Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Ograniczanie wyników

1 Právník. Teoretický časopis pro otázky státu a práva (The Lawyer - Scientific Review for Problems of State and Law)
1 The Lawyer Quarterly
1 Theatralia: Revue současného myšlení o divadelní kultuře (Theatralia: The revue of contemporary thought on theatre culture)

Znaleziono wyników: 3

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych: veřejný prostor

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

The politics of European human rights culture

100%

Agha P.

The Lawyer Quarterly

2017

tom 7

nr 3

200-215

a1_The issue of religious symbols in the public space has given rise to widespread debate on the scope of freedom of religion and of the State’s neutrality in various countries around the world. Over the years, it has become a source of vigorous legal and political controversy. In Europe in particular, this question chiefly concerns the wearing of headscarves. Bans (often formulated as either bans on headgear or as general bans on religious symbols or dress) have been introduced by many countries and in many areas of life. Islamic dress tends to be commonly perceived (at least in the west) as being associated with the subordination of young girls and women and the perceived link with what is commonly termed "Islamic fundamentalism". The wearing of religious symbols has been discussed both from a socio-political as well as legal perspective. These developments, particularly attempts to change a cultural reticence to publicly express faith into a legal obligation to refrain from religious expression in certain circumstances, have brought major challenges for European human rights law, most notably in relation to the wearing of religious dress. Although most European legal systems provide protection for religious freedom and to religious minorities, the scope of this protection is affected by many factors, such as history, (constitutional) traditions and social factors. In essence, the term European human rights culture developed in the interplay of jurisprudence between The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The text explores the two recent CJEU rulings and juxtaposes it against the recent developments in the ECtHR jurisprudence, focusing on how CJEU departs from the established manner set out by the ECtHR of dealing with cases involving the limitations on fundamental rights. The purpose of this is to present a reflection of the recent state of the European human rights culture, which has, in the past years, become very dynamic.

Teatralita veřejných událostí - uvedení do problematiky

100%

Musilová M.

Theatralia: Revue současného myšlení o divadelní kultuře (Theatralia: The revue of contemporary thought on theatre culture)

2014

tom 17

nr 1

9-24

The present paper introduces definitions of the key concepts that frame the research on the theatricality of public events held at the Department of Theatre Studies, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, since 2010. The overview presents concepts such as theatricality, performance, and symbolic aspects of acting as well as the concept of "theatre as a cultural model" (i.e. theatre in the broad sense of meaning). Present research allows for the symbolic acts to be perceived as spontaneous; it also concentrates on the way in which acting in everyday life, and during public events is being made prominent by theatrical means (e.g. set, costumes, expressivity). More generally, exploring the limits of theatricality enables theatre scholars to open up their field for impulses from anthropology, sociology, and culturology, hence approach their subject of inquiry in a more interdisciplinary way.

Sociální sítě a veřejný zájem

100%

Svoboda T.

Právník. Teoretický časopis pro otázky státu a práva (The Lawyer - Scientific Review for Problems of State and Law)

2021

tom 160

nr 7

580-596

The main purpose of the paper is a basic reflection of the phenomenon of increasing importance of social media (as one of the types of so-called digital platforms) and their legal regulation in the context of public interest. Simply put, this phenomenon is the result of the transformation of the means of communication (from common forms of communication to online communication), which creates pressure on the adaptation of legislation in many areas. In the field of social media, it is true that these digital platforms are increasingly beginning to function as a kind of new public space which is factually managed by them (especially in the form of content moderation). However, public space (in its ordinary, “offline” meaning) is traditionally associated with a certain form of public regulation, with a certain public interest respectively. The same seems to be the case for the most influential social media. In this context, the text examines the possible relations between social media and the public interest and, in particular, argues that the current functioning of the most influential social media indicates the need for some (additional) legal reflection. At the basic level, the text also outlines some of the possible regulatory approaches.

Text usiluje o základní reflexi jevu nárůstu významu sociálních sítí (jako jednoho z druhů tzv. digitálních platforem) a jejich právní regulace v kontextu veřejného zájmu. Zjednodušeně lze říci, že tento jev je důsledkem přeměny komunikačních prostředků (z běžných podob komunikace na komunikaci online), která vytváří tlak na adaptaci právní úpravy v mnohých oblastech. Pro oblast sociálních sítí pak platí, že tyto digitální platformy začínají čím dál více plnit funkci jakéhosi nového veřejného prostoru, který je jimi fakticky spravován (zejména v podobě obsahové regulace). Veřejný prostor (v jeho běžném, „offline“ významu) je ovšem tradičně spojen s jistou podobu veřejnoprávní regulace, respektive s určitým veřejným zájmem. Zdá se, že obdobně je tomu také v případě nejvlivnějších sociálních sítí. Text v této souvislosti zkoumá možné souvislosti sociálních sítí a veřejného zájmu a zejména argumentuje, že dosavadní fungování nejvlivnějších sociálních sítí nasvědčuje potřebě určité (dodatečné) právní reflexe. V základní rovině jsou v textu předestřeny také některé z možných regulatorních přístupů.