A. (2013). Do High‐Reliability Systems Have Lower Error Rates? Evidence from Commercial Aircraft Accidents. Public Administration Review, 73(4), pp. 604.
• 31. Polish State Commission on Aircraft Accidents Investigation (PKBWL). Final Report, Bombardier DHC-8-402, SP-EQG, 10 January 2018, EPWA. 2018, pp. 62.
• 32. Porte, T. L., & Consolini, P. (1998). Theoretical and operational challenges of "high-reliability organizations": air-traffic control and aircraft carriers. International Journal of Public Administration, 21(6-8), pp. 848.
• 33. Spriggs, J. (2002). Airport Risk Assessment: examples, models and mitigations. In Components of System Safety (pp. 183-195). Springer, London.
• 34. Wilhelmsen, C. A., Ostrom, L. T.: Risk assessment: tools, techniques, and their applications. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons.(2019).
• 35. Yousefi, Y., Karballaeezadeh, N., Moazami, D., Sanaei Zahed, A., Mohammadzadeh S, D., & Mosavi, A. (2020). Improving aviation safety through modeling accident risk assessment of runway. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(17), 6085.
• 36. Aven, T. (2022). A risk science perspective on the discussion concerning Safety I, Safety II and Safety III. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 217, 108077.
• 37. FAA_Order_8040.4B Safety Risk Management Policy.
• 38. UK CAA Safety Management Systems (SMS) guidance for organisations CAP 795.
• 39. Buzan T., The Mind Map Book: How to Use Radiant Thinking to Maximize Your Brain's Untapped Potential, Penguin Publishing Group, 1996.
• 40. EASA, Easy Access Rules for Unmanned Aircraft Systems, September 2021.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).